[10:36] <jbicha> I see at least epiphany-browser and ruby-pkg-config went missing when they were promoted from disco-proposed
[14:29] <jbicha> simple-scan too
[15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: openjdk-13 (disco-proposed/primary) [13~12-1]
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-418 [source] (disco-proposed) [418.43-0ubuntu1]
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-13 [source] (disco-proposed) [13~12-1]
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418 [i386] (disco-proposed/multiverse) [418.43-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418 [amd64] (disco-proposed/multiverse) [418.43-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-418 [amd64] (disco-proposed) [418.43-0ubuntu1]
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-418 [i386] (disco-proposed) [418.43-0ubuntu1]
[17:04] <Eickmeyer> Upstream Carla has just released version 2.0 final. I need it reviewed to out of the NEW queue ASAP so I can upload new patches bringing it to 2.0 final.
[17:29] <Eickmeyer> I do have a question about that process too that I'm sure cyphermox, vorlon, or anybody else can answer. Since Carla will be eventually in upstream Debian, when I upload the new patches, should I change it from 1.9.13-0ubuntu1 to 1.9.13-1ubuntu1 or some other method?
[17:29] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2, you could probably answer as well. ^
[17:38] <teward> Eickmeyer: if the package is -1 in Debian, then -1ubuntu1 is the first Ubuntu revision
[17:39] <teward> Eickmeyer: refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_packaging
[17:39] <teward> for how version strings behave.
[17:39] <Eickmeyer> teward: It's not upstream yet, though.
[17:39] <teward> i know it suggests -Xubuntu0.1, but I've typically seen it as -Xubuntu1 :P
[17:39] <teward> Eickmeyer: then don't change it until it's in upstream
[17:39] <teward> if it's not in Debian then it's -0ubuntuX.Y
[17:40] <teward> so 0ubuntu1
[17:40] <teward> you can take a look at any of my NGINX version bumps where the software version wasn't in Debian yet as examples ;P
[17:40] <Eickmeyer> Okay, then it'll have to be 0ubuntu1.1?
[17:41] <teward> I think i need more background on what you're after... :P
[17:41] <teward> (I came in late)
[17:41] <teward> AIUI, the 'version' change is based on the current package in Ubuntu
[17:42] <teward> so if the current one is -0ubuntu1 and you're adding new pathces to that version, then it'd either be -0ubuntu1 or -0ubuntu2 - typically I've seen the *second* of those two versions
[17:42] <teward> (but I've seen both before...)
[17:43] <Eickmeyer> Okay, Carla is in the NEW queue, which means it still needs an admin to look at it to migrate to proposed. Upstream has just released it's 2.0 final (what's in the NEW is 1.9.13, aka 2.0-RC3 patched to 2.0-RC4), so I have patches to bring it to 2.0.
[17:43] <Eickmeyer> And, since the eventualallity is that it will be in upstream Debian (but can't now due to the buster freeze), it has the Xubuntu1.
[17:44] <Eickmeyer> teward: ^
[17:56] <Eickmeyer> Going with 1.9.13-0ubuntu2
[20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-13 [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [13~12-1] (no packageset)
[21:49] <jbicha> Eickmeyer: new packages can still be uploaded to Debian, they just won't be in Buster
[21:50] <jbicha> and you can open a sponsoring bug for carla 2.0, you don't need to wait for it to be approved in the new queue first
[21:51] <Eickmeyer> jbicha: I don't need a sponsor for Carla anymore, I was approved as uploader and the ACLs were already applied.
[21:52] <Eickmeyer> It hasn't been moved out of new yet.
[21:52] <jbicha> you still need a sponsor until it's actually in Ubuntu
[21:53] <Eickmeyer> It's sitting in the new queue now, waiting for review.
[21:53] <Eickmeyer> cyphermox already sponsored it.
[21:59] <Eickmeyer> jbicha: Unless I'm confused?
[22:00] <jbicha> you started by saying you needed to wait until it made out of the new queue to update it to 2.0 and I replied that you didn't need to wait :)
[22:02] <Eickmeyer> jbicha: Well, it's already 2.0-RC3 (1.9.13) patched to 2.0-RC4 (1.9.14) and I have the patches ready to go once it's in Ubuntu, and since I have PPU for that package, I should just be able to update it directly, right?
[22:03] <jbicha> yes, once it's approved, you won't need a sponsor
[22:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-13 [s390x] (disco-proposed) [13~12-1]