infinityxnox: Well, linux-image isn't noawait, but it also almost certainly shouldn't be.  There's also no way for it to be in a loop with things like bamfdaemon and desktop-file-utils, though.00:42
infinityxnox: ca-certificates might be a candidate.00:43
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-ovn (disco-proposed/universe) [6.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)07:40
jamespagemorning ubuntu-release - sorry missed the upload for ^^ networking-ovn last friday...07:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (disco-proposed/main) [2:19.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:19.0.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server)07:43
jamespageand ^^ nova upload resolves an issue with the automated backport to 18.04 as openssl 1.1.1 is now in bionic-proposed07:44
jamespageif they could be reviewed and accepted much appreciated!07:44
seb128confirmed bug #1824672, unsure if you consider that as an issue to fix or just cosmetic though?07:57
ubot5`bug 1824672 in syslinux (Ubuntu) "Disco "check disc for defects" appears not to function" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182467207:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sip4 (disco-proposed/universe) [4.19.15+dfsg-1 => 4.19.15+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)08:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pi-bluetooth (disco-proposed/universe) [0.1.10ubuntu3 => 0.1.10ubuntu5] (no packageset)08:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pi-bluetooth [source] (disco-proposed) [0.1.10ubuntu5]08:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pi-bluetooth (disco-proposed/universe) [0.1.10ubuntu3 => 0.1.10ubuntu5] (no packageset)08:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pi-bluetooth [source] (disco-proposed) [0.1.10ubuntu5]08:27
seb128gstreamer upload to disco to fix the current autopkgtest issue with parlatype which blocked the update in disco-proposed in the queue08:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gfxboot-theme-ubuntu (disco-proposed/main) [0.21.0 => 0.21.1] (core)08:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer1.0 (disco-proposed/main) [1.15.90-1~sync1 => 1.15.90-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)08:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-ovn [source] (disco-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu1]08:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sip4 [source] (disco-proposed) [4.19.15+dfsg-1ubuntu1]08:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (disco-proposed) [2:19.0.0-0ubuntu2]08:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gfxboot-theme-ubuntu [source] (disco-proposed) [0.21.1]09:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gstreamer1.0 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1ubuntu1]09:05
LaneyLooking into that syslinux thing a bit09:08
mvosil2100: hey, can we release the "shadow" SRUs? I looked at the autopkgtest issues listed and one lxd failure is a "test timeout" and the other lxd one I have no clue but I can't see anything useradd/userdel related in there. and mariadb always fails it seems. I can dig into the second lxd test some more if you want though09:08
seb128Laney, thx09:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected blis [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.5.2-6]09:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted latte-dock [source] (disco-proposed) [0.8.8-0ubuntu1]09:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-django-mptt [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.8.7-1]09:14
Laneygoing to have to learn how it works first though /o\09:17
infinityseb128: Huzzah for the gstreamer 32-bit fix.09:19
sil2100mvo: hey! I can take a lookie now09:19
infinityseb128: Did you want to replace the gst-* ~sync1 uploads with real syncs while you're at it?09:19
mvosil2100: thank you!09:20
seb128infinity, I can do if you prefer, it's mostly cosmetic09:20
infinityseb128: Yeah, not super picky, just makes me feel icky. :)09:21
seb128if you are fine waiting for another round of rebuilds/autopkgtest for that stack to migrate09:21
seb128k, let me sync then09:21
infinityseb128: Figured maybe you'd want to since this is about to retrigger testing $world anyway.09:21
ginggsi have received the reject mail for blis 0.5.2-6 yet, so don't i know the reason.  can i sync 0.5.2-7 ?09:23
