[00:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: git-buildpackage (disco-proposed/universe) [0.9.13 => 0.9.14] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted git-buildpackage [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.9.14]
[00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pbuilder (disco-proposed/universe) [0.230.3 => 0.230.4] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pbuilder [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.230.4]
[00:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openssl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.0]
[01:10] <handsome_feng> q
[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8 (disco-proposed/main) [8.3.0-4ubuntu1 => 8.3.0-5ubuntu1] (core)
[01:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8 [source] (disco-proposed) [8.3.0-5ubuntu1]
[02:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8 (bionic-proposed/main) [8.3.0-4ubuntu1~18.04 => 8.3.0-5ubuntu1~18.04] (core)
[02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8 [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.3.0-5ubuntu1~18.04]
[02:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8-cross (disco-proposed/main) [27ubuntu2 => 27ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[02:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8-cross-ports (disco-proposed/universe) [20ubuntu5 => 20ubuntu6] (no packageset)
[02:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8-cross-ports [source] (disco-proposed) [20ubuntu6]
[02:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8-cross [source] (disco-proposed) [27ubuntu3]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpkg [source] (disco-proposed) [1.19.6ubuntu1]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lsb [source] (disco-proposed) [10.2019031300ubuntu1]
[05:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kwindowsystem [source] (disco-proposed) [5.56.0-0ubuntu2]
[07:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.7 (disco-proposed/main) [3.7.3-1ubuntu1 => 3.7.3-2] (core)
[07:27] <acheronuk> britney hasn't run for nearly 2 hrs. is there a problem?
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lintian [source] (disco-proposed) [2.11.0ubuntu1]
[07:28] <acheronuk> oh 1.5 hrs
[07:28] <infinity> acheronuk: Lack of archive churn or new test results means it has nothing to do.  It should run (or be running) soon.
[07:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cpprest (disco-proposed/universe) [2.10.11-1 => 2.10.12-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-8 (disco-proposed/main) [1:8-2 => 1:8-3] (core) (sync)
[07:30] <acheronuk> infinity: right. I guess I'm mostly used to seeing it at times when there is more going on. thanks
[07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cpprest [sync] (disco-proposed) [2.10.12-4]
[07:31] <acheronuk> and there is goes :D
[07:31] <acheronuk> *it
[07:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (disco-proposed) [2.575]
[07:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.7 [source] (disco-proposed) [3.7.3-2]
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-characters [sync] (disco-proposed) [3.32.0-2]
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-8 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1:8-3]
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libimagequant [sync] (disco-proposed) [2.12.2-1.1]
[07:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keyutils [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.6-6]
[07:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxml-twig-perl [sync] (disco-proposed) [1:3.50-1.1]
[07:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfce4-screenshooter [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.9.5-1]
[07:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libayatana-indicator [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.6.2-3]
[07:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted translate-toolkit [sync] (disco-proposed) [2.3.1-3]
[07:35] <Ukikie> Thank you.
[07:37] <infinity> Laney: There's been a deja-dup/trusty/armhf test running for 45h now.  I suspect it might be slightly sad. :P
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.8 (disco-proposed/universe) [3.8.0~a3-1ubuntu1 => 3.8.0~a3-2] (no packageset)
[07:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.8 [source] (disco-proposed) [3.8.0~a3-2]
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross (disco-proposed/universe) [30ubuntu2 => 30ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[07:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross [source] (disco-proposed) [30ubuntu3]
[07:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (disco-proposed/main) [19.0.1-1ubuntu1 => 19.0.1-1ubuntu2] (core, xorg)
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross (disco-proposed/universe) [30ubuntu3 => 30ubuntu4] (no packageset)
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross [source] (disco-proposed) [30ubuntu4]
[08:02] <Laney> /o\
[08:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (disco-proposed) [19.0.1-1ubuntu2]
[09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (disco-proposed/main) [2:1.20.4-1ubuntu2 => 2:1.20.4-1ubuntu3] (desktop-core, xorg)
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-initial-setup (disco-proposed/main) [3.32.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.32.0-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntugnome)
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-bluetooth (disco-proposed/main) [3.32.0-1 => 3.32.1-1] (desktop-core) (sync)
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdelibs4support (disco-proposed/universe) [5.56.0-0ubuntu1 => 5.56.0-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)
[10:28] <LocutusOfBorg> sad testsuite until lsb migrates...
