[00:42] <infinity> xnox: Well, linux-image isn't noawait, but it also almost certainly shouldn't be.  There's also no way for it to be in a loop with things like bamfdaemon and desktop-file-utils, though.
[00:43] <infinity> xnox: ca-certificates might be a candidate.
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-ovn (disco-proposed/universe) [6.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[07:43] <jamespage> morning ubuntu-release - sorry missed the upload for ^^ networking-ovn last friday...
[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (disco-proposed/main) [2:19.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:19.0.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[07:44] <jamespage> and ^^ nova upload resolves an issue with the automated backport to 18.04 as openssl 1.1.1 is now in bionic-proposed
[07:44] <jamespage> if they could be reviewed and accepted much appreciated!
[07:44] <jamespage> thanks!
[07:57] <seb128> confirmed bug #1824672, unsure if you consider that as an issue to fix or just cosmetic though?
[07:57] <ubot5`> bug 1824672 in syslinux (Ubuntu) "Disco "check disc for defects" appears not to function" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1824672
[08:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sip4 (disco-proposed/universe) [4.19.15+dfsg-1 => 4.19.15+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pi-bluetooth (disco-proposed/universe) [0.1.10ubuntu3 => 0.1.10ubuntu5] (no packageset)
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pi-bluetooth [source] (disco-proposed) [0.1.10ubuntu5]
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pi-bluetooth (disco-proposed/universe) [0.1.10ubuntu3 => 0.1.10ubuntu5] (no packageset)
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pi-bluetooth [source] (disco-proposed) [0.1.10ubuntu5]
[08:45] <seb128> gstreamer upload to disco to fix the current autopkgtest issue with parlatype which blocked the update in disco-proposed in the queue
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gfxboot-theme-ubuntu (disco-proposed/main) [0.21.0 => 0.21.1] (core)
[08:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer1.0 (disco-proposed/main) [1.15.90-1~sync1 => 1.15.90-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-ovn [source] (disco-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sip4 [source] (disco-proposed) [4.19.15+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (disco-proposed) [2:19.0.0-0ubuntu2]
[09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gfxboot-theme-ubuntu [source] (disco-proposed) [0.21.1]
[09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gstreamer1.0 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1ubuntu1]
[09:08] <Laney> Looking into that syslinux thing a bit
[09:08] <mvo> sil2100: hey, can we release the "shadow" SRUs? I looked at the autopkgtest issues listed and one lxd failure is a "test timeout" and the other lxd one I have no clue but I can't see anything useradd/userdel related in there. and mariadb always fails it seems. I can dig into the second lxd test some more if you want though
[09:09] <seb128> Laney, thx
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected blis [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.5.2-6]
[09:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted latte-dock [source] (disco-proposed) [0.8.8-0ubuntu1]
[09:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-django-mptt [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.8.7-1]
[09:17] <Laney> going to have to learn how it works first though /o\
[09:19] <infinity> seb128: Huzzah for the gstreamer 32-bit fix.
[09:19] <seb128> :-)
[09:19] <sil2100> mvo: hey! I can take a lookie now
[09:19] <infinity> seb128: Did you want to replace the gst-* ~sync1 uploads with real syncs while you're at it?
[09:20] <mvo> sil2100: thank you!
[09:20] <seb128> infinity, I can do if you prefer, it's mostly cosmetic
[09:21] <infinity> seb128: Yeah, not super picky, just makes me feel icky. :)
[09:21] <seb128> if you are fine waiting for another round of rebuilds/autopkgtest for that stack to migrate
[09:21] <seb128> k, let me sync then
[09:21] <infinity> seb128: Figured maybe you'd want to since this is about to retrigger testing $world anyway.
[09:23] <ginggs> i have received the reject mail for blis 0.5.2-6 yet, so don't i know the reason.  can i sync 0.5.2-7 ?
