/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/03/05/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Trusty 14.04.6] has been updated (20190304.2)00:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Trusty 14.04.6] has been updated (20190304.2)00:07
=== RAOF is now known as Guest56578
bluesabreHello release team! Please release xfce4-settings 4.13.4-1ubuntu2 into disco so we can begin the SRU process for cosmic :)00:13
tsimonq2bluesabre: It looks like you're waiting on glibc: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#xfce4-settings00:30
tsimonq2As far as I remember, we're close.00:30
bluesabretsimonq2, aha, thanks for that :)00:30
tsimonq2No problem at all. :)00:31
tsimonq2bluesabre: If you haven't seen it already, I'd take a look here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration00:31
tsimonq2It Almost Always™️ explains why a package is stuck.00:31
tsimonq2(Scroll up about six hours ago, Adam and Steve were talking about the remaining regressions.)00:33
bluesabrethanks again tsimonq2... I think this might be the first time I ran into a proposed blocker during during the dev cycle :D00:40
tsimonq2No problem, feel free to ping me if you need any other hints (not literally, I'm not on the release team, heh). :)00:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [1.46-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)03:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [s390x] (disco-proposed/main) [1.46-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)03:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [i386] (disco-proposed/main) [1.46-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)03:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [1.46-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)03:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [1.46-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)03:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [armhf] (disco-proposed/main) [1.46-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)03:44
infinitybluesabre: For what it's worth, the SRU process does not require that it's migrated in devel before you upload to other releases.06:52
infinitybluesabre: Just that it's uploaded to proposed and migration is expected (ie: it's not FTBFS or causing autopkgtest regressions)06:52
abeatovorlon, thanks, will take a look07:21
pieqjibel, hi!07:28
jibelhey pieq07:28
pieqjibel, regarding i386 testing for trusty, can we use any device (even newer ones) or should we stick with older ones?07:29
jibelpieq, you can use any07:29
pieqjibel, got it, thanks!07:31
dokojbicha: your ansible upload breaks at least os-faults. please fix07:55
dokojamespage, coreycb: ^^^07:55
jbichadoko: see bug 181360007:56
ubot5bug 1813600 in os-faults (Ubuntu) "[RM] os-faults" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181360007:57
dokooSoMoN, sil2100: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_excuses.html  should the libreoffice/i386 autopkg test regression be ignored (updating the hint), or fixed?08:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted initramfs-tools-devices [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.3]08:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted snapd-glib [arm64] (disco-proposed) [1.46-0ubuntu1]08:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted snapd-glib [i386] (disco-proposed) [1.46-0ubuntu1]08:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted snapd-glib [s390x] (disco-proposed) [1.46-0ubuntu1]08:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted snapd-glib [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.46-0ubuntu1]08:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted snapd-glib [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [1.46-0ubuntu1]08:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted snapd-glib [armhf] (disco-proposed) [1.46-0ubuntu1]08:48
oSoMoNdoko, it was run against the wrong version of openjdk-1108:49
oSoMoN(10.0.2+13-1ubuntu0.18.04.4)08:49
oSoMoNI retried it08:49
ddstreetsil2100 can you reject the systemd uploads to b/c, so can reupload with corrected changelog08:50
Laneyvorlon: very nice, I had just been quietly using / developing it in a minor way myself & had given up on getting it merged09:00
Laneyactually yesterday doko was pinging me about a bug in it and I fixed that (possibly) :>09:02
ginggsdoko: i was about to upload https://launchpad.net/~ginggs/+archive/ubuntu/sru/+sourcepub/9948222/+listing-archive-extra once the tests finish09:21
dokoginggs: ouch09:22
ginggsmonotone was removed from disco a few hours ago09:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Trusty 14.04.6] (20190305) has been added09:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Trusty 14.04.6] (20190305) has been added09:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Trusty 14.04.6] (20190305) has been added09:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base i386 [Trusty 14.04.6] (20190305) has been added09:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base powerpc [Trusty 14.04.6] (20190305) has been added09:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Trusty 14.04.6] (20190305) has been added09:30
