-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.9 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.10] (ubuntu-desktop)00:54
valoriethanks vorlon01:15
dokovorlon, infinity: is there still time to upload the openjdk-11 security update for disco? will take ~14 hours to build01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (xenial-proposed/main) [3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.11 => 3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.12] (ubuntu-desktop)02:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-lts (disco-proposed/main) [11.0.3+5-1ubuntu2 => 11.0.3+7-1ubuntu1] (core)03:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-12 (disco-proposed/universe) [12.0.0-3 => 12.0.1+12-1] (no packageset)03:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-12 [source] (disco-proposed) [12.0.1+12-1]03:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.30.2-0ubuntu10 => 3.30.2-0ubuntu11] (ubuntu-desktop)04:17
vorlondoko: we should let it start building; it's not seeded on any images04:42
tobikoch`multipass launch http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/disco/20190416.1/disco-server-cloudimg-amd64.img` does not produce a working vm (times out and goes into state unknown).06:40
tobikochsil2100, vorlon: I assume that might be a blocker?06:41
tobikochSo now it's official Azure gen2 is not ready ready.07:13
LocutusOfBorgas said, I'm worried about kernel 5 and virtualbox 6.0.4, because the canonical-made patches are too few wrt the upstream patches. This might require in issues with the iso testing in a virtualbox VM07:35
LocutusOfBorgI hope you can accept them, but I can understand the bad timing (it took me half the night to upload them in debian)07:35
LocutusOfBorgalso, 15 security issues in this release are fixed, some scored 9.8/10 as severity07:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (disco-proposed/multiverse) [6.0.4-1 => 6.0.6-1] (no packageset) (sync)07:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (disco-proposed/multiverse) [6.0.4-dfsg-7 => 6.0.6-dfsg-1] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync)07:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (disco-proposed/multiverse) [6.0.4-1 => 6.0.6-1] (no packageset) (sync)07:36
LocutusOfBorgok, the CVEs are only 12, and the highest risk is 8.8, not that bad07:37
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, good morning, looks like seqan2 is now building fine on armhf (the version in Debian), so I'm thinking wrt stealing your merge and upload, the package is not seeded...07:39
mvorbasak: hey, do you think the shadow SRU for xenial and bionic can be released? afaict its ready and in proposed for a couple of days already07:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: seqan2 (disco-proposed/universe) [2.4.0+dfsg-8ubuntu2 => 2.4.0+dfsg-11ubuntu1] (no packageset)07:51
infinitytobikoch: Is that multipass command meant to work? :P08:32
infinitytobikoch: Launching that image in raw kvm gets me a login prompt.  I imagine I need cloud-init goop to actually be able to use it, though.08:35
tobikochinfinity: I dunno, I mean it can just be a multipass problem, of course. Then not our problem.08:54
jibelapart from nvidia/nouveau is there anything to verify in particular on image 20190416?09:08
Wimpressjibel: WHat nvidia testing is required? I can help with that.09:23
jibelWimpress, booting with nouveau, but I've someone on it, so it should be fine.09:25
infinityjibel: There was the asound/pulse thing.09:27
ubot5`Ubuntu bug 1824103 in pulseaudio (Ubuntu) "aplay record file failed always." [Critical,Fix released]09:28
jibelinfinity, this pa bug, does it affect any system or only carbon ?09:59
infinityjibel: Affected my T450s.09:59
infinityjibel: And Will's.10:00
pieqjibel, infinity ok thanks10:00
infinityjibel: Likely most.10:00
pieqI'll check then10:00
infinityFWIW, the fix seems to work here.10:00
pieqhm... I'm trying the steps described in comment #7 on a Dell precision device with pulseaudio 1:12.2-2ubuntu1 and it works10:02
pieqso maybe it's related to Lenovo devices, not Dell10:02
pieqjibel, infinity ^10:02
infinityIt's more than just Lenovo devices, but yeah, it won't be *all* devices.10:03
infinityIf you only have one sound device, things might accidentally work.10:03
infinityAnyhow, I just tested again here, and it's happy.10:03
