[00:08] <xnox> vorlon, remove powerpc binaries from xenial-security?
[00:09] <vorlon> xnox: it was the binaries in xenial release that britney complained about, not security
[00:10] <xnox> vorlon, britney can haz "virtual" packages? add a virtual snapd/powerpc for -proposed?
[00:11] <xnox> i.e. those that only exist in britney's brain.
[00:11] <vorlon> virtual packages are used for calculating dependencies, AFAIK they're not used for calculating whether a package is up-to-date across archs
[00:11] <xnox> vorlon, drop powerpc from xenial arches har har har
[00:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1009.10~18.04.1] (kernel)
[00:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: lxd-installer (disco-proposed/primary) [1]
[00:30] <infinity> I mean, britney's not wrong, the way we're driving it.  Not having PPC binaries in post-release when release is immutable is "wrong".
[00:30] <infinity> The better solution would be to stub those packages out on PPC (ie: produce empty ones)
[00:30] <infinity> Really drives home the "lack of support" concept.
[00:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (disco-proposed/universe) [1.2.5-0ubuntu1 => 1.2.6-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[00:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted containerd [source] (disco-proposed) [1.2.6-0ubuntu1]
[00:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (disco-proposed/universe) [18.09.3-0ubuntu1 => 18.09.5-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (disco-proposed) [18.09.5-0ubuntu1]
[00:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lxd-installer [source] (disco-proposed) [1]
[00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lxd-installer [amd64] (disco-proposed/none) [1] (no packageset)
[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lxd-installer [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1]
[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-aws (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1002.2 => 5.0.0-1003.3] (core, kernel) (sync)
[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-gcp (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1002.2 => 5.0.0-1003.3] (core, kernel) (sync)
[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-azure (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0.1002.2 => 5.0.0.1003.3] (core, kernel) (sync)
[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-10.11 => 5.0.0-11.12] (core, kernel) (sync)
[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-azure (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1002.2 => 5.0.0-1003.3] (core, kernel) (sync)
[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0.10.11 => 5.0.0.11.12] (core, kernel) (sync)
[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-aws (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0.1002.2 => 5.0.0.1003.3] (core, kernel) (sync)
[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-meta-snapdragon (disco-proposed/primary) [5.0.0.1010.3]
[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-snapdragon (disco-proposed/primary) [5.0.0-1010.10]
[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-gcp (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0.1002.2 => 5.0.0.1003.3] (core, kernel) (sync)
[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-raspi2 (disco-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1005.5 => 5.0.0-1006.6] (kernel) (sync)
[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-raspi2 (disco-proposed/universe) [5.0.0.1005.2 => 5.0.0.1006.3] (kernel) (sync)
[01:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-azure (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1002.2 => 5.0.0-1003.3] (core, kernel) (sync)
[01:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-10.11 => 5.0.0-11.12] (core, kernel) (sync)
[01:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-gcp (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1002.2 => 5.0.0-1003.3] (core, kernel) (sync)
[01:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-aws [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1003.3]
[01:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-gcp [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1003.3]
[01:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-azure [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0.1003.3]
[01:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-raspi2 [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0.1006.3]
[01:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-raspi2 [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1006.6]
[01:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-azure [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1003.3]
[01:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-gcp [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0.1003.3]
[01:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-11.12]
[01:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-aws [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0.1003.3]
[01:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0.11.12]
[01:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-azure [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1003.3]
[01:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-11.12]
[01:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-gcp [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1003.3]
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted intel-media-driver [amd64] (disco-proposed) [18.4.1+dfsg1-2ubuntu1]
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected linux-meta-snapdragon [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0.1009.2]
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected linux-snapdragon [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1009.9]
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted intel-media-driver [i386] (disco-proposed) [18.4.1+dfsg1-2ubuntu1]
[05:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-restricted-modules [source] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-10.11]
[05:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-restricted-modules [amd64] (disco-proposed/restricted) [5.0.0-10.11] (kernel)
[06:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3] (core, kernel)
[06:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-11.12] (core, kernel)
[06:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3] (core, kernel)
[06:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-11.12] (core, kernel)
[06:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-11.12] (core, kernel)
[06:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-screensaver (disco-proposed/universe) [2.0.5-0ubuntu1 => 2.0.6-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin)
[06:48] <mvo> vorlon: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/xenial/update_excuses.html#snapd shows the "forced" flag now but it does not show any autopkgtest results. will those come in later?
[06:49] <mvo> vorlon: or is there (yet) more that needs to be done?
[07:15] <sil2100> infinity: since we're in freeze now, I guess I'll start working on refreshing the base language-packs for disco
[07:15]  * sil2100 goes to request a full language pack export
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aodh (disco-proposed/main) [8.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[07:40] <jamespage> hi ubuntu-release - I'm uploading final versions of lots of packages for OpenStack stein today - most will be version number change only
[07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: barbican (disco-proposed/main) [1:8.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 1:8.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (disco-proposed/main) [2:14.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1 => 2:14.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xf86-input-wacom (disco-proposed/main) [1:0.36.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:0.36.1-0ubuntu2] (desktop-core, xorg)
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: designate (disco-proposed/main) [1:8.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 1:8.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[07:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: designate-dashboard (disco-proposed/universe) [8.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[07:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted designate-dashboard [source] (disco-proposed) [8.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[07:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceilometer (disco-proposed/main) [1:12.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 1:12.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[07:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glance (disco-proposed/main) [2:18.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 2:18.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[08:03] <seb128> hey there
[08:04] <seb128> so, we are currently on an unstable version of gstreamer, they just rolled out their stable rc yesterday and Debian just picked those up
[08:04] <Laney> vorlon: dunno what you're talking about, but it should be possible to construct a test
[08:04] <Laney> to replicate this situation
[08:04] <seb128> do you think there is a chance to get thos accepted? or is that SRU material at this point?
[08:05] <seb128> (I'm mostly asking because if it's SRU material then I wait for Debian to have the updates published and just sync, but if we think it can still be in disco then I do some fakesyncs to lower delays)
[08:06] <LocutusOfBorg> I also hope to have my new virtualbox release syncd soon, but upstream didn't release it yet...
[08:07] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: SRUs exist.
[08:07] <LocutusOfBorg> sure
[08:07] <LocutusOfBorg> but vbox is part of the virtualization process inside the iso...
[08:07] <Laney> seb128: dunno, maybe if it can be done today, what's in it and how much would it benefit from having a specific testing phase that you'd get from an SRU?
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (disco-proposed/main) [3:15.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu2 => 3:15.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: librsvg (disco-proposed/main) [2.44.10-1ubuntu1 => 2.44.10-2] (core) (sync)
[08:08] <Laney> So a last minute release being slammed into the release, that breaks stuff, would be a very bad idea then?