ginggss/have/have not/09:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer-vaapi (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.90-1~sync1 => 1.15.90-1] (no packageset) (sync)09:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer-editing-services1.0 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.90-1~sync1 => 1.15.90-1] (ubuntustudio) (sync)09:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-base1.0 (disco-proposed/main) [1.15.90-1~sync1 => 1.15.90-1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync)09:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-rtsp-server1.0 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.90-1~sync1 => 1.15.90-1] (no packageset) (sync)09:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-ugly1.0 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.90-1~sync1 => 1.15.90-1] (kubuntu) (sync)09:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-python1.0 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.90-1~sync1 => 1.15.90-1] (ubuntustudio) (sync)09:25
seb128infinity, done ^09:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-base1.0 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1]09:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-python1.0 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1]09:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gstreamer-editing-services1.0 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1]09:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-ugly1.0 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1]09:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gstreamer-vaapi [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1]09:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-rtsp-server1.0 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1]09:32
sil2100mvo: ok, looking at the shadow SRU - I guess the main reason it wasn't released by anyone before is because it seems like the SRUs had some additional LP bugs attached that haven't been verified yet09:38
sil2100Can you take a look at those and see if maybe you could verify them? Or, well, if maybe they're not really relevant09:38
sil2100mvo: for instance:09:38
sil2100mvo: xenial and bionic have LP: #984390 and xenial LP: #149558009:39
ubot5`Launchpad bug 984390 in shadow (Ubuntu Bionic) "$PATH is taken from login.defs not /etc/environment" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/98439009:39
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1495580 in shadow (Ubuntu Xenial) "chfn needs to learn about the --extrausers argument and use libnss-extrausers files when set" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149558009:39
sil2100Very old bugs09:39
sil2100Guess maybe it's just some leftover in the changelog09:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-h5netcdf (disco-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-1 => 0.7.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)09:44
LocutusOfBorgcan we please kick llvm-toolchain-snapshot out from disco?09:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-snapshot (disco-proposed/universe) [1:9~svn354105-1~exp1 => 1:9~svn358327-1~exp1] (no packageset) (sync)09:50
infinityLocutusOfBorg: It's not in disco.09:50
infinityLocutusOfBorg: So... Done?09:50
ubot5`Ubuntu bug 1824784 in llvm-toolchain-snapshot (Ubuntu) "kick out from disco" [Undecided,New]09:51
LocutusOfBorginfinity, disco-proposed with block-proposed tag09:51
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Yes, it's in disco-proposed.  Not in disco.09:52
infinityLocutusOfBorg: So... What's the problem?09:52
LocutusOfBorgthat its now an experimental only package09:52
infinityIt'll move from disco-proposed to ee-proposed.09:52
LocutusOfBorgno, not autosyncd anymore09:52
infinityOh, if you mean remove it entirely, sure.  But then why did you just request a sync?09:52
infinityLike, 3 minutes ago09:52
LocutusOfBorginfinity, because in case you nack the removal, I'm planning to keep it up-to-date manually09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: blis (disco-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-11 => 0.5.2-6] (no packageset) (sync)09:53
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Honestly, I suspect there's value in having it in proposed and manually refreshes occasionally, to see that it continues to build/work/etc.09:53
ginggsi think a dingo ate my blis reject mail09:53
infinityLocutusOfBorg: But your call, if you're the one maintaining it.09:54
LocutusOfBorgin case you want to keep it around a little bit more, I want my changes in the packaging to go in the archive, so I can see if the testsuite is fixed09:54
LocutusOfBorgas you can see I committed fixes from the 8 branch in the snapshot one09:54
LocutusOfBorginfinity, I'm not in a position to have a decision, you are archive admin, I prefer you to decide on it09:54
LocutusOfBorgwe moved to experimental, because the binary packages moving to snapshot to "stable+1" version, were always missing breaks+replaces09:55
infinityLocutusOfBorg: If you're going to keep it updated, I'll keep it.  If you're not, I'll remove it.  Up to you.09:55