infinitySo if you can test that ubuntu3 doesn't regress that Dell, then we're good.10:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [sync] (disco-proposed) [6.0.6-1]10:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [sync] (disco-proposed) [6.0.6-dfsg-1]10:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [sync] (disco-proposed) [6.0.6-1]10:05
seb128saw bug #1824910, unsure if that ever worked/the drivers are supposed to be on the iso but I'm poiting it in case that's something to check10:10
ubot5`bug 1824910 in ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-drivers fail to install Nvidia divers without Internet connection in Lubuntu Disco Dingo" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182491010:10
rbasakseb128: looks like the importer hung a week ago :-/10:10
rbasakI have plans to add a watchdog, but de-prioritised that when it seems more reliable.10:10
seb128rbasak, oh, DOH :)10:11
rbasakLooks like I need to bump the priority of adding that.10:11
seb128(btw did you change channel on purpose? might interest people on the other one)10:11
rbasakOh, sorry10:11
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Why did you drop amd64 from low mem arches in seqan2?10:12
infinityseb128: We don't ship nvidia drivers on media, so...10:13
seb128infinity, right, what I though, thx for confirming10:13
pieqinfinity, I checked and ubuntu3 works on the Dell Precision I have here10:13
infinitypieq: Shiny.10:15
pieqinfinity, confirmed working on two different Dell devices (Precision and Latitude)10:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dm-writeboost (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.8-1ubuntu3~18.04.1 => 2.2.8-1ubuntu3~18.04.2] (no packageset)10:23
LocutusOfBorginfinity, looks like it builds fine with parallel=2, debian changed the else branch to take care of amd64?10:32
LocutusOfBorgdid I made a mistake?10:32
LocutusOfBorgI tried in my ppa and it built correctly, only arm64 and ppc64el were sad10:33
infinityLocutusOfBorg: I mean, that Debian change was there in Steve's too, but sure. :P10:34
infinityLocutusOfBorg: If you tested it and it seems fine, whatevs.10:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted seqan2 [source] (disco-proposed) [2.4.0+dfsg-11ubuntu1]10:35
LocutusOfBorgthe first person adding amd64 has been ginggs a couple of years ago https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/seqan2/2.3.1+dfsg-3ubuntu110:36
LocutusOfBorgat that point there were no "else amd64 then parallel=2", but the default was the one on the machine10:37
LocutusOfBorgI suspect amd64 has been copy-pasted in all merges without anybody trying to remove it10:37
LocutusOfBorgI noticed an else switch and I preferred to use it and reduce the delta, I can't promise it will work forever, because you know the build might fail in a non-reproducible way (it is built ok in my ppa, but it might fail in a no-change rebuild due to different building parallelism or files)10:38
LocutusOfBorganyway, readding is quick in case it starts failing too much10:38
infinityLocutusOfBorg: So the more interesting question is if we could move out "iffy" arches that we added to the parallel=2 case.10:38
infinityLocutusOfBorg: But also don't care deeply.10:38
LocutusOfBorginfinity, this sounds interesting, let me try in a ppa, having a build that takes 24 hours on armhf is sad10:39
infinityOh crap, I didn't look at that.  It takes 24h to build?10:39
LocutusOfBorgbut again, a newer toolchain might start failing because you know, memory increases everytime10:39
infinityIt might not make the release. :P10:39
infinityWe'll see.10:39
LocutusOfBorg Build started 21 hours ago on bos02-arm64-076 and finished 13 hours ago taking 7 hours 20 minutes — see the log10:40
LocutusOfBorgwell, I did make a mistake10:40
infinity7 hours, 24 hours, basically the same thing.10:41
LocutusOfBorghttps://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa here the build with parallel=2 on arm64 and ppc64el10:43
LocutusOfBorginfinity, FYI accepting golang-gopkg-sourcemap.v1 will make 3-4 golang packages unlock10:44
LocutusOfBorgit failed because of internet access, I patched and opened an RC bug in debian10:44
LocutusOfBorgI'm working only on leaf and non-seeded packages, FYI10:45
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Disabling the entire testsuite seems like overkill.  Unless the whole testsuite uses the internet...10:45