[08:08] <Laney> (to LocutusOfBorg)
[08:09] <LocutusOfBorg> ehm, unfortunately it is not me who uploaded linux 5.0, breaking virtualization :)
[08:09] <LocutusOfBorg> at least parts of it, its complicated
[08:10] <LocutusOfBorg> anyhow, I use bionic, and my servers are on LTS, so I don't really care anymore about users using non-LTS releases TBH
[08:11] <Laney> anyway, "it depends" is the answer to these questions :>
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: heat (disco-proposed/main) [1:12.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 1:12.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[08:12] <Laney> juliank: UMMMMMMMMMMM did you see the server-live failures?
[08:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keystone (disco-proposed/main) [2:15.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1 => 2:15.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[08:13] <Laney> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/418951098/buildlog_ubuntu_disco_arm64_ubuntu-server-live_BUILDING.txt.gz
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: magnum (disco-proposed/universe) [8.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted magnum [source] (disco-proposed) [8.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: manila (disco-proposed/universe) [1:8.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 1:8.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: masakari-monitors (disco-proposed/universe) [7.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu2 => 7.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted masakari-monitors [source] (disco-proposed) [7.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: masakari (disco-proposed/universe) [7.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 7.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted masakari [source] (disco-proposed) [7.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kmod (disco-proposed/main) [25-1ubuntu3 => 25-1ubuntu4] (core)
[08:28] <seb128> Laney, gstreamer1.0  isn't bad, it's only 34 commits between the versions and some being documentation/typo/readme type of changes
[08:29] <seb128> I'm going to land them in the queue and give a good round of testing
[08:29] <seb128> (or the other way around ;)
[08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: murano (disco-proposed/universe) [1:7.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 1:7.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-opcua (disco-proposed/universe) [0.98.6-1ubuntu1 => 0.98.6-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-opcua [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.98.6-2]
[08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: murano-dashboard (disco-proposed/universe) [1:7.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 1:7.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[08:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-bagpipe (disco-proposed/universe) [10.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 10.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:40] <Laney> seb128: ok, for the record I think SRU would be just fine if there's any concern at all
[08:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-bagpipe [source] (disco-proposed) [10.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-bgpvpn (disco-proposed/universe) [10.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 10.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:41] <seb128> Laney, you are probably like, I dislike releasing with a dev version but from our testing it isn't too buggy so it wouldn't be the end of the world (and most users will apply the SRU updates hopefully)
[08:42] <Laney> I don't mean "please do an SRU", just that it's an equally valid option to landing something in the release now
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-bgpvpn [source] (disco-proposed) [10.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:44] <seb128> right
[08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-l2gw (disco-proposed/universe) [1:14.0.0~b1~git2019013126.259d558-0ubuntu1 => 1:14.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-l2gw [source] (disco-proposed) [1:14.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-odl (disco-proposed/universe) [1:14.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 1:14.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-odl [source] (disco-proposed) [1:14.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer1.0 (disco-proposed/main) [1.15.2-1 => 1.15.90-1~sync1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-sfc (disco-proposed/universe) [8.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-sfc [source] (disco-proposed) [8.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (disco-proposed/main) [2:14.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu3 => 2:14.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-dynamic-routing (disco-proposed/universe) [2:14.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 2:14.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-dynamic-routing [source] (disco-proposed) [2:14.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-fwaas (disco-proposed/main) [1:14.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 1:14.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-fwaas-dashboard (disco-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.0.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-fwaas-dashboard [source] (disco-proposed) [2.0.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mistral (disco-proposed/universe) [8.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-lbaas (disco-proposed/universe) [2:14.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 2:14.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mistral [source] (disco-proposed) [8.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-lbaas-dashboard (disco-proposed/universe) [6.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-base1.0 (disco-proposed/main) [1.15.2-1 => 1.15.90-1~sync1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-lbaas-dashboard [source] (disco-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-vpnaas (disco-proposed/universe) [2:14.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 2:14.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ca-certificates-java [source] (disco-proposed) [20190405ubuntu1]
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-music [sync] (disco-proposed) [3.32.1-1]
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (disco-proposed) [0.97.11]
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted calamares [source] (disco-proposed) [3.2.4-0ubuntu3]
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [sync] (disco-proposed) [64ubuntu6]
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-good1.0 (disco-proposed/main) [1.15.2-1ubuntu1 => 1.15.90-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[09:08] <juliank> Laney: mwhudson just mentioned that in -devel earlier
[09:09] <Laney> ok
[09:09] <Laney> get to work then ;-)
[09:09] <jamespage> could a release team member look at https://code.launchpad.net/~james-page/britney/mininet-badtest/+merge/365898 pls
[09:10] <jamespage> mininet is blocking openvswitch migration due to the same underlying bug for which we badtest the openvswitch/i386 tests
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-ugly1.0 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.1-1 => 1.15.90-1~sync1] (kubuntu)
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iproute2 (xenial-proposed/main) [4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.04.4 => 4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.04.5] (core)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-python1.0 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.2-1 => 1.15.90-1ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-rtsp-server1.0 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.2-1 => 1.15.90-1~sync1] (no packageset)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-python1.0 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.2-1 => 1.15.90-1~sync1] (ubuntustudio)
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-bad1.0 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.2-1ubuntu1 => 1.15.90-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer-editing-services1.0 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.2-1 => 1.15.90-1~sync1] (ubuntustudio)
[09:27] <rbasak> Bug 1813317 is still outstanding. Is that on a final week checklist somewhere, or does it need pointing out?