LocutusOfBorgso people had pain in upgrading09:55
sil2100valorie, acheronuk: hey! So I see someone reported LP: #1824669 for kubuntu, did you see something like that by any chance?09:55
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1824669 in syslinux (Ubuntu) "Live boot fails legacy boot Kubuntu 19.04" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182466909:55
LocutusOfBorgI just want people to stop having upgrades issues, the same we faced in debian09:55
infinityginggs: The reject message was something like "an experimental package that is changing literally daily isn't an ideal candidate for a pre-release stable sync".09:55
LocutusOfBorgalso "please remove this binary from foo" often resulted in ftpmasters removing the binaries from other llvm-toolchain-N packages09:56
LocutusOfBorgso, I would prefer to stop having it around but really, if you think it is worth the effort, I can still sync it and check if it works or not09:56
ginggsinfinity: ack, debian maintainer told me yesterday 0.5.2-6 is the one we want, so i tested autopkgtests in my PPA an syc'd09:57
infinityLocutusOfBorg: If you prefer to remove it, I'll remove it.  I don't want unmaintained packages hanging around for no reason, so if there's no value to you, meh.09:57
LocutusOfBorg(I know end users shouldn't use devel-proposed at all, but backports are there...09:57
infinityginggs: And then he uploaded another one. :P09:57
LocutusOfBorgI would like to drop it, if possible, I think also it would be easier for archive admins09:57
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Kay.  Removing then.09:57
ginggsinfinity: but now he uploaded 0.5.2-7 this morning, so up to you if you want to let 0.5.2-6 through now09:58
LocutusOfBorgbecause the new binaries often builds only in a subset of archs, and meh if I sync manually your automatic minions don't work09:58
LocutusOfBorgI hope to don't make you angry if in the future we change idea!09:58
infinityLocutusOfBorg: I'm always angry. :)09:59
infinityLocutusOfBorg: (removed)09:59
LocutusOfBorg<3 lovely thanks09:59
ginggsinfinity: it should migrate, and then i'll check with him again before release and do another sync if needed10:00
sil2100valorie, acheronuk: oh, ok, I guess LP: #1824670 is related and duflu did take a look at it10:00
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1824670 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 (Ubuntu) "Boot to black screen after Kubuntu 19.04 install" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182467010:00
infinityginggs: If the Debian maintainer has higher confidence in experimental than in what we're currently shipping, that's probably a good enough argument, though we should likely take -710:01
infinitySince it looks like it has obvious bugfixes over -610:01
ginggsinfinity: ack, please reject -6 (again) and i'll sync -7 when launchpad picks it up10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected blis [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.5.2-6]10:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected llvm-toolchain-snapshot [sync] (disco-proposed) [1:9~svn358327-1~exp1]10:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-h5netcdf [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.7.1-1]10:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: puma (disco-proposed/universe) [3.12.0-2 => 3.12.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)10:04
LocutusOfBorginfinity, ^^ I really want it to move forward, I don't know which network configuration your infrastructure has, but local tests pass, as well as in Debian, and DebOMatic... I hope we can wait for some new release, and in the meanwhile let me ask upstream (the test is ignored already on windows and somewhere else, like appveyor CI)10:05
mvosil2100: thanks, let me double check this (and sorry for the slow reply, was in a meeting)10:06
LocutusOfBorgalso, there is a new puma 3.12.1 that has changes in that exact particular test... interesting10:08
sil2100mvo: infinity had a point with one thing - at least one of those bugs could be very suspicious if it's really fixed, so yeah, would be good to check that10:09
sil2100Wonder why it was included in the .changes file10:09
sil2100Oh, infinity is right, the six-digit one is *actually* explicitly in the changelog ;p (/me didn't look at that yet)10:11
* cjwatson eyes https://bugs.debian.org/926735 and wonders if we want that in disco10:14
ubot5`Debian bug 926735 in libparted2 "Include upstream patch for extended partition size" [Serious,Open]10:14
cjwatsonTrying to construct a test case now ...10:14
* infinity eyes cjwatson and wonders if we want him on distro.10:18
infinityWe have a pretty solid testcase.10:18
LocutusOfBorg"I want cjwatson on disco" so I can pull-lp-source him! :D10:18
LocutusOfBorgeverybody should have a local cjwatson instance :)10:18
cjwatsonI mean it'd be handy to be cloned10:20
cjwatsonDon't want my clones to have more fun than I do though10:21
LocutusOfBorgyou can pthread_join your forks eventually...10:22
cjwatsonAll gets a bit Greg Egan10:22
LocutusOfBorgbut OTOH I don't want zombie cjwatson around... :D10:22
acheronuksil2100: I tried a 'legacy' live usb boot on a Dell Inspiron 15 5578 laptop last night to check, and all was fine. That laptop is wuite new, and  Darin's (bug reporter) are about 2009 with Nvidia (I have Intel) so maybe not a fair comparison10:36
acheronuksil2100: oh, I see your later comment. right10:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: multipath-tools (disco-proposed/main) [0.7.4-2ubuntu7 => 0.7.4-2ubuntu8] (core)11:01
xnoxinfinity, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/disco/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=multipath-tools http://launchpadlibrarian.net/419367051/multipath-tools_0.7.4-2ubuntu7_0.7.4-2ubuntu8.diff.gz11:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted puma [source] (disco-proposed) [3.12.0-2ubuntu1]11:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted multipath-tools [source] (disco-proposed) [0.7.4-2ubuntu8]11:09
sil2100mvo: how does the ddtp-ubuntu stuff work? I mean, I guess we'd normally like that updated, I see you did an import from Debian into ddtp-pot-disco but the translations in launchpad don't seem to exist for disco?11:10
sil2100mvo: anyway, it's probably not a priority to get that updated11:10
sil2100mvo: was just wondering if that's anything that you're working on already?11:10
sil2100For cosmic I guess we skipped the update?11:11
sil2100acheronuk: yeah, in that case I guess this should also be an issue for Ubuntu, right?11:12
mvosil2100: I updated it for disco but its stuck apparently in LP approval of the templates11:13
mvosil2100: https://translations.launchpad.net/ddtp-ubuntu/disco/+imports11:13
mvosil2100: I'm not sure why this no longer gets approved, either in the "old" days people looked at this and don't anymore or a script has changed11:13
mvosil2100: with that approved I think I could upload new translations for disco11:13
infinitytjaalton: Have you had more time to think about the nouveau modeset madness?11:14
sil2100mvo: hm, I wonder what happened then, I guess I don't have the powers to approve that - but probably Gunnar has, let me reach out to him11:14
sil2100mvo: anyway, not a top priority, but certainly would be nice if your work wouldn't go to waste just because of that11:14
infinitytjaalton: It occurred to me just now that this means all nvidia systems will also be running the installer at 640x480, which is really suboptimal.11:14
mvosil2100: let me know if there is a way to automate this11:15
mvosil2100: please ping me once this is unblocked, the amount of work to upload the update is tiny11:15
acheronuksil2100: you would think so, be Darin said the Ubuntu iso booted ok. I'm afraid I don't have hardware I can reproduce this on, and not much time anyway today11:17
acheronuk*but Darin11:17
sil2100mvo: thank you!11:18
* acheronuk deliberately NEVER EVER buys laptops with Nvidia ;)11:22
tjaaltoninfinity: on uefi systems it'll use efifb with the native resolution..11:23
infinitytjaalton: EFI systems are still relatively newish.11:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (disco-proposed/main) [20190124+dfsg1-0ubuntu1 => 20190315-0ubuntu1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)11:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-restricted-modules (disco-proposed/restricted) [5.0.0-10.11 => 5.0.0-11.12] (kernel)11:27
tjaaltoninfinity: a more refined patch would take more time, so if you prefer to revert for disco and rethink it for EE then that's fine11:30
sil2100acheronuk: ok, that's a bit weird then!11:32
sil2100But yeah, if only his laptop is affected (and only for Kubuntu), I'd say the importance of the bug has lowered a bit11:32
sil2100I was worried it's an indication of something bigger11:33
sil2100Wonder what's going on there11:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-restricted-modules [source] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-11.12]11:33
infinitytjaalton: Has the nouveau/firmware situation gotten significantly worse since cocmis?11:33
infinitytjaalton: cosmic, even.11:33
infinitytjaalton: Cause I'd prefer not to regress in the name of progression.11:33
tjaaltoninfinity: i'm not sure, upstream said it's not the first tume11:41
infinitytjaalton: I guess what I'm driving at is that if cosmic and bionic(+hwe) have the same issues you were trying to work around in disco, you're causing a regression to fix something that isn't.12:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: blis (disco-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-11 => 0.5.2-7] (no packageset) (sync)12:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blis [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.5.2-7]12:17
LocutusOfBorgrails migrated!13:07
LocutusOfBorgI think we now need a rails that disables bootsnap only on armhf instead of everywhere...13:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-mixlib-install (disco-proposed/universe) [3.11.7-1 => 3.11.7-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)13:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mozjs60 (disco-proposed/main) [60.2.3-2build1 => 60.2.3-3] (desktop-core) (sync)13:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mozjs60 [sync] (disco-proposed) [60.2.3-3]13:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-mixlib-install [source] (disco-proposed) [3.11.7-1ubuntu1]13:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-restricted-modules (disco-proposed/restricted) [5.0.0-10.11 => 5.0.0-11.12] (kernel)13:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2:13.0.2-0ubuntu3.1]13:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: diaspora (disco-proposed/universe) [ =>] (no packageset)13:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.20 => 237-3ubuntu10.21] (core)13:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (bionic-proposed/main) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8.8 => 4.0.0-1ubuntu8.9] (ubuntu-server, virt)13:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-restricted-modules [source] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-11.12]13:51
infinityLocutusOfBorg: That diaspora change looks wrong to me.13:51
infinityLocutusOfBorg: ruby-handlebars-assets has an epoch in both Ubuntu and Debian, why would you remove it in the version check?13:52
infinityLocutusOfBorg: The problem you're seeing in britney isn't the version, it's a component mismatch.13:53
infinityruby-handlebars-assets moved from contrib to main in Debian and we didn't follow suit (yet).13:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-restricted-modules [amd64] (disco-proposed/restricted) [5.0.0-11.12] (kernel)13:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected diaspora [source] (disco-proposed) []13:54
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Fixing.13:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-oauth2 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1 => 1.4.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)13:57
LocutusOfBorgsorry infinity I obviously made a mistake13:58
LocutusOfBorgbecause I saw "hey diaspora is not main, how can be a mismatch"13:58
LocutusOfBorgI didn't think about multiverse, you are right13:58
LocutusOfBorgruby-oauth2 looks more legit13:58
infinityLocutusOfBorg: All good.  Should be fixed in the next publisher run.13:58
LocutusOfBorglovely! I don't think it will migrate TBH13:58
LocutusOfBorgbut I want autopkgtestsuite results...13:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-oauth2 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.4.1-1ubuntu1]14:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-restricted-modules [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-11.12]14:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 44 entries have been added or removed14:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ddtp-translations (disco-proposed/universe) [20180103.1 => 20190415.1] (no packageset)15:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-concurrent (disco-proposed/universe) [1.0.5-2 => 1.0.5-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)15:51
LocutusOfBorg^^ that one is finally fixed yay15:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pi-bluetooth (disco-proposed/multiverse) [0.1.10ubuntu5 => 0.1.10ubuntu6] (no packageset)15:55
ginggsLocutusOfBorg: good work! please send that fix to debian bug #92678215:59
ubot5`Debian bug 926782 in src:ruby-concurrent "ruby-concurrent: autopkgtest needs update" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/92678215:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pi-bluetooth [source] (disco-proposed) [0.1.10ubuntu6]16:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-concurrent [source] (disco-proposed) [1.0.5-2ubuntu1]16:00
LocutusOfBorgginggs, already fixed an uploaded in debian too16:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ddtp-translations [source] (disco-proposed) [20190415.1]16:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (trusty-proposed/main) [0.154.1ubuntu4 => 0.154.1ubuntu5] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)16:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntukylin-meta (disco-proposed/universe) [0.35 => 0.36] (ubuntukylin)16:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-meta [source] (disco-proposed) [0.36]16:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpng1.6 (disco-proposed/main) [1.6.36-6 => 1.6.37-1~exp2] (core) (sync)17:04
LocutusOfBorginfinity, missing build on ppc64el: os-autoinst (from 4.5.1527308405.8b586d5-2)17:22
LocutusOfBorgmissing build on s390x: os-autoinst (from 4.5.1527308405.8b586d5-2)17:22
LocutusOfBorgplease can you do it? removed on debian, decruft NBS proposed17:22
vorloninfinity, LocutusOfBorg: looking17:24
vorloninfinity, LocutusOfBorg: done17:25
bdmurrayvorlon: I've verified bug 1822886 if you also feel it is worth releasing early.17:31
ubot5`bug 1822886 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Cosmic) "universe missing after bionic->cosmic do-release-upgrade" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182288617:31
LocutusOfBorglast fix from my side for today17:43
LocutusOfBorgvala-panel is ok17:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala-panel (disco-proposed/universe) [0.4.87+dfsg1-1 => 0.4.87+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)17:45
infinityLocutusOfBorg: That patch could use a link to the upstream commit yuo took "part" of...18:03
infinityLocutusOfBorg: And why on earth are you trying to sync libpng from experimental?18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libpng1.6 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.6.37-1~exp2]18:05
vorlonbdmurray: released, thanks18:36
infinityvorlon: What exactly did you do above to os-autoinst?19:09
infinity(he asked, after removing the NBS binaries that weren't removed)19:09
LocutusOfBorginfinity, because of arm* fixes19:10
infinityArgh, and why did the VPN section of my panel disappear again?19:10
LocutusOfBorginfinity, I'm the debian libpng maintainer...19:10
LocutusOfBorgand I uploaded to experimental because of freeze, not because of instability19:10
infinityLocutusOfBorg: That's nice.  We're in a hard freeze, and libpng is on every image.19:11
LocutusOfBorgactually mostly all of the arm improvements are already in the current 1.6.36-6 version, but I would like to avoid having to maintain all the patches there, the new release included them all with some additional fixes19:11
LocutusOfBorgbut of course I see your point19:12
LocutusOfBorgand you are RT, so I'll be happy whatever decision you make :)19:12
infinityI already made it. :)19:12
LocutusOfBorgbtw I vala-panel is now updated, we should probably drop the file at all, but I prefer to keep changes minimal19:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala-panel (disco-proposed/universe) [0.4.87+dfsg1-1 => 0.4.87+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)19:18
vorloninfinity: apparently what I did was typo '-a s390x' as '-b s390x' <shrug>19:19
LocutusOfBorgpick the one you prefer infinity :) the last upload might even be better19:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala-panel (disco-proposed/universe) [0.4.87+dfsg1-1 => 0.4.87+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)19:22
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Why not the whole commit, that actually deletes the file?19:25
infinityI mean, in spirit, as it may not apply cleanly.  But you can do the 1-liner to CMakeLists, rm the file, then dpkg-source --commit.19:27
LocutusOfBorginfinity, that is the second upload19:50
LocutusOfBorgthe reason for not deleting the file is that dpkg-source didn't pick deleted files...19:50
LocutusOfBorgin any case this is already a commit part of 0.4.88 released version, so it will go away on next sync19:51
LocutusOfBorginfinity, ^^ now you have the three flavours, the one with the function removed, the one with the cmake one-line and the one with also the file removed19:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala-panel (disco-proposed/universe) [0.4.87+dfsg1-1 => 0.4.87+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)19:58
LocutusOfBorgnext time I'll leave ricotz and seb128 the fixup of the sync from debian experimental :)19:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mokutil (disco-proposed/main) [0.3.0+1538710437.fb6250f-0ubuntu2 => 0.3.0+1538710437.fb6250f-1] (core) (sync)20:00
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: ^^ seriously?20:04
vorlonwe're in final freeze. *critical fixes only*, not "sync new upstream versions to be in sync"20:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mokutil [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.3.0+1538710437.fb6250f-1]20:05
vorlonnot even new upstream version; but regardless, no20:06
cyphermoxI may have a fix for casper in a minute; provided I manage to master this test iso properly20:19
cyphermox(integrity check)20:19
tsimonq2infinity, vorlon: How badly would the Release Team hate me if I wanted to upload a new Calamares module, assuming I take full responsibility for testing it?20:22
xnoxslitghtly concerts that lxqt-globalkeys took out 6 builders for 1h+ now, when normally the build takes just 2minutes.20:30
xnoxeither the cloud is dead, or the lxqt-globalkeys is blocking 12 buildings in a hung state.20:30
xnoxno, not 12 builders, 24 builders.20:33
xnoxtsimonq2, what's up with lxqt-globalkeys? do you have access to lubuntu ci? maybe we should cancel the builds, and retry them?20:33
xnoxhttps://launchpad.net/builders -> ctrl+f for lxqt-globalkeys20:33
xnoxi have rights to cancel these too.... it seems odd how they are hung.20:34
xnoxhm cancelling them doesn't help, as they get stuck in "cancelling" state then.20:43
xnoxlaunchpad is probably broken.20:43
tsimonq2Yeah, it's that.20:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready21:03
EickmeyerNo blockers. :)21:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (disco-proposed/main) [2.13.2-9ubuntu5 => 2.13.2-9ubuntu6] (core)21:19
fossfreedomEickmeyer, bit early? thought there is at least one more spin coming21:20
tsimonq2There's Always one more spin coming.21:20
tsimonq2Eickmeyer: I don't think infinity has updated base-files yet.21:21
tsimonq2(At minimum.)21:21
EickmeyerOhhhh.... :/21:21
tsimonq2Eickmeyer: No need.21:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Disco Final] has been updated (20190413.1)21:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected vala-panel [source] (disco-proposed) [0.4.87+dfsg1-1ubuntu1]21:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected vala-panel [source] (disco-proposed) [0.4.87+dfsg1-1ubuntu1]21:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected vala-panel [source] (disco-proposed) [0.4.87+dfsg1-1ubuntu1]21:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vala-panel [source] (disco-proposed) [0.4.87+dfsg1-1ubuntu1]21:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apparmor [source] (disco-proposed) [2.13.2-9ubuntu6]21:30
infinityWell, that apparmor didn't last long in the queue...21:31
infinityDidn't even get to review it.21:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (disco-proposed/main) [2.13.2-9ubuntu5 => 2.13.2-9ubuntu6] (core)21:31
jdstrandI wanted a quick patch comment. the new one is there21:31
infinityDoes this fix the issue you were discussing earlier?21:32
jdstrandthis isn't install critical, so sru is fine, but if you want to take it, it is super small21:32
jdstrandit fixes part of it. I say part because this seems like twp parts21:33
jdstrandthere is a shiftfs interaction with apparmor that jjohansen needs to look at21:33
jdstrandI fixed the easy part :)21:34
jdstrandthe details are in the bug21:34
jdstrandif lxd didn't use shftfs or shiftfs was backed out, this would be good enough21:34
jdstrandI'm not advocating for that per se, but mention it since that might be something you want to consider21:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apparmor [source] (disco-proposed) [2.13.2-9ubuntu6]21:37
tsimonq2xnox: (Technically, you also have access to the Lubuntu CI, being an Ubuntu Core Developer that is indirectly a Lubuntu Developer: https://ci.lubuntu.me/ )22:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unattended-upgrades (disco-proposed/main) [1.10ubuntu3 => 1.10ubuntu4] (core)22:17
rbalintinfinity, bdmurray just marked one of the bugs rls-dd-incoming, and those issues are seen frequently on errors.ubuntu.com22:18
rbalintfull autopkgtest is still running locally, the changes are on review at https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades/pulls22:20
rbalintu-u should run fine on default configs, thus it may be enough to release it as a 0-day sru, but wanted to show the most important patches22:22
infinityrbalint: Conceptually, I don't have issues with a u-u upload right now while I'm working on migrating a kernel anyway.22:26
infinityvorlon: I'm perhaps a bit too sleepy to give a good review to that u-u, could you give it some love?22:26
rbalintinfinity, i'm too sleepy as well, thus i would not mind waiting till tomorrow or at least a review22:28
rbalintinfinity, but i can fix anything tomorrow that were not caught by the review22:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-11.12 => 5.0.0-13.14] (core, kernel) (sync)22:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-11.12 => 5.0.0-13.14] (core, kernel) (sync)22:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: parted (disco-proposed/main) [3.2-24build1 => 3.2-25] (core) (sync)22:37
rbalint infinity, vorlon u-u autopkgtest passed locally in disco22:46
rbalintrunning another in bionic22:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (disco-proposed) [1.10ubuntu4]22:47
vorloninfinity, rbalint: accepted ^^22:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta (disco-proposed/main) [ =>] (core, kernel) (sync)22:49
rbalintvorlon, thanks! i'll keep the remaining patches needed in stable releases for the 0-day sru22:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta [sync] (disco-proposed) []22:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-13.14]22:53
=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted parted [sync] (disco-proposed) [3.2-25]22:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: casper (disco-proposed/main) [1.403 => 1.404] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)23:07
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: so you're disabling tests in puma when you cannot account for what the failure means?23:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted casper [source] (disco-proposed) [1.404]23:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-13.14]23:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-13.14] (core, kernel)23:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-aws (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-gcp (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-aws (disco-proposed/main) [ =>] (core, kernel) (sync)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-gcp (disco-proposed/main) [ =>] (core, kernel) (sync)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-restricted-modules (disco-proposed/restricted) [5.0.0-11.12 => 5.0.0-13.14] (kernel) (sync)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-azure (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-azure (disco-proposed/main) [ =>] (core, kernel) (sync)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-kvm (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-kvm (disco-proposed/main) [ =>] (core, kernel) (sync)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-13.14] (core, kernel)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-13.14] (core, kernel)23:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-restricted-modules [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-13.14]23:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-azure (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)23:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-gcp (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)23:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-13.14]23:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-13.14]23:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-13.14]23:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-aws [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1004.4]23:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-gcp [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1004.4]23:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-aws [sync] (disco-proposed) []23:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-gcp [sync] (disco-proposed) []23:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-azure [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1004.4]23:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-azure [sync] (disco-proposed) []23:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-kvm [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1004.4]23:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-kvm [sync] (disco-proposed) []23:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-signed-azure [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1004.4]23:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-azure (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)23:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-signed-gcp [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1004.4]23:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-gcp (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)23:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-azure [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1004.4]23:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-gcp [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1004.4]23:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-gcp (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)23:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tomcat9 (cosmic-proposed/universe) [9.0.16-3~18.04 => 9.0.16-3~18.10] (no packageset) (sync)23:42
tdaitxsbeattie: vorlon: ^ tomcat9 build is finished now, I requested the binary copy23:42
vorlontdaitx: accepted23:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tomcat9 [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [9.0.16-3~18.10]23:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!