=== brainwash_ is now known as brainwash
[08:47] <Unit193> Right, so tried the nice importer script, but xfconf balks at gsettings commands giving these errors https://paste.unit193.net/?66346b3acc074b94#KmdZpooBcCh5Wz2gBreUwgJ0fADUSfBtw4kFfH2eHO0=
[09:34] <bluesabre> Unit193, suppose we can file a bug report to xfconf and see if we can improve it there
[09:35] <bluesabre> ochosi, we use feh these days in ubiquity since it's basically fail-proof
[09:35] <Unit193> So yeah, config migration script is a bust. :/
[09:36] <bluesabre> :(
[10:38] <Unit193> cyphermox: I don't suppose you're still the ubiquity guy?
=== brainwash_ is now known as brainwash
[11:53] <cyphermox> Unit193: I can still do ubiquity stuff, what's up?
[13:38] <knome> bluesabre, i have a wallpaper draft that i can likely make "final" today, are you around at some time before UI freeze to do the upload?
[13:41] <knome> bluesabre, bbabl, you have a PM
[20:29] <Unit193> cyphermox: Was just wondering about https://code.launchpad.net/~unit193/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+merge/364282 before time runs out.
[20:34] <cyphermox> Unit193: thanks for reminding me
[20:35] <cyphermox> nice!
[20:35] <cyphermox> xnox will be happy
[20:36] <Unit193> Thanks!
[20:36] <knome> Unit193, hullooo!
[20:37] <Unit193> Howdy, knome.
[20:37] <knome> (:
[20:38] <Spass> hi, I strongly suggest including "fonts-noto-color-emoji" by default, IMHO a modern distro should have that included, even if many won't use it, it's nice to be able to see what others send (monochrome icons are really small and mostly unreadable)
[20:38] <knome> Spass, we had a discussion about this and iirc, most of the team thought color emojis were meh ;)
[20:38] <Spass> before - https://ibb.co/St0FhLt and after - https://ibb.co/2czvb2r
[20:40] <Spass> oh ok, thanks knome, too bad
[20:40] <cyphermox> since I'm here, might as well ask
[20:41] <cyphermox> or not, it's not really relevant
[20:43] <knome> cyphermox, we don't care, go ahead :P
[20:44] <cyphermox> well, it's a policy question really
[20:44] <cyphermox> do you care much if other flavours can also upload xfce* packages and the like
[20:46] <knome> my answer isn't an official statement, but i guess it would depend which flavors and if we they communicated about it with us
[20:46] <cyphermox> or say, if I shuffle the packagesets "a lot" and in the process remove some upload rights you might "care" about -- the packages would remain in universe and everything all the same, just that one might need to be explicitly MOTU to upload them
[20:46] <cyphermox> knome: I'm talking about status quo here: currently flavours that include xfce as a DM do get to upload it if they have uploaders for their packageset
[20:47] <knome> are there others than studio?
[20:47] <knome> (and xubuntu, ofc)
[20:47] <cyphermox> doesn't look to be the case
=== brainwash_ is now known as brainwash
[20:48] <cyphermox> oh, you guys do your own uploader vetting for xubuntu, correct?
[20:49] <Unit193> cyphermox: Our lead dev isn't MOTU, only Xubuntu packageset (and he's more fitting for upload than I am, he does work upstream as well.)
[20:49] <knome> socially yes, but we do not have delegation to grant upload rights afaik.
[20:50] <cyphermox> ok
[20:50] <Unit193> We don't, still have to go to the DMB.
[20:50] <cyphermox> ok
[20:50] <cyphermox> I would expect it would be just a formality though; where people can naturally "graduate" from packageset to MOTU easily
[20:51] <cyphermox> right now I'm just thinking; so I can prepare for making changes (which I think we shouldn't do until post-release anyway)
[20:52] <knome> Unit193, did bluesabre apply for MOTU already?
[20:52] <Unit193> knome: Not that I know of, just looked and he has an old application (last edited 2015) but that's it.
[20:53] <knome> right... i wonder how many uploads he had done at that point then, and if he applied
[20:53] <knome> because i would also think it would be a formality to jump from packageset uploader to MOTU, but i don't know what the reality is
[20:54] <knome> at this point i definitely think there should be no stopper for bluesabre to be approved as a MOTU if he only applied
[20:54] <Unit193> Still have to find a meeting at a time you can attend, get sponsors to endorse, etc.
[20:54] <knome> indeed. these kinds of "just a formality" things tend to get tedious because of silly things like this.
[20:55] <knome> cyphermox, ^ a note to you too in case you happen to be involved with these processes...
[21:09] <cyphermox> I am
[21:09] <cyphermox> we want to make it easier
[21:10] <cyphermox> indeed bluesabre has only xubuntu packageset
[21:12] <knome> sure, we were pondering whether the application for MOTU was prepared but never submitted. my memory doesn't serve back to 2015...
[23:21] <Unit193> We need to keep an eye on https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14972 I think.
[23:21] <ubottu> bugzilla.xfce.org bug 14972 in General "met.no sunrise API needs to be updated another time." [Normal,New]
[23:46]  * Unit193 tempted to steal the patch as-is.