LocutusOfBorgehm, considering the only test consists in "hey, lets do a query to jquery.org and see the result"... I don't think it is an overkill...10:47
LocutusOfBorghttps://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-gopkg-sourcemap.v1/blob/debian/sid/example_test.go and consumer_test.go are doing internet communication10:48
LocutusOfBorgthere is a benchmark_test.go that might be useful, but I doubt it really is...10:50
LocutusOfBorghere a build with internet access enabled, and disco baseline http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#disco/golang-gopkg-sourcemap.v1/1.0.5-1build1/buildlog10:51
LocutusOfBorg(btw autopkgtests are what really gives meaningful answers to this kind of "internet packages")10:52
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Oh, if this testsuite runs as an autopkgtest, that's fine.10:53
infinityBut it doesn't. :P10:53
infinitySo, yeah, please don't suggest disabling testsuites without enabling them as autopkgtests instead.10:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dkms (disco-proposed/main) [2.6.1-4ubuntu1 => 2.6.1-4ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)10:54
LocutusOfBorgyeah you right man! I saw the "autopkgtests" tab on debomatic... interesting10:55
LocutusOfBorganyway, Debian will fix properly then10:55
LocutusOfBorgI don't want to loose time for a package that will go out from testing in one month, and we will just have the debian fix on next Ubuntu eventually10:55
LocutusOfBorghttps://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=927227 should start the autoremoval counter10:56
ubot5`Debian bug 927227 in golang-gopkg-sourcemap.v1 "golang-gopkg-sourcemap.v1: attempts internet communication during build?" [Serious,Open]10:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected golang-gopkg-sourcemap.v1 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.0.5-1ubuntu1]10:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected golang-gopkg-sourcemap.v1 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.0.5-1ubuntu1]10:57
xnoxinfinity, paride - filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/qa-jenkins-jobs/+bug/182515611:19
ubot5`Ubuntu bug 1825156 in QA Jenkins Jobs "the results from server tests should use ISO Tracker API to push result good and bad result for every tested daily image" [Undecided,New]11:19
paridexnox, thanks11:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (disco-proposed/multiverse) [6.0.4-dfsg-7ubuntu19.04.1 => 6.0.6-dfsg-1ubuntu19.04.1] (no packageset)12:11
LocutusOfBorg^^ I forgot this one, fortunately it is not seeded12:12
ginggsinfinity LocutusOfBorg: debian limited max-parallel=2 on amd64 in seqan2 2.4.0+dfsg-3 - so dropping that part of the delta is correct12:37
LocutusOfBorgyep! unfortunately while parallel=2 is good on ppc64el, it isn't on arm64 https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/1664392812:39
LocutusOfBorgso, in order to have a reduced delta, better use parallel=1 on both...12:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (disco-proposed) [6.0.6-dfsg-1ubuntu19.04.1]12:54
rbalintsil2100, please reject gce-compute-image-packges from disco unapproved, i make it a bit prettier13:04
xnoxtobikoch, so, booting disco cloud image, with the seed that multipass uses, and it's all fine. so i suspect something is broken in multipass, and/or how it uses qemu options.13:12
xnox(cause i tested the stuff in just /my/ way to launch vms)13:12
xnoxtobikoch, i suspect the disco cloud image is ok13:13
LocutusOfBorgYAY with my ruby fixes ruby-gnome2 is now building!13:14
infinityrbalint: Rejected.13:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (disco-proposed) [20190315-0ubuntu1]13:18
tobikochxnox: kewl13:26
xnoxtobikoch, i have the answer14:09
xnoxtobikoch, they don't pass the cloud-config.iso correctly to qemu, hence the VM boots without a cloud-config.iso and well doesn't nothing.14:10
tobikochxnox: thanks for looking at that14:10
xnoxtobikoch, i bind-mounted qemu to be a `sleep infinity` and launched qemu-system-x86_64 by hand with -device ....config-drive.iso with -cdrom ....config-drive.iso and multipass "found" the vm and claimed it laucnhed successfully.14:10
xnox(bind mounted into the snap)14:10
xnoxso multipassd launches the qemu VM broken.14:11
xnoxtobikoch, so i guess worth a multipass bug.14:11