[09:27] <ubot5`> bug 1813317 in php7.3 (Ubuntu) "Please remove src:php7.3 from disco" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1813317
[09:27] <rbasak> vorlon: ^
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zaqar (disco-proposed/universe) [8.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer-vaapi (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.2-1 => 1.15.90-1~sync1] (no packageset)
[09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: watcher (disco-proposed/universe) [1:2.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 1:2.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:31] <juliank> Laney: should be fixed later, I submitted https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/ubuntu-advantage-client/pull/362
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: trove-dashboard (disco-proposed/universe) [12.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 12.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:31] <gitbot> CanonicalLtd issue (Pull request) 362 in ubuntu-advantage-client "apt-hook: Do not crash/fail if we can't read /proc/self/status" [Open]
[09:32]  * juliank disappears again
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: senlin (disco-proposed/universe) [7.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 7.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sahara (disco-proposed/universe) [1:10.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 1:10.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[09:37] <sil2100> Odd_Bloke, powersj: ^
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sahara-dashboard (disco-proposed/universe) [10.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 10.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: placement (disco-proposed/universe) [1.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: panko (disco-proposed/universe) [6.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openstack-trove (disco-proposed/universe) [1:11.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 1:11.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:23] <didrocks> sil2100: almost daily ping now to copy the canary-image to p.c.c please :)
[10:24] <didrocks> and hey ;)
[10:28] <sil2100> Hey! didrocks eek, forgot to talk about that, hopefull I won't forget today! Anyway, copying shortly
[10:28] <didrocks> sil2100: thx! ;)
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (disco-proposed/main) [2:19.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 2:19.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted heat [source] (disco-proposed) [1:12.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kmod [source] (disco-proposed) [25-1ubuntu4]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted manila [source] (disco-proposed) [1:8.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted murano [source] (disco-proposed) [1:7.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-lbaas [source] (disco-proposed) [2:14.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (disco-proposed) [2:14.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted panko [source] (disco-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sahara-dashboard [source] (disco-proposed) [10.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted senlin [source] (disco-proposed) [7.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted watcher [source] (disco-proposed) [1:2.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keystone [source] (disco-proposed) [2:15.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted murano-dashboard [source] (disco-proposed) [1:7.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-vpnaas [source] (disco-proposed) [2:14.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted placement [source] (disco-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted trove-dashboard [source] (disco-proposed) [12.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted librsvg [sync] (disco-proposed) [2.44.10-2]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openstack-trove [source] (disco-proposed) [1:11.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zaqar [source] (disco-proposed) [8.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-fwaas [source] (disco-proposed) [1:14.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sahara [source] (disco-proposed) [1:10.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aodh [source] (disco-proposed) [8.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceilometer [source] (disco-proposed) [1:12.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted designate [source] (disco-proposed) [1:8.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (disco-proposed) [3:15.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova-lxd (disco-proposed/main) [19.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 19.0.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted barbican [source] (disco-proposed) [1:8.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glance [source] (disco-proposed) [2:18.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinder [source] (disco-proposed) [2:14.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (disco-proposed) [2:19.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: octavia-dashboard (disco-proposed/universe) [3.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 3.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-desktop [source] (disco-proposed) [10.5-0ubuntu1.1]
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-screensaver [source] (disco-proposed) [2.0.6-0ubuntu1]
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted curtin [source] (disco-proposed) [18.2-22-g08bf6ff7-0ubuntu1]
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xf86-input-wacom [source] (disco-proposed) [1:0.36.1-0ubuntu2]
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-410 (bionic-proposed/primary) [410.104-0ubuntu0~18.04.1]
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: octavia (disco-proposed/universe) [4.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 4.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: manila-ui (disco-proposed/universe) [2.17.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.18.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted manila-ui [source] (disco-proposed) [2.18.0-0ubuntu1]
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octavia-dashboard [source] (disco-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (disco-proposed) [1.10ubuntu3]
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova-lxd [source] (disco-proposed) [19.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octavia [source] (disco-proposed) [4.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: atheist (disco-proposed/universe) [0.20110402-2.1 => 0.20110402-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openmw (disco-proposed/multiverse) [0.45.0-2 => 0.45.0-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iptables-persistent (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.4+nmu2 => 1.0.4+nmu2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iptables-persistent (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.7 => 1.0.7ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-410 (bionic-proposed/primary) [410.104-0ubuntu0~18.04.1]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tracker-miners (disco-proposed/main) [2.1.6-1 => 2.1.6-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:05] <ogra> sil2100, hey ... could i get initramfs-tools-devices in the disco queue approved (we do not seed it anywhere and we do not build core images from disco, it landed only there to fulfill SRU prerequisites)
[12:06] <ogra> sil2100, the accompaning bug is #1819454
[12:09] <sil2100> ogra: looking o/
[12:09] <ogra> TA!
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools-devices [source] (disco-proposed) [0.4]
[12:12] <sil2100> didrocks: ah, forgot to give heads up - copied the image o/
[12:13]  * ogra hugs sil2100 
[12:22] <tseliot> can an admin reject nvidia-graphics-drivers-410 (bionic-proposed/primary) please? That was meant to go to a PPA. Not sure what happened on my side
[12:22] <apw> tseliot, looking
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1003.3]
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-11.12]
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-11.12]
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1003.3]
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-11.12]
[12:23] <tseliot> apw: thanks
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-410 [source] (bionic-proposed) [410.104-0ubuntu0~18.04.1]
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-410 [source] (bionic-proposed) [410.104-0ubuntu0~18.04.1]
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-1009.10~18.04.1]
[12:27] <tseliot> apw: thanks again
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: opensaml (disco-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-2 => 3.0.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:31] <didrocks> sil2100:thx!
[12:42] <rbalint> sil2100, could you please reject bb and cc u-u srus?
[12:42] <rbalint> sil2100, i asked for the rejection of disco's as well, but it is not terribly bad that it landed, i just would like to extend the fix and add one more
[12:54] <sil2100> rbalint: ok
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected unattended-upgrades [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.11]
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected unattended-upgrades [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.5ubuntu3.18.10.4]
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-kvm (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1002.2 => 5.0.0-1003.3] (core, kernel) (sync)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-kvm (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0.1002.2 => 5.0.0.1003.3] (core, kernel) (sync)
[13:16] <ahasenack> hi release team, juliank gave us a fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1824523, we if upload now, can you respin disco server, or do we have to wait for the middle of the night?
[13:16] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1824523 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) "Assertion error during iso build" [Critical,In progress]
[13:16] <ahasenack> we have some questions about that fix, but he is not available atm
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: morse-simulator (disco-proposed/universe) [1.4-4 => 1.4-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: opencascade (disco-proposed/universe) [7.3.0+dfsg1-4 => 7.3.0+dfsg1-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (disco-proposed/main) [19.2 => 19.3] (core)
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-meta (disco-proposed/universe) [1.231 => 1.232] (ubuntu-mate)
[13:26] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, please merge alsa-utils? there is a CVE-2019-5953 there...
[13:27] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, nevermind, sorry!
[13:27] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, ?
[13:27] <seb128> nw
[13:28] <LocutusOfBorg> I had a wrong tab open on my browser (and made confusion with the already fixed wget)
[13:28] <seb128> ah ok
[13:28] <seb128> good :)
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-settings (disco-proposed/universe) [19.04.1 => 19.04.2] (ubuntu-mate)
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-bluetooth (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-2ubuntu0.1 => 3.28.0-2ubuntu0.2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[13:30] <Wimpress> sil2100: Please review/approve `ubuntu-mate-meta` and `ubuntu-mate-settings`
[13:31] <sil2100> Wimpress: on it
[13:31] <Wimpress> Cheers.
[13:31]  * sil2100 waits for the diffs since he's lazy
[13:31] <sil2100> ;)
[13:32] <sil2100> (they're pending)
[13:41] <Wimpress> sil2100: Thanks!
