[00:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.20 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.21] (core)
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (trusty-proposed/main) [2.208.16 => 2.208.17] (desktop-core)
[06:11] <tjaalton> any archive admin still around? linux-signed-oem is in bionic NEW and blocking testing
[06:12] <tjaalton> still/already
[06:13] <tjaalton> vorlon, infinity: you're probably only ones that might be still awake :)
[06:48] <RAOF> infinity: The thought occurs that we didn't go over accepting from binary-NEW in the archive admin training... 😁
[07:03] <RAOF> The packages tjaalton is talking about look like they're destined for the correct pockets, and lintian is reasonably happy with them. I think they're correct to accept, and I think that pushing the button on LP would do the right thing. (and presumably `queue accept`, too).
[07:03] <RAOF> So, I would accept them; but I won't do that until you tell me that there isn't a necessary check I've missed.
[07:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1035.40]
[07:33] <infinity> RAOF: Oh, I caught a ping in another channel and sorted it.
[07:34] <infinity> RAOF: We should talk binary NEW at some point, yeah, but for kernel stuff, "people who do kernel stuff are meant to handle it" is the rule of thumb.
[07:34] <infinity> Looks like Lukasz just missed a step.
[07:35] <tjaalton> right
[08:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpdk (bionic-proposed/main) [17.11.3-3~ubuntu0.18.04 => 17.11.5-0~ubuntu18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[08:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpdk (cosmic-proposed/main) [17.11.3-3 => 17.11.5-0~ubuntu18.10.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[11:18] <LocutusOfBorg> can anybody please kick them out?
[11:18] <LocutusOfBorg> missing build on arm64: libceres-dev, libceres1 (from 1.13.0+dfsg0-2build1)
[11:18] <LocutusOfBorg> missing build on ppc64el: libceres-dev, libceres1 (from 1.13.0+dfsg0-2build1)
[11:18] <LocutusOfBorg> (probably colmap on ppc64el has to go too)
[11:19] <LocutusOfBorg> debian already removed, not sure why nobody picked them up yet :)
[11:25] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, maybe I can abuse of your time? I'm really trying to let something migrate from the proposed pocket
[11:26] <LocutusOfBorg> I made a script that looks for stuff in proposed that has a new version in debian unstable, and I'm manually syncing what is fixed in Debian
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-chromedriver-helper [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-6ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[11:35] <LocutusOfBorg> this one should unblock lots of ruby proposed packages ^^
[11:35] <LocutusOfBorg> not sure why it fails testsuite on pbuilder, and not on sbuild, some network restriction, there is an associated debian RC bug
[11:36] <LocutusOfBorg> also, please remove freecad on armhf, already removed by debian
[11:53] <LocutusOfBorg> also please bump debci hint to 2.0
[14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1014.14~18.04.1] (kernel)
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: geogebra (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.0.34.0+dfsg1-4 => 4.0.34.0+dfsg1-6~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted geogebra [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.34.0+dfsg1-6~18.04.1]
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1041.45~14.04.1] (kernel)
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: linux-restricted-modules (disco-proposed/primary) [5.0.0-8.9]
[16:33] <apw> vorlon, ^ you are likley the most aware of that one
[16:33] <oSoMoN> dear release team: I'm considering adding gstreamer1.0-gtk3 as a recommends of libreoffice-avmedia-backend-gstreamer to fix bug #1820062. libreoffice-avmedia-backend-gstreamer is in main, whereas gstreamer1.0-gtk3 is in universe, but its source package itself is in main (gst-plugins-good1.0). Is that acceptable, and would that require a FFe? (seb_128 suggested it would)
[16:39] <jamespage> bdmurray: hey - I revisited the testing of bug 1813807 - we had a bit of a test misconfiguration in terms of user setup which I've corrected
[16:40] <jamespage> unrelated to the packages actually being SRU's but now resolved more generally
[16:41] <bdmurray> jamespage: cool, I'll have a look
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-1014.14~18.04.1]
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-1008.9]
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1041.45]
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-1014.14]
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.15.0-1041.45~14.04.1]
[19:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted resolvconf [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.79ubuntu10.18.10.3]
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted resolvconf [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.79ubuntu10.18.04.3]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected intel-mediasdk [source] (disco-proposed) [18.4.1-0ubuntu1]