[10:29] <LocutusOfBorg> dpkg: lsb-base: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you requested:
[11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kbibtex (disco-proposed/universe) [0.8.1-1ubuntu2 => 0.8.1-1ubuntu3] (kubuntu)
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pip (bionic-proposed/universe) [9.0.1-2.3~ubuntu1 => 9.0.1-2.3~ubuntu1.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (disco-proposed/main) [1.1.1b-1ubuntu1 => 1.1.1b-1ubuntu2] (core)
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pip (cosmic-proposed/universe) [9.0.1-2.3 => 9.0.1-2.3ubuntu0.18.10.1] (no packageset)
[11:34] <xnox> Laney, could you please review and accept openssl into disco?
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pbgenomicconsensus (disco-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-2 => 2.3.2-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pbgenomicconsensus [sync] (disco-proposed) [2.3.2-3]
[12:00] <Laney> xnox: aye will look at the queue in a bit
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (disco-proposed/main) [19.04.7 => 19.04.8] (core)
[12:30] <rbasak> Could I get some AA help with bug 1822780 and pymacaroons in trusty-proposed please? I'm ready to SRU-accept, but this will drop the building of python-pymacaroons binary package that's in trusty-proposed only, making it NBS I think - so I thought I'd check first.
[12:30] <ubot5`> bug 1822780 in pymacaroons (Ubuntu Trusty) "dependency issues in the pymacaroons stack" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1822780
[12:31] <rbasak> Will it need a specific binary package deletion  from an AA after my accept? Any other consequences?
[12:31] <rbasak> cpaelzer, ahasenack: ^
[12:31] <ahasenack> I see
[12:31] <ahasenack> so in proposed, yes, the py2 package needs to go away
[12:31] <rbasak> I believe it should be fine but thought it best to ask.
[12:32] <ahasenack> I think the first step is to accept it, then see if the py2 one gets reaped, if not, ask
[12:32] <ahasenack> ?
[12:32] <rbasak> AIUI, there is no auto-reaping
[12:33] <rbasak> AAs run some NBS processing script in the development release, and NBS is not usually expected in a stable release of course.
[12:33] <ahasenack> I see
[12:33] <rbasak> For the release pocket at least. This is proposed, and so I don't know what happens there.
[12:33] <rbasak> I thought I'd ask first in case someone says "no don't do that you'll make it worse" :)
[12:35] <ahasenack> sounds good
[12:36] <xnox> rbasak, i'm sure we have a tonne of nbs in stable releases -proposed/-updates from like unreleased/superseeded kernel srus and the like.
[12:37] <xnox> rbasak, and i bet we should script nbs report for stable series.
[13:00] <apw> xnox, we arn't allowed to NBS kerenls, as anyone might need the d-i bits for any netboot image they have ever
[13:00] <apw> xnox, in stables
[13:01] <xnox> heh, right!
[13:02] <xnox> also fun
[13:12] <jdstrand> sforshee: hey, not sure you saw, but ubuntu5 migrated. hopefully you are good to go now :)
[13:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-imageio (disco-proposed/universe) [2.4.1-2 => 2.4.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-imageio [source] (disco-proposed) [2.4.1-2ubuntu1]
[13:16] <sforshee> jdstrand: cool, I see that the last couple runs of the linux package tests both passed, so I think that did the trick. Thanks again!
