[20:00] <embrosyn> Hi there!
[20:01] <embrosyn> I've uploaded new packages to my PPA before adding an OpenPGP key.
[20:01] <embrosyn> Seems like those packages were now silently rejected.
[20:02] <embrosyn> Can I fix it somehow without bumping the package version?
[20:55] <embrosyn> Teeny-tiny bump?
[20:55] <embrosyn> I don't want to litter my PPA with meaningless version increments if not necessary.
[20:56] <embrosyn> It's not a big deal for me to run `dch -i` again, but why if it's not necessary?
[21:06] <hloeung> embrosyn: remove the local .uploaded (or similar) file and retry
[21:06] <embrosyn> OH.
[21:06] <embrosyn> WOW.
[21:06] <embrosyn> I should've known that.
[21:06] <embrosyn> Thanks man.
[21:07] <embrosyn> Er, or girl.
[21:07] <hloeung> np. It should have e-mailed you telling you why it was rejected though
[21:07] <embrosyn> I expected it'd happen, but no, it didn't.
[21:11] <embrosyn> And now I'm getting success messages, of course :P.
[23:00] <wgrant> embrosyn, hloeung: You can also use dput -f to override the local .upload check
[23:00] <hloeung> ah yes, that too
[23:00] <wgrant> LP can't email you about that sort of rejection because it can't know who to tell without a signature.
[23:00] <embrosyn> Thanks!
[23:00] <embrosyn> Seems legit.
[23:01] <embrosyn> However, there could've been a mail in the manner of "Someone tried to upload a package to your repository".
[23:01] <wgrant> That would be very abusable, but it's a possibility.
[23:02] <embrosyn> Abusability. Didn't have that in mind.
[23:02] <jeremy31> Hi wgrant please take care of https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/679230
[23:02] <jeremy31> and 231 and 232
[23:04] <embrosyn> For a moment I thought you acted as if those were legit issues.
[23:04] <embrosyn> Yeah, that has to go, without doubt :D.
[23:14] <wgrant> jeremy31: Please report spam at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[23:14] <wgrant> So we can track it and handle it as normal