| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| doko | jbicha, willcooke: was the gtk2 demotion on your plate, or will it stay in main, and maybe for how long? | 11:56 |
|---|---|---|
| willcooke | I don't know, I'd need to ask seb128 (who is on holiday) - didrocks, any ideas? ^ | 11:59 |
| === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
| didrocks | I didn't follow the gtk2 demotion, I guess that can wait for Monday as won't happen this cycle | 13:52 |
| gpiccoli | Hi rbasak , we were discussing in private the absence of some dbg symbols from trusty packages - you even pointed to LP # 1465777 | 14:06 |
| rbasak | o/ | 14:07 |
| gpiccoli | Just for curiosity / full clarification, given that a dbg symbol package was built (like irqbalance example) and we can find the dbg pkg in the ppa builder | 14:07 |
| gpiccoli | Can't we copy this ddeb to the regular place where ddebs live, in order to allow apt-get to download the package? | 14:07 |
| gpiccoli | I think it makes sense for some packages, and only for the latest versions of them, of course... | 14:08 |
| gpiccoli | In other words - is it feasible to do a manual copying of the dbg package to the right place? | 14:08 |
| gpiccoli | rbasak ^ | 14:08 |
| gpiccoli | fabiomirmar, ^ | 14:08 |
| rbasak | There's probably a data integrity issue there. We'd want to be sure that the debug symbols package really does match the corresponding binaries. | 14:09 |
| rbasak | The only way to be sure is if they actually came out of the same build. | 14:09 |
| rbasak | Is that the case here? | 14:09 |
| gpiccoli | exactly rbasak, it's the same build! | 14:10 |
| gpiccoli | let me find the link | 14:10 |
| gpiccoli | to provide an example | 14:10 |
| gpiccoli | rbasak, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irqbalance/1.0.6-2ubuntu0.14.04.4/+build/7896738 | 14:11 |
| gpiccoli | this package is present in trusty, though if we check [0], the dbg symbols pkg is not there. | 14:12 |
| gpiccoli | [0] - http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/main/i/irqbalance/ | 14:12 |
| gpiccoli | my idea: to move this .ddeb package to ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool in order we can "fix" the situation, at least for some packages as we found them. Not sure if it's super laborious, or if it's worthed heheh | 14:13 |
| gpiccoli | Just want to understand the feasibility for that | 14:13 |
| rbasak | From bug 1465777 I was under the impression that the missing ddebs were no longer available. | 14:15 |
| ubottu | bug 1465777 in php-json (Ubuntu) "A subset of ddebs built during the Trusty cycle are missing" [Undecided,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1465777 | 14:15 |
| rbasak | This case appears to be different. | 14:15 |
| rbasak | I'm not sure what's going on there. | 14:18 |
| rbasak | Perhaps it's not a case of that bug, but something else. | 14:18 |
| === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
| gpiccoli | oh, interesting rbasak | 14:26 |
| coreycb | rbasak: hi there, if you have some time we have new versions of neutron in the unapproved queues for disco, cosmic and bionic with some very important patch fixes. these package versions can replace the current versions that are in -proposed. | 14:27 |
| bdmurray | willcooke: I take your on comment on bug 1821415 to mean that there isn't some new hot replacement for pkexec, is that right? | 15:46 |
| ubottu | bug 1821415 in policykit-1 (Ubuntu) "pkexec fails in a non-graphical environment" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1821415 | 15:46 |
| willcooke | bdmurray, correct, no new replacement | 15:47 |
| willcooke | andyrock thinks he can fix it though | 15:47 |
| bdmurray | that'd be helpful | 15:48 |
| bdmurray | willcooke: Do you know what the status of systemd user sessions is? | 15:49 |
| willcooke | bdmurray, AFAICR, not finished this cycle, will land early next cycle | 15:49 |
| bdmurray | willcooke: Well as long as it happens sometime! ;-) | 15:50 |
| willcooke | :)) | 15:50 |
| infinity | robert_ancell: Was there a master plan to make snapd-glib-tests in disco actually ship stuff (like the one you uploaded to cosmic)? | 22:35 |
| robert_ancell | infinity, is the binary package empty? | 22:35 |
| infinity | Very. | 22:36 |
| robert_ancell | oops | 22:36 |
| infinity | robert_ancell: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/4Nh79khq6w/ | 22:36 |
| infinity | robert_ancell: Note the last three files that differ. :) | 22:36 |
| * robert_ancell hastily fixes | 22:36 | |
| infinity | robert_ancell: Just confirming that the cosmic SRU is correct and it's disco that's buggy? | 22:37 |
| infinity | robert_ancell: Before I go processing the cosmis stuff in NEW. | 22:37 |
| robert_ancell | I'll just double check | 22:37 |
| robert_ancell | infinity, the cosmic package seems correct here. | 22:38 |
| infinity | robert_ancell: Alrighty. So, please fix disco. Kthx. | 22:38 |
| robert_ancell | ah, didn't bzr add the .install file | 22:39 |
| infinity | And two others, I'd assume. | 22:39 |
| infinity | debian/tests/* | 22:40 |
| robert_ancell | file(s) | 22:40 |
| robert_ancell | yes | 22:40 |
| infinity | bdmurray: Alright, snapd-glib/cosmic NEW reviewed and accepted, and exposed an icky bug in snapd-glib/disco. :) | 22:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!