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pbgenomicconsensus (disco-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-3 => 2.3.2-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pbgenomicconsensus [source] (disco-proposed) [2.3.2-3ubuntu1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted inxi [source] (disco-proposed) [3.0.33-1-0ubuntu1]
[13:47] <jdstrand> sforshee: np, glad I could help
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (disco-proposed) [3.192.16]
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (disco-proposed) [2:1.20.4-1ubuntu3]
[14:23] <acheronuk> sil2100: can you look at kbibtex and kdelibs4support in the queue? that would get Qt 5.12 transition to one libreoffice test issue plus one upload of a qtbase-opensource-src-gles to go
[14:24] <acheronuk> Oh and one more, but it would be good to get these done now
[14:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (xenial-proposed/main) [2:13.1.4-0ubuntu4.3 => 2:13.1.4-0ubuntu4.4] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[14:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-initial-setup [source] (disco-proposed) [3.32.0-1ubuntu2]
[14:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-bluetooth [sync] (disco-proposed) [3.32.1-1]
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kbibtex [source] (disco-proposed) [0.8.1-1ubuntu3]
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdelibs4support [source] (disco-proposed) [5.56.0-0ubuntu2]
[14:45] <acheronuk> sil2100: if that was you thank you. if it was not thank you to who did it.
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pymacaroons [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.9.2-0ubuntu1~ubuntu14.04.2]
[15:07] <rbasak> ^ I accepted it given no feedback to the contrary.
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-online-accounts (disco-proposed/main) [3.31.90-1ubuntu1 => 3.32.0-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (disco-proposed) [19.04.8]
[15:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (disco-proposed/main) [3.192.16 => 3.192.17] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[15:19] <juliank> ^ please accept, fixes up last upload which missed a build-depends (sorry about that, did not do a clean build)
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (disco-proposed) [3.192.17]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (disco-proposed) [1.431]
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [1.431] (core)
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [1.431] (core)
[15:35] <rbalint> if i'd like to sru ubuntu-meta in LP: #1822341 should i handcraft the patch or include seed updates as well in the upload?
[15:35] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1822341 in ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "[FFE][SRU] Please add ubuntu-wsl binary package" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1822341
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (disco-proposed) [1.1.1b-1ubuntu2]
[15:40] <rbalint> sil2100, https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/systemd-cosmic-hints/+merge/365104
[15:41] <Laney> whoever accepted that openssl, I had asked a question on one of the linked bugs
[15:41] <Laney> would appreciate checking of those in future
[15:43] <Laney> (not a huge deal, but would be good to avoid crossed wires)
[15:43] <sil2100> Laney: looking o/
[15:43] <sil2100> Laney: argh
[15:43] <sil2100> I meant
[15:43] <sil2100> rbalint: looking o/
[15:43] <sil2100> Laney: (and I didn't accept the openssl)
[15:49] <rbalint> Laney, i am seeing an odd failure in http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/o/octave-interval/bionic/amd64 , which i documented in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wslu/+bug/1818673/comments/7
[15:49] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1818673 in wslu (Ubuntu Cosmic) " [SRU] Please accept wslu to supported releases " [Undecided,Fix released]
[15:50] <rbalint> it can affect other tests as well making them false positives as well
[15:52] <Laney> mmm yeah we only have one copy of autodep8
[15:52] <vorlon> Laney: I accepted it; sorry, I had sufficient context to be comfortable with the change, so I wasn't looking for questions
[15:52] <sil2100> rbalint: I'll apply your hints with some slight modifications
[15:53] <vorlon> Laney: anyway, I was accepting it for disco, which doesn't require the SRU template
[15:53] <Laney> vorlon: I know, but if there's a linked bug it seems like a fine place to ask questions about queue items.
[15:53] <Laney> Should I safety reject in that case?
[15:53] <vorlon> if you feel you should :)
[15:54] <vorlon> Laney: the context I have is that I rejected his *bionic* SRU because it *added* the patch in question
[15:54] <vorlon> so he's trying to sort that out so that bionic is SRUable :)
[15:54] <Laney> No, leaving it pending would be better, but if that helps to avoid clashing then that might be the best way to do it
[15:56] <vorlon> Laney: I guess the convention of marking the bug task 'incomplete' when there are outstanding questions would have reduced the chance of me overlooking your question
[15:57] <Laney> If people are checking bugs at all ;-)
[15:57] <Laney> anyway, thanks for the information
[15:57] <Laney> now want to change subject? see the thing rbalint just pinged me about
[15:58] <Laney> seems like something we'd want to fix ...