[09:23] <ginggs> s/have/have not/
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer-vaapi (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.90-1~sync1 => 1.15.90-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer-editing-services1.0 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.90-1~sync1 => 1.15.90-1] (ubuntustudio) (sync)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-base1.0 (disco-proposed/main) [1.15.90-1~sync1 => 1.15.90-1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-rtsp-server1.0 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.90-1~sync1 => 1.15.90-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-ugly1.0 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.90-1~sync1 => 1.15.90-1] (kubuntu) (sync)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-python1.0 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.15.90-1~sync1 => 1.15.90-1] (ubuntustudio) (sync)
[09:26] <seb128> infinity, done ^
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-base1.0 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-python1.0 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gstreamer-editing-services1.0 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-ugly1.0 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gstreamer-vaapi [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-rtsp-server1.0 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.15.90-1]
[09:38] <sil2100> mvo: ok, looking at the shadow SRU - I guess the main reason it wasn't released by anyone before is because it seems like the SRUs had some additional LP bugs attached that haven't been verified yet
[09:38] <sil2100> Can you take a look at those and see if maybe you could verify them? Or, well, if maybe they're not really relevant
[09:38] <sil2100> mvo: for instance:
[09:39] <sil2100> mvo: xenial and bionic have LP: #984390 and xenial LP: #1495580
[09:39] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 984390 in shadow (Ubuntu Bionic) "$PATH is taken from login.defs not /etc/environment" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/984390
[09:39] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1495580 in shadow (Ubuntu Xenial) "chfn needs to learn about the --extrausers argument and use libnss-extrausers files when set" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1495580
[09:39] <sil2100> Very old bugs
[09:40] <sil2100> Guess maybe it's just some leftover in the changelog
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-h5netcdf (disco-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-1 => 0.7.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:49] <LocutusOfBorg> can we please kick llvm-toolchain-snapshot out from disco?
[09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-snapshot (disco-proposed/universe) [1:9~svn354105-1~exp1 => 1:9~svn358327-1~exp1] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:50] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: It's not in disco.
[09:50] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: So... Done?
[09:51] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-snapshot/+bug/1824784
[09:51] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1824784 in llvm-toolchain-snapshot (Ubuntu) "kick out from disco" [Undecided,New]
[09:51] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, disco-proposed with block-proposed tag
[09:52] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Yes, it's in disco-proposed.  Not in disco.
[09:52] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: So... What's the problem?
[09:52] <LocutusOfBorg> that its now an experimental only package
[09:52] <infinity> It'll move from disco-proposed to ee-proposed.
[09:52] <LocutusOfBorg> no, not autosyncd anymore
[09:52] <infinity> Oh, if you mean remove it entirely, sure.  But then why did you just request a sync?
[09:52] <infinity> Like, 3 minutes ago
[09:53] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, because in case you nack the removal, I'm planning to keep it up-to-date manually
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: blis (disco-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-11 => 0.5.2-6] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:53] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Honestly, I suspect there's value in having it in proposed and manually refreshes occasionally, to see that it continues to build/work/etc.
[09:53] <ginggs> i think a dingo ate my blis reject mail
[09:54] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: But your call, if you're the one maintaining it.
[09:54] <LocutusOfBorg> in case you want to keep it around a little bit more, I want my changes in the packaging to go in the archive, so I can see if the testsuite is fixed
[09:54] <LocutusOfBorg> as you can see I committed fixes from the 8 branch in the snapshot one
[09:54] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, I'm not in a position to have a decision, you are archive admin, I prefer you to decide on it
[09:55] <LocutusOfBorg> we moved to experimental, because the binary packages moving to snapshot to "stable+1" version, were always missing breaks+replaces
[09:55] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: If you're going to keep it updated, I'll keep it.  If you're not, I'll remove it.  Up to you.
[09:55] <infinity> :P
[09:55] <LocutusOfBorg> so people had pain in upgrading
[09:55] <sil2100> valorie, acheronuk: hey! So I see someone reported LP: #1824669 for kubuntu, did you see something like that by any chance?
[09:55] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1824669 in syslinux (Ubuntu) "Live boot fails legacy boot Kubuntu 19.04" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1824669
[09:55] <LocutusOfBorg> I just want people to stop having upgrades issues, the same we faced in debian
[09:55] <infinity> ginggs: The reject message was something like "an experimental package that is changing literally daily isn't an ideal candidate for a pre-release stable sync".