bluesabreinfinity, oh, right on :)09:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [2:10.3.0-0ubuntu1~18.04.3 => 2:10.3.5-7~ubuntu0.18.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)09:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (cosmic-proposed/main) [2:10.3.0-0ubuntu3 => 2:10.3.5-7~ubuntu0.18.10.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)09:56
cpaelzer_jamespage: juergh: I tried to link our old bug 1736390 to your recent mail to OVS "openvswitch crash on i386"10:12
ubot5bug 1736390 in linux (Ubuntu Cosmic) "openvswitch: kernel oops destroying interfaces on i386" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/173639010:12
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
cpaelzerjuergh: they really seem to be the same thing to me10:13
cpaelzerjuergh: thanks for picking it up again10:13
sil2100Laney: heeeeeey, you have access to snakefruit, right?10:23
* Laney snakes towards sil2100 10:25
Laneyyeah, what do you need?10:25
sil2100Laney: I'd need an archive snapshotty done for 14.04.6 ;)10:26
sil2100Laney: I guess that would be something like `point-release-snapshot trusty trusty.6-security-updates-snapshot`, right?10:27
Laneyoh gosh10:27
LaneyI've never done that before10:27
LaneyI can see the xenial command that someone used ...10:27
sil2100Yeah, do the same just with s/xenial/trusty/, the xenial one was ran by vorlon and infinity so they had to know what they were doing10:28
sil2100;)10:28
sil2100Not sure how long it takes10:29
sil2100So possibly do it in a screen session10:29
Laneyok I read the script, seems simple enough10:29
Laneydone10:31
Laneyit only copies dists/ of security & updates, so takes no time10:31
dokoginggs: do you want continue with merucrial, or should I?10:33
sil2100Laney: thanks o/10:41
ginggsdoko: can you back out version 4-9.2ubuntu1 ?10:55
dokoginggs, remove it from -proposed?11:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.15]11:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd [source] (cosmic-proposed) [239-7ubuntu10.10]11:08
ginggsdoko: will that allow me to upload 4.8.2-1ubuntu3 ?11:11
apwginggs, yes11:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (cosmic-proposed/main) [239-7ubuntu10.9 => 239-7ubuntu10.10] (core)11:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.14 => 237-3ubuntu10.15] (core)11:18
ginggsapw: ok, will you please do that, then i'll upload11:20
apwginggs, from where, and "why" for the logs11:21
ginggsapw:  4-9.2ubuntu1 from disco-proposed - new version breaks hg-git11:24
apwginggs, and you have confirmed nothing is built with it ...11:24
ginggsapw: hmm, how do i do that?11:25
apwginggs, look at the reverse-depends and see if any of them is in -propsoed as a first step11:26
ginggsapw: i don't see any of the reverse-build-dependencies in -proposed11:28
apwginggs, then we are probabally ok11:29
apwok gone11:30
ginggsapw: ta!11:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netbeans (bionic-proposed/universe) [10.0-2~18.04 => 10.0-3~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)12:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libjavaewah-java (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.12-2 => 0.7.9-1~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)12:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libjogl2-java (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2+dfsg-7 => 2.3.2+dfsg-8~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)12:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: scilab (bionic-proposed/universe) [6.0.1-1ubuntu1 => 6.0.1-7~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)12:28
=== yiko is now known as yikoru
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netbeans [sync] (bionic-proposed) [10.0-3~18.04.1]12:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libjavaewah-java [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.9-1~18.04.1]12:38
ginggsapw: based on my ppa test earlier, we are going to need 'force-badtest mercurial/4.8.2-1ubuntu3/arm64'12:38
ginggsapw: and p.itti's 'force-badtest mercurial/all/armhf' can probably be dropped (or at least made more specific)12:39
apwginggs, always going to need some background to do that12:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libjogl2-java [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.2+dfsg-8~18.04]12:40
ginggsapw: we already have a hint for 4.8.2-1ubuntu2, so it's just bumping that12:40
apwginggs, ok12:41
ginggsand it has been passing on armhf lately, although somewhat flaky12:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted scilab [sync] (bionic-proposed) [6.0.1-7~18.04]12:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: wslu (disco-proposed/primary) [1.9+dfsg1-0ubuntu1]13:16
rbalint^ i'm looking for a friendly archive admin here :-)13:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wslu [source] (disco-proposed) [1.9+dfsg1-0ubuntu1]14:13
