[04:04] <sbeattie> okay +1 on updated figtree in stage5, and the stegosuite in tomcat2
[04:06] <sbeattie> +1 on the rest of the stage5 packages that I hadn't already reviewed, except for zeroc-ice, which is a +1 from the https://launchpad.net/~openjdk-11-transition/+archive/ubuntu/ddebs ppa.
[04:06] <sbeattie> I *think* zeroc-ice is the only one in the ddebs ppa I hadn't already reviewed.
[04:08] <sbeattie> tdaitx: sorry, which spreadsheet?
[04:09] <sbeattie> are y'all ready for me to review https://launchpad.net/~openjdk-11-transition/+archive/ubuntu/antmaven
[04:10] <sbeattie> oh, that's what it looks like, okay, I'll start in on those.
[04:35] <sbeattie> doko: on the maven source package, libmaven3-core-java ends up having its dependency on libmaven-parent-java go from  (>= 27) to (>= 3.x), is that right? maven-parent in the same ppa jumps to 31-2~18.04, so would be satisfied, but 3.x seems... weird.
[04:39]  * sbeattie goes afk for a little bit
[06:03] <sbeattie> hrm, according to https://codesearch.debian.net, maven-artifact-transfer includes an import of org.apache.maven.shared.artifact.filter.resolve.transform.SonatypeAetherFilterTransformer which the maven-common-artifact-filters dropped
[07:01] <sbeattie> (re maven, same weird dependency in the generated package in debian: https://packages.debian.org/unstable/libmaven3-core-java )
[07:02] <sbeattie> I'm guessing 'org.apache.maven maven* * s/.*/3.x/ * *' in debian/maven.rules is overmatching something, but I don't really know how any of this works.
[07:14] <sbeattie> other than the two issues I highlighted above, I am +1 on the antmaven ppa being binary copied to bionic-proposed.
[07:16] <sbeattie> I think I am out of things to review at this point, so calling it an evening.
[09:55] <doko> sil2100: some time for java?
[09:56] <doko> stage3: gettext openjfx
[09:56] <doko> tomcat2: tomcat-native
[09:56] <doko> apps: gluegen2 java3d libjogl2-java visualvm
[09:56] <doko> stage5: jxgrabkey
[09:56] <doko> these are rebuilds with debug symbols enabled, please copy again
[10:16] <sil2100> Crap
[10:16] <sil2100> doko: will do, just need to finish up my current stuff
[11:15] <tdaitx> sil2100: plz add stage5: zeroc-ice to the list
[11:17] <tdaitx> sil2100: and sorry for the rework, my fault that we didn't enable debug build/publishing in the ppa's so arch:any packages had to be rebuild
[11:24] <tdaitx> doko: will we be using libreoffice from ppa:apps? if so it also needs a rebuild
[11:27] <doko> tdaitx: good catch. let me fix that. still have the sources here locally
[11:28] <doko> the rebuilds are now copied into the original ppas
[11:28] <tdaitx> doko: same for openjdk-11-jre-dcevm and scilab, I will update those
[11:28] <tdaitx> doko: I saw it, thanks
[11:56] <doko> tomcat2 is now obsolete (but please don't remove), tomcat3 has the eclipse 4.9 versions
[12:20] <tdaitx> sil2100: plz add stage3 openjdk-11-jre-dcevm to the copy list, it has been bumped & (no change) rebuild with ddeb enabled
[12:35] <sil2100> tdaitx: ok
[14:13] <doko> sbeattie: filed #923941 for the libmaven3-core-java dependency, but I think we can ignore that, not supporting partial upgrades
[14:27] <doko> apparently a bug in maven-debian-helper
[14:29] <doko> sbeattie: filed #923943 for maven-artifact-transfer, and removed maven-common-artifact-filters. not needed because bionic still has these old packages
[14:29] <doko> so paa:antmaven should be good to go
[15:34] <doko> tdaitx: copied scilab to ppa:apps
[15:58] <tdaitx> thanks
[16:08] <sil2100> doko: should I still copy tomcat-native from tomcat2?
[16:09] <doko> sil2100: yes
[16:17] <sil2100> doko, tdaitx: should all the newly rebuilt packages have -dbgsym packages?
[16:18] <sil2100> Since gluegen2 doesn't seem to have one, but maybe it wasn't supposed to?
[16:20] <doko> sil2100: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gluegen2/2.3.2-7/+build/14890752 apparently not
[16:20] <doko> so we don't need the copy
[16:20] <sil2100> Ok
[16:21] <sil2100> Guess same for libjogl2-java - in case those are still needed, I can copy them over later
[16:22] <tdaitx> sil2100: hmm, indeed, it does not, sorry, I didn't look at LP to check if the arch:any actually had it or not
[16:22] <tdaitx> only looked at the Architecture: field in the control file
[16:24] <sil2100> hmmm, did zeroc-ice actually get reviewed by sbeattie ?
[16:24]  * sil2100 checks backlog
[16:26] <doko> yes, see above: +1 on the rest of the stage5 packages that I hadn't already reviewed, except for zeroc-ice, which is a +1 from the https://launchpad.net/~openjdk-11-transition/+archive/ubuntu/ddebs ppa
[16:28] <tdaitx> doko: sil2100: I copied zeroc-ice to stage5 already, so it is the same
[16:28] <sil2100> ok
[16:28] <doko> who just gave back libreoffice/ppc64el?
[16:29] <sil2100> doko, tdaitx: what about swt4-gtk in tomcat2? Is it good to go or did that also need a rebuild?