[09:56] <LocutusOfBorg> also "please remove this binary from foo" often resulted in ftpmasters removing the binaries from other llvm-toolchain-N packages
[09:56] <LocutusOfBorg> so, I would prefer to stop having it around but really, if you think it is worth the effort, I can still sync it and check if it works or not
[09:57] <ginggs> infinity: ack, debian maintainer told me yesterday 0.5.2-6 is the one we want, so i tested autopkgtests in my PPA an syc'd
[09:57] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: If you prefer to remove it, I'll remove it.  I don't want unmaintained packages hanging around for no reason, so if there's no value to you, meh.
[09:57] <LocutusOfBorg> (I know end users shouldn't use devel-proposed at all, but backports are there...
[09:57] <infinity> ginggs: And then he uploaded another one. :P
[09:57] <LocutusOfBorg> I would like to drop it, if possible, I think also it would be easier for archive admins
[09:57] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Kay.  Removing then.
[09:58] <ginggs> infinity: but now he uploaded 0.5.2-7 this morning, so up to you if you want to let 0.5.2-6 through now
[09:58] <LocutusOfBorg> because the new binaries often builds only in a subset of archs, and meh if I sync manually your automatic minions don't work
[09:58] <LocutusOfBorg> I hope to don't make you angry if in the future we change idea!
[09:59] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: I'm always angry. :)
[09:59] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: (removed)
[09:59] <LocutusOfBorg> <3 lovely thanks
[10:00] <ginggs> infinity: it should migrate, and then i'll check with him again before release and do another sync if needed
[10:00] <sil2100> valorie, acheronuk: oh, ok, I guess LP: #1824670 is related and duflu did take a look at it
[10:00] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1824670 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 (Ubuntu) "Boot to black screen after Kubuntu 19.04 install" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1824670
[10:01] <infinity> ginggs: If the Debian maintainer has higher confidence in experimental than in what we're currently shipping, that's probably a good enough argument, though we should likely take -7
[10:01] <infinity> Since it looks like it has obvious bugfixes over -6
[10:01] <ginggs> infinity: ack, please reject -6 (again) and i'll sync -7 when launchpad picks it up
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected blis [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.5.2-6]
[10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected llvm-toolchain-snapshot [sync] (disco-proposed) [1:9~svn358327-1~exp1]
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-h5netcdf [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.7.1-1]
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: puma (disco-proposed/universe) [3.12.0-2 => 3.12.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:05] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, ^^ I really want it to move forward, I don't know which network configuration your infrastructure has, but local tests pass, as well as in Debian, and DebOMatic... I hope we can wait for some new release, and in the meanwhile let me ask upstream (the test is ignored already on windows and somewhere else, like appveyor CI)
[10:06] <mvo> sil2100: thanks, let me double check this (and sorry for the slow reply, was in a meeting)
[10:08] <LocutusOfBorg> also, there is a new puma 3.12.1 that has changes in that exact particular test... interesting
[10:09] <sil2100> mvo: infinity had a point with one thing - at least one of those bugs could be very suspicious if it's really fixed, so yeah, would be good to check that
[10:09] <sil2100> Wonder why it was included in the .changes file
[10:11] <sil2100> Oh, infinity is right, the six-digit one is *actually* explicitly in the changelog ;p (/me didn't look at that yet)
[10:14]  * cjwatson eyes https://bugs.debian.org/926735 and wonders if we want that in disco
[10:14] <ubot5`> Debian bug 926735 in libparted2 "Include upstream patch for extended partition size" [Serious,Open]
[10:14] <cjwatson> Trying to construct a test case now ...
[10:18]  * infinity eyes cjwatson and wonders if we want him on distro.
[10:18] <cjwatson> :P
[10:18] <infinity> We have a pretty solid testcase.