[13:54] <sil2100> ...ok, those are taking forever
[13:57] <LocutusOfBorg> lol
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm not the only one waiting for diffs that don't happen
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[13:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-meta [source] (disco-proposed) [1.232]
[13:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (disco-proposed) [19.3]
[14:00] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: ;p
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-settings [source] (disco-proposed) [19.04.2]
[14:05] <ahasenack> sil2100: ubuntu-advantage-tools 19.3 has the fix for the disco ubuntu-server image build failure, is that something you can take a look at, and perhaps even spin a new build to verify it's fixed?
[14:07] <sil2100> ahasenack: ^ approved it already (see above)
[14:07] <sil2100> I guess we can spin images for that, yes
[14:07] <ahasenack> ah, sorry, missed that
[14:07] <sil2100> Let me finish up the langpack business though
[14:07] <ahasenack> thx!
[14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nwchem (disco-proposed/universe) [6.8.1-4 => 6.8.1-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[14:09] <seb128> Rejected:
[14:09] <seb128> language-pack-en_19.04+20160720.dsc: Version older than that in the archive. 1:19.04+20160720 <= 1:19.04+20190408
[14:09] <seb128> something went wrong there :p
[14:10] <ahasenack> sil2100: we have to wait for it to migrate anyway
[14:10] <sil2100> eek
[14:11] <sil2100> EEEk
[14:12] <sil2100> seb128: indeed ;p
[14:12]  * sil2100 looks what the heck happened
[14:12] <sil2100> What the fuu..
[14:13] <sil2100> Ok, now this is WEIRD
[14:14] <ahasenack> must be related to the blackhole discovery
[14:18]  * Eickmeyer plays twilight zone music
[14:19] <sil2100> Now it'll be good
[14:20] <seb128> sil2100, what was the issue?
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (disco-proposed/main) [1:3.32.1-1ubuntu3 => 1:3.32.1-1ubuntu4] (desktop-core)
[14:29] <sil2100> seb128: a bit embarrasing really... I downloaded the latest tarball using the +latest-full-language-pack link, but didn't notice that there was already an old trusty tarball saved in the dir as well with the same name, so even though I downloaded the latest, I renamed the old one to be used for the import ;/
[14:29] <seb128> lol, I see
[14:30] <seb128> :)
[14:30] <juliank> ahasenack: you have questions?
[14:30] <sil2100> seb128: my WTF moment was because I checked my wget command and it was correctly pulling in disco, but my actual tarball was trusty
[14:30] <ahasenack> juliank: rbasak had
[14:30] <seb128> k
[14:30] <seb128> well, good that it did lead to a reject then!
[14:30] <rbasak> juliank: my question was: is the first hunk really required?
[14:30] <sil2100> Yeah, phew
[14:30] <rbasak> That was all.
[14:30] <rbasak> I'm still +1 to land it
[14:31] <rbasak> Though also it seems like quite a leaky abstraction for the caller to rely on the implementation detail of the function to know not to call it
[14:31] <juliank> rbasak: Yeah, there were a few possible choices.
[14:31] <juliank> rbasak: I wanted to drop the error handling in case /proc/foo/status is not readable at all
[14:31] <rbasak> IMHO that check should be in the function itself but that refactoring is probably inappropriate for right now.
[14:32] <juliank> and /proc/$foo/cmdline parsing also does not do any checking
[14:32] <juliank> The idea is: If /proc exists and we can read the files we have to, continue with our task, otherwise don't complain
[14:33] <juliank> this also handles cases where the hook might be run in a chroot or some weird thing where /proc/$ppid/ is not readable
[14:34] <juliank> I guess we can make it warn instead of error in a later iteration
[14:34] <juliank> in some cases
[14:34] <juliank> But I don't want to print messages every time you run apt on a system without a /proc mounted
[14:35] <juliank> (and I'm not sure which cases there exist where ppid(ppid(self)) has a non-readable proc)
[14:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware-raspi2 (disco-proposed/multiverse) [1.20190215-0ubuntu1 => 1.20190215-0ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[14:36] <juliank> rbasak: as for the check in the function, well it does not need to be - the function just returns ""; it's just performing a self-test at start against getppid() and that fails
[14:37] <juliank> But there might be cases where the function returns "" where it should not return that
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware-raspi2 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.20190215-0ubuntu3]
[14:38] <juliank> the self-tests are not technically necessary
[14:38] <juliank> they just assure you that the basic logic works :)
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pi-bluetooth [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.1.10ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tracker-miners [source] (disco-proposed) [2.1.6-1ubuntu1]
[14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-maps (disco-proposed/universe) [3.32.0-1 => 3.32.1-1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-budgie, ubuntugnome) (sync)
[14:43] <rbasak> juliank: sure.
[14:44] <rbasak> juliank: it might be worth specifying the edge cases in the function specification
[14:44] <rbasak> (ie. the comment at the top)
[14:44] <rbasak> Anyway, to be clear, this is for the future - I'm certainly not proposing on blocking on any of this right now
[14:48] <sil2100> seb128: ok, this time I *properly* sanity checked those ;)
[14:49] <seb128> good
[14:50] <seb128> so r-t friends, there is a new gstreamer stack in the queue
[14:50] <seb128> it's a bit late but upstream screwed their release cycle which means we are currently on a dev version
[14:50] <seb128> where the new is the stable rc
[14:50] <seb128> any chance to get that in (it has been uploaded to Debian and tested in the desktop ppa by a few persons)
[14:50] <seb128> or should I turn tthat into a SRU and reupload?
[14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpac (disco-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4+dfsg5-4build1 => 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4+dfsg5-4ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:59] <vorlon> rbasak: removed, cheers (and no, it wasn't on radar)
[15:00] <rbasak> Thanks!
[15:04] <LocutusOfBorg> dear release team, instead of kicking out freecad, can we have 0.18~pre1+dfsg1-5 copied in porposed?
