[00:41] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: ack
[00:43] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: I find it especially interesting considering Ubuntu MATE has a similar grub theme, so perhaps Wimpress can shed some light on it as well?
[01:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-openssl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.9-0ubuntu1]
[01:34] <tsimonq2> infinity, vorlon: Could ubuntu-archive-tools be converted to Git? I have some code that uses copy-package and delete-package and I'd like to be able to define it as a Git submodule without having to keep git-remote-bzr in the job slave (and without some crazy wget/curl hardcoding).
[01:34] <tsimonq2> You know, besides the other reasons it should be converted. :P
[01:35] <tsimonq2> https://phab.lubuntu.me/source/ppa-britney/ <-- using the Bileto fetch-indexes script and Ubuntu's britney2 as a base, I'm working on a fully-functioning Britney to be used with PPAs, independent of Bileto.
[01:36] <tsimonq2> I have it working locally, I just need to glue it all together either in a script or in the Jenkins job itself.
[03:35] <tsimonq2> (Update: glued together and working. Yay.)
[03:40] <Eickmeyer> {insert Britney Spears pun here}
[03:40] <Eickmeyer> Sorry, couldn't resist.
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ldb [amd64] (disco-proposed) [2:1.5.4-0ubuntu1]
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ldb [armhf] (disco-proposed) [2:1.5.4-0ubuntu1]
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ldb [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [2:1.5.4-0ubuntu1]
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ldb [arm64] (disco-proposed) [2:1.5.4-0ubuntu1]
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ldb [s390x] (disco-proposed) [2:1.5.4-0ubuntu1]
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ldb [i386] (disco-proposed) [2:1.5.4-0ubuntu1]
[07:13] <doko> ahasenack: done
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvtop [amd64] (disco-proposed/multiverse) [1.0.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvtop [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.0.0-1ubuntu1]
=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414
[12:49] <ahasenack> doko: thanks
[12:49] <ahasenack> now comes the last one, samba itself
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: samba [s390x] (disco-proposed/main) [2:4.10.0~rc4+dfsg-0ubuntu1] (core)
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted samba [s390x] (disco-proposed) [2:4.10.0~rc4+dfsg-0ubuntu1]
[13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: samba [i386] (disco-proposed/main) [2:4.10.0~rc4+dfsg-0ubuntu1] (core)
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted samba [i386] (disco-proposed) [2:4.10.0~rc4+dfsg-0ubuntu1]
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: samba [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [2:4.10.0~rc4+dfsg-0ubuntu1] (core)
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted samba [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [2:4.10.0~rc4+dfsg-0ubuntu1]
[15:02] <doko> is somebody/something running automatical demotions?
[18:54] <fossfreedom> yes I know its a sunday...! anybody any thoughts why our (Ubuntu Budgie) disco daily has failed today - I've hit the rebuild and it also fails http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-budgie/disco/daily-live-20190310.1.log
[19:05] <acheronuk> UnknownManifestFile: .manifest has non-existent file /trusty/ubuntu-14.04.5-desktop-amd64.iso
[19:10] <acheronuk> I would guess something a bit out of kilter after the trusty 14.04.6 point release? image removed but not all refs to it?
[19:10] <acheronuk> sil2100 would be my bet to ask, but not online right now
[19:12] <acheronuk> sorry. thought this was in flavours channel. I'll shut up and let proper release-team speak if they are about
[19:27] <fossfreedom> thx acheronuk - yeah thought that looked very strange.  Forgot the trusty ISOs were respun last week.
[20:10] <tsimonq2> Yeah, maybe vorlon knows.
[20:10] <tsimonq2> Same thing with Lubuntu.
[20:11] <acheronuk> Kubuntu seems ok.
[20:11] <tsimonq2> O_O
[20:11] <tsimonq2> hmm
[20:12] <acheronuk> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/kubuntu/disco/daily-live-20190310.log
[20:12] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: Wait, did Kubuntu do 14.04.6?
[20:12] <acheronuk> nope
[20:12] <acheronuk> so maybe...
[21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (cosmic-backports/universe) [187-1~ubuntu18.10.1 => 189-1~ubuntu18.10.1] (no packageset)
[21:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (bionic-backports/universe) [187-1~ubuntu18.04.1 => 189-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (cosmic-backports) [189-1~ubuntu18.10.1]
[21:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (bionic-backports) [189-1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[21:39] <wxl> so it does seem to me that lubuntu's problem relates to non-participation in 14.04.6 as budgie also has the same problems and they also did not participate
[21:42] <wxl> mate did not participate, either, but they never had a trusty release so that may be irrelevant
[21:43] <wxl> xubuntu doesn't have the problem and they didn't participate, but perhaps this is timing related, since they have one of the earliest builds there is
[21:44] <wxl> actually the two earliest are xubuntu and mate
[21:46] <wxl> it seems that lp:ubuntu-cdimage doesn't have any changes quite that new, though
[21:50] <acheronuk> kubuntu did not participate in, but our cd built
[21:50] <acheronuk> we had a trusty release
[21:52] <acheronuk> but we are early as well
[23:14] <Eickmeyer> Anybody feeling brave enough to review carla?
=== cascardo` is now known as cascardo