[10:18] <LocutusOfBorg> "I want cjwatson on disco" so I can pull-lp-source him! :D
[10:18] <LocutusOfBorg> everybody should have a local cjwatson instance :)
[10:20] <cjwatson> I mean it'd be handy to be cloned
[10:21] <cjwatson> Don't want my clones to have more fun than I do though
[10:22] <LocutusOfBorg> you can pthread_join your forks eventually...
[10:22] <cjwatson> All gets a bit Greg Egan
[10:22] <LocutusOfBorg> but OTOH I don't want zombie cjwatson around... :D
[10:36] <acheronuk> sil2100: I tried a 'legacy' live usb boot on a Dell Inspiron 15 5578 laptop last night to check, and all was fine. That laptop is wuite new, and  Darin's (bug reporter) are about 2009 with Nvidia (I have Intel) so maybe not a fair comparison
[10:37] <acheronuk> sil2100: oh, I see your later comment. right
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: multipath-tools (disco-proposed/main) [0.7.4-2ubuntu7 => 0.7.4-2ubuntu8] (core)
[11:01] <xnox> infinity, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/disco/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=multipath-tools http://launchpadlibrarian.net/419367051/multipath-tools_0.7.4-2ubuntu7_0.7.4-2ubuntu8.diff.gz
[11:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted puma [source] (disco-proposed) [3.12.0-2ubuntu1]
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted multipath-tools [source] (disco-proposed) [0.7.4-2ubuntu8]
[11:10] <sil2100> mvo: how does the ddtp-ubuntu stuff work? I mean, I guess we'd normally like that updated, I see you did an import from Debian into ddtp-pot-disco but the translations in launchpad don't seem to exist for disco?
[11:10] <sil2100> mvo: anyway, it's probably not a priority to get that updated
[11:10] <sil2100> mvo: was just wondering if that's anything that you're working on already?
[11:11] <sil2100> For cosmic I guess we skipped the update?
[11:12] <sil2100> acheronuk: yeah, in that case I guess this should also be an issue for Ubuntu, right?
[11:13] <mvo> sil2100: I updated it for disco but its stuck apparently in LP approval of the templates
[11:13] <mvo> sil2100: https://translations.launchpad.net/ddtp-ubuntu/disco/+imports
[11:13] <mvo> sil2100: I'm not sure why this no longer gets approved, either in the "old" days people looked at this and don't anymore or a script has changed
[11:13] <mvo> sil2100: with that approved I think I could upload new translations for disco
[11:14] <infinity> tjaalton: Have you had more time to think about the nouveau modeset madness?
[11:14] <sil2100> mvo: hm, I wonder what happened then, I guess I don't have the powers to approve that - but probably Gunnar has, let me reach out to him
[11:14] <sil2100> mvo: anyway, not a top priority, but certainly would be nice if your work wouldn't go to waste just because of that
[11:14] <infinity> tjaalton: It occurred to me just now that this means all nvidia systems will also be running the installer at 640x480, which is really suboptimal.
[11:15] <mvo> sil2100: let me know if there is a way to automate this
[11:15] <mvo> sil2100: please ping me once this is unblocked, the amount of work to upload the update is tiny
[11:17] <acheronuk> sil2100: you would think so, be Darin said the Ubuntu iso booted ok. I'm afraid I don't have hardware I can reproduce this on, and not much time anyway today
[11:17] <acheronuk> *but Darin
[11:18] <sil2100> mvo: thank you!
[11:22]  * acheronuk deliberately NEVER EVER buys laptops with Nvidia ;)
[11:23] <tjaalton> infinity: on uefi systems it'll use efifb with the native resolution..
[11:23] <infinity> tjaalton: EFI systems are still relatively newish.
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (disco-proposed/main) [20190124+dfsg1-0ubuntu1 => 20190315-0ubuntu1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[11:26] <tjaalton> sure
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-restricted-modules (disco-proposed/restricted) [5.0.0-10.11 => 5.0.0-11.12] (kernel)
[11:30] <tjaalton> infinity: a more refined patch would take more time, so if you prefer to revert for disco and rethink it for EE then that's fine
[11:32] <sil2100> acheronuk: ok, that's a bit weird then!