didrocksrbalint: NEWED ^14:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wslu [amd64] (disco-proposed/none) [1.9+dfsg1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)14:15
rbalintdidrocks, thanks!14:18
didrocksrbalint: yw, I'll binNEW in a moment14:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wslu [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.9+dfsg1-0ubuntu1]14:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (cosmic-proposed) [239-7ubuntu10.10]14:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxkbcommon (bionic-proposed/main) [0.8.0-1ubuntu0.1 => 0.8.2-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (core, xorg)14:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.15]14:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libxkbcommon [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.2-1~ubuntu18.04.1]14:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxkbcommon (bionic-proposed/main) [0.8.0-1ubuntu0.1 => 0.8.2-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (core, xorg)14:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gluegen2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-6 => 2.3.2-7~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)14:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gluegen2 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.2-7~18.04]14:48
* Laney fist bumps juliank 14:55
Laneyjust used ADT_PACKAGE for the first time14:55
Laneythis wins14:55
juliank:)14:55
juliankLaney: I've used it a few times already, as did other(s?)14:55
Laneyit's actualy surprisingly fast14:55
Laney-u filtering was quite slow on there14:55
juliankLaney: I think it's doing an indexed search14:55
juliankLaney: You can also ask it journalctl -F ADT_PACKAGE and it would show you all values it has seen14:56
Laneythat's nice14:57
dokoLocutusOfBorg: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/413357077/buildlog_ubuntu-bionic-amd64.virtualbox-hwe_5.2.18-dfsg-3~ubuntu18.04.2_BUILDING.txt.gz  this needs an update for openjdk-1115:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: eclipse-debian-helper (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.5~18.04]15:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: eclipse-jdt-debug (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.10-2~18.04]15:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: eclipse-platform-debug (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.10-1~18.04]15:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: eclipse-jdt-core (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.10-1~18.04]15:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: eclipse-platform-resources (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.10-1~18.04]15:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: eclipse-emf (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.3-2 => 2.16.0-1~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)15:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: eclipse-jdt-ui (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.10-1~18.04]15:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ecj (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.13.3-1 => 3.16.0-1~18.04] (kubuntu) (sync)15:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: eclipse-platform-runtime (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.10-1~18.04]15:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: eclipse-platform-text (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.10-1~18.04]15:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: eclipse-platform-ui (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.10-1~18.04]15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: equinox-bundles (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.10-1~18.04]15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: equinox-p2 (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.10-1~18.04]15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: eclipse-platform-team (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.10-1~18.04]15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: el-api (bionic-proposed/primary) [3.0.0-2~18.04]15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jetty9 (bionic-proposed/universe) [9.2.23-1 => 9.4.15-1~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: eclipse-platform-ua (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.10-1~18.04]15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: equinox-framework (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.10-1~18.04]15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: jsp-api (bionic-proposed/primary) [2.3.4-2~18.04]15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: tomcat9 (bionic-proposed/primary) [9.0.16-3~18.04]15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: servlet-api (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.0.1-2~18.04]15:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: websocket-api (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.1-1~18.04]15:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: swt4-gtk (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.6.3-2 => 4.10.0-3~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)15:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tomcat8 (bionic-proposed/universe) [8.5.30-1ubuntu1.4 => 8.5.38-2ubuntu1~18.04] (kubuntu) (sync)15:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tomcat-native (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.16-1build1 => 1.2.21-1~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)15:37
