[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-os-resource-classes (disco-proposed/primary) [0.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[06:12] <jamespage> if there is an archive admin around ^^ is a split out from the nova project that came in since our last set of snapshots
[06:13] <jamespage> its a pretty minimal package so hopefully not to onerous to review - I'll also need to raise a MIR for it
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-os-resource-classes [source] (disco-proposed) [0.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-os-resource-classes [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-os-resource-classes [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted leaflet-markercluster [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.4.1~dfsg-6]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-167.217] (core, kernel)
[10:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-167.217]
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ggcov (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9-20 => 0.9+20190314-0ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ggcov (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.9-21 => 0.9+20190314-0ubuntu0.3] (no packageset)
[11:16] <tjaalton> disco-proposed seems to have synced nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390xx, that should be added to sync blacklist
[11:32] <juliank> Riddell: Hey, could you perhaps transfer https://launchpad.net/software-properties to ubuntu-core-dev?
[11:37] <juliank> rbalint: (reg ^) I think I want to convert software-properties to git before working on it
[11:39] <juliank> but let's discuss that in #u-d if you have any pointers
[11:42] <ddstreet> juliank are you planning to update apt-add-repository?  i was going to update that soon to work with private ppa's
[11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-47.50] (core, kernel)
[11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-17.18] (core, kernel)
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-17.18] (core, kernel)
[12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-47.50] (core, kernel)
[12:07] <juliank> ddstreet: no, just porting software-properties to PackageKit
[12:07] <juliank> ddstreet: But I've been thinking about the same thing
[12:08] <juliank> ddstreet: So, if you want us to exchange our thoughts, let's do that on #ubuntu-devel :-)
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.7.4]
[12:11] <slashd> o/ sil2100, could you please approve the upload in X of pacemaker (LP: #1819046) when you have a moment ?
[12:11] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1819046 in pacemaker (Ubuntu Xenial) "Systemd unit file reads settings from wrong path" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1819046
[12:13] <sil2100> slashd: sure! But I guess it'll have to wait until after lunch, since I'm doing apt and systemd now ;)
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.10]
[12:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.2.31]
[12:15] <Riddell> Probably, give me a few mins
[12:19] <slashd> sil2100, no rush ;)
[12:19] <slashd> sil2100, tks
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.0.1ubuntu2.22]
[12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.16]
[12:31] <doko> apw: build-essential is now blocked for 12 days by linux autopkg test failures. please could you have a look?
[12:38] <apw> doko, that is kind of a lie, this morning that wasn't on there, that has appeared because i got rid of the 4.19 hint because it no longer exists
[12:40] <apw> doko, so i've reinstated the existing hint, we shall see what that does
[12:41] <apw> doko, (a lie by the tooling)
[12:44] <doko> ok, ta. but that failed since the build-essential upload, so it was there for 12 days, maybe with different version for the linux package
[12:46] <apw> doko, it wasn't on the list this morning is all i know
[12:46] <ginggs> apw, if you can, please: 'force-badtest statsmodels/0.8.0-9/armhf' LP: #1819227
[12:46] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1819227 in statsmodels (Ubuntu) "KalmanFilter gives wrong results on armhf" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1819227
[12:46] <apw> doko, as i look at it every morning, so i fixed the binutils one
[12:47] <apw> doko, though that is likely a previous binutils by now
[12:47] <ginggs> also, please 'force-badtest octave-image/2.10.0-2/ppc64el' ?  it has regressed in release (as did amd64 and i386, which are already hinted)
[12:55] <apw> ginggs, looks fine, done and done
[12:55] <ginggs> apw: thanks!
[13:16] <rbalint> juliank, ok, let's make s-p the next converted repo, i take a look
[13:19] <juliank> :)
[14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (xenial-proposed) [229-4ubuntu21.18]
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-8.9]
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-8.9]
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-8.9]
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pacemaker [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.14-2ubuntu1.5]
[15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-lts (cosmic-proposed/main) [11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.10.1] (core) (sync)
[15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-lts [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.10.1]
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gvfs [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.38.1-0ubuntu1.3]
[15:56] <tjaalton> Laney: ffe for mesa good now? tested it on intel & amd
[15:57] <tjaalton> upstream released 19.0.0 yesterday
[16:10] <Laney> tjaalton: I guess so... what could possibly go wrong? :>
[16:11] <tjaalton> exactly :)
[16:11] <teward> *watches everything explode*  :P  (just kidding!)
[16:11] <tjaalton> there will be point-releases every two weeks..
[16:11]  * Laney sends teward in in a hazmat suit
[16:12] <teward> heh
[16:19] <teward> Laney: you're coming with.  *drags Laney in with him*
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:20190312.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[16:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libnfs (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp1 => 2.0.0-1~exp1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[16:54] <doko> trying: icedtea-web
[16:54] <doko> skipped: icedtea-web (10, 1, 0)
[16:54] <doko>     got: 35+0: a-7:a-5:a-5:i-6:p-4:s-8
[16:54] <doko>     * i386: sagemath
[16:54] <doko> why?
[16:57] <rbasak> doko: sagemath -> jmol -> libjmol-java -> icedtea-netx-common
[16:58] <doko> ahh
[16:58] <rbasak> icedtea-netx (from icedtea-web) Breaks icedtea-netx-common (< 1.7.1-1~)
[16:58] <rbasak> I used chdist with apt-get install -s
[16:59] <rbasak> In fact, more trivially, it looks like icedtea-netx and icedtea-netx-common aren't coinstallable?