[11:32] <sil2100> ;)
[11:32] <sil2100> But yeah, if only his laptop is affected (and only for Kubuntu), I'd say the importance of the bug has lowered a bit
[11:33] <sil2100> I was worried it's an indication of something bigger
[11:33] <sil2100> Wonder what's going on there
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-restricted-modules [source] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-11.12]
[11:33] <infinity> tjaalton: Has the nouveau/firmware situation gotten significantly worse since cocmis?
[11:33] <infinity> tjaalton: cosmic, even.
[11:33] <infinity> tjaalton: Cause I'd prefer not to regress in the name of progression.
[11:41] <tjaalton> infinity: i'm not sure, upstream said it's not the first tume
[12:04] <infinity> tjaalton: I guess what I'm driving at is that if cosmic and bionic(+hwe) have the same issues you were trying to work around in disco, you're causing a regression to fix something that isn't.
[12:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: blis (disco-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-11 => 0.5.2-7] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blis [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.5.2-7]
[13:07] <LocutusOfBorg> rails migrated!
[13:09] <LocutusOfBorg> I think we now need a rails that disables bootsnap only on armhf instead of everywhere...
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-mixlib-install (disco-proposed/universe) [3.11.7-1 => 3.11.7-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mozjs60 (disco-proposed/main) [60.2.3-2build1 => 60.2.3-3] (desktop-core) (sync)
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mozjs60 [sync] (disco-proposed) [60.2.3-3]
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-mixlib-install [source] (disco-proposed) [3.11.7-1ubuntu1]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-restricted-modules (disco-proposed/restricted) [5.0.0-10.11 => 5.0.0-11.12] (kernel)
[13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2:13.0.2-0ubuntu3.1]
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: diaspora (disco-proposed/universe) [0.7.9.0+dfsg-4 => 0.7.9.0+dfsg-4ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.20 => 237-3ubuntu10.21] (core)
[13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (bionic-proposed/main) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8.8 => 4.0.0-1ubuntu8.9] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-restricted-modules [source] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-11.12]
[13:51] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: That diaspora change looks wrong to me.
[13:52] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: ruby-handlebars-assets has an epoch in both Ubuntu and Debian, why would you remove it in the version check?
[13:53] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: The problem you're seeing in britney isn't the version, it's a component mismatch.
[13:53] <infinity> ruby-handlebars-assets moved from contrib to main in Debian and we didn't follow suit (yet).
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-restricted-modules [amd64] (disco-proposed/restricted) [5.0.0-11.12] (kernel)
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected diaspora [source] (disco-proposed) [0.7.9.0+dfsg-4ubuntu1]
[13:56] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Fixing.
[13:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-oauth2 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1 => 1.4.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> sorry infinity I obviously made a mistake
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> because I saw "hey diaspora is not main, how can be a mismatch"
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> I didn't think about multiverse, you are right
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> sorry
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> ruby-oauth2 looks more legit
[13:58] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: All good.  Should be fixed in the next publisher run.
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> lovely! I don't think it will migrate TBH
[13:59] <LocutusOfBorg> but I want autopkgtestsuite results...