[15:06] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: freecad/0.18~pre1+dfsg1-5 did not migrate http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/freecad/disco/i386
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pi-bluetooth (disco-proposed/universe) [0.1.10ubuntu2 => 0.1.10ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pi-bluetooth [source] (disco-proposed) [0.1.10ubuntu3]
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: leveldb (disco-proposed/main) [1.20-2 => 1.20-2.1] (ubuntu-server) (sync)
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xml-core (disco-proposed/main) [0.18 => 0.18+nmu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer1.0 (disco-proposed/main) [1.15.2-1 => 1.15.90-1~sync1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (disco-proposed/main) [240-6ubuntu4 => 240-6ubuntu5] (core)
[15:14] <vorlon> infinity: got to the bottom of the glibc autopkgtest regressions, we should be good now
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-base1.0 (disco-proposed/main) [1.15.2-1 => 1.15.90-1~sync1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer1.0 (disco-proposed/main) [1.15.2-1 => 1.15.90-1~sync1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (disco-proposed/main) [240-6ubuntu4 => 240-6ubuntu5] (core)
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-good1.0 (disco-proposed/main) [1.15.2-1ubuntu1 => 1.15.90-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xml-core (disco-proposed/main) [0.18 => 0.18+nmu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: leveldb (disco-proposed/main) [1.20-2 => 1.20-2.1] (ubuntu-server) (sync)
[15:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-base1.0 (disco-proposed/main) [1.15.2-1 => 1.15.90-1~sync1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[15:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: leveldb (disco-proposed/main) [1.20-2 => 1.20-2.1] (ubuntu-server) (sync)
[15:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xml-core (disco-proposed/main) [0.18 => 0.18+nmu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[15:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer1.0 (disco-proposed/main) [1.15.2-1 => 1.15.90-1~sync1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[15:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (disco-proposed/main) [240-6ubuntu4 => 240-6ubuntu5] (core)
[15:16] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: in fact, 0.18+dfsg1-1 no longer seems to have the math errr on i386
[15:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: duplicity (disco-proposed/main) [0.7.18.2-1ubuntu3 => 0.7.18.2-1ubuntu3.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pi-bluetooth [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.1.10ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected pi-bluetooth [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.1.10ubuntu2]
[15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pi-bluetooth [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.1.10ubuntu3]
[15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: leveldb (disco-proposed/main) [1.20-2 => 1.20-2.1] (ubuntu-server) (sync)
[15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xml-core (disco-proposed/main) [0.18 => 0.18+nmu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[15:25] <xnox> vorlon, ganeti-instance-debootstrap "failure" is a bit false... it looks like deb.debian.org no longer provides ports.
[15:38] <vorlon> xnox: do you want to retrigger the tests against the release pocket so there's a log of this?
[15:43] <LocutusOfBorg> ginggs, so, copying the previous version, and cherry-picking that fix, might work
[15:44] <xnox> vorlon, no, i'm preparing a fix.
[15:44] <xnox> vorlon, so actual issue is that jessie is hardcoded in ganeti, and jessie is EOL and removed from mirrors.
[15:44] <vorlon> ok
[15:45] <xnox> vorlon, switching default to use distro-info & thus stable all the time.
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-restricted-modules [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-10.11]
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tracker (disco-proposed/main) [2.1.8-1 => 2.1.8-2~fakesync] (desktop-extra, ubuntugnome)
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ganeti-instance-debootstrap (disco-proposed/universe) [0.16-6 => 0.16-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:47] <xnox> vorlon, but it means that multipath-tools did not migrate before final freeze
[15:52] <ahasenack> sil2100: ua19.3 is in disco, can you respin the ubuntu server isos to see if this time they build?
[15:52] <ahasenack> ubuntu-server-live
[15:54] <Laney> I'll do it.
[15:55] <Laney> More than one of us can do cdimage things, no need to ping Łukasz every time :>
[15:57] <Laney> oh OK, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/disco/ubuntu-server-live/+build/161983 is running already, I guess that'll do the job?
[16:09] <ahasenack> Laney: h just had context
[16:09] <ahasenack> thx
[16:26] <infinity> xnox: Migration before freeze isn't necessary, as long as it migrates before we build RCs.
[16:26] <infinity> xnox: (so make it go!)
[16:31] <infinity> vorlon: Hrm, so you hinted the old fuse-zip, but not the new?  Isn't the failure the same for both?
[16:31] <vorlon> infinity: I didn't check the new yet
[16:32] <vorlon> infinity: I verified that the timeout was not reproducible before I upgraded my kernel locally, and was reproducible after
[16:33] <infinity> vorlon: Kay.  Pretty sure the same surface issue (timeout) shows on the new version too, but if you could verify that it passes with an old kernel, that'd be awesome.
[16:33] <vorlon> infinity: I upgraded my host and am not going to spend that much effort verifying its behavior on an old kernel
[16:34] <infinity> vorlon: Then gimme a 20-second repro (which kernel worked, etc) and I'll do it in a VM? :P
[16:34] <infinity> vorlon: Seems silly to block a new version if it's no worse than the old.
[16:34] <vorlon> infinity: I was running in a disco chroot on top of a cosmic kernel
[16:35] <vorlon> and I didn't say it /worked/, I said the timeout is linked to the kernel upgrade
[16:35] <vorlon> (trying to run in a chroot may have been an invalid test setup)
[16:35] <infinity> Ahh.
[16:35] <infinity> Well, this is what VMs are for.
[16:36] <vorlon> so why did checkbox dependencies get repromoted to main?
[16:41] <infinity> Is this a trick question?
[16:42] <infinity> I don't see checkbox-support being in universe since 2014.
[16:43] <infinity> But more importantly, if plainbox/checkbox is removed, should we be demoting checkbox-support or removing it?
[16:44] <infinity> Oh, it comes from Debian.
[16:44] <infinity> Nevermind.
[16:44] <infinity> ... but it comes from Debian via a Canonical maintainer who hasn't uploaded since 2015.
[16:44] <infinity> So maybe that does need revisiting. :P
[16:46] <cwayne> You can remove them
[16:46] <cwayne> We're all about that snap life now
[16:46] <xnox> infinity, i have requested in debian to remove them there too i think......
[16:46] <xnox> cwayne, but do need to file RM RoM bugs in debian, no?
[16:46] <cwayne> I think that's already been done?
[16:47] <infinity> I don't see one.
[16:47] <infinity> I see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913361
[16:47] <ubot5`> Debian bug 913361 in src:checkbox-support "checkbox-support: Don't include in Buster" [Serious,Open]
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-bad1.0 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1ubuntu1]
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-good1.0 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1ubuntu1]
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-python1.0 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1~sync1]
[16:47] <infinity> Which is a weird "warning, there might be a removal bug" bug.
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gstreamer-editing-services1.0 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1~sync1]
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gstreamer1.0 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1~sync1]
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-base1.0 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1~sync1]
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-rtsp-server1.0 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1~sync1]
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-ugly1.0 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1~sync1]
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gstreamer-vaapi [source] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1~sync1]
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gst-python1.0 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1ubuntu1]
[16:48] <xnox> cwayne, i don't see one either on https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=ftp.debian.org;dist=unstable
[16:48] <xnox> and packages still exist:
[16:48] <xnox> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/plainbox
[16:48] <xnox> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/checkbox-ng
[16:48] <xnox> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/checkbox-support
[16:49] <Eickmeyer> Interesting bug found. I was able to confirm it with my own hardware, but it might be worth mentioning in the release notes unless something can get fixed. Either way, a show-stopper bug for certain hardware. bug 1824546
[16:49] <ubot5`> bug 1824546 in linux (Ubuntu) "Intel N3060 booting into black screen with 5.0 kernel" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1824546
[16:51] <infinity> tjaalton: ^
[16:52] <infinity> Eickmeyer: Oh, this *might* be fixed in the kernel in -proposed.  Can you easily test that?
[16:53] <Eickmeyer> infinity: I can. Standby...
