| === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 | ||
| === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iproute2 (bionic-backports/main) [4.15.0-2ubuntu1 => 4.18.0-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] (core) | 08:42 | |
| oSoMoN | good morning | 09:27 |
|---|---|---|
| oSoMoN | asking again a question that remained without an answer yesterday: | 09:27 |
| oSoMoN | I'm considering adding gstreamer1.0-gtk3 as a recommends of libreoffice-avmedia-backend-gstreamer to fix bug #1820062. libreoffice-avmedia-backend-gstreamer is in main, whereas gstreamer1.0-gtk3 is in universe, but its source package itself is in main (gst-plugins-good1.0). Is that acceptable, and would that require a FFe? (seb_128 suggested it would) | 09:27 |
| ubot5 | bug 1820062 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "LibreOffice Impress embed video problem (libreoffice-gtk3)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1820062 | 09:27 |
| oSoMoN | in fact it should be added as a recommend of libreoffice-gtk3, that's more correct (and that's what is done in debian now: https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/commit/a7307bd4d2ab671a47573e8b9b8f78a295e223e5) | 09:28 |
| oSoMoN | but the idea and implications are the same | 09:28 |
| oSoMoN | Laney, sil2100: can you enlighten me? ^ | 09:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libunistring (bionic-proposed/main) [0.9.9-0ubuntu1 => 0.9.9-0ubuntu2] (core) | 09:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libidn (bionic-proposed/main) [1.33-2.1ubuntu1.1 => 1.33-2.1ubuntu1.2] (core) | 09:36 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | sil2100, ^^ sorry for reverting your libidn upload ^^ | 09:37 |
| Laney | oSoMoN: If it's fine to promote (should be), I think it should be fine to add those recommends - it's a couple of new sinks so shouldn't affect things that don't opt in to those | 09:46 |
| Laney | obviously it'd be good to watch out for it being buggy in any way | 09:46 |
| oSoMoN | Laney, do you reckon that warrants a FFe ? | 09:46 |
| Laney | arguably, but feel free to just paste this into the bug I think | 09:47 |
| Laney | maybe check with d_idrocks or another archive admin that they'd be OK with promoting the package first | 09:47 |
| oSoMoN | didrocks, your opinion welcome ^ | 09:56 |
| sil2100 | oSoMoN, Laney: since the source is in main I'd be fine to promote the binary to main if needed | 09:56 |
| oSoMoN | ah, thanks sil2100 | 09:56 |
| * sil2100 checks the binary real quick | 09:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (bionic-proposed/main) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.10 => 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.11] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 10:00 | |
| didrocks | oSoMoN: sure, I can promote that package, I'm still warry about binary promotion because sometimes MIRs are about "we can promote that part, but not that part", and this is lost in time, but as we have a maintainer (you!), I'm ok with promoting :) | 10:01 |
| didrocks | oSoMoN: just tell me when it hits proposed and I'll promote it | 10:01 |
| oSoMoN | excellent, thanks | 10:02 |
| sil2100 | LocutusOfBorg: that's fine, I backported the fix from cosmic/disco since it was easier | 10:02 |
| didrocks | it == libreoffice-gtk3 | 10:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sil2100, yes, I just see the overlinking as "regression", and now we have a proper fix by upstream I hope you can process both libidn and libunistring even if the end user won't be affected that much (meh, it will gain some size on his system!) | 10:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pygnuplot [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.11.16-2] (no packageset) | 10:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tesserocr [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-4] (no packageset) | 10:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tesserocr [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-4] (no packageset) | 10:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tesserocr [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-4] (no packageset) | 10:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tesserocr [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-4] (no packageset) | 10:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tesserocr [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-4] (no packageset) | 10:23 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | I hope to solve the ruby madness in -proposed soon | 10:24 |
| rbalint | sil2100, could you please take a look at the wslu packages in NEW ? | 10:27 |
| rbalint | (in your sru cycles) | 10:28 |
| sil2100 | rbalint: is that for disco, or stable series? | 10:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pygnuplot [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.11.16-2] | 10:38 | |
