[00:23] <jbicha> xnox: why the rush to ignore the regression?
[00:23] <jbicha> Debian Buster needs the regression fixed too
[00:27] <jbicha> sorry, I didn't realize that webkit2gtk was skipping dh_auto_test
[00:27] <xnox> jbicha, there is no rush. it's just on our report it appeared as if "foundations responsible package sphinx, is preventing desktop package to migrate" it's entirely up to you when/how to deal with it =)
[00:27] <jbicha> merge requests welcome if you figure it out
[00:27] <xnox> jbicha, hence in our weekly call, we looked deeper into it.
[00:27] <jbicha> *figure out dh_auto_test
[00:27] <xnox> jbicha, and we hate to block people.
[00:30] <jbicha> it's too bad webkit doesn't use git yet, someone could dig through https://trac.webkit.org/log/webkit/releases/WebKitGTK/webkit-2.24 😢
[00:37] <xnox> ouch
[03:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.8 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.9] (ubuntu-desktop)
[04:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.32.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.32.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.37.4ubuntu0.1 => 2.38] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.37.4+18.04.1 => 2.38+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.37.4+18.10.1 => 2.38+18.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/main) [2.37.4~14.04.1 => 2.38~14.04] (no packageset)
[08:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-firmware [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.175.2]
[08:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.38+19.04]
[08:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.47-0ubuntu0.18.10.0]
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.47-0ubuntu0.18.04.0]
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.18.10.0] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[08:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.18.10.0] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.18.10.0] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.47-0ubuntu0.16.04.0]
[08:51] <LocutusOfBorg> please remove thunderbird testsuite package to let it migrate, NBS in proposed!
[08:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.18.04.0] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[08:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.18.04.0] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.18.04.0] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.18.10.0] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.16.04.0] (no packageset)
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.18.04.0] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [s390x] (xenial-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.16.04.0] (no packageset)
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.18.10.0] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.16.04.0] (no packageset)
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.18.04.0] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.16.04.0] (no packageset)
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [i386] (xenial-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.16.04.0] (no packageset)
[08:56] <mvo> tjaalton: thanks for rejecting incorrect snapd upload some minutes ago - I had indeed mixed up the changelog version. sorry for that
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.18.04.0] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [armhf] (xenial-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.16.04.0] (no packageset)
[08:57] <tjaalton> mvo: :)
[08:57] <tjaalton> I noticed the correct one had just arrived on the queue
[08:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [arm64] (xenial-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.16.04.0] (no packageset)
[09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.10.1]
[09:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plymouth [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.9.3-1ubuntu10.1]
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxkbcommon [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.2-1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxkbcommon [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.8.2-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (core, xorg)
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gvfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.36.1-0ubuntu1.3.1]
[10:00] <ginggs> can we consider hint python-scipy and scikit-learn?  both autopkgtests pass for me locally on amd64
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.32.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (disco-proposed) [1.32.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [1.32.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (disco-proposed) [1.32.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (disco-proposed) [1.32.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (disco-proposed) [1.32.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-firmware [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.173.4]
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glib2.0 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.56.4-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfwm4 [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.12.5-1ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.20]
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glib2.0 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.56.4-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 2.56.4-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (core)
[12:59] <Laney> tjaalton: thanks for glib2.0, but it failed to build on i386/s390x - would you be able to review this one quickly please? just two cherry-picks from upstream to fix that (https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3685/+packages shows they work)
[13:01] <tjaalton> Laney: sure
[13:01] <Laney> merci
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glib2.0 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.56.4-0ubuntu0.18.04.2]
[13:04] <Laney> 🤠
[13:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xdg-desktop-portal (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-0ubuntu0.1 => 1.0.3-0ubuntu0.2] (ubuntugnome)
[14:01] <xnox> Laney, infinity, vorlon - it seems like htere was proxy error whilst trying to download squashfs out of a launchpad build....
[14:01] <xnox> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-server/disco/daily-live-20190322.log
[14:01] <xnox> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/416090788/livecd.ubuntu-server.installer.squashfs:
[14:01] <xnox> 2019-03-22 07:54:09 ERROR 502: Proxy Error.
[14:01] <xnox> should we like retry that whole build?
[14:02] <xnox> can you like run the build without '--live' such that it redownloads existing squashfs, and remasters them?
[14:02] <xnox> without installer.squashfs, we will really not installer today....