[15:58] <vorlon> Laney: I actually run sru-review when reviewing the devel-proposed unapproved queue, so it does pop the bugs :)
[15:58] <vorlon> that's the octave-internal thing?
[15:58] <Laney> ye
[15:58] <vorlon> interval
[15:58] <Laney> whateveritis
[15:58] <Laney> Looks like autodep8 only works for devel uploads, but we run it for everything
[15:59] <vorlon> which part of that points to an autodep8 failure?
[15:59] <rbalint> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wslu/+bug/1818673/comments/7
[16:00] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1818673 in wslu (Ubuntu Cosmic) " [SRU] Please accept wslu to supported releases " [Undecided,Fix released]
[16:01] <Laney> I don't think you can actually see which parts are autodep8 from a log...
[16:01] <Laney> but it is
[16:01] <Laney> support/octave/generate:Depends: @, $builddeps dh-octave-autopkgtest (>= 0.5.6), xauth, xvfb
[16:02] <Laney> seems like a #debci topic, moving over there
[16:06] <vorlon> Laney: well, I don't see how/why dh-octave-autopkgtest is uninstallable either
[16:06] <vorlon> oh, it's based on version
[16:06] <vorlon> ok now I've read the comment rbalint pointed me at :P
[16:07] <vorlon> so we have a mismatch between the version of autodep8 being used, and the series being tested, oops
[16:08] <rbalint> vorlon, the topic aready started on #debci as well
[16:10] <vorlon> in the meantime, the test failure should be ignored, yah?
[16:10] <Laney> it's basically BS, indeed
[16:10] <rbalint> vorlon, also the passes...
[16:10] <rbalint> vorlon, if they bring in something different, but mostly the failures
[16:14]  * Laney has begun thinking about/working on private job support
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resource-agents (xenial-proposed/main) [1:3.9.7-1 => 1:3.9.7-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-online-accounts [source] (disco-proposed) [3.32.0-1ubuntu1]
[16:20] <rbalint> vorlon, probably there are no interesting false passes, the diff to bionic's version: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/BzJr7p3rTK/
[16:22] <rbalint> please reject ubuntu-meta sru-s, i'm uploading a new round
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-meta [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.417.1]
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-meta [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.425.1]
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-meta [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.361.3]
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (bionic-proposed/main) [1.417 => 1.417.1] (core)
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (xenial-proposed/main) [1.361.2 => 1.361.3] (core)
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.425 => 1.425.1] (core)
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: im-config (bionic-proposed/main) [0.34-1ubuntu1.2 => 0.34-1ubuntu1.3] (input-methods, kubuntu, personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libssh2 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.8.0-2 => 1.8.0-2.1] (kubuntu) (sync)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libssh2 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.8.0-2.1]
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.431]
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [arm64] (disco-proposed) [1.431]
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (disco-proposed/main) [2.4.38-2ubuntu1 => 2.4.38-2ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)
[19:16] <Eickmeyer[m]> Anybody else just get slapped upside-the-head with a build failure?
[19:18] <ahasenack> yes, lp is having issues
[19:18] <ahasenack> https://git.launchpad.net/ is 503
[19:29] <Eickmeyer[m]> Sad day.
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1 => 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.2] (core)
[19:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curtin (disco-proposed/main) [18.2-10-g7afd77fa-0ubuntu1 => 18.2-19-g36351dea-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdelibs4support (disco-proposed/universe) [5.56.0-0ubuntu2 => 5.56.0-0ubuntu3] (kubuntu)
[20:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: squashfs-tools (disco-proposed/main) [1:4.3-11 => 1:4.3-12] (core) (sync)
[20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcre2 (disco-proposed/main) [10.32-4 => 10.32-5] (core) (sync)
[20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-8.9~18.04.1] (kernel)
[20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-8.9~18.04.1] (kernel)
[21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pcre2 [sync] (disco-proposed) [10.32-5]
[21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted squashfs-tools [sync] (disco-proposed) [1:4.3-12]
[22:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1009.10] (kernel)
[23:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (bionic-proposed/main) [1.1.0g-2ubuntu4.3 => 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.1] (core) (sync)
[23:06] <xnox> vorlon, new openssl is in both bionic-proposed and matching fixes in cosmic-proposed. hoping for bionic-proposed accept; as cosmic one is not as time sensitive, and can discuss the 0->1 change there.
