/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/04/03/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: git-buildpackage (disco-proposed/universe) [0.9.13 => 0.9.14] (no packageset) (sync)00:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted git-buildpackage [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.9.14]00:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pbuilder (disco-proposed/universe) [0.230.3 => 0.230.4] (no packageset) (sync)00:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pbuilder [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.230.4]00:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openssl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.0]00:41
handsome_fengq01:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8 (disco-proposed/main) [8.3.0-4ubuntu1 => 8.3.0-5ubuntu1] (core)01:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8 [source] (disco-proposed) [8.3.0-5ubuntu1]01:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8 (bionic-proposed/main) [8.3.0-4ubuntu1~18.04 => 8.3.0-5ubuntu1~18.04] (core)02:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8 [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.3.0-5ubuntu1~18.04]02:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8-cross (disco-proposed/main) [27ubuntu2 => 27ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)02:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8-cross-ports (disco-proposed/universe) [20ubuntu5 => 20ubuntu6] (no packageset)02:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8-cross-ports [source] (disco-proposed) [20ubuntu6]02:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8-cross [source] (disco-proposed) [27ubuntu3]02:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpkg [source] (disco-proposed) [1.19.6ubuntu1]05:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lsb [source] (disco-proposed) [10.2019031300ubuntu1]05:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kwindowsystem [source] (disco-proposed) [5.56.0-0ubuntu2]05:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.7 (disco-proposed/main) [3.7.3-1ubuntu1 => 3.7.3-2] (core)07:07
acheronukbritney hasn't run for nearly 2 hrs. is there a problem?07:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lintian [source] (disco-proposed) [2.11.0ubuntu1]07:28
acheronukoh 1.5 hrs07:28
infinityacheronuk: Lack of archive churn or new test results means it has nothing to do.  It should run (or be running) soon.07:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cpprest (disco-proposed/universe) [2.10.11-1 => 2.10.12-4] (no packageset) (sync)07:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-8 (disco-proposed/main) [1:8-2 => 1:8-3] (core) (sync)07:29
acheronukinfinity: right. I guess I'm mostly used to seeing it at times when there is more going on. thanks07:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cpprest [sync] (disco-proposed) [2.10.12-4]07:30
acheronukand there is goes :D07:31
acheronuk*it07:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (disco-proposed) [2.575]07:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.7 [source] (disco-proposed) [3.7.3-2]07:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-characters [sync] (disco-proposed) [3.32.0-2]07:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-8 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1:8-3]07:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libimagequant [sync] (disco-proposed) [2.12.2-1.1]07:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keyutils [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.6-6]07:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxml-twig-perl [sync] (disco-proposed) [1:3.50-1.1]07:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfce4-screenshooter [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.9.5-1]07:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libayatana-indicator [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.6.2-3]07:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted translate-toolkit [sync] (disco-proposed) [2.3.1-3]07:33
UkikieThank you.07:35
infinityLaney: There's been a deja-dup/trusty/armhf test running for 45h now.  I suspect it might be slightly sad. :P07:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.8 (disco-proposed/universe) [3.8.0~a3-1ubuntu1 => 3.8.0~a3-2] (no packageset)07:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.8 [source] (disco-proposed) [3.8.0~a3-2]07:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross (disco-proposed/universe) [30ubuntu2 => 30ubuntu3] (no packageset)07:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross [source] (disco-proposed) [30ubuntu3]07:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (disco-proposed/main) [19.0.1-1ubuntu1 => 19.0.1-1ubuntu2] (core, xorg)07:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross (disco-proposed/universe) [30ubuntu3 => 30ubuntu4] (no packageset)08:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross [source] (disco-proposed) [30ubuntu4]08:01
Laney/o\08:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (disco-proposed) [19.0.1-1ubuntu2]08:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (disco-proposed/main) [2:1.20.4-1ubuntu2 => 2:1.20.4-1ubuntu3] (desktop-core, xorg)09:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-initial-setup (disco-proposed/main) [3.32.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.32.0-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntugnome)09:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-bluetooth (disco-proposed/main) [3.32.0-1 => 3.32.1-1] (desktop-core) (sync)09:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdelibs4support (disco-proposed/universe) [5.56.0-0ubuntu1 => 5.56.0-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)10:04