xnoxtobikoch, also found other weird issues with qemu tooo....14:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:12.0.5-0ubuntu4]14:20
vorlontobikoch: do you have any console logs or anything for that hung multipass?14:47
vorlonoh, sounds like xnox has investigated14:48
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: I certainly don't mind not being TIL on seqan214:48
LocutusOfBorglovely thanks14:51
LocutusOfBorgI just want some migration for what is still in proposed, and looks like we are mostly there for it14:52
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, "ushare (- to 1.1a-0ubuntu11)" <-- kill it with fire?14:56
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: should at least get a bug report first since it's an Ubuntu-specific package14:58
vorlonoh, it has one14:58
vorlonLP: #1818577 :P14:58
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1818577 in ushare (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu-specific package; FTBFS, depends on obsolete libupnp6" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181857714:58
xnoxapw, can we chat about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1824864 ?14:59
ubot5`Ubuntu bug 1824864 in linux (Ubuntu Ee-series) "CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT set to 14 is too low on arm64" [Undecided,Confirmed]14:59
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: ushare removed14:59
LocutusOfBorgLOL wrt the bug author :)15:04
LocutusOfBorgtwice thanks!15:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.3+git20190124-0ubuntu18.04.1 => 3.28.3+git20190124-0ubuntu18.04.2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)15:13
LocutusOfBorgwhere is the new iso spin done?15:17
infinityLocutusOfBorg: There isn't one.  What made you think there was?15:20
LocutusOfBorgit happens everytime, just one day before release, or the day of the release :)15:21
infinityDon't jinx it.15:21
LocutusOfBorgnot my intention :)15:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.3+git20190124-0ubuntu18.04.2]15:22
LocutusOfBorgI hope to see vbox 6.0.6 in the iso, and if it doesn't happen, not a problem, that is the reason for me asking if there is a spin ongoing15:24
vorlon"in the iso"? has there been a seeded package accepted but not included in the last respin?15:26
infinityIt's not on any ISOs...15:28
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Which ISOs were you expecting to see it on? :P15:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (precise-proposed/main) [2016j-0ubuntu0.12.04 => 2019a-0ubuntu0.12.04] (core)15:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (precise-proposed) [2019a-0ubuntu0.12.04]15:40
infinitybdmurray: 1) Dangit, I was sure I did all of those updates two weeks ago.  I must have gotten sidetracked and never gone back. :(15:41
infinitybdmurray: 2) precise goes through ESM, not the primary archive.  I can do that one.15:41
bdmurrayinfinity: ah right, thanks15:43
LocutusOfBorgmmm ok infinity15:48
LocutusOfBorgI remember a while ago virtualbox-guest* included in the iso15:48
LocutusOfBorgso probably now they are taken from the kernel...15:48
LocutusOfBorgapw, ^^ sync them please on next kernel update?15:48
apwsforshee, ^15:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-ftpd-ssl (disco-proposed/universe) [0.17.36+0.3-2.1 => 0.17.36+0.3-2.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)15:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-ftpd (disco-proposed/universe) [0.17-36.1 => 0.17-36.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)15:50
LocutusOfBorgbtw I fixed two packages from proposed in the meanwhile ^^ the asneeded nightmare that will be ending soon (now that also debian is taking it)15:50
xnoxsil2100, 🍓🥧15:50
xnoxsil2100, 🍓π15:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (trusty-proposed) [2019a-0ubuntu0.14.04]15:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (xenial-proposed) [2019a-0ubuntu0.16.04]15:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (bionic-proposed) [2019a-0ubuntu0.18.04]15:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2019a-0ubuntu0.18.10]15:52
infinitybdmurray: Accepted, and uploaded a precise bump to esm-staging.15:52
sforsheeapw: methinks that is smb's problem now ;-)15:52
sforsheebut I can send a patch for it15:53
sforsheeLocutusOfBorg: can you file a bug agains the kernel for the vbox sync please?15:54