dokoLaney, infinity, vorlon: is there a possibility to generate an update_excuses.txt for bionic, as if the global block request would not exist?15:41
vorlondoko: the long term plan is to have sru-release drive britney hints instead of doing copies directly; so if you're asking because you're interested in uninstallability problems, that's a more comprehensive solution15:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ecj [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.16.0-1~18.04]15:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted eclipse-emf [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.16.0-1~18.04]15:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jetty9 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [9.4.15-1~18.04]15:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swt4-gtk [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.10.0-3~18.04]15:58
dokovorlon: I just want to know if all the openjdk stuff would migrate15:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tomcat-native [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.21-1~18.04]15:59
vorlondoko: well, I can set unblock hints for the regular britney; let me try that16:00
dokovorlon: but don't let it migrate by accident ...16:01
vorlondoko: the britney instance isn't currently set up to write to lp16:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tomcat8 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [8.5.38-2ubuntu1~18.04]16:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclipse-debian-helper [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.5~18.04]16:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclipse-jdt-core [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.10-1~18.04]16:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclipse-jdt-debug [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.10-2~18.04]16:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclipse-jdt-ui [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.10-1~18.04]16:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclipse-platform-debug [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.10-1~18.04]16:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclipse-platform-resources [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.10-1~18.04]16:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclipse-platform-runtime [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.10-1~18.04]16:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclipse-platform-team [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.10-1~18.04]16:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclipse-platform-text [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.10-1~18.04]16:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclipse-platform-ua [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.10-1~18.04]16:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclipse-platform-ui [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.10-1~18.04]16:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted el-api [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-2~18.04]16:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted equinox-bundles [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.10-1~18.04]16:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted equinox-framework [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.10-1~18.04]16:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted equinox-p2 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.10-1~18.04]16:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jsp-api [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.4-2~18.04]16:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted servlet-api [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.1-2~18.04]16:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tomcat9 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [9.0.16-3~18.04]17:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted websocket-api [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1-1~18.04]17:02
rharperbdmurray: Hi, I've uploaded a curtin SRU that has a couple field critical bugs that need to get SRU'ed and I was wondering if you could take a look to get curtin into -proposed17:03
bdmurrayrharper: for which release of Ubuntu?17:05
rharperCosmic, Bionic and Xenial17:05