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-oauth2 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.4.1-1ubuntu1]
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-restricted-modules [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-11.12]
[14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 44 entries have been added or removed
[15:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ddtp-translations (disco-proposed/universe) [20180103.1 => 20190415.1] (no packageset)
[15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-concurrent (disco-proposed/universe) [1.0.5-2 => 1.0.5-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:51] <LocutusOfBorg> ^^ that one is finally fixed yay
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pi-bluetooth (disco-proposed/multiverse) [0.1.10ubuntu5 => 0.1.10ubuntu6] (no packageset)
[15:59] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: good work! please send that fix to debian bug #926782
[15:59] <ubot5`> Debian bug 926782 in src:ruby-concurrent "ruby-concurrent: autopkgtest needs update" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/926782
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pi-bluetooth [source] (disco-proposed) [0.1.10ubuntu6]
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-concurrent [source] (disco-proposed) [1.0.5-2ubuntu1]
[16:03] <LocutusOfBorg> ginggs, already fixed an uploaded in debian too
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ddtp-translations [source] (disco-proposed) [20190415.1]
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (trusty-proposed/main) [0.154.1ubuntu4 => 0.154.1ubuntu5] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[16:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntukylin-meta (disco-proposed/universe) [0.35 => 0.36] (ubuntukylin)
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-meta [source] (disco-proposed) [0.36]
[17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpng1.6 (disco-proposed/main) [1.6.36-6 => 1.6.37-1~exp2] (core) (sync)
[17:22] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, missing build on ppc64el: os-autoinst (from 4.5.1527308405.8b586d5-2)
[17:22] <LocutusOfBorg> missing build on s390x: os-autoinst (from 4.5.1527308405.8b586d5-2)
[17:22] <LocutusOfBorg> please can you do it? removed on debian, decruft NBS proposed
[17:24] <vorlon> infinity, LocutusOfBorg: looking
[17:25] <vorlon> infinity, LocutusOfBorg: done
[17:26] <LocutusOfBorg> <3
[17:31] <bdmurray> vorlon: I've verified bug 1822886 if you also feel it is worth releasing early.
[17:31] <ubot5`> bug 1822886 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Cosmic) "universe missing after bionic->cosmic do-release-upgrade" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1822886
[17:43] <LocutusOfBorg> last fix from my side for today
[17:44] <LocutusOfBorg> vala-panel is ok
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala-panel (disco-proposed/universe) [0.4.87+dfsg1-1 => 0.4.87+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)
[18:03] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: That patch could use a link to the upstream commit yuo took "part" of...
[18:04] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: And why on earth are you trying to sync libpng from experimental?
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libpng1.6 [sync] (disco-proposed) [1.6.37-1~exp2]
[18:36] <vorlon> bdmurray: released, thanks
[19:09] <infinity> vorlon: What exactly did you do above to os-autoinst?
[19:09] <infinity> (he asked, after removing the NBS binaries that weren't removed)
[19:10] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, because of arm* fixes
[19:10] <infinity> Argh, and why did the VPN section of my panel disappear again?
[19:10] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, I'm the debian libpng maintainer...
[19:10] <LocutusOfBorg> and I uploaded to experimental because of freeze, not because of instability
[19:11] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: That's nice.  We're in a hard freeze, and libpng is on every image.
[19:11] <LocutusOfBorg> actually mostly all of the arm improvements are already in the current 1.6.36-6 version, but I would like to avoid having to maintain all the patches there, the new release included them all with some additional fixes
[19:12] <LocutusOfBorg> but of course I see your point
[19:12] <LocutusOfBorg> and you are RT, so I'll be happy whatever decision you make :)
[19:12] <infinity> I already made it. :)
[19:17] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[19:17] <LocutusOfBorg> btw I vala-panel is now updated, we should probably drop the file at all, but I prefer to keep changes minimal
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala-panel (disco-proposed/universe) [0.4.87+dfsg1-1 => 0.4.87+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)
[19:19] <vorlon> infinity: apparently what I did was typo '-a s390x' as '-b s390x' <shrug>
[19:20] <infinity> Neat.
[19:21] <LocutusOfBorg> pick the one you prefer infinity :) the last upload might even be better
[19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala-panel (disco-proposed/universe) [0.4.87+dfsg1-1 => 0.4.87+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)
[19:25] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Why not the whole commit, that actually deletes the file?
[19:27] <infinity> I mean, in spirit, as it may not apply cleanly.  But you can do the 1-liner to CMakeLists, rm the file, then dpkg-source --commit.
[19:50] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, that is the second upload
[19:50] <LocutusOfBorg> the reason for not deleting the file is that dpkg-source didn't pick deleted files...
[19:51] <LocutusOfBorg> in any case this is already a commit part of 0.4.88 released version, so it will go away on next sync
[19:57] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, ^^ now you have the three flavours, the one with the function removed, the one with the cmake one-line and the one with also the file removed
[19:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala-panel (disco-proposed/universe) [0.4.87+dfsg1-1 => 0.4.87+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)
[19:59] <LocutusOfBorg> next time I'll leave ricotz and seb128 the fixup of the sync from debian experimental :)
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mokutil (disco-proposed/main) [0.3.0+1538710437.fb6250f-0ubuntu2 => 0.3.0+1538710437.fb6250f-1] (core) (sync)
[20:04] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ^^ seriously?