smbsforshee, I have no problem in making it other peoples problem again. Whatever it is15:54
LocutusOfBorgsforshee, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1825210 assigned to you, so you can reassign to whoever you think is right :D15:56
ubot5`Ubuntu bug 1825210 in linux (Ubuntu) "Please sync vbox modules from virtualbox 6.0.6 on next kernel update" [High,New]15:56
LocutusOfBorgthanks to you16:01
Wimpresswillcooke: Ho is the 19.04 desktop looking? Do you anticipate any respins?16:03
willcookeWimpress, you are tempting fate there :)16:03
* Wimpress rubs a rabbits foots while standing a pentagram of rice16:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-desktop [source] (bionic-proposed) [10.4+git20171031.10.g9f71bb8-1.2ubuntu1.2]16:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-desktop [source] (cosmic-proposed) [10.4+git20180830.02.f2dbc215fdb-2ubuntu0.2]16:11
bdmurrayfossfreedom: thanks for cleaning up that budgie-desktop SRU16:36
sforsheeLocutusOfBorg: yikes, that's a lot of changes. Can you add some sru justification to the bug?16:45
sforsheesigh, and they made a bunch of changes to the makefiles and broke our in-kernel build16:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (disco-proposed/main) [1.1.1b-1ubuntu2 => 1.1.1b-1ubuntu2.1] (core)16:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (bionic-proposed/universe) [20190124+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~18.04.0 => 20190315-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)17:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (trusty-proposed/universe) [20190124+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~14.04.0 => 20190315-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)17:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (cosmic-proposed/main) [20190124+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~18.10.0 => 20190315-0ubuntu1~18.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud)17:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20190124+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 20190315-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)17:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (disco-proposed/main) [20190124+dfsg1-0ubuntu1 => 20190315-0ubuntu1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)17:05
rbalint^just for 0day and normal srus17:06
bdmurrayinfinity: do you have plans to do the verification of tzdata or should I do it?17:08
infinitybdmurray: I can tomorrow, or laaaaate tonight, but between now and then is some dinner out and about.17:11
vorlonmwhudson: LP: #1819550 - actually, the reason it's still in Ubuntu is that Debian's unstable index is keeping golang-1.7 1.7.3-1 around, presumably because a Built-Using record somewhere that just won't die.  Do you want to chase those out in Debian? :)17:11
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1819550 in golang-1.7 (Ubuntu) "please remove this package from ubuntu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181955017:11
infinitybdmurray: If have to do the ESM one anyway, though, so I can do all of them.17:11
vorlonmwhudson: looking at sid/amd64, I see docker-swarm, tendermint17:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openssl [source] (disco-proposed) [1.1.1b-1ubuntu2.1]17:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1030.32] (no packageset)17:14
vorlonmwhudson: there are also 8 packages in disco that are Built-Using: golang-1.7, maybe we should rebuild those?17:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (disco-updates/main) [1.1.1b-1ubuntu2 => 1.1.1b-1ubuntu2.1] (core)17:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1030.32]17:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mono (disco-proposed/universe) [ =>] (cli-mono, kubuntu) (sync)19:48
seb128did we forgot to update ubiquity translations this cycle? looking on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+changelog the most recent translations mention is for 18.10.1019:50
seb128one translator was asking about 'when are the cycle translations going to be included' on https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-translators/2019-April/007537.html19:50
seb128respin material? ;)19:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mono [sync] (disco-proposed) []19:51
vorloninfinity, cyphermox: ^^ ?19:51