bdmurrayrharper: sure17:08
rharperbdmurray: thanks!17:08
bdmurrayrharper: bug 1811117 is missing SRU information17:16
ubot5bug 1811117 in curtin "Failed deployment: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/sys/class/block/bcache0/bcache0p1/slaves'" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181111717:16
rharperlooking17:17
bdmurrayrharper: actually all the bugs are except for the "new upstream release" one17:17
rharperhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/disco/+source/curtin/+bug/181796417:17
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1817964 in curtin (Ubuntu Cosmic) "sru curtin 2019-02-27 - 18.2-10-g7afd77fa-0ubuntu1" [Undecided,New]17:17
rharpercurtin uses a single SRU bug, sorry17:17
bdmurrayrharper: then the other bugs shouldn't be included in Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed.17:18
rharperbdmurray: hrm, I think it's just cosmic that's got it wrong17:24
rharperthis was the first SRU into cosmic, so I've missed something in that source package build17:25
rharperbdmurray: I suspect I'll need a new upload into cosmic to fix;  does the current unapproved package in cosmic queue need to be removed ?17:27
bdmurrayrharper: okay, no you could reupload the same version with -f17:27
rharperoh, good17:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected curtin [source] (cosmic-proposed) [18.2-10-g7afd77fa-0ubuntu1~18.10.1]17:31
ginggswould someone please kick the can along? 'force-badtest mercurial/4.8.2-1ubuntu3/arm64'17:41
vorlonginggs: done17:53
ginggsvorlon: ta!  there's a 'force-badtest mercurial/all/armhf' in p.itti's hints - maybe this can be removed now?17:54
vorlonginggs: looks like it - also done17:55
ginggsthanks again!17:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curtin (cosmic-proposed/main) [18.1-59-g0f993084-0ubuntu1 => 18.2-10-g7afd77fa-0ubuntu1~18.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)18:07
rharperbdmurray: ok, I fixed the changelog in the cosmic package and just uploaded again; thank you for the review and help18:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted curtin [source] (cosmic-proposed) [18.2-10-g7afd77fa-0ubuntu1~18.10.1]18:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted curtin [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.2-10-g7afd77fa-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]18:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted curtin [source] (xenial-proposed) [18.2-10-g7afd77fa-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]18:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted numactl [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.0.11-2.2ubuntu0.1]18:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted numactl [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.11-2.1ubuntu0.1]18:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtwebengine-opensource-src [source] (cosmic-proposed) [5.11.1+dfsg-2ubuntu4.1]18:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-eventlet [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.20.0-5ubuntu0.18.10.1]18:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-eventlet [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.20.0-4ubuntu0.18.04.1]19:06
EickmeyerIs there any chance I can bug anyone about bug 1818373? We need this in Ubuntu Studio so some packages can get updated that depend on it.19:12
ubot5bug 1818373 in ubuntustudio-meta "[FFe] grub2-themes-ubuntustudio" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181837319:12
EickmeyerAlso bug 1818366 needs an FFe.19:16
ubot5bug 1818366 in Ubuntu Studio "[FFe] Carla: Please Upload to Universe" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181836619:16
vorloninfinity: postgriopython-hll?19:29
infinityvorlon: Err, can I really not copy/paste?19:30
vorloninfinity: no, that was me asking a question19:30
infinityOh.19:30
vorlonperhaps my question raced your answer19:30
infinitypython thingee was fixed yesterday, psql thingee, I've determined that if it is a precision issue, I can't figure out how, and punted to an upstream git ticket and hinted.19:30
infinityglibc's just waiting on a snapd-glib test to do a thing now, it seems.19:31
vorlonok19:31
vorlonhow long's it been waiting for that?19:31
vorlonthat's a completely new test19:31
infinityDunno, I only just noticed it.19:31
vorloncan we just skiptest and be done?19:31
infinityCould do.19:31
infinityBe my guest.19:31
infinityI'll be chasing it with a new glibc in a day or two anyway (once I stop puzzling over this new container test infra thing), so that test will get its day in court.19:32
vorloninfinity: hint added19:33
infinityMay god have mercy on our souls.19:33
vorlonEickmeyer: so, I'm taking a look at the FFe requests now, but I'm more bothered by the meta question of why there are still no ubuntustudio team members with upload rights19:34
