[04:59] <tdaitx> doko: take a look at the scilab - 6.0.2-0ubuntu0.3~01 that I uploaded in disco (I didn't want to overwrite your bionic package) it fixes the build by ignoring debian/patches/scicos_Makefile.patch
[05:00] <tdaitx> please beware that the changelog is kind busted for disco: it includes an cosmic entry; plus the version has an ~01 appended since it was just a test
[07:27] <tdaitx> doko: sbeattie: I uploaded geogebra to stage 5, it is a no-change backport from Cosmic to bring a couple openjdk-11 fixes
[07:27] <tdaitx> without that backport one has to use openjdk-8 to run it (usually through update-java-alternatives)
[15:36] <sbeattie> tdaitx, sil2100: +1 on stage5/geogebra from me
[15:49] <tdaitx> sil2100: I copied the source+binaries to the unnaproved queue
[15:49] <tdaitx> for geogebra
[15:51] <tdaitx> sbeattie: thanks for the review =)
[15:51] <tdaitx> just a heads up that I should be uploading openjdk-7 into the openjdk-r/security later on today, I have a build going on my openjdk ppa to check that tests are sane but a few archs are still building
[15:51] <tdaitx> will send and email out when that is done
[15:52] <tdaitx> this is the security update from 7u201 to 7u211
[15:54] <sil2100> tdaitx: thanks! Reviewing
[15:54] <sil2100> sbeattie: thanks o/
[15:54] <tdaitx> doko: do you want me to upload scilab 6.0.2 to bionic/cosmic? not clear what issue that would be fixing
[16:01] <sil2100> tdaitx: accepted
[16:06] <doko> tdaitx: maybe not yet. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scilab/+bug/1819353 is still broken
[16:09] <sbeattie> tdaitx: openjdk-7> thanks
[16:29] <tdaitx> doko: sbeattie: I have an updated octave build in that brings Cosmic version to Bionic
[16:29] <tdaitx> the current bionic version is kind of working, since vorlon backported the java version fix
[16:29] <tdaitx> though I have only quickly looked over their changelog (still need to check the bits that changed, it is a big diff afterall) the new version does seem to introduce extra compatibility with openjdk 11
[16:29] <tdaitx> so before I dig into that I would like to know if there's any know problem with bringing a Cosmic's octave version to bionic
[17:19] <sbeattie> tdaitx: won't that result in an soversion bump in liboctave (from 4->6)?
[17:35] <sbeattie> (so you'd have to do a library transition as well)
[18:50] <doko> please no, at least not for the initial stuff
[21:40] <tdaitx> yeah, it does bump the soversion, I didn't expect that, so let's sit this one down, I will take a look later and see if we need to backport a few of the patches for improved compatibility instead of updating the version