[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cups (bionic-proposed/main) [2.2.7-1ubuntu2.3 => 2.2.7-1ubuntu2.4] (core)
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: netkit-ftp-ssl (disco-proposed/primary) [0.17.34+0.2-4.1]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: piuparts [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.98] (no packageset)
[18:56] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, the reason for the lintian sync was to try to unblock the current proposed version, suffering from the very same issue... can't we move the package to some testing system with more computational power? it is a regression in release, from what I can see in arm64 backlog
[21:43] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: why *should* we move it to runners with more compute?  Why does lintian need a test suite that exceeds glibc's in runtime?
[21:57] <jbicha> vorlon: please remove birdtray/s390x from disco-proposed.  birdtray is now correctly not built on s390x since thunderbird is not available there currently
[21:59] <vorlon> jbicha: done
[22:01] <mwhudson> vorlon: where is the glibc transtition out of curiosity? i think i've seen chatter that the failing tests are going to get badtest-ed
[22:01] <mwhudson> maybe not postgresql-hll
[22:02] <vorlon> mwhudson: I only know of chatter about glibc's own autopkgtest regressions getting badtested. I don't know if infinity has analyzed postgresql-hll and python-biopython
[22:02] <mwhudson> k
[22:02] <mwhudson> postgresql-hll looks a bit interesting
[22:03] <mwhudson> biopython is the AssertionError: 188.51403793245183 != 188.51404344898586 within 5 places one
[22:04] <jbicha> it looks like the poppler transition needs to be completed for glibc to migrate
[22:36] <vorlon> mwhudson: yeah, the implementation of that takes the difference between the two values and checks that it's < 0.00001, which in this case it's not.  So even though the values both round to the same thing, the test fails, which I'm not sure if that is or isn't sane
[22:37] <mwhudson> vorlon: it seems _unlikely_ to be the result of a change in behaviour of glibc that should cause concern but i guess that does need to be verified
[22:38] <mwhudson> in other news, linux block devices are terrible
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: flatbuffers (disco-proposed/primary) [1.10.0+dfsg1-0ubuntu1]