[16:53] <Eickmeyer> (this might take a while)
[16:54] <infinity> Eickmeyer: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1821820 is the bug ref.
[16:54] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1821820 in linux (Ubuntu) "Cannot boot or install - have to use nomodeset" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (disco-proposed/main) [20190124+dfsg1-0ubuntu1 => 20190315-0ubuntu1~rbalint1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-libav1.0 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.2-1 => 1.15.90-1] (kubuntu) (sync)
[17:02] <cwayne> xnox: would the maintainer need to log such a bug?
[17:02] <cwayne> Sorry for dumb question, haven't dealt with anything Debian in ages
[17:09] <xnox> cwayne, yeah, using like reportbug cmdline tool against ftp.debian.org and follow the prompts, for each package.
[17:10] <xnox> cwayne, i guess i can do that, and like CC people.... who should I cc?
[17:10] <cwayne> xnox: Sylvain Pineau and myself please
[17:11] <xnox> ok
[17:28] <cwayne> thanks man
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ganeti-instance-debootstrap [source] (disco-proposed) [0.16-6ubuntu1]
[17:32] <infinity> Laney: Why the sketchy ~fakesync version for tracker when you could just grab the Debian source, generate a changes, and change target dist to disco?
[17:32]  * infinity does that instead.
[17:33] <xnox> cwayne, and done. you should have like 5 emails each.
[17:33] <xnox> soon
[17:35] <Eickmeyer> infinity: Looks like that kernel did the trick. :)
[17:35] <infinity> Eickmeyer: Excellent, then I'll dupe that bug.
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted duplicity [source] (disco-proposed) [0.7.18.2-1ubuntu3.1]
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gpac [source] (disco-proposed) [0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4+dfsg5-4ubuntu1]
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (disco-proposed) [1:3.32.1-1ubuntu4]
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tracker (disco-proposed/main) [2.1.8-1 => 2.1.8-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntugnome)
[17:37] <infinity> rbalint: Was the ~rbalint1 upload of gce-compute-thingee meant for a PPA, not the archive?
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (disco-proposed) [20190315-0ubuntu1~rbalint1]
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tracker [source] (disco-proposed) [2.1.8-2]
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tracker [source] (disco-proposed) [2.1.8-2~fakesync]
[17:41] <Eickmeyer> infinity: Thanks! We were working with someone in #ubuntu+1 on that very issue.
[17:43] <rbalint> infinity, please reject, ppa indeed
[17:44] <rbalint> infinity, thanks
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (disco-proposed) [240-6ubuntu5]
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted atheist [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.20110402-3]
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-libav1.0 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1]
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nwchem [sync] (disco-proposed) [6.8.1-5]
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openmw [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.45.0-3]
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-maps [sync] (disco-proposed) [3.32.1-1]
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opencascade [sync] (disco-proposed) [7.3.0+dfsg1-5]
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted morse-simulator [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.4-5]
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opensaml [sync] (disco-proposed) [3.0.1-1]
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted leveldb [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.20-2.1]
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xml-core [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.18+nmu1]
[17:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tdbcmysql (disco-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1 => 1.1.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: leveldb [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [1.20-2.1] (ubuntu-server)
[17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: leveldb [s390x] (disco-proposed/main) [1.20-2.1] (ubuntu-server)
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: leveldb [i386] (disco-proposed/main) [1.20-2.1] (ubuntu-server)
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: leveldb [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [1.20-2.1] (ubuntu-server)
[17:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: leveldb [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [1.20-2.1] (ubuntu-server)
[17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: leveldb [armhf] (disco-proposed/main) [1.20-2.1] (ubuntu-server)
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tdbcmysql [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.1.0-2]
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted leveldb [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.20-2.1]
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted leveldb [armhf] (disco-proposed) [1.20-2.1]
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted leveldb [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [1.20-2.1]
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted leveldb [arm64] (disco-proposed) [1.20-2.1]
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted leveldb [s390x] (disco-proposed) [1.20-2.1]
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted leveldb [i386] (disco-proposed) [1.20-2.1]
[18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpaste (disco-proposed/universe) [3.30.2-1 => 3.30.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (disco-proposed/main) [1:19.04.15 => 1:19.04.16] (core)
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: derpconf (disco-proposed/universe) [0.8.2-1 => 0.8.2-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gitsome (disco-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+git20180130.5751a31+ds-1 => 0.7.0+git20180130.5751a31+ds-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: onionbalance (disco-proposed/universe) [0.1.8-3 => 0.1.8-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: preggy (disco-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1 => 1.3.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-bottle (disco-proposed/universe) [0.12.15-1 => 0.12.15-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-osmapi (disco-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-1 => 1.2.2-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-scales (disco-proposed/universe) [1.0.9-1 => 1.0.9-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:24] <infinity> vorlon: Do you have context on that u-r-u upload (or, rather, can I punt that review to you because reasons)?
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted derpconf [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.8.2-2]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gpaste [source] (disco-proposed) [3.30.2-1ubuntu1]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted preggy [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.3.0-2]
[18:24] <vorlon> infinity: yes
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-osmapi [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.2.2-2]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gitsome [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.7.0+git20180130.5751a31+ds-2]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-bottle [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.12.15-2]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted onionbalance [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.1.8-4]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-scales [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.0.9-2]
[18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: librime (disco-proposed/universe) [1.4.0+dfsg1-2 => 1.4.0+dfsg1-2build1] (input-methods)
[18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-leveldown (disco-proposed/universe) [1.5.0+dfsg-3 => 1.5.0+dfsg-3build1] (no packageset)
[18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: minetest (disco-proposed/universe) [0.4.17.1+repack-1 => 0.4.17.1+repack-1build1] (no packageset)
[18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-leveldb (disco-proposed/universe) [0~svn68-3build5 => 0~svn68-3build6] (no packageset)
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stenographer (disco-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20180422.0.73ce5dd-1 => 0.0~git20180422.0.73ce5dd-1build1] (no packageset)
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: caffe-contrib (disco-proposed/multiverse) [1.0.0+git20180821.99bd997-2ubuntu1 => 1.0.0+git20180821.99bd997-2ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: caffe (disco-proposed/universe) [1.0.0+git20180821.99bd997-2build1 => 1.0.0+git20180821.99bd997-2build2] (no packageset)
[18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (disco-proposed) [1:19.04.16]
[18:33] <Laney> infinity: So you can sync the real version over.
[18:33] <Laney> I don't find it sketchy. But you already did what you wanted, so whatever.