LocutusOfBorgsad testsuite until lsb migrates...10:28
LocutusOfBorgdpkg: lsb-base: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you requested:10:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kbibtex (disco-proposed/universe) [0.8.1-1ubuntu2 => 0.8.1-1ubuntu3] (kubuntu)11:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pip (bionic-proposed/universe) [9.0.1-2.3~ubuntu1 => 9.0.1-2.3~ubuntu1.18.04.1] (no packageset)11:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (disco-proposed/main) [1.1.1b-1ubuntu1 => 1.1.1b-1ubuntu2] (core)11:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pip (cosmic-proposed/universe) [9.0.1-2.3 => 9.0.1-2.3ubuntu0.18.10.1] (no packageset)11:09
xnoxLaney, could you please review and accept openssl into disco?11:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pbgenomicconsensus (disco-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-2 => 2.3.2-3] (no packageset) (sync)11:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pbgenomicconsensus [sync] (disco-proposed) [2.3.2-3]11:46
Laneyxnox: aye will look at the queue in a bit12:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (disco-proposed/main) [19.04.7 => 19.04.8] (core)12:26
rbasakCould I get some AA help with bug 1822780 and pymacaroons in trusty-proposed please? I'm ready to SRU-accept, but this will drop the building of python-pymacaroons binary package that's in trusty-proposed only, making it NBS I think - so I thought I'd check first.12:30
ubot5`bug 1822780 in pymacaroons (Ubuntu Trusty) "dependency issues in the pymacaroons stack" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182278012:30
rbasakWill it need a specific binary package deletion  from an AA after my accept? Any other consequences?12:31
rbasakcpaelzer, ahasenack: ^12:31
ahasenackI see12:31
ahasenackso in proposed, yes, the py2 package needs to go away12:31
rbasakI believe it should be fine but thought it best to ask.12:31
ahasenackI think the first step is to accept it, then see if the py2 one gets reaped, if not, ask12:32
ahasenack?12:32
rbasakAIUI, there is no auto-reaping12:32
rbasakAAs run some NBS processing script in the development release, and NBS is not usually expected in a stable release of course.12:33
ahasenackI see12:33
rbasakFor the release pocket at least. This is proposed, and so I don't know what happens there.12:33
rbasakI thought I'd ask first in case someone says "no don't do that you'll make it worse" :)12:33
ahasenacksounds good12:35
xnoxrbasak, i'm sure we have a tonne of nbs in stable releases -proposed/-updates from like unreleased/superseeded kernel srus and the like.12:36
xnoxrbasak, and i bet we should script nbs report for stable series.12:37
apwxnox, we arn't allowed to NBS kerenls, as anyone might need the d-i bits for any netboot image they have ever13:00
apwxnox, in stables13:00
xnoxheh, right!13:01
xnoxalso fun13:02
jdstrandsforshee: hey, not sure you saw, but ubuntu5 migrated. hopefully you are good to go now :)13:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-imageio (disco-proposed/universe) [2.4.1-2 => 2.4.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)13:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-imageio [source] (disco-proposed) [2.4.1-2ubuntu1]13:14
sforsheejdstrand: cool, I see that the last couple runs of the linux package tests both passed, so I think that did the trick. Thanks again!13:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pbgenomicconsensus (disco-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-3 => 2.3.2-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)13:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pbgenomicconsensus [source] (disco-proposed) [2.3.2-3ubuntu1]13:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted inxi [source] (disco-proposed) [3.0.33-1-0ubuntu1]13:43
jdstrandsforshee: np, glad I could help13:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (disco-proposed) [3.192.16]14:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (disco-proposed) [2:1.20.4-1ubuntu3]14:14
acheronuksil2100: can you look at kbibtex and kdelibs4support in the queue? that would get Qt 5.12 transition to one libreoffice test issue plus one upload of a qtbase-opensource-src-gles to go14:23
acheronukOh and one more, but it would be good to get these done now14:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (xenial-proposed/main) [2:13.1.4-0ubuntu4.3 => 2:13.1.4-0ubuntu4.4] (openstack, ubuntu-server)14:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-initial-setup [source] (disco-proposed) [3.32.0-1ubuntu2]14:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-bluetooth [sync] (disco-proposed) [3.32.1-1]14:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kbibtex [source] (disco-proposed) [0.8.1-1ubuntu3]14:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdelibs4support [source] (disco-proposed) [5.56.0-0ubuntu2]14:37
acheronuksil2100: if that was you thank you. if it was not thank you to who did it.14:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pymacaroons [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.9.2-0ubuntu1~ubuntu14.04.2]15:07
rbasak^ I accepted it given no feedback to the contrary.15:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-online-accounts (disco-proposed/main) [3.31.90-1ubuntu1 => 3.32.0-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)15:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (disco-proposed) [19.04.8]15:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (disco-proposed/main) [3.192.16 => 3.192.17] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)15:19
juliank^ please accept, fixes up last upload which missed a build-depends (sorry about that, did not do a clean build)15:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (disco-proposed) [3.192.17]15:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (disco-proposed) [1.431]15:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [1.431] (core)15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [1.431] (core)15:32