seb128(it's probably not worth a respin but a bit of a shame if that was not done :/)19:52
vorlonseems as though ubiquity translation updates should be an automatic part of the source package build19:52
cyphermoxright now it's not automated, it's a manual step to export translations from launchpad and import them. I don't know how to automate it for the uploads, but sure it should be looked into19:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mono (disco-proposed/universe) [ =>] (cli-mono, kubuntu)20:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mono [source] (disco-proposed) []20:35
vorlonxnox: I tried to ditch gcc-5 by merging the new upstream version of mono which drops the s390x-specific build-dep; but apparently it now ftbfs in disco on s390x, both with or without the -O0 workaround patch20:56
mwhudsonvorlon: yeah we probably should21:02
xnoxvorlon, i am ok with shipping mono which is known to ftbfs and remove gcc-521:15
vorlonxnox: yet you are not an AA, so you can't pull the trigger ;)21:16
vorlonand I am not planning to remove gcc-5 while mono in devel still build-depends on it21:16
xnoxvorlon, i am also ok to remove all of mono/s390x binaries.... if that can be done in a manner which doesn't increase uninstallable count or something ftbfs because it tries to compine mono bindings21:16
xnoxvorlon, i don't think .NET is huge on s390x21:16
xnoxmono_gdb_render_native_backtraces not supported on this platform, unable to find gdb or lldb -> hmmm missing build-deps?!21:17
xnoxlooks like mdoc / documentation fails to execute..... i wonder if it builds with docs disabled21:18
vorlonreverse-depends src:mono -a s390x -> go fish21:20
vorlonxnox: doesn't the gdb thing just mean it can't give you a better explanation /after/ the build has failed?21:20
vorlonand mdoc was the bit that was crashing before, necessitating the Ubuntu patch21:21
xnoxvorlon, fedora claims it builds with (a) a patch (b) no-fpie => https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mono/c/cb2069e8baa6814a1094b4ac700047ee42139f16?branch=master21:21
xnoxyeah, gdb is a nice to have when crashy crashy21:21
tjaaltonvorlon: hi, I assume you accepted intel-opencl-clang and -graphics-compiler? did you have a look at -compute-runtime? there was the issue of a binary blob used by some of the tests, wonder if that was a blocker or not..21:21
xnoxas found by reading https://github.com/mono/mono/issues/900921:21
gitbotmono issue 9009 in mono "[s390x] Fails to compile against recent glibc" [Area-Runtime: Jit, Os-Linux, Target-S390X, Closed]21:21
vorlontjaalton: I didn't get so far as to see if there was a binary blob; I have the source here for review, the licensecheck output was even more horrible than usual, so I didn't get through the review yet21:22
vorlontjaalton: still hoping to do it before the archive closes21:22
tjaaltonvorlon: yes, third_party/* is most of the horrible stuff I hope21:23
xnoxvorlon, ok, patch is already in debian cause can be reverse applied....21:24
tjaaltonit had some wildcard issues like the one you mentioned about i-g-c21:24
tjaaltonvorlon: anyway, thanks for having a look21:24
xnoxvorlon, https://launchpad.net/~xnox/+archive/ubuntu/nonvirt/+build/1664620322:37
xnoxstill building.... and it's been longer.22:37
xnoxmaybe it will finish in like 30min22:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maas (disco-proposed/main) [2.5.0-7442-gdf68e30a5-0ubuntu1 => 2.6.0~beta1-7673-g850a92f90-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)22:49
xnoxvorlon, it builds.... https://launchpad.net/~xnox/+archive/ubuntu/nonvirt/+build/1664620323:13
xnoxvorlon, uploaded into the queue for you to review/accept23:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mono (disco-proposed/universe) [ =>] (cli-mono, kubuntu)23:15
vorlonxnox: accepted, but now you get to defend to rbalint the decision to disable pie in mono ;)23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mono [source] (disco-proposed) []23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-ftpd [source] (disco-proposed) [0.17-36.1ubuntu1]23:36
bdmurrayI forget is the release notes link in ubiquity not supposed to work until after release?23:52
bdmurrayThe url loaded was "https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases?os=ubuntu&ver=19.04&lang=en23:52

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!