[18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-initial-setup (disco-proposed/main) [3.32.1-1ubuntu1 => 3.32.1-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntugnome)
[18:38] <infinity> Laney: Well, the upload I did is a real sync, just not using the API. :P
[18:38] <infinity> Laney: (as in, it's your actual .dsc, with your signature on it)
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ontospy (disco-proposed/universe) [0~20190107~dfsg1-4 => 0~20190225~dfsg1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:39] <seb128> the gnome-initial-setup ^ is considered RC by desktop (since the initial setup wizard can't get updates before the first boot so SRU doesn't work to fix issues, and the bug is an annoying one (apps screen being empty in most cases))
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ontospy [sync] (disco-proposed) [0~20190225~dfsg1-1]
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-snapdragon [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1010.10]
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils-xtensa-lx106 (disco-proposed/universe) [1 => 2] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-xtensa-lx106 (disco-proposed/universe) [1 => 2] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:53] <vorlon> doko: is gcc-5 meant to stick around for disco?  (speaking of hard-to-process Debian removals...)
[18:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: caffe-contrib (disco-proposed/multiverse) [1.0.0+git20180821.99bd997-2ubuntu1 => 1.0.0+git20180821.99bd997-2ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: caffe (disco-proposed/universe) [1.0.0+git20180821.99bd997-2build1 => 1.0.0+git20180821.99bd997-2build2] (no packageset)
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (disco-proposed/main) [13.2.4+dfsg1-0ubuntu1 => 13.2.4+dfsg1-0ubuntu2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: librime (disco-proposed/universe) [1.4.0+dfsg1-2 => 1.4.0+dfsg1-2build1] (input-methods)
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils-xtensa-lx106 [sync] (disco-proposed) [2]
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: minetest (disco-proposed/universe) [0.4.17.1+repack-1 => 0.4.17.1+repack-1build1] (no packageset)
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: persistent-cache-cpp (disco-proposed/universe) [1.0.4+16.10.20160823-0ubuntu3 => 1.0.4+16.10.20160823-0ubuntu4] (no packageset)
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stenographer (disco-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20180422.0.73ce5dd-1 => 0.0~git20180422.0.73ce5dd-1build1] (no packageset)
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-xtensa-lx106 [sync] (disco-proposed) [2]
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-leveldb (disco-proposed/universe) [0~svn68-3build5 => 0~svn68-3build6] (no packageset)
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-leveldown (disco-proposed/universe) [1.5.0+dfsg-3 => 1.5.0+dfsg-3build1] (no packageset)
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected caffe-contrib [source] (disco-proposed) [1.0.0+git20180821.99bd997-2ubuntu2]
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected librime [source] (disco-proposed) [1.4.0+dfsg1-2build1]
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected node-leveldown [source] (disco-proposed) [1.5.0+dfsg-3build1]
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected stenographer [source] (disco-proposed) [0.0~git20180422.0.73ce5dd-1build1]
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected caffe [source] (disco-proposed) [1.0.0+git20180821.99bd997-2build2]
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-leveldb [source] (disco-proposed) [0~svn68-3build6]
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected minetest [source] (disco-proposed) [0.4.17.1+repack-1build1]
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted caffe-contrib [source] (disco-proposed) [1.0.0+git20180821.99bd997-2ubuntu2]
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (disco-proposed) [13.2.4+dfsg1-0ubuntu2]
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted minetest [source] (disco-proposed) [0.4.17.1+repack-1build1]
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted persistent-cache-cpp [source] (disco-proposed) [1.0.4+16.10.20160823-0ubuntu4]
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stenographer [source] (disco-proposed) [0.0~git20180422.0.73ce5dd-1build1]
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted caffe [source] (disco-proposed) [1.0.0+git20180821.99bd997-2build2]
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-leveldown [source] (disco-proposed) [1.5.0+dfsg-3build1]
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted librime [source] (disco-proposed) [1.4.0+dfsg1-2build1]
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-leveldb [source] (disco-proposed) [0~svn68-3build6]
[19:00] <infinity> seb128: Do you have a good testing plan for this gnome-initial-setup (ie: ways to abuse it and make sure you love it)?  The changes are a bit too long for a useful code review other than "yeah, that looks like code that does kinda what you say".
[19:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-meta-snapdragon [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0.1010.3]
[19:03] <infinity> seb128: (not looking for a written test plan or anything, just a "yeah, we have an idea of how it might break and different ways to exercise it to make sure it's good", or even a "yes, jibel is involved" :P)
[19:08] <seb128> infinity, the test case it's basically "go through the wizard steps after install and make sure the apps page is not empty"
[19:08] <seb128> we can also test on a normal system but there snapd is in an happy/stable state so there should be no issue
[19:09] <infinity> seb128: Right, I guess it was more of a "put snappy in sketchy states, test every possible way of clicking on wizard, win". :P
[19:10] <infinity> seb128: Anyhow, if you're on top of it, I'm accepting.
[19:10] <seb128> but from our first round of testing and code review it looks fine (also the regression potential is low, and it's only the last page of the wizard, even if it crashes it's not much different from being empty today)
[19:10] <seb128> we are
[19:10] <seb128> thx
[19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-initial-setup [source] (disco-proposed) [3.32.1-1ubuntu2]
[19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libnanomsg-raw-perl (disco-proposed/universe) [0.10-1build2 => 0.10-1build3] (no packageset)
[19:14] <infinity> vorlon: I need to run to vote and pick up my travel laptop from my dad and a few other things, so leaving the queue to you.
[19:14] <vorlon> infinity: ok
[19:14] <infinity> vorlon: Timing-wise, I intend to britney block and spin RCs either before bed or when I wake up (depending on how quickly we can migrate the current lot), so do mental math on long builds for seeded stuff.
[19:15] <vorlon> infinity: was linux-kvm intentionally skipped?
[19:15] <infinity> systemd migration is probably the one we're waiting on.
[19:15] <infinity> vorlon: It was skipped because I thought Andy was taking care of his rebase kernels, but maybe he missed that one and walked away. :P
[19:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libnanomsg-raw-perl [source] (disco-proposed) [0.10-1build3]
[19:16] <infinity> vorlon: Feel free.
[19:16] <infinity> (or feel free to poke apw about why it was missed)
[19:16] <vorlon> accepted it
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-kvm [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1003.3]
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-kvm [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0.1003.3]
[19:17] <infinity> I'll do a final (hopefully) d-i upload to migrate the kernel before said block-and-RC dance.
[19:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: leiningen-clojure (disco-proposed/universe) [2.8.1-9 => 2.9.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:20] <infinity> apw: linux-restricted-modules appears to need a version bump.
[19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted leiningen-clojure [sync] (disco-proposed) [2.9.0-1]
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (disco-proposed/main) [0.131ubuntu18 => 0.131ubuntu19] (core)
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (disco-proposed) [0.131ubuntu19]
[19:34] <apw> infinity: again? sigh, thanks
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: munin (disco-proposed/universe) [2.0.37-1ubuntu1 => 2.0.47-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted munin [source] (disco-proposed) [2.0.47-1ubuntu1]
[20:03] <xnox> infinity, about that crashy apt esm hook
[20:03] <xnox> infinity, still crashy on s390x.... with 18.03, and now crashy on line 184
[20:03] <xnox> infinity, yes access R_OK guard is true, and yes we still crash.
