[00:10] <mwhudson> teward: no a native package means patches are not applied
[00:11] <mwhudson> (not that i've attempted to SRU a native package with a debian/patches directory or anything embarassing like that)
[00:12] <mwhudson> and the mechanism for making changes is ... making changes
[00:12] <mwhudson> if that's not appropriate it probably shouldn't be a native package i guess
[04:43] <tjaalton> RAOF: thanks, I'll clean it up
[04:52] <tjaalton> meh, I'll just let intel split ipp in a public repo first
[04:52] <tjaalton> there's no way to download ipp anywhere without filling a form
[04:54] <RAOF> Oh, really? WTF?
[04:55] <RAOF> Oh, wow. Yeah.
[04:55] <tjaalton> I'll try stripping it off, only used for some sw fallback
[04:55] <RAOF> Good hustle, Intel.
[04:56] <tjaalton> and let them know about it
[05:17] <JZA> hi got a question about how to mantain a package on launchpad
[05:17] <JZA> currently there is a team account with a package, but I want to get a testing branch from my user
[05:17] <JZA> how do I go about that
[07:16] <tjaalton> RAOF: oh well, can't build it without embedded ipp or gtest. I'll just wait for them to fix it
[07:17] <lag> Hmm ... not sure my messages went through - apologies for the churn if they did:
[07:18] <lag> Does anyone know how to tell the Ubuntu Installer to install additional modules into the rootfs?
[07:18] <lag> s/modules/kernel modules/
[07:18] <lag> I guess we could hack initramfs-tools.deb to include them in the '/etc/initramfs-tools/modules' template, but is there a better/proper way to do this?
[07:21] <RAOF> tjaalton: ipp is not a (strong) blocker, but it should really use the perfectly sensible copy of googletest we have.
[07:21] <tjaalton> or disable tests
[07:22] <tjaalton> anyway, filed tickets upstream
[08:07] <lag> xnox: mwhudson: FYI --^
[08:19] <dupondje> Its to late in the release schedule for merges? Or are some still accepted?
[08:20] <dupondje> mwhudson: https://merges.ubuntu.com/g/golang-1.12/REPORT
[11:45] <Mirv> Trevinho: thank you so much for continous maintenance of the AppIndicator/KStatusNotifierItem extension!
[11:49] <Trevinho> Mirv: :) well actually I should spend much more time on it as there are various issues I had no time to address yet, but thank you :)
[13:14] <tjaalton> ahasenack: hey, do you have plans to push the samba/talloc etc py3 work to debian?
[13:20] <ahasenack> tjaalton: yep
[13:21] <ahasenack> tjaalton: as soon as I'm done with the disco work, which should be tomorrow
[13:22] <tjaalton> ahasenack: ok cool, for experimental I assume?
[13:22] <ahasenack> that will be up to them
[13:22] <ahasenack> I'm planning on salsa mps
[13:22] <tjaalton> right
[13:22] <ahasenack> (I can't upload to debian myself)
[13:23] <ahasenack> experimental sounds right
[13:28] <coreycb> sil2100: hello, if you have a moment we have swift and nova SRUs in the bionic unapproved queue that we'd like to get going on with testing.
[13:35] <sil2100> coreycb: let me try getting to those after the kernels
[13:35] <sil2100> o/
[13:36] <coreycb> sil2100: thanks!
[13:51] <juliank> What's the status of Kubuntu package management?
[13:51] <juliank> Does it use PackageKit or that QApt thing?
[13:52] <juliank> I'm porting software-properties to PackageKit, but only the GTK+ one so far
[13:53] <juliank> Currently the Qt one is a weird mix of aptdaemon and qapt-batch
[15:34] <teward> mwhudson: just saw your message.  It probably doesn't matter much either way, but iptables-persistent has a liiitle bit of a bug in it - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables-persistent/+bug/1820144 - so i was wondering how best to prep changes for the SRU.  So just changing it directly, then, would be the proper course since its a native package and not a quilt one?
