[04:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: snapd-glib [i386] (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.47-0ubuntu0.18.10.0] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: progress-linux-metapackages (disco-proposed/primary) [20190225-3]
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xfce4-weather-plugin (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.8.10-1build1 => 0.8.11-0ubuntu0.18.10.1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xfce4-weather-plugin (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.10-1 => 0.8.11-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xfce4-weather-plugin (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.8.9-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 0.8.11-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (bionic-proposed/main) [2:12.0.5-0ubuntu1 => 2:12.0.5-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (cosmic-proposed/main) [2:13.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 2:13.0.2-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xdg-desktop-portal [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.3-0ubuntu0.2]
[13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xdg-desktop-portal (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-0ubuntu0.1 => 1.0.3-0ubuntu0.2] (ubuntugnome)
[13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xdg-desktop-portal [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.3-0ubuntu0.2]
[14:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tomcat8 (bionic-proposed/universe) [8.5.38-2ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 8.5.39-1ubuntu1~18.04] (kubuntu) (sync)
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tomcat8 (cosmic-proposed/universe) [8.5.38-2ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 8.5.39-1ubuntu1~18.04] (kubuntu) (sync)
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tomcat8 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [8.5.39-1ubuntu1~18.04]
[14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tomcat8 [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [8.5.39-1ubuntu1~18.04]
[15:09] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, reasons for ruby-gnome2 failures? also the current package in -release FTBFS in the same way... I suspect some cairo gtk3 changes, but after 4 days of debug... nothing
[15:13] <LocutusOfBorg> oh... gtk3 bumped version
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tomcat8 (cosmic-proposed/universe) [8.5.38-2ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 8.5.39-1ubuntu1~18.04] (kubuntu) (sync)
[15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tomcat8 [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [8.5.39-1ubuntu1~18.04]
[15:32] <bdmurray> coreycb: Could you improve the regression potential in bug 1818614?
[15:32] <ubot5`> bug 1818614 in neutron (Ubuntu Cosmic) "[SRU] Various L3HA functional tests fails often" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1818614
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.5ubuntu3.18.10.3]
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.10]
[16:01] <coreycb> bdmurray: yep, done
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpdk [source] (cosmic-proposed) [17.11.5-0~ubuntu18.10.1]
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2:13.0.2-0ubuntu2]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shadow [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:4.5-1ubuntu2]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:12.0.5-0ubuntu2]
[17:02] <jdstrand> hey, I asked about this yesterday, but some time ago I issue a FFe for apparmor 2.13. I thought I followed the process, but no one looked at it yet: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1817799
[17:02] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1817799 in apparmor (Ubuntu) "[FFe] apparmor 2.13" [Undecided,New]
[17:03] <jdstrand> can someone take a look?
[17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shadow [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:4.5-1ubuntu2]
[17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libglvnd (disco-proposed/main) [1.1.0-1 => 1.1.1-0ubuntu1] (core)
[17:07] <jdstrand> infinity: can you confirm that ^ is even on the list of things to review?
[17:07] <jdstrand> infinity: hi btw :)
[17:09] <jdstrand> ah, it does sho up in https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/+subscribedbugs
[17:09] <jdstrand> show even
[17:09] <infinity> jdstrand: The obvious question is, if it's been in progress in Debian for so long, why did we wait until post-FF to get it in Ubuntu? :)
[17:11] <jdstrand> infinity: resource constraints and honestly, bug fixing there. I wanted to do it before the freeze, but there was a particular bug around profile loads that I didn't want to introduce. it was fixed after FF
[17:12] <infinity> jdstrand: Ahh, and the snapd you needed didn't land until just recently, I see.
[17:12] <jdstrand> infinity: I mean, it can technically wait til e opens
[17:12] <jdstrand> infinity: yes, that too
[17:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libunistring [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.9-0ubuntu2]
[17:13] <infinity> jdstrand: If your confidence level is very high, and your commitment to fixing it when it turns out you're wrong is even higher, then I'm fine with it.
[17:13] <jdstrand> infinity: but wanted to get this batch of changes in for less disruption. if it is too late now, that isn't the worst thing
[17:13] <jdstrand> infinity: it is and it is
[17:13] <infinity> jdstrand: Just take into account the snappy team's turnaround time too, if you discover that half the bugs are theirs.
[17:14] <jdstrand> heh, those could changes were pretty small. I'm confident and will work with them as needed
[17:14] <jdstrand> code*
[17:14] <jdstrand> jeez, type much?
[17:14] <infinity> jdstrand: Is that ugly snap-confie parser error thing also fixed in newer snapd, or will everyone see that scary on upgrade?
[17:16] <jdstrand> infinity: that should normally be created. I can verify in disco and file a bug and get it on their radar
[17:17] <infinity> Also:
[17:17] <infinity> dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/etc/apparmor.d/cache': Directory not empty
[17:17] <infinity> Do you need some extra magic to migrate or remove old cache contents so we're not leaving cruft around?
[17:17] <cascardo> bdmurray: hey, I have just updated the last bug on the list for makedumpfile bionic SRU, could you get it looked at again, please?