[20:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pomegranate-clojure (disco-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1 => 1.1.0+really-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pomegranate-clojure [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.1.0+really-1]
[20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mariadb-10.1 (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:10.1.38-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 1:10.1.38-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (no packageset)
[20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mariadb-10.1 (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:10.1.29-6ubuntu2 => 1:10.1.38-0ubuntu0.18.10.1] (no packageset)
[20:28] <xnox> reopened https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1824523
[20:28] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1824523 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) "Assertion error during iso build" [Critical,Confirmed]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (disco-proposed/main) [2.576 => 2.577] (desktop-core)
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (disco-proposed) [2.577]
[20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (disco-proposed/main) [2.576 => 2.577] (desktop-core)
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (disco-proposed) [2.577]
[20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-greeter (disco-proposed/universe) [18.04.0+18.10.20180926-0ubuntu2 => 18.04.0+19.04.20190410-0ubuntu1] (mythbuntu) (sync)
[20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-scope-home (disco-proposed/universe) [6.8.2+16.04.20160212.1-0ubuntu3 => 6.8.2+19.04.20190412-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:51] <vorlon> xnox: I've merged https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/ubuntu-cdimage/no-hard-coded-style/+merge/365882 now, if you could rebase your vanilla on that
[20:52] <xnox> vorlon, i also wonder if that breaks all of ubuntu.
[20:52] <xnox> vorlon, cause i thought our <style> block there is overrides to vanilla, hence should come after it is included.
[20:52] <xnox> vorlon, or are they all /suplemental/ styles.
[20:52] <vorlon> well we can try it and see
[20:53] <xnox> vorlon, is there a css parser to like generate the end computed styles, to compare that changing this doesn't change the assembled result?
[20:53] <xnox> something like that.
[20:54] <vorlon> xnox: old: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20190411.2/ new: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20190412/ spot the difference
[20:54] <vorlon> css parser> not my department
[20:54] <vorlon> anyway, they both look the same to me
[20:54] <vorlon> which is what I would expect - I would not expect us to be overriding any styles declared in vanilla, only supplementing them
[20:55] <xnox> vorlon, looks all wrong to me.
[20:55] <xnox> vorlon, the criss-cross on the banner logo is in a different place.
[20:55] <xnox> unless banner logo is like dynamically generated on per page view.
[20:56] <vorlon> xnox: oh. that's because the original code had a bug, and declared 'background-position: 75% 50%' except this was done in a wrong context that caused it to be interpreted as a special character
[20:56] <xnox> vorlon, the fold is at the bottom of the logo, versus center of the logo.
[20:57] <xnox> sigh
[20:57] <xnox> sigh
[20:57] <xnox> sigh
[20:57] <vorlon> so instead of 'background-position: 75% 50%', you got 'background-position: 75                                               %'
[20:57] <vorlon> ;D ;D
[20:57] <vorlon> so I can revert that if it causes it to display incorrectly
[20:57] <xnox> vorlon, i'll check with the webteam as to where the fold should be next week
[20:58] <vorlon> xnox: in the meantime I will make it bug-compatible with the previous
[20:58] <xnox> vorlon, both of these urls will stay live? well i can just take a screenshot on my system.
[20:58] <vorlon> xnox: at least the first one will age out
[21:00] <vorlon> xnox: better? http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20190412/
[21:01] <xnox> vorlon, it's the same as the old 0412, and still different to the 11.2
[21:01] <xnox> vorlon, if you think that <style> block and inline style="" behave the same, good luck! =)
[21:02] <xnox> vorlon, i can edit this live in my browser, let me experiment like that
[21:02] <xnox> easier with ctrl+shit+c thing
[21:02] <xnox> c+s+I obviously
[21:02] <xnox> hm
[21:02] <xnox> no idea
[21:04] <xnox> vorlon, just delete background-position at all
[21:05] <xnox> vorlon, as google chrome helpfully tells me is that 'background-position: 75 %' is invalid property value
[21:05] <xnox> hence old one had no background-position at all.
[21:08] <vorlon> xnox: k, pushed again
[21:08] <xnox> great! looks nice.
[21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (disco-proposed/main) [19.3 => 19.4] (core)
[21:18] <ahasenack> xnox: vorlon: ^
[21:19] <ahasenack> powersj: ^
[21:19] <powersj> ahasenack, thank you
[21:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity-greeter [sync] (disco-proposed) [18.04.0+19.04.20190410-0ubuntu1]
[21:55] <vorlon> ahasenack, xnox, powersj: accepted
[21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (disco-proposed) [19.4]
[22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: munin (disco-proposed/universe) [2.0.47-1ubuntu1 => 2.0.47-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[22:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity-scope-home [sync] (disco-proposed) [6.8.2+19.04.20190412-0ubuntu1]
[22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted munin [source] (disco-proposed) [2.0.47-1ubuntu2]
[22:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected intel-opencl-clang [source] (disco-proposed) [8.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[22:54] <xnox> vorlon, multipath-tools is a valid candidate now.
[22:54]  * vorlon braces for impact
[22:54] <xnox> oh and it migrated too.
[22:54] <xnox> oh well, i thought we are in such a freeze that requires manual unblocks.
[22:59] <xnox> vorlon, systemd passes all tests, bug ppc64le which is still https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1814373 i believe. I wonder if i should simply mark the test cases as "meh" when on ppc64le
[22:59] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1814373 in linux (Ubuntu) "storage / luks / dmsetup regressed (or got better) on ppc64le" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[22:59] <xnox> still waiting on systemd/i386, and everything else passed or it's linux -> which with kernel in proposed should be passing fine actually. I wonder if i should retrigger those with -proposed.
[23:10] <vorlon> xnox: I thought failure to remove scsi_debug module was to be made nonfatal?
[23:11] <vorlon> oh, or is that not the bit that failed
[23:11] <vorlon> right
[23:11] <xnox> vorlon, the bit that failed is "luks cryptsetup from a previous test case is still clogged up, cannot test something else"
[23:12] <xnox> vorlon, i guess i can work around this by using unique names for devmapper names, but i don't think i can have multiple scsi debug volumes.... which is what is actually clogged up. and we know i can't just remove the module, as that fails.....
[23:13] <xnox> and well peppers over the issue, that stopping / unmounting things / udevadm settle => doesn't give us back a known state, for some reason.
[23:13] <wxl> maybe using luks1 would help
[23:13]  * wxl ducks
[23:13] <vorlon> have you tried reproducing this on ppc64el?
[23:14] <vorlon> (did you ever create a linear reproducer that wasn't dependent on python unittest decorations and destructors?)