[15:46] <Kiranos> Hi I have an issue, I'm trying to automate the ubuntu 18.04 installation with preseed, this is how partitioning look like: https://pastebin.com/xm6dQiuV
[15:46] <Kiranos> however I get a prompt like this: https://imgur.com/a/W2sj7yu
[15:46] <Kiranos> I'm not sure which option I miss
[15:46] <Kiranos> I look at https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/installation-guide/i386/apbs04.html and seem to follow it
[15:46] <Kiranos> if I just hit enter on that screen all is just continuing and finalizing
[16:55] <sil2100> coreycb: sorry for it to take so long, let me take a look at your SRUs now
[17:34] <cyphermox> Kiranos: your config is not selecting the recipe; or you are not specifying guided_size, up to you ;)
[17:35] <cyphermox> you would need either "d-i partman-auto/choose_recipe select root"
[17:35] <cyphermox> that's if you want preseed to follow exactly your recipe there
[17:36] <cyphermox> Kiranos: or if you want to use the guided partitioning, you'll want to preseed:
[17:37] <cyphermox> d-i partman-auto-lvm/guided_size string "max"
[17:37] <cyphermox> for example
[17:37] <CarlFK> d-i partman-auto-lvm/guided_size string max
[17:37] <CarlFK> before d-i partman-auto/expert_recipe string                           \
[17:40] <sil2100> coreycb: ugh, why is there an UNRELEASED changelog entry in the changelog for swift?
[17:40] <coreycb> sil2100: checking
[17:40] <sil2100> coreycb: if 2.17.0-0ubuntu1.1 was unreleased, I guess it should be included in 2.17.1-0ubuntu1
[17:41] <sil2100> coreycb: could you re-upload with that fixed? Other than that it's good to go
[17:41] <coreycb> sil2100: yeah let me fix that. thanks for catching it.
[17:46] <sil2100> coreycb: give me a sign once you upload, I accepted nova in the meantime
[17:46] <sil2100> I'll reject the old swift
[17:47] <coreycb> sil2100: should be there soon, just uploaded it. thank you.
[17:52] <sil2100> yw! Thanks for reuploading, approved
[18:29] <jdstrand> cjwatson: hey, does debmirror need any special support for cnf? (command-not-found)
[18:30] <jdstrand> cjwatson: I noticed apt-get update errors on disco and it doesn't seem to pull it. I'm going to use --include and see if that helps
[19:08] <cjwatson> jdstrand: it probably will do, yes
[19:18] <jdstrand> cjwatson: I couldn't get that to work. looked at the dep11 handling and can steal code from there. if I get it to work I'll file a bug with patch
[20:10] <mwhudson> dupondje: i should merge golang-1.12 yeah
[20:10] <mwhudson> teward: yes
[20:11] <teward> mwhudson: ack.  I'll take that approach then.
[20:58] <CarlFK> when bionic runs my systemd script, HOME is not set.  disco and stretch it is set.  I can work around this in my script.  Should I file a bug?
[21:21] <rbasak> rharper: FYI, that bcache bug I asked about was apparently a udev bug
[21:30] <rharper> rbasak: thanks; i really looked like a udev issue; I suspected that many other rules could break as wekk
[21:30] <rharper> well
[21:38] <jdstrand> cjwatson: fyi, bug #1821251
[21:38] <jdstrand> cjwatson: patch is attached
[22:56] <xnox> CarlFK, yes, and also describing the sample script, systemd unit, and whether it is installed as user or system wide.
[22:56] <xnox> CarlFK, potentially you might be able to reproduce it with like systemd-run
[22:57] <CarlFK> xnox: is there a package I should file against ?
[22:57] <xnox> CarlFK, $ ubuntu-bug systemd
[22:57] <CarlFK> thanks
[23:06] <CarlFK> is there a "hello systemd" I can use to demo my HOME issue?