[13:28] <tdaitx> sbeattie: doko: openjdk-lts in stage3 is done and test results sound sane, is this something you would like to review sbeattie? or could sil2100 already copy it?
[15:25] <doko> tdaitx: copied, it's a no-change rebuild
[15:25] <tdaitx> ok
[16:20] <sbeattie> yeah, that's fine.
[16:20] <tdaitx> doko: I uploaded ant to disco to fix LP: #1808383
[16:42] <huehner> tdaitx: thanks :)
[16:49] <tdaitx> doko: should I prepare a bionic update for ant containing this fix? or should this be done later on as a SRU?
[16:52] <doko> tdaitx: if the patch is validated, why not?
[16:53] <huehner> tdaitx,doko we are also preparing to update one of our ci servers to run bionic-proposed ... so early next week hopefully i have some more stability feedback on that
[17:06] <huehner> for ant... it changes in bionic-proposed anywa now 1.10.3 -> .5 backport so maybe good idea to add now as people are asked to test anyway with the u-d-a mail
[17:14] <tdaitx> ok, uploaded new ant versions to bionic and cosmic into the test ppa
[17:14] <tdaitx> doko: I saw you updated android-sdk-meta and said you were working on other backports, what else should I be working on for our transition besides the FTBFS from bionic?
[17:14] <tdaitx> I have an openjdk-7 security update to finish which I believe takes precedence over the FTBFS fixes
[17:22] <doko> tdaitx: I don't have anything else for now. yes, 7 sounds good
[20:11] <tdaitx> doko: oh, and we had the jameica package that I yanked from bionic (because it was new and we didn't need it there) and it is currently sitting in a separate "cosmic" ppa, should I copy it back to stage5 now that we have cosmic packages there?
[20:14] <tdaitx> cosmic needs the update to work properly
[20:18] <tdaitx> anyway, I bumped the version to 18.10 and uploaded it into the test ppa