rbalintif i'd like to sru ubuntu-meta in LP: #1822341 should i handcraft the patch or include seed updates as well in the upload?15:35
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1822341 in ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "[FFE][SRU] Please add ubuntu-wsl binary package" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182234115:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (disco-proposed) [1.1.1b-1ubuntu2]15:37
rbalintsil2100, https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/systemd-cosmic-hints/+merge/36510415:40
Laneywhoever accepted that openssl, I had asked a question on one of the linked bugs15:41
Laneywould appreciate checking of those in future15:41
Laney(not a huge deal, but would be good to avoid crossed wires)15:43
sil2100Laney: looking o/15:43
sil2100Laney: argh15:43
sil2100I meant15:43
sil2100rbalint: looking o/15:43
sil2100Laney: (and I didn't accept the openssl)15:43
rbalintLaney, i am seeing an odd failure in http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/o/octave-interval/bionic/amd64 , which i documented in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wslu/+bug/1818673/comments/715:49
ubot5`Ubuntu bug 1818673 in wslu (Ubuntu Cosmic) " [SRU] Please accept wslu to supported releases " [Undecided,Fix released]15:49
rbalintit can affect other tests as well making them false positives as well15:50
Laneymmm yeah we only have one copy of autodep815:52
vorlonLaney: I accepted it; sorry, I had sufficient context to be comfortable with the change, so I wasn't looking for questions15:52
sil2100rbalint: I'll apply your hints with some slight modifications15:52
vorlonLaney: anyway, I was accepting it for disco, which doesn't require the SRU template15:53
Laneyvorlon: I know, but if there's a linked bug it seems like a fine place to ask questions about queue items.15:53
LaneyShould I safety reject in that case?15:53
vorlonif you feel you should :)15:53
vorlonLaney: the context I have is that I rejected his *bionic* SRU because it *added* the patch in question15:54
vorlonso he's trying to sort that out so that bionic is SRUable :)15:54
LaneyNo, leaving it pending would be better, but if that helps to avoid clashing then that might be the best way to do it15:54
vorlonLaney: I guess the convention of marking the bug task 'incomplete' when there are outstanding questions would have reduced the chance of me overlooking your question15:56
LaneyIf people are checking bugs at all ;-)15:57
Laneyanyway, thanks for the information15:57
Laneynow want to change subject? see the thing rbalint just pinged me about15:57
Laneyseems like something we'd want to fix ...15:58
vorlonLaney: I actually run sru-review when reviewing the devel-proposed unapproved queue, so it does pop the bugs :)15:58
vorlonthat's the octave-internal thing?15:58
Laneyye15:58
vorloninterval15:58
Laneywhateveritis15:58
LaneyLooks like autodep8 only works for devel uploads, but we run it for everything15:58
vorlonwhich part of that points to an autodep8 failure?15:59
rbalinthttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wslu/+bug/1818673/comments/715:59
ubot5`Ubuntu bug 1818673 in wslu (Ubuntu Cosmic) " [SRU] Please accept wslu to supported releases " [Undecided,Fix released]16:00
LaneyI don't think you can actually see which parts are autodep8 from a log...16:01
Laneybut it is16:01
Laneysupport/octave/generate:Depends: @, $builddeps dh-octave-autopkgtest (>= 0.5.6), xauth, xvfb16:01
Laneyseems like a #debci topic, moving over there16:02
vorlonLaney: well, I don't see how/why dh-octave-autopkgtest is uninstallable either16:06
vorlonoh, it's based on version16:06
vorlonok now I've read the comment rbalint pointed me at :P16:06
vorlonso we have a mismatch between the version of autodep8 being used, and the series being tested, oops16:07
rbalintvorlon, the topic aready started on #debci as well16:08
vorlonin the meantime, the test failure should be ignored, yah?16:10
Laneyit's basically BS, indeed16:10
rbalintvorlon, also the passes...16:10
rbalintvorlon, if they bring in something different, but mostly the failures16:10
* Laney has begun thinking about/working on private job support16:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resource-agents (xenial-proposed/main) [1:3.9.7-1 => 1:3.9.7-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)16:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-online-accounts [source] (disco-proposed) [3.32.0-1ubuntu1]16:18
rbalintvorlon, probably there are no interesting false passes, the diff to bionic's version: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/BzJr7p3rTK/16:20
rbalintplease reject ubuntu-meta sru-s, i'm uploading a new round16:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-meta [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.417.1]16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-meta [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.425.1]16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-meta [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.361.3]16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (bionic-proposed/main) [1.417 => 1.417.1] (core)16:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (xenial-proposed/main) [1.361.2 => 1.361.3] (core)16:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.425 => 1.425.1] (core)16:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: im-config (bionic-proposed/main) [0.34-1ubuntu1.2 => 0.34-1ubuntu1.3] (input-methods, kubuntu, personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop)17:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libssh2 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.8.0-2 => 1.8.0-2.1] (kubuntu) (sync)17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libssh2 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.8.0-2.1]17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.431]17:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [arm64] (disco-proposed) [1.431]17:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (disco-proposed/main) [2.4.38-2ubuntu1 => 2.4.38-2ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)18:55
