| lubot | <HMollerCl> Wxl: To run a GUI app with pkexec, you have to write a xml file and place it in /usr/share/polkit-1/actions and a running polkit agent | 00:17 |
|---|---|---|
| kc2bez | wxl: guiverc Neon testing uses ubiquity, no need to bother with that. I am downloading unstable now. | 00:33 |
| guiverc | kc2bez - I don't see you in #kde-neon :) .. I just got troubles with iso .. so got nowhere anyway.. | 00:36 |
| kc2bez | yeah, I should probably join over there to follow along. I got the testing booted in a vm, unstable is nearly downloaded. | 00:37 |
| guiverc | i couldn't get it to boot on BIOS machine; I was just asking .... (no answer anyway) if they want me to report what I got; I will.. but it booted on my uefi thing, just not the bios d780 I prefer | 00:39 |
| kc2bez | wxl: guiverc Automated LUKS partition isn't enabled in Neon unstable. It does have cala though. | 00:46 |
| kc2bez | FWIW the large (suspend) swap partition is default. It wants to create a 8.8 GB swap on my 8G VM. | 00:49 |
| guiverc | :( | 00:50 |
| wxl[m] | Bah | 01:48 |
| kc2bez | Indeed. | 01:49 |
| wxl[m] | @tsimonq2 you got Debian friends we could get to compile cryptsetup with luks1 as default? | 01:49 |
| tsimonq2 | wxl[m]: cyphermox is about it. | 01:52 |
| tsimonq2 | Otherwise I do have upload access to do it. | 01:52 |
| tsimonq2 | Although I would really much prefer to ask cyphermox before I do that :) | 01:52 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> https://www.reddit.com/r/Ubuntu/comments/b9h6gh/disco_installing_the_kubuntudesktop_package/ | 08:29 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> @HMollerCl @tsimonq2 ^^^ | 08:29 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1823306 | 09:08 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> @HMollerCl @tsimonq2 I'm going to try to talk to the Discover developer to see if there is a way to have discover 'sed' out the 'lxqt-sudo' from the command it tries to execute if it finds it in there. | 09:15 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> @acheronuk if I can't upload it today I will this weekend | 09:30 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> Is it normal that a programm call the .desktop instead of the direct the script? | 09:31 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> @HMollerCl [Is it normal that a programm call the .desktop instead of the direct script?], It doesn't. It parses it to find out what to run. | 09:33 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> then runs that command using /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexec/kf5/discover/runservice | 09:34 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> Rather than harcoding the executable in Discover's code | 09:35 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> I see, I thought it was not used because of the notShow flag | 10:41 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> Nope, it is very much used | 11:24 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> https://cgit.kde.org/discover.git/tree/libdiscover/backends/PackageKitBackend/PackageKitSourcesBackend.cpp?h=Plasma/5.15#n62 | 11:25 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> Now I know. Kdesu is what you use? | 11:26 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> Yes, which is why it works for Discover with just the plain Exec line we used to have. | 11:28 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> I will make 3..desktop files the prior qt a KDE and a lxqt | 11:31 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> I'kk have to patch idscover then, otherwise I'll end up with 2 sources buttons | 11:34 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> @acheronuk [I'll have to patch discover then, otherwise I'll end up with 2 sources buttons], Do you have other idea? | 12:12 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> If I make the qt to be shown in Kubuntu menu I have to add a "sudo" command before it, but if I make it, it will break discover | 12:14 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> Don't worry about the Qt or KDE showing in the KDE menus. Not really needed. | 12:17 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> @acheronuk [Don't worry about the Qt or KDE one showing in the KDE menus. Not really needed.], ok, but I will have to do 2 at leaste the normal qt for discover and a software-properties-lxqt.desktop to be shown in lxqt. Would that be ok? | 12:18 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> That would work as long as the -qt one is just the plain Exec line as before | 12:19 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> Discover won't know about software-properties-lxqt.desktop, so it's then just get one button for the plain -qt one | 12:20 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> @acheronuk [That would work as long as the -qt one is just the plain Exec line as before], yes, that's the idea, leave the qt as before and make a -lxqt for lxqt (with lxqt-sudo) and if you want a -kde withe kdesu. | 12:20 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> don't worry about the KDE for now. At this stage I'm happy with just unbreaking discover | 12:22 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> ok | 12:22 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> mmm, anyone knows how to use bzr to branach from launchpad through a proxy? | 13:07 |
| cyphermox | tsimonq2: what's what about luks1? | 13:15 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @cyphermox [<cyphermox> tsimonq2: what's what about luks1?], LUKS2 is now default with the new cryptsetup | 13:21 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> That's a problem because GRUB doesn't have support | 13:21 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> @HMollerCl [mmm, anyone knows how to use bzr to branch from launchpad through a proxy?], anyone? | 13:27 |
| lubot | <teward001> @HMollerCl [anyone?], https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1039057/how-do-i-use-bazaar-with-a-http-proxy I think? | 13:56 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> thanks, I have set the proxy .bashrc but it didn't work | 13:57 |
| lubot | <teward001> did you source bashrc after setting it? | 13:58 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> what do you mean by source? I close the terminal and open it again | 13:58 |
| lubot | <teward001> ah | 13:58 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> this is what I hva en .bashrc #proxy … http_proxy=http://192.168.1.115:8080/ … https_proxy=http://192.168.1.115:8080/ … #export http_proxy | 14:00 |
| lubot | <teward001> those two lines for http_proxy= should have `export ` before them | 14:02 |
| teward | and https_proxy too of course | 14:04 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> @teward001 [those two lines for http_proxy= should have export before them], before? not after? | 14:23 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> #proxy … http_proxy=http://192.168.1.115:8080/ … https_proxy=http://192.168.1.115:8080/ … export http_proxy … export https_proxy | 14:24 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> it worked!!! | 14:24 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> thanks | 14:24 |