[17:00] <doko> yep, just didn't see any java deps in sagemath, missing jmol
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.525.19 => 2.525.20] (desktop-core)
[18:47] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Looks like the build worked.
[18:47] <Eickmeyer> Now all we need is for Carla to be looked at.
[18:47]  * Eickmeyer realizes vorlon is very busy and hates bugging him
[19:33] <ddstreet> cyphermox i see you did the last no-change rebuild for d-i to update mini.iso; for lp #1755863 i also need to update the mini.iso in the archive; is the proper thing to do for me to upload a no-change rebuild of d-i and the netboot contents are automatically generated into the archive?  i know the manual process to build the netboot stuff has nothing to do with actually building d-i, but i don't know what the official process is to update
[19:33] <ddstreet>  the archive netboot files
[19:33] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1755863 in systemd (Ubuntu Disco) "netbooting the bionic live CD over NFS goes straight to maintenance mode :" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1755863
[19:34] <cyphermox> ddstreet: sorry, I don't understand; you say there was already a no-change rebuild of d-i?
[19:34] <cyphermox> sounds like it would already be fixed in that case (looking)
[19:34] <ddstreet> no i was just asking you because you're at the top of the changelog
[19:35] <ddstreet> well, the top no-change rebuild in the changelog ;-)
[19:35] <cyphermox> which release?
[19:36] <ddstreet> b and c
[19:36] <cyphermox> basically as long as whatever you needed of d-i was in the archive before the last build of d-i you'd be good
[19:36] <cyphermox> so it depends when whatever other fix landed
[19:36] <ddstreet> and if it wasn't, and i want to rebuild e.g. http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic-updates/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/
[19:36] <ddstreet> all i need to do is no-change rebuild update the d-i changelog and upload?
[19:37] <cyphermox> yes
[19:37] <ddstreet> cool thnx
[19:37] <cyphermox> I'm very curious though, because I get a systemd bug there.
[19:37] <ddstreet> yes
[19:37] <ddstreet> systemd bug preventing installer from working
[19:38] <cyphermox> you don't have systemd in d-i images where the installer runs AFAIK, so that would be quite odd
[19:38] <ddstreet> hmm ok maybe it's for subiquity then...i'll check with the bug owner (i took it while he was out)
[20:56] <leftyfb> https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1820096
[20:56] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1820096 in subiquity "/etc/hosts not populated, preventing dns registration with dhcp" [Undecided,New]
[20:56] <leftyfb> That's 1 of 4 bugs I have found with the live installer vs the classic installer
[20:56] <leftyfb> another bug about cloud-init reverting the hostname after reboot was already filed
[20:57] <leftyfb> another bug/difference is the fact that the live installer uses cloud-init to configure netplan so the config file in /etc/netplan/ is named differently than the classic installer. Is this worth filing a bug?
[20:58] <leftyfb> another difference is the live installer installs the .46 kernel a opposed to the classic still installing the .45
[21:01] <leftyfb> these issues are enough to trip up automated deployment (ansible in my case)
[21:01] <leftyfb> issues/differences
[21:05] <mwhudson> thanks for filing 1820096
[21:05] <mwhudson> i don't think the netplan file name is part of the contract
[21:06] <mwhudson> and i'm not going to apologise for the fact that you get the latest kernel from the archive by default either i think
[21:09] <leftyfb> mwhudson: I'm just pointing out there are clear differences in the resulting installs between the live and classic installers
[21:10] <leftyfb> mwhudson: what does "part of the contract" mean exactly?
[21:10] <leftyfb> contract to ensure than the resulting installs are identical?
[21:10] <mwhudson> leftyfb: you are right that there are differences
[21:10] <mwhudson> and i guess i would argue that this is not a problem
[21:11] <leftyfb> it is for automation tools like ansible when you make some assumptions
[21:11] <mwhudson> the goal of the live installer is to install a server system, not one that is exactly the same as the older installer
[21:11] <mwhudson> this might require changing some assumptions indeed
[21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.44 => 2.408.45] (desktop-core)
[21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (xenial-proposed/main) [229-4ubuntu21.18 => 229-4ubuntu21.19] (core)
[21:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-ldappool [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.0-3ubuntu2]
[21:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keystone [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2:14.0.1-0ubuntu2]
[22:06] <rbalint> tjaalton, vorlon, sil2100, could you please drop my systemd 229-4ubuntu21.19 upload? it is too early for it
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openconnect (cosmic-proposed/universe) [7.08-3 => 7.08-3ubuntu0.18.04.1] (kubuntu)
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openconnect (cosmic-proposed/universe) [7.08-3 => 7.08-3ubuntu0.18.10.1] (kubuntu)
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openconnect [source] (cosmic-proposed) [7.08-3ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openconnect (bionic-proposed/universe) [7.08-3 => 7.08-3ubuntu0.18.04.1] (kubuntu)
[23:32] <vorlon> rbalint: done
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd [source] (xenial-proposed) [229-4ubuntu21.19]
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grilo-plugins (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.3.8-2ubuntu1 => 0.3.8-2ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop)