[05:38] <tjaalton> RAOF: I've uploaded a new version of intel-mediasdk with d/copyright fixed and using a packaged googletest. ipp can't be split though, it's only a subset of the real thing
[05:41] <RAOF> tjaalton: ta. Ipp was the wishlistiest wishlist bit.
[05:41] <tjaalton> ok ;)
[05:42] <RAOF> Is anything using the mediasdk yet? 😀
[05:42] <tjaalton> I have the compute runtime (NEO opencl) building now, I'll push the rest to the queue this week
[05:42] <RAOF> Ah, rad.
[05:42] <tjaalton> eventually will, it'll allow building opensource shaders for the media driver
[05:43] <tjaalton> so strictly for universe for now
[05:43] <tjaalton> all of this
[05:43] <RAOF> Neo OpenCL? Is this a third Intel OpenCL implementation?
[05:43] <tjaalton> yeah
[05:43] <tjaalton> what they'll actually support
[05:44] <RAOF> Is this the one that'll have SYCL support?
[05:44] <tjaalton> probably
[06:00] <RAOF> Heh
[12:46] <coreycb> hi, i'm not seeing sil2100 but if someone else is on SRU rota today, we have new versions of neutron in the unapproved queues for disco, cosmic and bionic with some very important patch fixes. these package versions can replace the current versions that are in -proposed.
[12:48] <coreycb> those are needed by a bootstack customer
[13:07] <rbasak> cpaelzer: what's the test plan for the Posgres MRE SRUs? I can't find one documented anywhere.
[13:08] <rbasak> cpaelzer: or does it meet the criteria listed under https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#New_upstream_microreleases?
[13:16] <cpaelzer> rbasak: this is from before the time of being listed there
[13:17] <cpaelzer> rbasak: but we got passed the procedure which essentially is "it has a vast assortment of build time and related autopkgtests - make sure those pass or fails are understood"
[13:17] <cpaelzer> this is how pitti described and handled it (o/ pitti)
[13:17] <cpaelzer> and this is how we do it since
[13:18] <cpaelzer> TBH all the upgrade errors we found this time were catched by exactly this assortment of autopkgtests
[13:18] <pitti> o/ cpaelzer
[13:18] <rbasak> cpaelzer: thanks. That meets the criteria then. We should probably document that in the template.
[13:18] <pitti> we used to have a special exception for postgresql, and then generalized the policy so that it (and similar packages) falls under it
[13:20] <pitti> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates?action=diff&rev2=232&rev1=231
[13:21] <pitti> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions?action=diff&rev2=60&rev1=59 was the former explicit list (including psql)
[14:41]  * juliank even used microrelease exceptions for apt SRUs. When I collected a bunch of apt bug fixes upstream (without individual LP bugs) that all had autopkgtests :)
[15:51] <Eickmeyer> Anybody know who I can ping about a UX bug in Ubiquity? (bug 1822134)
[15:54] <Eickmeyer> Actually, looks like cyphermox might be my man. ^
[15:55] <cyphermox> oh that's cute
[15:56] <cyphermox> Eickmeyer: you want to make the changes in ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu?
[15:56] <Eickmeyer> cyphermox: Would that be me just pulling the repo, making the change, then setting-up a PR?
[15:57] <cyphermox> yup
[15:57] <Eickmeyer> Okay, I'll work on it.
[15:57] <Eickmeyer> cyphermox: Though, it appears right when Ubiquity opens, so not sure it's just the slideshow. I'll investigate.
[15:57] <cyphermox> ah
[15:57] <cyphermox> then yeah, it wouldn't be the slideshow
[15:58] <cyphermox> could you add a screenshot to the bug? I'll help you debug this and then I can sponsor a fix
[15:59] <Eickmeyer> I'll see what I can do. Studio's ISO doesn't play well in a VM.
[16:09] <cyphermox> ah, in that case I'll just download the image and run it on a spare system somewhere
[16:10] <Eickmeyer> cyphermox: I almost have something usable.
[16:16] <Eickmeyer> cyphermox: I have a screenshot in the bug report now.
[16:19] <cyphermox> yeah ok, that's indeed theming and not at all the slideshow
[16:20] <handsome_feng> Hi, cyphermox, let me join your conversation too, could you have a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~feng-kylin/ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/updateVersionNum/+merge/364663 when you are free, :)
[16:25]  * Eickmeyer will probably update Studio's slideshow for 19.10. Too much going on this time around.
[16:29] <Eickmeyer> cyphermox: Are we talking the GTK theme or Ubiquity's usage of it?
[16:29] <cyphermox> Eickmeyer: a little bit of both, probably
[16:30] <Eickmeyer> If we can adapt Ubiquity to use white text, then that should solve the issue.
[16:33] <cyphermox> sure, but it already works for the other flavours
[16:33] <cyphermox> IIRC it's already white text
[16:35] <infinity> powersj: I see no ubuntu-server beta ISO testing.  Coming in late, or someone forgot the release schedule (and isn't subscribed to devel-announce)?
[16:35] <powersj> infinity, just haven't published results
[16:35] <infinity> I thought we'd talked about this. :P
[16:36] <Eickmeyer> cyphermox: Then, are we looking at a bug in the theme itself?
[16:38] <cyphermox> Eickmeyer: I think so; but I'm unsure what exactly
[16:38] <Eickmeyer> Okay. Should I add materia-gtk-theme to the bug report?
[16:38] <cyphermox> I'm not really familiar with theming; what I can tell you is that this is an issue with the GtkLabel being in a 'menubar', probably
[16:39] <infinity> tjaalton: Can you triage and reassign https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1822026 to where it belongs (pretty sure it's not ubiquity :P)
[16:39] <cyphermox> I see your menubars already are grey but they do have white text
[16:39] <Eickmeyer> Intersting.
[16:39] <cyphermox> Eickmeyer: please ask in #ubuntu-desktop; someone there might be in a position to help you out in how to debug this / compare with the other themes, unfortunately I don't know enough how this works
[16:40] <Eickmeyer> cyphermox: Okay, will do.
[16:40] <cyphermox> essentially right now I'm just guessing, but I know the grey background is because the section of that page in ubiquity is a 'menubar' class
[16:41] <cyphermox> I don't know if / how much there is inheritance of styling for objects in other objects like in css for the gtk theming
[16:41] <Eickmeyer> Okay.
[16:43] <cyphermox> Eickmeyer: so; if there's evidence that it's an issue in ubiquity, then sure let's change it there, but right now I don't see what picks color for that particular GtkLabel; seems it's all about the theme, so I'd first look there
[16:44] <Eickmeyer> Okay. I just pinged #ubuntu-desktop on the issue.
[17:07] <tjaalton> infinity: likely the kernel..
[18:08] <bdmurray> rbalint: I updated bug 1809920 but yes the second upgrade did not work which is as we suspected
[18:13] <rbalint> bdmurray, good, then it is just annoying, not a deadly trap :-)
[18:13] <bdmurray> rbalint: right!