[14:17] <xnox> anyway, requested the amd64 rebuild via the iso tracker
[14:18] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, --> please remove thunderbird testsuite package to let it migrate, NBS in proposed! and then you can remove llvm-toolchain-4.0
[14:19] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1816736
[14:19] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1816736 in thunderbird (Ubuntu) "llvm-toolchain-4.0: Remove from disco" [Undecided,Fix committed]
[14:37] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: As beta freeze is Monday, may I check on the status of carla?
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, ^^ can you please remove llvm-toolchain-4.0 and let thundebird finally migrate?
[15:07] <Laney> xnox has iso tracker rebuild permissions?
[15:07] <Laney> TIL
[15:07] <xnox> Laney, for some products only, ie. subiquity.
[15:11] <Laney> so that build succeeded but one of the squashfses failed to download?
[15:13] <xnox> Laney, the 22$ build yeah, livefs build is good, debian-cd download squashfs bad, failed to download 3 squashfs due to proxy error, and it simply carried on with rolling the .iso and claiming it's good enough
[15:13] <Laney> bloop
[15:14] <xnox> 22.1 looks good, in terms of download... let's wait and see what jenkins/utah tell us.
[15:37] <vorlon> xnox: so the 20190322 build spit out an image but was missing a squashfs?  probably needs something fixed in ubuntu-cdimage to treat that as an error
[15:38] <xnox> vorlon, right, i think i missfiled a bug report then. It should be against ubuntu-cdimage, let me retarget it
[15:38] <xnox> vorlon, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/1821356
[15:38] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1821356 in Ubuntu CD Images "false positive builds server subiquity images" [Undecided,New]
[15:44] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: thunderbird-testsuite, llvm-toolchain-4.0 sorted
[15:44] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, <3
[15:44] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, do you have a list of build failures similar to this one? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/prelude-lml/+bug/1803320 I want to fix them all
[15:44] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1803320 in prelude-lml (Ubuntu) "prelude-lml ftbfs in disco" [Undecided,Fix released]
[15:44] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: carla: I'm planning to get to it today; if I don't, I'm off work after today for a week so you probably will want to grab another AA to look at it
[15:45] <Laney> vorlon: you too?
[15:46] <Laney> Guess autopkgtest is juliank and sil2100's for a week then :>
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (trusty-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-9ubuntu1.16 => 2.02~beta2-9ubuntu1.17] (core)
[15:46] <vorlon> indeed
[15:47] <juliank> oh no
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prelude-lml [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [4.1.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prelude-lml [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [4.1.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prelude-lml [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [4.1.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prelude-lml [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [4.1.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prelude-lml [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [4.1.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prelude-lml [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [4.1.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:52] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Okay.
[16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9-cross [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [4ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[17:03] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: no
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-9-cross [amd64] (disco-proposed) [4ubuntu1]
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prelude-lml [arm64] (disco-proposed) [4.1.0-2ubuntu1]
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prelude-lml [i386] (disco-proposed) [4.1.0-2ubuntu1]
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prelude-lml [s390x] (disco-proposed) [4.1.0-2ubuntu1]
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prelude-lml [amd64] (disco-proposed) [4.1.0-2ubuntu1]
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prelude-lml [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [4.1.0-2ubuntu1]
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prelude-lml [armhf] (disco-proposed) [4.1.0-2ubuntu1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:0.5.2.3]
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (xenial-proposed/main) [1:4.2-3.1ubuntu5.3 => 1:4.2-3.1ubuntu5.4] (core)
[19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (bionic-proposed/main) [1:4.5-1ubuntu1 => 1:4.5-1ubuntu2] (core)
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (trusty-proposed/main) [1.34.18 => 1.34.19] (core)
[19:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1001.1] (kernel)
[19:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1001.1] (kernel)
[19:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (xenial-proposed/main) [1:4.2-3.1ubuntu5.3 => 1:4.2-3.1ubuntu5.4] (core)
[19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.02~beta2-9ubuntu1.17]
[19:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (bionic-proposed/main) [1:4.5-1ubuntu1 => 1:4.5-1ubuntu2] (core)
[19:49] <mvo> sorry for the double upload of shadow - the first just contans "userdel --extrausers" but while going over the things we had to fix for Ubuntu Core I noticed there were some more fixes worth SRUing, hence the second update
[19:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (trusty-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-9ubuntu1.17 => 2.02~beta2-9ubuntu1.17] (core)
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shadow [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:4.2-3.1ubuntu5.4]
[20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.34.19]
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.175.3]
[20:46] <ahasenack> hi release team, could someone please badtest autofs in disco? https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/britney/autofs-badtest-cifs-bug/+merge/364988
[20:46] <ahasenack> it's a real bug, but not yet fixed in the kernel we have
[20:47] <ahasenack> or, if you prefer, I could change the autofs test to *not* use SMB3.11 when using cifs and a guest mount, but by having that test as is is what allowed us to find that bug
[20:56] <vorlon> ahasenack: does the bug not represent a regression at runtime between autofs 5.1.2-4ubuntu2 and the new samba?
