 @Duke [Yes. Actually I renamed them ladspa_old.  The problem is that I have to close Ar …], That doesn't actually stop Ardour from finding them. You have to remove them completely (and, unfortunately, lmms along with them).
 Really?  Ardour would crash much faster before I renamed it. I’ll delete them and LMMS and let you know what happens. If that solves the problem I’ll be very happy.
 @Duke [Really?  Ardour would crash much faster before I renamed it. I’ll delete them an …], That is as easy as "sudo apt remove calf-ladspa".
 Though, now that you've renamed the folder, that might throw an error.
[00:32] <OvenWerk1> not if they are renamed...
 I'll rename the directory to ladspa then remove them.  That's not a problem.  I'll be doing that tomorrow. Thanks for the information and suggestions.
 @Duke [I'll rename the directory to ladspa then remove them.  That's not a problem.  I' …], Best of luck.
[11:01] <studiobot> Polifilo71 was added by: Polifilo71
[14:59] <studio-user086> Hi everyone. I just picked up a new error today - suddenly I'm not able to install any applications from the repo's...can't run apt-get update, and getting the same error even after reinstalling various different distro's on my system (ubuntu, kubuntu, and ubuntustudio - all 18.10). Just this morning everything was fine, but suddenly I keep getting "Cosmic....does not have a release file...etc..."
[15:01] <studio-user086> and now i can't even install a deb package I downloaded previously to my system...the installer simply doesn't run, no messages...
[15:02] <studio-user086> example: E: The repository 'http://za.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic-updates Release' does not have a Release file.
[15:02] <studio-user086> (from terminal)
[15:20] <Eickmeyer> studio-user086: That's a good question to ask in #ubuntu. It's not a Studio-specific problem, and you'll get faster help there.
[15:21] <studio-user086> ok. thanx for the response. I was just wondering if anyone else had encountered the same problem?
[15:22] <studio-user086> but ok, i'll ask there. thanx
[17:16] <eeight_> bonjour, I was wondering if it was really a good idea to turn off intel turbo for reducing audio latency. I tried it but my computer feels slower! I tried to set min / max cpu freq to 3.3ghz but it doesn't seems to work (4 cpus stays 1.6gz)?
[17:22] <Eickmeyer> eeight_: Using intel turbo is known to cause latency.
[17:22] <Eickmeyer> Computer might feel slower overall, for but for low latency audio, it's a factor.
[17:22] <Eickmeyer> Higher overall performance does not mean lower latency.
[19:20] <OvenWerk1> Eickmeyer: I missed him, The reason to turn off Boost is to keep the speed from going up and down. A decrese in cpu speed often causes dropouts. Also, Boost increases CPU temperature which may invoke the CPU's go real slow because "I am way to hot" mechanism which is really bad for even high latency audio.
[19:21] <Eickmeyer> OvenWerk1: That makes sense.
[19:21] <Eickmeyer> I didn't know why, I just new it could cause problems.
[19:21] <OvenWerk1> In experiments I have done in the past with an older Atom based netbook, I found that I had stable audio with the CPU forced to 800Mz but when I set the CPU to ondemand with the 1.6ghz I had dropouts
[19:23] <OvenWerk1> Eickmeyer: I can run my cpu at full speed (performance) with all cores running at 100% load and stay within a usable temperature range
[19:24] <OvenWerk1> With boost on it still seems stable at 3.4ghz rather than 3.2Gh but if it bumps up beyond the temperature goes up quick.
[19:25] <OvenWerk1> I could probably change settings to run in performance at 3.4gh if I really wanted to play with things, but I feel that 3.2Gh gives me some headroom for dust in things etc.
[19:25] <OvenWerk1> The standard test for temperature is to run the cores at 100% for more than ten minutes
[19:26] <Eickmeyer> My AMD processor doesn't have that (nor an equivalent, I thinK), so I don't run into that.
[19:27] <OvenWerk1> I have found that building Ardour is a good test :) I uses all four of my cores full out and takes as much as 12 to 15 minutes
[19:27] <OvenWerk1> the AMD processors do have something similar, I do not know if that is turned off by performance or not.
[19:28] <Eickmeyer> I am honestly not sure.
[19:29] <OvenWerk1> Intel actively supports the Linux kernel with patches and code, I don't know if AMD does or not. But I do know that they do tend to set core speed by a mix of load and temperature.
[19:29] <OvenWerk1> It is one of the ways they can keep up with the competition.
[19:31] <Eickmeyer> AMD actively supports Linux too.
[19:31] <Eickmeyer> The machine I use has probably the best Linux support I've ever had, and I've run other systems with Intel processors that weren't supported nearly as nicely.
[19:31] <Eickmeyer> Might be because it's a Dell.
[19:32] <OvenWerk1> AMD may have some counters that only run at one speed. I think all the cpu counter on the intel are timed by one of the cores. This means that when the speed goes down the counter has to be reloaded if the time is to remain the same... at least that is my guess as to why the downspeed case causes xruns.
[19:33] <OvenWerk1> Eickmeyer: the finished mother board computer is not the same as kernel CPU support. It is good to hear AMD contributes code though.
[19:34] <OvenWerk1> in the next few years we find ourselves all running ARM the way thing are going as both Apple and MS are looking at going that route
[19:50] <Eickmeyer> OvenWerk1: Yeah, no joke.
[22:37] <mykhyggz> I want to install on a new partition, but stuck at how to configure booting and such. About to make a new ext4 partition - needs a grub entry, no? And a new mount point, maybe?