[20:05] <vorlon> we're in final freeze. *critical fixes only*, not "sync new upstream versions to be in sync"
[20:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mokutil [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.3.0+1538710437.fb6250f-1]
[20:06] <vorlon> not even new upstream version; but regardless, no
[20:19] <cyphermox> I may have a fix for casper in a minute; provided I manage to master this test iso properly
[20:19] <cyphermox> (integrity check)
[20:22] <tsimonq2> infinity, vorlon: How badly would the Release Team hate me if I wanted to upload a new Calamares module, assuming I take full responsibility for testing it?
[20:30] <xnox> slitghtly concerts that lxqt-globalkeys took out 6 builders for 1h+ now, when normally the build takes just 2minutes.
[20:30] <xnox> *concerned
[20:30] <xnox> either the cloud is dead, or the lxqt-globalkeys is blocking 12 buildings in a hung state.
[20:30] <xnox> *builders
[20:33] <xnox> no, not 12 builders, 24 builders.
[20:33] <xnox> tsimonq2, what's up with lxqt-globalkeys? do you have access to lubuntu ci? maybe we should cancel the builds, and retry them?
[20:33] <xnox> https://launchpad.net/builders -> ctrl+f for lxqt-globalkeys
[20:34] <xnox> i have rights to cancel these too.... it seems odd how they are hung.
[20:36] <tsimonq2> O_o
[20:43] <xnox> hm cancelling them doesn't help, as they get stuck in "cancelling" state then.
[20:43] <xnox> launchpad is probably broken.
[20:44] <tsimonq2> Yeah, it's that.
[21:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[21:04] <Eickmeyer> BOOM!
[21:04] <Eickmeyer> No blockers. :)
[21:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (disco-proposed/main) [2.13.2-9ubuntu5 => 2.13.2-9ubuntu6] (core)
[21:20] <fossfreedom> Eickmeyer, bit early? thought there is at least one more spin coming
[21:20] <tsimonq2> There's Always one more spin coming.
[21:21] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: I don't think infinity has updated base-files yet.
[21:21] <tsimonq2> (At minimum.)
[21:21] <Eickmeyer> Ohhhh.... :/
[21:21] <Eickmeyer> *unmarks*
[21:22] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: No need.
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Disco Final] has been updated (20190413.1)
[21:22] <Eickmeyer> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected vala-panel [source] (disco-proposed) [0.4.87+dfsg1-1ubuntu1]
[21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected vala-panel [source] (disco-proposed) [0.4.87+dfsg1-1ubuntu1]
[21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected vala-panel [source] (disco-proposed) [0.4.87+dfsg1-1ubuntu1]
[21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vala-panel [source] (disco-proposed) [0.4.87+dfsg1-1ubuntu1]
[21:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apparmor [source] (disco-proposed) [2.13.2-9ubuntu6]
[21:31] <infinity> Well, that apparmor didn't last long in the queue...
[21:31] <infinity> Didn't even get to review it.
[21:31] <jdstrand> sorry
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (disco-proposed/main) [2.13.2-9ubuntu5 => 2.13.2-9ubuntu6] (core)
[21:31] <jdstrand> I wanted a quick patch comment. the new one is there
[21:32] <infinity> Does this fix the issue you were discussing earlier?
