/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/03/20/#ubuntu-devel.txt

LocutusOfBorgtjaalton, https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-llvm-team/llvm-toolchain/tree/8 merge request here please?07:49
LocutusOfBorgif they are in llvm-toolchain-snapshot, nice, so we don't have to keep them around on more branches07:49
tjaaltonLocutusOfBorg: ok, will do07:50
LocutusOfBorgtjaalton, if you have them, please double check if they aren't in the one that is going uploaded probably today07:50
LocutusOfBorghttps://salsa.debian.org/pkg-llvm-team/llvm-toolchain/commit/42b7383d1a6f8b5df0a7e960a17bb5230ffec61f07:50
LocutusOfBorg8.0 stable is out...07:50
LocutusOfBorghttps://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-8.0.0 maybe your patches are already there07:51
LocutusOfBorgso we can just sync07:51
tjaaltonLocutusOfBorg: they are these https://github.com/intel/opencl-clang/tree/ocl-open-80/patches/clang07:58
tjaaltonI was told they were not queued for 807:58
tjaaltonLocutusOfBorg: where do I get the tarball?08:27
LocutusOfBorgtjaalton, I guess when sylvestre uploads it09:00
LocutusOfBorglet me ask09:00
dokooSoMoN: could you have a look at the libreoffice/s390x autopkg test failure? triggered by openjdk-8 (which isn't even installed in the test)09:46
oSoMoNdoko, looking09:47
seb128jdstrand, iptables still looks like it's unhapy, firewalld tests with 1.8.2-4ubuntu109:49
seb128autopkgtest firewalld[1362]: ERROR: '/usr/sbin/iptables-restore -w -n' failed: iptables-restore v1.8.2 (nf_tables):09:49
seb128                                             line 4: RULE_REPLACE failed (No such file or directory): rule in chain INPUT09:49
seb128                                             line 4: RULE_REPLACE failed (No such file or directory): rule in chain OUTPUT09:49
oSoMoNdoko, that looks like a flaky test, it previously failed with the same error on 2019-03-12 02:37:15 UTC, and was then retried by j_bicha and passed, I will need to look into that more closely but for now I just retried it10:10
dokooSoMoN: I already did, but maybe you have better luck ;p10:12
oSoMoNdoko, yeah, I saw you had retried already, fingers crossed this time it passes10:19
tjaaltonLocutusOfBorg: they applied on top of rc5, so I sent the merge request already11:39
LocutusOfBorgmerged thanks11:52
tjaaltoncool, thanks!12:14
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch
rbalintjuliank, seb128: i finalized the switch of lp:software-properties to git13:39
rbalinti'm in the process of updating the precise and trusty git branches with synthetic commits13:39
LocutusOfBorgtjaalton, uploading right now13:40
tjaaltonLocutusOfBorg: sweet13:44
LocutusOfBorglet me know if it works, next upload in debian will be syncable thanks to you :)13:45
LocutusOfBorgI think you should join the team, llvm and graphic people have a lot in common!13:46
LocutusOfBorg(I mean, you need patches mostly each llvm release)13:46
LocutusOfBorgbtw next time please also update changelog in the merge request13:46
tjaaltonwell actually I rarely need patches, this was an exception :)13:49
tjaaltonllvm upstream is a mystery, would be nice to have relnotes for point-releases for starters13:49
seb128rbalint, great, thx14:02
juliankthanks rbalint14:05
ahasenackrbasak: does debian's ci also trigger dep8 tests on reverse dependencies, like we do? Do you know?14:24
rbasakI think so, but am not sure.14:26
ahasenackhttps://ci.debian.net/status/ is nice14:32
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab
rbasakrharper: have you ever seen anything like https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925126 on Ubuntu?15:29
ubottuDebian bug 925126 in bcache-tools "bcache-tools: Load bcache kernel module *before* registering device" [Important,Open]15:29
rbasakApparently RUN{builtin} and RUN are separate lists in udev and ordering isn't guaranteed; the reporter is hitting the wrong ordering.15:29
rharperrbasak: I've not seen that before15:29
rharperI suspect that the normal path is that the initramfs will load the bcache module (even if the race still exists)15:31
rharperrbasak: I would be interested in confirmation of the run order15:32
rharperthat does seem like lots of things could break (not just bcache)15:32
coreycbrbasak: hello, if you have a chance today we'd like to see if we can get nova and swift into bionic-proposed for bug 181806915:34
ubottubug 1818069 in swift (Ubuntu Bionic) "[SRU] queens stable releases" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181806915:34
ahasenackdoko: hi, does this ring a bell?16:18
ahasenackdoko: Can't exec "gcc": No such file or directory at /usr/share/perl5/Dpkg/Arch.pm line 126.16:18
ahasenackdoko: -: warning: cannot determine CC system type, falling back to default (native compilation)16:18
ahasenackstarted happening in a test16:18
ahasenackhttps://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/H55y8JcMVw/16:19
ahasenackit's not what failed the test, though16:22
dokoahasenack: probably gcc is not installed16:31
WimpressSnapcraft Live! starts in about 5 minutes - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_U-pcvBFrU19:55
RAOFtjaalton: intel-mediasdk appears to use the embedded googletest/googlemock source.23:08
RAOFtjaalton: debian/copyright is incorrect; a bunch of files under samples/ are 3-clause BSD (copyright claims them as MIT), a handful of files (eg: wayland-drm-client-protocol.h) are neither BSD nor MIT and don't have their licence recorded in debian/copyright.23:19
RAOFtjaalton: Possibly we should split contrib/ipp out and have an actual intel-performance-primitives library, but we don't currently have one.23:37
RAOFtjaalton: A quick codesearch shows that there are at least 6 packages in Debian that would use an ipp library if it existed, so maybe it's time to bite that particular bullet?23:37
tewardif a package is 3.0 native format do you still use quilt patches to patch it, or is there a different mechanism for making changes?23:40
teward(package in question is in universe but still a valid question)23:40

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!