| lubot | <teward001> @HMollerCl [before? not after?], Either or, but you can condense it into `export VAR=VALUE` | 14:26 |
| lubot | <teward001> @HMollerCl treat the bashrc as a script - if you don't `export` the env var so it's usable by the entire env then `VAR=VALUE` is local only to the execution of that script and doesn't persist after it | 14:27 |
| lubot | <teward001> so you have to `export` any value that you want used in the env that `source`'s `.bashrc` (`source ~/.bashrc` is done automagically at session load, but still :P) | 14:27 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> ok, thanks! | 14:30 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> @acheronuk bzr branch of software-properties doesn't bring me the code, I have to get the code from git, the copy t to the bzr and then do the add, commit, push (to my launchpad)? | 14:36 |
| lubot | <teward001> you do know LP supports git right...? (Why do you need bzr again?) | 14:36 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> @teward001 [you do know LP supports git right...? (Why do you need bzr again?)], cause couple of weeks @tsimonq2 told me to use bzr | 14:38 |
| lubot | <teward001> @tsimonq2 ... why | 14:38 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> @HMollerCl [@acheronuk bzr branch of software-properties doesn't bring me the code, I have t …], Its now in git: https://git.launchpad.net/software-properties | 14:38 |
| lubot | <teward001> that's what i thought | 14:39 |
| lubot | <teward001> @HMollerCl in this case I think we can call Simon "wrong" in this case | 14:39 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> Last commit in bzr = Moved to git at https://git.launchpad.net/software-properties … https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/software-properties/main | 14:39 |
| lubot | <teward001> @HMollerCl so git it, not bzr | 14:40 |
| lubot | <teward001> and slap @tsimonq2 with a rotting fish | 14:40 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> jajaja, what @tsimonq2 told me was before that commit | 14:41 |
| lubot | <teward001> welllllll now it's in git | 14:41 |
| lubot | <teward001> so git it | 14:41 |
| lubot | <teward001> we'll still smack @tsimonq22 | 14:41 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @acheronuk [Its now in git: https://git.launchpad.net/software-properties], That wasn't the case when I was working with Hans | 14:54 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @teward001 [@HMollerCl so git it, not bzr], Right | 14:55 |
| lubot | * acheronuk shrugs | 14:55 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> @tsimonq2 [Right], and git push to lp:`~/software-properties/software-properties` or where? | 14:57 |
| lubot | <teward001> @tsimonq2 [That wasn't the case when I was working with Hans], well it is now so 😛 | 15:23 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> git push lp:~/software-properties/software-properties didn't work | 15:27 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> ssh: Could not resolve hostname lp: Temporary failure in name resolution … fatal: Could not read from remote repository. | 15:28 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> I'm not sure if it's because of the proxy or not. | 15:28 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> but I have been able to push to github other code. | 15:28 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> @acheronuk @tsimonq2 do you know where I should push the code? | 15:30 |
| lubot | <teward001> well | 15:30 |
| lubot | <teward001> GH has FQDNs | 15:31 |
| lubot | <teward001> `lp:` is shorthand | 15:31 |
| lubot | <teward001> and that shorthand is hardcoded into bzr, not git | 15:31 |
| lubot | <teward001> just to explain why you had the failure you did ;) | 15:31 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> thanks @teward001 | 15:32 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> I should git to https://code.launchpad.net/~hmollercl/software-properties/software-properties yhen? | 15:33 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> fatal: repository 'https://code.launchpad.net/~hmollercl/software-properties/software-properties/' not found | 15:35 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> @teward001 [and that shorthand is hardcoded into bzr, not git], You can set in .gitconfig … [url "git+ssh://yourlpname@git.launchpad.net/"] … insteadof = lp: | 15:37 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> But it would still fail, as only core-dev can push to the software-properties main project | 15:37 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> You need to push to your own personal git, then propose a merge | 15:38 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> e.g. git+ssh://yourlpusername@git.launchpad.net/~yourlpusername/software-properties | 15:40 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> ok, thanks @acheronuk I'm uploading now | 15:41 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> not sure how I propose a merge in git though | 15:42 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> https://code.launchpad.net/~hmollercl/+git/software-properties here is the code | 15:43 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> I used to see that when using bzr, now I don't | 15:49 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> I see no merge option | 15:50 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> any ideas on how to propose merge? | 16:38 |
| lubot | <teward001> you have to go back to the software-properties 'master' and then do the merge req from this branch | 16:38 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> AFAIK it's done form the branch to the master | 16:40 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/software-properties/+git/software-properties/+ref/ubuntu/master/+register-merge | 16:41 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> https://launchpad.net/software-properties | 16:42 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [T15: Fix software-properties-qt under other DEs] hmollercl (Hans P. Möller) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T15#379 | 16:47 | |
| teward | wxl: NO SOUP FOR YOU unless you wake up and reply | 18:57 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [T38: Document ppa-britney] tsimonq2 (Simon Quigley) just created this task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T38 | 20:01 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [T39: Add autopkgtest support to ppa-britney ] tsimonq2 (Simon Quigley) just created this task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T39 | 20:05 | |
| === DalekSec_ is now known as DalekSec | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!