| rbalint | sil2100, for all stable releases | 10:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-tesserocr [amd64] (disco-proposed) [2.4.0-4] | 11:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-tesserocr [i386] (disco-proposed) [2.4.0-4] | 11:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-tesserocr [s390x] (disco-proposed) [2.4.0-4] | 11:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-tesserocr [armhf] (disco-proposed) [2.4.0-4] | 11:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-chromedriver-helper [amd64] (disco-proposed) [2.1.0-6ubuntu2] | 11:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-tesserocr [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [2.4.0-4] | 11:04 | |
| sil2100 | rbalint: on it! | 11:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iproute2 [source] (bionic-backports) [4.18.0-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] | 11:07 | |
| sil2100 | Laney: thanks! | 11:09 |
| sil2100 | abeato: ^ | 11:09 |
| abeato | sil2100, \o/ | 11:11 |
| Laney | 😘 | 11:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | please "decruft" knot-resolver ("libkres-dev, libkres9") NBS in proposed | 11:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | also, knot-resolver on arm64 has to go away (removed in debian too) | 11:35 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wslu [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.0.0-0ubuntu2~18.10.0] | 11:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wslu [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [2.0.0-0ubuntu2~18.10.0] (no packageset) | 11:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wslu [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-0ubuntu2~18.04.0] | 11:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wslu [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.0.0-0ubuntu2~18.04.0] (no packageset) | 11:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.37.4+18.10.1 => 2.38+19.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 12:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wslu [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.0-0ubuntu2~16.04.0] | 12:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wslu [amd64] (xenial-proposed/none) [2.0.0-0ubuntu2~16.04.0] (no packageset) | 12:12 | |
| === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-144.170~14.04.1] (kernel) | 12:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-144.170~14.04.1] | 12:59 | |
| leosilva | hi kstenerud, we have some CVEs that affects php7.2 and we were discussing if it is too late to update 7.2 to a whole new version for disco. What are your thoughts? | 13:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wslu [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-0ubuntu2~18.04.0] | 13:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wslu [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.0.0-0ubuntu2~18.10.0] | 13:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wslu [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.0-0ubuntu2~16.04.0] | 13:08 | |
| kstenerud | leosilva: do you mean going to 7.3? | 13:08 |
| kstenerud | or 7.2.16 (the latest) | 13:10 |
| kstenerud | actually 7.2.17rc1 is latest | 13:10 |
| leosilva | kstenerud: 7.2.16 | 13:11 |
| kstenerud | I can give it a go. 7.2.15 was a pain, but maybe 16 wasn't that big of a change... | 13:13 |
| leosilva | kstenerud: cool, let me know if everything goes right, so I can steal your tarball for bionic and cosmic :) | 13:14 |
| kstenerud | sure :) | 13:14 |
| leosilva | tks! | 13:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gradle (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.4.1-5~18.04.1 => 4.4.1-5ubuntu2~18.04] (no packageset) (sync) | 13:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gradle (cosmic-proposed/universe) [4.4.1-5~18.10.1 => 4.4.1-5ubuntu2~18.10] (no packageset) (sync) | 13:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.66.20 => 1.66.21] (core) | 13:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1008.9~18.04.1] (kernel) | 13:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: openjdk-11 (disco-proposed/primary) [11.0.3+4-1] | 14:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected openjdk-11 [source] (disco-proposed) [11.0.3+4-1] | 14:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9 [s390x] (disco-proposed/main) [9-20190321-1ubuntu1] (core) | 15:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1010.12] (kernel) | 15:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-9 [s390x] (disco-proposed) [9-20190321-1ubuntu1] | 15:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gradle [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.4.1-5ubuntu2~18.04] | 16:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gradle [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [4.4.1-5ubuntu2~18.10] | 16:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9 [i386] (disco-proposed/main) [9-20190321-1ubuntu1] (core) | 16:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-1008.9~18.04.1] | 16:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1010.12] | 16:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: health-check (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.02.09-1 => 0.02.09-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 16:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-9 [i386] (disco-proposed) [9-20190321-1ubuntu1] | 16:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1029.31] (kernel) | 17:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libmbim (bionic-proposed/main) [1.14.2-2.1ubuntu1 => 1.18.0-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 17:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: modemmanager (bionic-proposed/main) [1.6.8-2ubuntu1 => 1.10.0-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 17:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libqmi (bionic-proposed/main) [1.18.0-3ubuntu1 => 1.22.0-1.3~ubuntu18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 17:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nova [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2:17.0.7-0ubuntu2.1] | 17:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:17.0.9-0ubuntu1] | 17:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected swift [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.17.1-0ubuntu1] | 17:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: swift (bionic-proposed/main) [2.17.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.17.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 17:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swift [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.17.1-0ubuntu1] | 17:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1029.31] | 17:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plymouth (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.9.3-1ubuntu10 => 0.9.3-1ubuntu10.1] (core) | 19:29 | |
| vorlon | xnox: webkit2gtk v. sphinx? | 20:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu8.3] | 20:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.110.3] | 20:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu8.3 => 2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu8.3] (core) | 20:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (bionic-proposed/main) [1.173.3 => 1.173.5] (core, kernel) | 20:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.175.1 => 1.175.3] (core, kernel) | 20:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu8.3 => 2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu8.3] (core) | 21:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.13] | 21:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.93.14] | 21:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.21] | 21:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.02-2ubuntu8.13 => 2.02-2ubuntu8.13] (core) | 21:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.21 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.21] (core) | 21:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.02-2ubuntu8.13 => 2.02-2ubuntu8.13] (core) | 21:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.21 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.21] (core) | 21:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.66.21] | 22:20 | |
| jbicha | vorlon: that's https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195455 I guess we should have filed an Ubuntu bug for it too | 22:37 |
| ubot5 | bugs.webkit.org bug 195455 in WebKitGTK "REGRESSION [GTK] 2.23.92 ppc64el and s390x crashes" [Normal,New] | 22:37 |
| vorlon | jbicha: sure; I was highlighting xnox on it because there was discussion during Foundations team meeting about the sphinx autopkgtest failures and what to do with them | 22:37 |
| jbicha | I've made sure the webkitgtk upstream guys know about the bug | 22:38 |
| jbicha | (I pinged them separately about it) | 22:39 |
| xnox | jbicha, ok thank you. So to recap our meeting. We see that sphinx has autopkgtest, which tests that generated documentation has operatable js (which is arch:all) and it tests that, well everywhere. The docs are clearly fine, because it does pass on ![ppc64el s390x] and sphinx has not moved. So what should we do? make sphinx skip and/or report xfail on s390x/ppc64le for now? | 22:41 |
| xnox | jbicha, or do we want to continue blocking webkit2gtk migration? | 22:41 |
| xnox | jbicha, or do we want to remove webkit2gtk from ppc64le/s390x pending it's reinclusion? | 22:42 |
| xnox | jbicha, or do we want to let webkit2gtk migrate, abeit knowngly broken on ppc64le/s390x? | 22:42 |
| xnox | jbicha, i also noticed that webkit2gtk does not run unittests (even though, i believe it could do that) is that on purpose? ( as in are they like timing sensitive, non-passing, unreliable, etc?) | 22:43 |
| xnox | jbicha, i was meant to write an email, but i guess we'll have to do that on irc now. | 22:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu8.3] | 22:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu8.3] | 22:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.13] | 22:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.21] | 22:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.13] | 22:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.21] | 22:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.32.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 22:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.32.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 23:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.32.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 23:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.32.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 23:49 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!