[21:32] <jdstrand> this isn't install critical, so sru is fine, but if you want to take it, it is super small
[21:33] <jdstrand> it fixes part of it. I say part because this seems like twp parts
[21:33] <jdstrand> there is a shiftfs interaction with apparmor that jjohansen needs to look at
[21:34] <jdstrand> I fixed the easy part :)
[21:34] <jdstrand> the details are in the bug
[21:34] <jdstrand> if lxd didn't use shftfs or shiftfs was backed out, this would be good enough
[21:35] <jdstrand> I'm not advocating for that per se, but mention it since that might be something you want to consider
[21:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apparmor [source] (disco-proposed) [2.13.2-9ubuntu6]
[21:38] <jdstrand> thanks
[22:04] <tsimonq2> xnox: (Technically, you also have access to the Lubuntu CI, being an Ubuntu Core Developer that is indirectly a Lubuntu Developer: https://ci.lubuntu.me/ )
[22:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unattended-upgrades (disco-proposed/main) [1.10ubuntu3 => 1.10ubuntu4] (core)
[22:18] <rbalint> infinity, bdmurray just marked one of the bugs rls-dd-incoming, and those issues are seen frequently on errors.ubuntu.com
[22:20] <rbalint> full autopkgtest is still running locally, the changes are on review at https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades/pulls
[22:22] <rbalint> u-u should run fine on default configs, thus it may be enough to release it as a 0-day sru, but wanted to show the most important patches
[22:26] <infinity> rbalint: Conceptually, I don't have issues with a u-u upload right now while I'm working on migrating a kernel anyway.
[22:26] <infinity> vorlon: I'm perhaps a bit too sleepy to give a good review to that u-u, could you give it some love?
[22:27] <vorlon> ok
[22:28] <rbalint> infinity, i'm too sleepy as well, thus i would not mind waiting till tomorrow or at least a review
[22:29] <rbalint> infinity, but i can fix anything tomorrow that were not caught by the review
[22:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-11.12 => 5.0.0-13.14] (core, kernel) (sync)
[22:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-11.12 => 5.0.0-13.14] (core, kernel) (sync)
[22:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: parted (disco-proposed/main) [3.2-24build1 => 3.2-25] (core) (sync)
[22:46] <rbalint>  infinity, vorlon u-u autopkgtest passed locally in disco
[22:46] <rbalint> running another in bionic
[22:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (disco-proposed) [1.10ubuntu4]
[22:48] <vorlon> infinity, rbalint: accepted ^^
[22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0.11.12 => 5.0.0.13.14] (core, kernel) (sync)
[22:50] <rbalint> vorlon, thanks! i'll keep the remaining patches needed in stable releases for the 0-day sru
[22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0.13.14]
[22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-13.14]
[22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted parted [sync] (disco-proposed) [3.2-25]
[23:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: casper (disco-proposed/main) [1.403 => 1.404] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[23:08] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: so you're disabling tests in puma when you cannot account for what the failure means?
[23:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted casper [source] (disco-proposed) [1.404]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-13.14]
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-13.14] (core, kernel)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-aws (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-gcp (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-aws (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0.1003.3 => 5.0.0.1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-gcp (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0.1003.3 => 5.0.0.1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-restricted-modules (disco-proposed/restricted) [5.0.0-11.12 => 5.0.0-13.14] (kernel) (sync)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-azure (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-azure (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0.1003.3 => 5.0.0.1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-kvm (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-kvm (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0.1003.3 => 5.0.0.1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-13.14] (core, kernel)
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-13.14] (core, kernel)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-restricted-modules [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-13.14]
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-azure (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-gcp (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-13.14]
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-13.14]
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-13.14]
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-aws [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1004.4]
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-gcp [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1004.4]
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-aws [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0.1004.4]
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-gcp [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0.1004.4]
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-azure [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1004.4]
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-azure [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0.1004.4]
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-kvm [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1004.4]
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-kvm [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0.1004.4]
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-signed-azure [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1004.4]
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-azure (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-signed-gcp [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1004.4]
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-gcp (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-azure [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1004.4]
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-gcp [sync] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1004.4]
[23:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-gcp (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.3 => 5.0.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) (sync)
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tomcat9 (cosmic-proposed/universe) [9.0.16-3~18.04 => 9.0.16-3~18.10] (no packageset) (sync)
[23:42] <tdaitx> sbeattie: vorlon: ^ tomcat9 build is finished now, I requested the binary copy
[23:46] <sbeattie> thanks
[23:48] <vorlon> tdaitx: accepted
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tomcat9 [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [9.0.16-3~18.10]