[17:17] <jdstrand> infinity: I saw that and something later cleans it and its gone
[17:18]  * jdstrand looks to see what that is
[17:19] <jdstrand> infinity: postint rm -rf's it
[17:19] <jdstrand> (which is fine, the new parser recreates everything in /var/cache/apparmor
[17:19] <jdstrand> )
[17:20] <infinity> Would probably make more sense for preinst to rm cachedir/* but okay.
[17:20] <jdstrand> I can adjust that
[17:21] <infinity> Not super picky.  I just like clean upgrades, and I'm sure 3 or 4 people still watch the dpkg output. :)
[17:22] <infinity> (Though depending on how and when caches are used, it might make more sense for in general to whack cachedir/* in preinst ANYWAY, so you don't have new binary and old cache before postinst generates new cache?)
[17:22] <infinity> But then you'd want oldcachedir (if upgrade from << foo) AND newcachedir.
[17:24] <jdstrand> the parser will ignore those and put them in /var/cache/apparmor so there isn't an issue if I see what you are getting at, but I'm already testing a fix
[17:25] <infinity> jdstrand: Sure, the new parser will ignore them cause it doesn't read there, but what happens when /var/cache/apparmor contains cache that a new binary doesn't love?
[17:25] <infinity> jdstrand: That was my "in general, maybe wiping it is smart anyway".
[17:26] <infinity> jdstrand: And then, if that general code is there, adding a special case for "oh, and get the old cache dir too, on upgrade from old versions" has a home.
[17:26] <jdstrand> infinity: we don't do that unconditionally on upgrades since the parser is smart enough to know when to invalidate
[17:26] <infinity> Fair enough.
[17:26] <jdstrand> and when not to
[17:35] <bdmurray> cpaelzer__: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/numactl/+bug/1817258/comments/20 that'd be highly unusual. Could you explain more why you think we should release it anyway?
[17:35] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1817258 in numactl (Ubuntu Cosmic) ""numastat" doesn't display correct information for the guest." [High,Fix committed]
[17:50] <jdstrand> infinity: so the ugly message/snapd issue is not seen. I think that was a local issue (I recall now I was working with a particularly minimal vm and was purging --force-breaksing and the like and likely removed snapd but didn't purge, so that dir was gone but the profile was on the system)
[17:51] <infinity> jdstrand: Ahh, good.
[17:53] <jdstrand> I'll have the preinst adjusted in a sec (missed a hidden file in my first test :)
[17:53] <jdstrand> infinity: the process says you'd put it at triaged. are you still reviewing?
[17:54]  * jdstrand is happy to wait, just want to upload at the right time :)
[17:56] <infinity> jdstrand: Bug updated.
[17:57] <jdstrand> infinity: thanks for the review :)
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.11]
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (disco-proposed/main) [2.12-4ubuntu10 => 2.13.2-9ubuntu2] (core)
[18:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apparmor [source] (disco-proposed) [2.13.2-9ubuntu2]
[19:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backports.functools-lru-cache (disco-proposed/main) [1.5-2 => 1.5-3] (ubuntu-server) (sync)
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted health-check [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.02.09-1ubuntu1]
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shadow [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:4.2-3.1ubuntu5.4]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rtkit (disco-proposed/main) [0.12-3 => 0.12-4] (desktop-core) (sync)
[19:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rtkit [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.12-4]
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.45]
[19:43] <ginggs> infinity: o/ if you are handing out FFes, please LP: #1821792
[19:43] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1821792 in nvidia-cuda-toolkit (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync nvidia-cuda-toolkit 10.1.105-1 (multiverse) from Debian experimental (non-free) " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1821792
[20:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.7 (disco-proposed/main) [3.7.3-1 => 3.7.3-1ubuntu1] (core)
[20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.7 [source] (disco-proposed) [3.7.3-1ubuntu1]
[20:18] <tumbleweed> ginggs: approved
[20:18] <ginggs> tumbleweed: thanks!
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted backports.functools-lru-cache [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.5-3]
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Disco Beta] (20101020ubuntu567) has been added
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Disco Beta] (20101020ubuntu567) has been added
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Disco Beta] (20101020ubuntu567) has been added
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot i386 [Disco Beta] (20101020ubuntu567) has been added
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Disco Beta] (20101020ubuntu567) has been added
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Disco Beta] (20101020ubuntu567) has been added
[21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base i386 [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[21:48] <bdmurray> infinity: How should I evaluate the snapd-glib stuff in the cosmic new queue?
[21:50] <infinity> bdmurray: Ask an AA, cause you can't do anything about it?
[21:51] <infinity> bdmurray: (I'll look in a bit)
[21:52] <bdmurray> infinity: thanks
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi3 [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi2 [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi3 [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[22:23] <bdmurray> cascardo: This makedumpfile update looks like a new upstream microrelease in which case https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#New_upstream_microreleases should be followed.
[22:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ufw [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.36-0ubuntu0.18.10.1]
[22:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ufw [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.36-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfce4-weather-plugin [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.8.11-0ubuntu0.18.10.1]
[22:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Disco Beta] (20190326.2) has been added
[22:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfce4-weather-plugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.11-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[22:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[22:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[22:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Disco Beta] (20190326) has been added
[22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[22:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Disco Beta] (20190326.1) has been added
[22:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor-profiles-extra (disco-proposed/universe) [1.26 => 1.26ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apparmor-profiles-extra [source] (disco-proposed) [1.26ubuntu1]