[20:56] <ahasenack> vorlon: no
[20:56] <ahasenack> vorlon: and I have proof
[20:56] <ahasenack> autofs passwd with previous rc4 and 4.19 kernel
[20:56] <ahasenack> fails with 5.0 kernel
[20:56] <ahasenack> and I don't need autofs to show the bug
[20:56] <vorlon> ahasenack: so if we retested autofs with the disco version of autofs, we'd see the same failure now that 5.0 is in?
[20:57] <ahasenack> the autofs test is correctly failinh
[20:57] <ahasenack> yes
[20:57] <vorlon> ok
[20:57] <ahasenack> I also have confirmation in the cifs-devel mailing list
[20:57] <vorlon> it is preferable to retrigger the autopkgtests so that this is visible in the log; I'm doing this now
[20:58] <ahasenack> vorlon: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cifs/CANYNYEH3qVQA_05H-FeJdRgQe81O8gaULXuCGz42e_nKVgMnkg@mail.gmail.com/T/#m3bef710c4ec39be849f2684fbb85183f988dae38
[20:58] <vorlon> retry-autopkgtest-regressions --blocks samba --no-proposed  | xargs -rn1 -P10 wget --load-cookies ~/.cache/autopkgtest.cookie -O-
[20:59] <vorlon> ahasenack: yep, acceptable rationale, I just prefer it to be self-documenting on autopkgtest.u.c
[20:59] <vorlon> so once those test results come in, I'll merge your hint
[20:59] <ahasenack> vorlon: is this just a new run? What will be different in the log, other than you triggered it?
[21:01] <ahasenack> vorlon: the samba dep8 tests also include a cifs mount test, but only an authenticated one, not a guest one. autofs tests both
[21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9-cross-ports [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.16 => 237-3ubuntu10.17] (core)
[21:56] <vorlon> ahasenack: what is different is --no-proposed, so that they are run against the devel version of samba instead of the -proposed version
[21:56] <vorlon> ahasenack: but none of the results are showing up for me yet on the web ui :P
[21:58] <ahasenack> vorlon: ah, ok
[21:59] <ahasenack> vorlon: it's there now, or did you mean somewhere else? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/autofs/disco/amd64
[21:59] <ahasenack> (I was afk, came back now)
[21:59] <vorlon> ahasenack: heh, I was looking at ppc64el and s390x which are normally fastest to finish
[21:59] <vorlon> but those just showed up too
[21:59] <ahasenack> that surprised me today, seeing s390x finishing first
[22:02] <vorlon> ahasenack: and hint added
[22:02] <ahasenack> thanks!
[22:04] <ahasenack> vorlon: I'll find some time to test the kernel patch provided in the list. They said it fixed it for them, but just that patch on our kernel doesn't fix it. They asked to test one of those for-next git branches kernel people have, which is ahead of ours
[22:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.38+18.10]
[22:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.38+18.04]
[22:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-9-cross-ports [amd64] (disco-proposed) [3ubuntu1]
[22:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.38]
[22:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.38~14.04]
[22:40] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: licensecheck disagrees with you about the license of source/modules/hylia/link/AudioEngine.* and source/modules/hylia/link/ableton/* in carla; your debian/copyright says they're BSL-1, licensecheck reports that they are GPL-2+
[22:42] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: (this is by virtue of the stanza starting at line 48, which matches all files under that directory recursively, and is the most specific match for these files)
[22:44] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: and you have conflicting declarations for source/modules/dgl/*, which is listed as both public-domain-with-attribution and ISC
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [2.02~beta2-9ubuntu1.17]