Eickmeyer[m]Anybody else just get slapped upside-the-head with a build failure?19:16
ahasenackyes, lp is having issues19:18
ahasenackhttps://git.launchpad.net/ is 50319:18
Eickmeyer[m]Sad day.19:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1 => 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.2] (core)19:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curtin (disco-proposed/main) [18.2-10-g7afd77fa-0ubuntu1 => 18.2-19-g36351dea-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)19:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdelibs4support (disco-proposed/universe) [5.56.0-0ubuntu2 => 5.56.0-0ubuntu3] (kubuntu)20:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: squashfs-tools (disco-proposed/main) [1:4.3-11 => 1:4.3-12] (core) (sync)20:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcre2 (disco-proposed/main) [10.32-4 => 10.32-5] (core) (sync)20:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-8.9~18.04.1] (kernel)20:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-8.9~18.04.1] (kernel)20:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pcre2 [sync] (disco-proposed) [10.32-5]21:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted squashfs-tools [sync] (disco-proposed) [1:4.3-12]21:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1009.10] (kernel)22:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (bionic-proposed/main) [1.1.0g-2ubuntu4.3 => 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.1] (core) (sync)23:04
xnoxvorlon, new openssl is in both bionic-proposed and matching fixes in cosmic-proposed. hoping for bionic-proposed accept; as cosmic one is not as time sensitive, and can discuss the 0->1 change there.23:06
UkikieDidn't that cause a few FTPFSes?23:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-1009.10]23:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1015.15] (kernel)23:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-48.51] (core, kernel)23:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-18.19] (core, kernel)23:07
vorlonyoink23:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-8.9~18.04.1]23:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-48.51]23:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-8.9~18.04.1]23:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-48.51] (core, kernel)23:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-18.19] (core, kernel)23:08
vorlonxnox: you had an opportunity here to make this one not be a sync :P23:08
vorlonxnox: your multipath-tools upload made ganeti-instance-debootstrap autopkgtests fail? glorious23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.1]23:16
tewardvorlon: openssl ^ there, did I miss something in the bug?  What's different between this and the one that was NACK'd?  Just asking because I am genuinely curious...23:27
teward(and I can't tell from the changelogs...O23:27
vorlonteward: rollback of the sauce patch that downgraded the security compat level23:27
tewardah23:27
tewardthanks :)23:27
tewardsorry to pry/ask :)23:28
vorlonn/p, I've adjusted the bug description now for accuracy as well23:29
tewardack23:31
tewardvorlon: i don't normally track OpenSSL stuff but this is one I'm *really* eager to see SRU'd in, my question is whether this is landing only in -updates or if security team is going to copy to -security (cc: sarnold)23:32
tewardand the reason for that question is becuase I'm antsy to add TLS1.3 support into nginx :p23:32
vorlonI'm not aware of any immediate plans to copy it into -security.  The next time there's a CVE against openssl, I expect it would then be copied.23:35
tewardi'll bug sarnold / #ubuntu-hardened with my question then.  I'm already bugging sarnold on other things :P23:35
vorlonBut adding TLS1.3 support to nginx shouldn't require 1.1.1 to be in -security first, should it?23:35
tewardvorlon: wellllllllllll23:36
tewardno....23:36
vorlonbecause I would expect all apps to let openssl negotiate the best possible protocol at runtime23:36
tewardbut23:36
tewardtrue23:36
vorlonand I would not expect any package in bionic to require TLS 1.3 as a minimum23:36
tewardvorlon: but the changes I did in Cosmic added TLSv1.3 to the default ssl_protocols line23:36
tewardif TLS1.3 isn't available at runtime23:36
tewardit'll critfail23:36
vorlonright23:36
tewardand i know this ONE GUY who nitpicks specific things from -updates and doesn't pull anything else and is likely to pull the OpenSSL in23:37
tewardbut that's my only concern is if people think "Oh it's available" but don't pull in -updates23:37
tewardwhich should be... what, almost nobody...23:37
tewardmaybe?23:37
* teward knows people who do questionable update practices :/23:37
vorlonan SRU that mangled the default ssl_protocols would be subjected to extra scrutiny23:38
tewardyep.23:38
vorlonand would absolutely have to have a versioned dep on the right version of libssl23:38
tewardbeen asked of me whether it could be default-supported.23:38
tewardi've said "No" (but always meant to look into it)23:38
tewardstill curious whether it's being copied to -security though23:38
tewardand I did bug sarnold ;)23:38
teward... back in a bit I Need some food23:39
xnoxvorlon, i do not look for easy ways. and thanks for accepting openssl. rejoice for me.23:53
xnoxvorlon, i love ganeti as i love brexit23:53

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!