[16:00] <cmatsuoka> cjwatson: is there a call that lists the names of the snap files built by LP, or they're only in the web page for that build?
[16:00] <cjwatson> cmatsuoka: https://launchpad.net/+apidoc/devel.html#snap_build-getFileUrls
[16:01] <cmatsuoka> I just noticed that I can't really know the file names beforehand because version can be set dynammically during the build process
[16:01] <cmatsuoka> ah great, thanks
[17:23] <teward> is there an issue with the ppas and accepting uploads?
[17:26] <cjwatson> There was, but it should be mostly fixed now
[17:27] <cjwatson> What's the package whose upload you're waiting for?
[17:27] <teward> parted, to my build-tests PPA
[17:27] <teward> maybe 10 minutes ago?
[17:28] <cjwatson> Right, apparently one of the percentage that's still failing
[17:28] <cjwatson> We're having keyserver troubles today
[17:28] <teward> ah
[17:28] <teward> that explains it :P
[17:29] <teward> cjwatson: do I need to reupload or is it just sitting somewhere waiting for attention/fixing?
[17:29] <cjwatson> teward: To help with our investigations, what's the fingerprint of the key you signed this with?
[17:29] <teward> cjwatson: moment
[17:29] <cjwatson> teward: No need to reupload, for now at least
[17:29] <teward> 5B8AD6F4C26ADDDD
[17:29] <teward> or do you want the full fingerprint?
[17:29] <teward> rather than that 'shorter' keyid?
[17:29] <cjwatson> Full fingerprint would be better
[17:31] <teward> full fingerprint is 5792 F661 64D0 57EF C6D0  6FAF 5B8A D6F4 C26A DDDD
[17:31] <cjwatson> thanks
[17:31] <teward> and is a fairly 'recent' key - but it looks like keyserver.u.c can't find it o.O
[17:31] <teward> though I've used this key for some time now
[17:32] <cjwatson> Like I say, keyserver troubles
[17:32] <teward> yep
[17:32] <cjwatson> SKS, not even once
[17:32] <teward> i thought the keyservers switched to a different implementation, at least the last time I prodded IS about keyserver.u.c issues
[17:33] <cjwatson> Sorta kinda
[17:33] <cjwatson> There's one called hockeypuck that's involved in some requests, but not in this case
[17:33] <teward> ah
[18:05] <teward> cjwatson: let me know if you need me to do anything, otherwise I am just going to wait this out and see what happens...
[18:05] <cjwatson> Not for now, thanks
[18:06] <cjwatson> Currently in sysadmins' hands trying to repair that SKS node
[18:06] <teward> ack
[21:04] <teward> cjwatson: you might want to reach out to epk in #ubuntu-packaging for their key ID fingerprint, they seem to have the same issue if they want more testing evidence.  just noticed it while going through things.
[21:04] <teward> if you need more things for diagnostics, that is
[21:04] <teward> (or rather if IS needs it)
[21:04] <cjwatson> We don't, as far as I know
[21:05] <cjwatson> DB rebuild currently in progress
[21:05] <teward> ack
[21:12] <epk> Is this the right place to request support while working with the ppa infrastructure?  My PPA's key is seemingly no longer available on the keyservers. I'm wondering if I can get it republished or rekeyed
[21:12] <epk> https://launchpad.net/~epkugelmass/+archive/ubuntu/jsvc
[21:13] <teward> epk: cjwatson is already aware I poked informing them that you reported it :P
[21:14] <teward> and was told there's a DB rebuild in progress :)
[21:14] <teward> *hides* :P
[21:14] <teward> cjwatson: did IS give an ETA for the rebuild? and is that a Key Server rebuild or LP database rebuild?
[21:14] <epk> Thank you. Restating the context for those not in #ubuntu-packaging =]
[21:15] <cjwatson> teward: No
[21:15] <cjwatson> (on ETA)
[21:15] <cjwatson> teward: rebuild of some bit of one of the keyserver nodes
[21:15] <cjwatson> an LP database rebuild would be a very much more dramatic operation!
[21:15] <teward> ah, OK
[21:16] <epk> Is there an issue I can follow? I unfortunately have a bunch of increasingly annoyed colleagues =P
[21:16] <teward> cjwatson: I believe it.  *WARNING: LP IS DOWN!* (in very LOUD volume heh)
[21:16] <cjwatson> epk: No, but I'll change the topic back here when it's fixed
[21:16] <epk> Much appreciated cjwatson
[21:17] <cjwatson> There's an internal ticket with our sysadmins, but you can't see that
[22:20] <jeremy31> What launchpad group do I have to apply to to be able to get rid of spam?
[22:44] <acheronuk> cjwatson: will the PPA uploads LP is eating without trace eventually happen, or will they need to be re-uploaded?
[22:45] <acheronuk> typical. as soon as I write that, they appear. lol
[22:52] <wgrant> jeremy31: Spam is handled primarily by automated systems, and anything missed should be reported to Launchpad staff. It's not something users can or should handle themselves.
[22:53] <jeremy31> wgrant: It seems plenty of spam is on the answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu site
[22:54] <wgrant> Hm, I see maybe a dozen questions in the last week?
[22:54] <jeremy31> I think I saw some of it reported on answers.launchpad.net/launchpad already
[22:55] <wgrant> Which is a problem, but hardly "plenty" :)
[22:55] <jeremy31> https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-aws-edge/+question/679133 is one
[22:56] <wgrant> Not any more
[22:56] <wgrant> Thanks
[22:56] <jeremy31> more from March 11
[22:57] <wgrant> That's already gone
[22:59] <jeremy31> wgrant: find the adderall and taxi booking ones too?
[22:59] <wgrant> yep
[22:59] <jeremy31> good, thanks
[23:16] <jeremy31> wgrant: one more https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/678948
[23:21] <wgrant> jeremy31: Ah, thanks
[23:21] <wgrant> Removed
[23:23] <jeremy31> wgrant: thanks
[23:58] <mwhudson> i thought there was a trick to get packages to build on new architectures after they've been enabled in a ppa
[23:58] <mwhudson> copying the package over itself or something?
[23:59] <mwhudson> but copy-package won't let me do it
[23:59] <mwhudson> maybe i need to use the api directly...