Eickmeyervorlon: Because there are only 3 of us active. I'm new in the past year, OvenWerks has been told he doesn't have enough packaging experience, and Rosco2, while he does have Debian rights, also has been told he doesn't have enough packaging experience in Ubuntu. I'm going to try to apply after the 19.04 release.19:36
vorlonEickmeyer: "doesn't have enough packaging experience in Ubuntu" - can you please give me a pointer to this discussion?19:36
EickmeyerAnyone with upload rights didn't hand-off the project properly.19:36
Eickmeyervorlon: I cannot, it's anecdotal from OvenWerks.19:37
EickmeyerAlso, I need to speak with Rosco2 more about this.19:40
vorlonEickmeyer: so, with my TB hat on I raised the point directly to the DMB over 2 years ago that it was a problem for there to not be any uploaders for ubuntustudio, in reference to Rosco2's application; I am dismayed to learn there has apparently been no progress19:43
Eickmeyervorlon: I agree. Since joining the team and being the figurehead, it has been frustrating every 6 months to run into this same brick wall.19:44
EickmeyerWe /might/ get sakrecoer back in the summer.19:45
EickmeyerBut that's no guarantee.19:47
tsimonq2This isn't a point for or against anyone in particular but it's noteworthy that when Ubuntu Studio was revived after the hiatus, they didn't have to go through a flavor reapplication process with the TB. The TB would have caught this.19:48
vorlontsimonq2: when was the hiatus?19:48
Eickmeyertsimonq2: Was Ubuntu Studio ever officially dropped?19:48
vorlonI really think it's improper to have a flavor that has no uploaders.  I think this needs to be fixed before 19.04 releases (which effectively means, before beta)19:49
EickmeyerThen how do we fix it?19:50
vorlonEickmeyer: who of the current ubuntustudio members has recently (re)applied for uploader rights?19:50
tsimonq2I have an action item with the DMB to standardize the Lubuntu Developer qualification requirements, so that can lead you in the right direction: https://phab.lubuntu.me/w/lubuntu-dev/19:50
tsimonq2I have offered to mentor Eickmeyer if needed.19:50
tsimonq2vorlon: I don't recall specifics but ~ 16.04 iirc19:51
Eickmeyervorlon: I don't know. Nobody in the past year that I know of.19:51
tsimonq2Er, 18.0419:51
tsimonq2Recently there was a hiatus before Eickmeyer showed up.19:51
Eickmeyertsimonq2: I joined just before 18.04 released and acted as release manager.19:51
EickmeyerI've been with the project for a year now.19:51
tsimonq2Eickmeyer: Wasn't 18.04 non-LTS from your side?19:52
Eickmeyertsimonq2: Yes, and that was our decision.19:52
tsimonq2vorlon: ^ pre-Eickmeyer was the hiatus time.19:52
Eickmeyersakrecoer dropped after 16.10, and Rosco2 acted as release manager for 17.04 and 17.10.19:54
Eickmeyer17.04, 17.10, and 18.04 were all really just maintenance releases.19:54
vorlonEickmeyer: right, so it needs to be a priority on the part of the ubuntustudio devs to be applying for upload rights; it needs to be a priority of the DMB to work out what upload rights can reasonably be granted to an ubuntustudio packageset to allow the maintenance to continue; and it needs to be a priority for the TB to be prepared to revoke the flavor status if there's no movement on this19:54
tsimonq2Rosco2 is a DD, what does his Ubuntu uploading story look like?19:54
tsimonq2vorlon: +1, would you like me to bring it up to the DMB?19:55
vorlontsimonq2: I will be doing so :)19:55
tsimonq2Sounds good.19:55
vorlontsimonq2: you joined the DMB too late to have my previous mails on the subject in your mailbox ;P19:56
tsimonq2vorlon: I can dig through the archives though. :P19:56
vorlontsimonq2: October 201619:56
tsimonq2ack, thanks.19:56
EickmeyerExcellent. Is there any way I can attend this meeting?19:57
vorlonsomewhere there is a calendar that says when the DMB irc meetings are :)19:57
vorlonI was just going to send mail (and cc y'all)19:57
EickmeyerExcellent. eeickmeyer@ubuntu in my case.19:57
cyphermoxfwiw there already is an ubuntustudio packageset.19:59
tsimonq2vorlon: So my understanding from reading the thread is that the DMB has yet to evaluate this. Am I correct?20:01
tsimonq2Er, wait.20:01
vorlontsimonq2: I don't know anything beyond that thread since I'm not privy to dmb private discussions20:02
tsimonq2Yeah, one member's email about needing sponsors and such is accurate.20:02
tsimonq2vorlon: No further discussion took place privately on that thread.20:02
vorlonI had hoped that the DMB would revisit the question of Rosco2's upload status in light of the impact on flavor status but I don't know whether or not that was actually doen20:03
tsimonq2From what I can tell, it wasn't.20:03
vorlonEickmeyer: regarding LP: #1818373 and LP: #1818366, were you actually told by a would-be sponsor that you needed to file an FFe? I wouldn't have considered an FFe necessary for either of these20:05
ubot5Launchpad bug 1818373 in grub2-themes-ubuntustudio "[FFe] grub2-themes-ubuntustudio" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181837320:05
ubot5Launchpad bug 1818366 in ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Carla: Please Upload to Universe" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181836620:05