[23:06] <Ukikie> Didn't that cause a few FTPFSes?
[23:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-1009.10]
[23:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1015.15] (kernel)
[23:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-48.51] (core, kernel)
[23:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-18.19] (core, kernel)
[23:07] <vorlon> yoink
[23:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-8.9~18.04.1]
[23:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-48.51]
[23:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-8.9~18.04.1]
[23:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-48.51] (core, kernel)
[23:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-18.19] (core, kernel)
[23:08] <vorlon> xnox: you had an opportunity here to make this one not be a sync :P
[23:12] <vorlon> xnox: your multipath-tools upload made ganeti-instance-debootstrap autopkgtests fail? glorious
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.1]
[23:27] <teward> vorlon: openssl ^ there, did I miss something in the bug?  What's different between this and the one that was NACK'd?  Just asking because I am genuinely curious...
[23:27] <teward> (and I can't tell from the changelogs...O
[23:27] <vorlon> teward: rollback of the sauce patch that downgraded the security compat level
[23:27] <teward> ah
[23:27] <teward> thanks :)
[23:28] <teward> sorry to pry/ask :)
[23:29] <vorlon> n/p, I've adjusted the bug description now for accuracy as well
[23:31] <teward> ack
[23:32] <teward> vorlon: i don't normally track OpenSSL stuff but this is one I'm *really* eager to see SRU'd in, my question is whether this is landing only in -updates or if security team is going to copy to -security (cc: sarnold)
[23:32] <teward> and the reason for that question is becuase I'm antsy to add TLS1.3 support into nginx :p
[23:35] <vorlon> I'm not aware of any immediate plans to copy it into -security.  The next time there's a CVE against openssl, I expect it would then be copied.
[23:35] <teward> i'll bug sarnold / #ubuntu-hardened with my question then.  I'm already bugging sarnold on other things :P
[23:35] <vorlon> But adding TLS1.3 support to nginx shouldn't require 1.1.1 to be in -security first, should it?
[23:36] <teward> vorlon: wellllllllllll
[23:36] <teward> no....
[23:36] <vorlon> because I would expect all apps to let openssl negotiate the best possible protocol at runtime
[23:36] <teward> but
[23:36] <teward> true
[23:36] <vorlon> and I would not expect any package in bionic to require TLS 1.3 as a minimum
[23:36] <teward> vorlon: but the changes I did in Cosmic added TLSv1.3 to the default ssl_protocols line
[23:36] <teward> if TLS1.3 isn't available at runtime
[23:36] <teward> it'll critfail
[23:36] <vorlon> right
[23:37] <teward> and i know this ONE GUY who nitpicks specific things from -updates and doesn't pull anything else and is likely to pull the OpenSSL in
[23:37] <teward> but that's my only concern is if people think "Oh it's available" but don't pull in -updates
[23:37] <teward> which should be... what, almost nobody...
[23:37] <teward> maybe?
[23:37]  * teward knows people who do questionable update practices :/
[23:38] <vorlon> an SRU that mangled the default ssl_protocols would be subjected to extra scrutiny
[23:38] <teward> yep.
[23:38] <vorlon> and would absolutely have to have a versioned dep on the right version of libssl
[23:38] <teward> been asked of me whether it could be default-supported.
[23:38] <teward> i've said "No" (but always meant to look into it)
[23:38] <teward> still curious whether it's being copied to -security though
[23:38] <teward> and I did bug sarnold ;)
[23:39] <teward> ... back in a bit I Need some food
[23:53] <xnox> vorlon, i do not look for easy ways. and thanks for accepting openssl. rejoice for me.
[23:53] <xnox> vorlon, i love ganeti as i love brexit