[16:29] <sil2100> Since I saw sbeattie giving a +1 on it
[16:29] <doko> sil2100: already copied
[16:30] <sil2100> Ah, ok
[16:31] <sil2100> I guess jxgrabkey doesn't need update as well
[16:39] <tdaitx> doko: so, what's next? I could go back to look at the stuff we thought was not a priority (as jasperreports and octave) or look for more apps and see which would need backports
[16:39] <doko> tdaitx: yes, stage5, then antmaven
[16:39] <tdaitx> or do you need me doing something else?
[16:39] <doko> ahh, no, sorry
[16:39] <doko> jasperreports?
[16:41] <tdaitx> yes, it is one of packages that need backports to work, it is a dependency for other packages
[16:43] <tdaitx> the one that was build-dep of various packages libspring-java, which b-d on jasperreports, but it build fine with the jasper we have... so we actually don't seen to need it
[16:44] <doko> but it ftbfs, so no runtime issue, but a build issue
[16:45] <tdaitx> yes, it is a FTBFS and a regression
[16:45] <tdaitx> that's why I was looking into it a few weeks back
[16:46] <tdaitx> jasperreports still fails to build even with all the other updates, so we are missing something else
[16:46] <tdaitx> I could start looking into that and octave if we don't have anything with a higher priority
[16:47] <doko> I currently don't have anything else
[16:48] <sil2100> doko, tdaitx: I copied the ones mentioned to be earlier this morning on the channel
[16:49] <sil2100> In case I missed any, give me a ping
[16:49] <tdaitx> sil2100: thanks! are the scripts running any better or is lp still giving you trouble?
[16:49] <sil2100> It's easy to loose  track due to them coming one by one like this
[16:49] <tdaitx> yeah, I will double check if proposed has everything we need
[16:49] <sil2100> tdaitx: I think it was a bad time for LP, sometimes that happens when it's time for some backups or somethin
[16:49] <tdaitx> good to know
[16:50] <tdaitx> I wondered why it seemed to fail more often sometimes
[16:50] <doko> I think we should be fine. next ppa's are stage5, then antmaven
[17:19] <tdaitx> alright, so what I can see is that we are missing the following packages
[17:19] <tdaitx> antmaven:
[17:19] <tdaitx> gradle-apt-plugin 0.10-1~18.04
[17:19] <tdaitx>  gradle-completion 1.3.1-1~18.04
[17:19] <tdaitx>  maven-cache-cleanup 1.0.4-1~18.04
[17:19] <tdaitx>  mojo-executor 2.3.0-1~18.04
[17:19] <tdaitx>  string-template-maven-plugin 1.1-1~18.04ubuntu1
[17:20] <tdaitx> stage5:
[17:20] <tdaitx>  libscram-java 1.0.0~beta.2-3~18.04
[17:20] <tdaitx>  mapsforge 0.10.0+dfsg.1-1ubuntu0~18.04.1
[17:20] <tdaitx>  mckoisqldb 1.0.6-2~18.04
[17:20] <tdaitx>  obantoo 2.1.12+ds1-2~18.04
[17:20] <tdaitx> doko: sil2100: ^
[17:20] <tdaitx> by missing I mean these are the ones not yet on bionic-proposed
[17:28] <tdaitx> steve did mention something about libmaven3-core-java (src:maven) having a weird dependency, did you check that?
[17:28] <tdaitx> doko: ^
[17:29] <tdaitx> sbeattie: sorry, you mentioned something about a dropped import between maven-artifact-transfer and maven-common-artifact-filters, but those are not on our ppas what package seems to be affected?
[17:30] <tdaitx> <sbeattie> doko: on the maven source package, libmaven3-core-java ends up having its dependency on libmaven-parent-java go from  (>= 27) to (>= 3.x), is that right? maven-parent in the same ppa jumps to 31-2~18.04, so would be satisfied, but 3.x seems... weird.
[17:30] <tdaitx> doko: I meant this one ^
[17:31]  * tdaitx EOD, but will stay connected
[18:39] <sbeattie> tdaitx: yeah, doko dropped maven-common-artifact-filters, and filed a bug about maven/maven-debian-helper, but that one shouldn't affect installability.
[18:42] <sbeattie> I've +1'ed (previously) all the packages tdaitx listed as missing, so they are not waiting on me.
[18:42] <sbeattie> AFAIK, there's nothing currently for me to review, correct?
[19:04] <tdaitx> I see, that's good then, I missed that in the backlog... too many words to look at o_O
[19:05] <tdaitx> sbeattie: yeah, if you have been through the ppas, then yeah, nothing for you to look at right now
[19:08] <tdaitx> sil2100: for when you are back: feel free to copy the packages that I listed, steve has reviewed them
[19:08] <tdaitx> antmaven: gradle-apt-plugin gradle-completion maven-cache-cleanup mojo-executor string-template-maven-plugin
[19:08] <tdaitx> stage5: libscram-java mapsforge mckoisqldb obantoo
[19:14] <doko> tdaitx, sbeattie: I'm confused. because sbeattie said the reviews are complete. why do you mention specific packages now?
[19:14] <tdaitx> doko: those are the ones that are on our ppa but not yet on bionic-proposed
[19:14] <tdaitx> so it seems they have not been copied yet (or published at that time I checked)
[19:25] <tdaitx> doko: why is libapache-poi-java versioned as 4.0.1-1~18.03 ?
[19:25] <tdaitx> should it be 18.03 instead of ~18.03 ?
[19:26] <tdaitx> ¬¬
[19:26] <tdaitx> I mean 18.04 instead of 18.03
[19:53] <sbeattie> tdaitx: holler if you need me to review anything else.
[20:54] <doko> tdaitx: there's a lot more not yet in proposed
[20:55] <doko> but that is sil2100's task
[21:16] <doko> huehner: do you have some feedback for the tomcat testing?