vorlon(of course, ppu rights also don't really help with new packages...)20:05
Eickmeyervorlon: Only really Carla, since slangasek just trivially approved and said it falled under UIFe. Also, the wiki entry on the FFe subject implied that any new packages required an FFe after FF.20:06
tsimonq2slangasek = vorlon ;)20:06
EickmeyerOOOOhhhhh!20:06
vorlonhaha20:06
EickmeyerNew nick or just an additional one?20:07
vorlonold nick reborn20:07
EickmeyerNice.20:07
vorlonalso it now matches the launchpad id20:07
bdmurrayjuliank: Is bug 1814727 fixed in Disco? the tasks don't reflect that20:07
ubot5bug 1814727 in apt (Ubuntu Disco) "Backport never pinning and Packages-Require-Authorization" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181472720:07
EickmeyerMakes sense. I'd have to add an E to make it match. Name is hard enough as it is, so meh.20:07
vorloneh, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess doesn't so much imply as outright state that you have to get release signoff on new packages20:08
vorlonbut that hasn't been true for a very, very long time20:08
EickmeyerGood to know.20:09
EickmeyerSince Rosco2 wasn't in this chat, I went ahead and forwarded him a copy-paste via email, so he knows what's going on.20:13
EickmeyerAlso, OvenWerks has been having family issues lately (death in the family), so he's been somewhat (understandably) absent as of late.20:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted packagekit [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.10-1ubuntu7.1]20:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted packagekit [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.9-1ubuntu2.18.04.5]20:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-7.8] (core, kernel)20:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-7.8] (core, kernel)20:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-7.8] (core, kernel)20:34
juliankbdmurray: yes, not sure what I did with the tasks20:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opencryptoki [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.10.0+dfsg-0ubuntu1.1]20:42
bdmurrayjuliank: okay, I'll have a look at it again in a bit20:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected chromium-browser [source] (cosmic-proposed) [72.0.3626.119-0ubuntu0.18.10.1]21:16
juliankbdmurray: if you're like a bit bored, it would be great if you could accept the apt SRUs :-)21:19
juliankugh, me is confused21:19
juliankthat's what we've been talking about21:19
juliankthat's what I get for writing at 22:20 ...21:20
vorlondoko: glibc looks fine, but the britney autohinter is getting things wrong so I'm manually hinting21:47
vorlondoko: well, in fact infinity also added a hint, so one or the other of our hints should DTRT ;)21:49
infinityvorlon: Oh look, my easy hint worked.  glibc migrated.21:54
infinityvorlon: You were too late. :P21:55
* infinity drops both hints.21:56
vorlon:)21:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.7.3]22:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.9]22:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.44-1 => 1.46-0ubuntu0.18.10.0] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)22:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.2.30]22:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lmdb (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.9.22-1 => 0.9.22-1ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu)22:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.0.1ubuntu2.21]22:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-7.8]22:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-7.8]22:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-7.8]22:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lmdb [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.9.22-1ubuntu1~cosmic18.10]22:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lmdb [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.21-1ubuntu2~bionic18.04]22:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lmdb (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.21-1 => 0.9.21-1ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu)22:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ec2-hibinit-agent [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu4~18.10.0]22:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ec2-hibinit-agent [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu4~18.04.0]22:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ec2-hibinit-agent [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu4~16.04.0]22:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ec2-hibinit-agent [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu4~14.04.0]23:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lmdb [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.9.22-1ubuntu0.1]23:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lmdb [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.21-1ubuntu0.1]23:15

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!