[17:10] tdaitx, doko, vorlon: are there any remaining blockers to publishing openjdk today? [17:17] sbeattie: I'm not aware of anything new since Friday. I am gathering the long way around that the recommendation is to ignore the autopkgtest regressions for dogtag-pki in cosmic, is that correct? [17:18] (which should be done as a proper hint) [17:19] yes, that is my understanding [17:21] sbeattie: and are we ignoring this on the basis that it's a bad test or on the basis that we believe no one cares about the regression? [17:22] from the tjaalton quote in the notes, it sounds like we believe no one cares about the regression [17:23] "while setting up pki-tps which likely no-one uses" [17:26] sbeattie: and in that case, do you care about notating this somehow as part of the USN? [17:29] I'm not sure the USN notice is the right place for that, but we should probably have a bug report for it. [17:31] sbeattie: well, apparently there's LP: #1682149 [17:32] but that same test didn't fail in bionic... so... [17:33] vorlon: yeah, I think I looked at that, and I'm pretty sure it's that the test isn't detecting the failure, not that bionic magically works. [17:33] heh [17:34] oh, dogtag-pki is the only reason we have a resteasy3.0 package, and dogtag-pki has been removed from disco? :P [17:34] well, it's a sync from unstable anyway, so I'll let the lazy gc do its thing [17:40] sbeattie: also filed LP: #1824861 in case it's not the same bug [17:40] and hint added [17:40] thanks [17:50] sbeattie: none that I know of and there has been no new bug reports comming in for a while [18:23] okay, I'm going to work on publishing then. thanks! [18:26] tdaitx: umm, there's some packages that we updated in bionic that didn't get respun (didn't need the fix) for cosmic, but not changing them results in them having a lower version in cosmic than bionic. [18:26] tomcat9 being the first one I noticed. [18:27] hmm, do you have a list there? I thought I updated all the ones I had to change [18:28] alright, let me check that [18:33] I have not made a list yet [18:51] sbeattie: I compared the versions in the ppas + latest versions in bionic|cosmic and only tomcat9 showed up as being an earlier version in cosmic than bionic [18:53] tdaitx: okay, cool. Can you get an upload ready? [18:56] rbalint: LP: #1823125 shows as fixed on Cosmic, but there is no upload for Cosmic with the same changelog entry as Bionic, do you remember why it was marked as released? [18:56] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1823125 [18:58] or doko: ^ [19:00] I am under the impression that this only affected bionic - ie. systemd had a fix in for cosmic so tomcat9 in Cosmic was unaffected, but then I would expect that the Cosmic task to be set as invalid for tomcat9, not "Fix released" [19:03] sbeattie: ^ do you recall if that was the case? [19:17] tdaitx: yes, it only affected bionic, because systemd-sysusers in that version did not allow specifying a home directory when adding a system user. [19:49] sbeattie: it has been uploaded, about 1h to finish the build, then we can copy it to cosmic-proposed [19:50] I will be away for the next 2h, so somebody else has to copy it [19:50] vorlon: could you binary copy tomcat9 from the tomcat3 ppa to cosmic-proposed after the build is done (in about 1h from now)? [19:56] tdaitx: yes [20:13] tdaitx, i can confirm that cosmic and up were not affected and i just marked to bug invalid for them [20:36] tks =) [20:55] tdaitx: fwiw the amd64 build hasn't started yet and I don't know why, raising it w/ launchpad team [22:28] tomcat9 building now [22:50] wow, that started pretty late [22:51] yeah, I never saw a reply from lp folks, but the outage seems to finally be resolved [23:44] binary copied tomcat9 to cosmic-proposed, notified some fine folks on ubuntu-release, waiting for approval now