[00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-gopkg-sourcemap.v1 (disco-proposed/universe) [1.0.5-1 => 1.0.5-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[00:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-gopkg-sourcemap.v1 [source] (disco-proposed) [1.0.5-1ubuntu1]
[00:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-lts [source] (disco-proposed) [11.0.3+7-1ubuntu1]
[00:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-ftpd-ssl [source] (disco-proposed) [0.17.36+0.3-2.1ubuntu1]
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-gopkg-sourcemap.v1 [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.0.5-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[00:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-gopkg-sourcemap.v1 [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.0.5-1ubuntu1]
[02:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-robertkrimen-otto [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20180617.15f95af-2] (no packageset)
[02:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-robertkrimen-otto [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.0~git20180617.15f95af-2]
[02:55] <tsimonq2> xnox (cc vorlon): ack on the CSS changes.
[03:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-lts (disco-proposed/main) [11.0.3+7-1ubuntu1 => 11.0.3+7-2ubuntu1] (core)
[04:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-flynn-json5 [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20160717.7620272-1] (no packageset)
[04:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-13 (disco-proposed/universe) [13~13-0ubunt1 => 13~17-1] (no packageset)
[04:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-13 [source] (disco-proposed) [13~17-1]
[04:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-flynn-json5 [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.0~git20160717.7620272-1]
[05:07] <vorlon> tjaalton: intel-compute-runtime, note that this license should be labelled 'BSD-3-clause' in debian/copyright, not just 'BSD'
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted intel-compute-runtime [source] (disco-proposed) [19.13.12717-0ubuntu1]
[05:20] <infinity> bdmurray: That's actually meant to be a redirect through ubuntu.com, which appears to have broken some time in the past.  I'll talk to the web team about it this morning.
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resolvconf (disco-proposed/universe) [1.79ubuntu12 => 1.79ubuntu13] (no packageset)
[05:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: intel-compute-runtime [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [19.13.12717-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:35] <tjaalton> vorlon: yes, fixed in git
[05:35] <tjaalton> thanks!
[05:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dde-qt-dbus-factory (disco-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-2 => 1.1.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted intel-compute-runtime [amd64] (disco-proposed) [19.13.12717-0ubuntu1]
[05:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted resolvconf [source] (disco-proposed) [1.79ubuntu13]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[07:18] <acheronuk> morning. any issues cropped up demanding respins, or are we looking good over all?
[07:18] <acheronuk> I'm assuming the later, as infin1ty just did block-all source
[07:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[07:55] <acheronuk> infinity or anyone else who may know.. flavours such as Kubuntu supported 16.04 for 3 year, so do we get a EOL email sent out from Ubuntu, or does each flavour so their own. Plus where do we set the date? Exactly at the 3 year date? (e.g. 17th April for 16.04)
[07:55] <acheronuk> April 21st I mean!
[07:57] <acheronuk> also, there is some confusion about trusty eol date. 5 years would be 17th, but some sources (including a now removed statement on a Ubuntu blog) say 30th April
[08:02] <infinity> acheronuk: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2019-March/000241.html <-- The official EOLish date
[08:03] <infinity> acheronuk: As for the flavour 3y EOLs, no, I don't send notices for those.
[08:03] <infinity> acheronuk: If you have flavour mailing lists and blogs, I'd suggest maybe mentioning it there, but I also expect flavour users to follow LTS to LTS, since that's what the 3y overlap is meant to facilitate.
[08:04] <acheronuk> infinity: thanks. did not see that email
[08:05] <acheronuk> on the overlap, yes, of course. some users are hard to shift onwards though ;)
[08:13] <jibel> willcooke, infinity just finished netboot, unless you have something pending on your side, Ubuntu Desktop and netboot are good to ship for me.
[08:13] <willcooke> jibel, woot. thanks!
[08:13] <infinity> jibel: \o/
[08:15] <sil2100> pi's look good as well
[08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[08:17] <willcooke> \o/ \o/ \o/
[08:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[09:01] <bluesabre> high fives all around (and back to bed)
[09:31] <sil2100> bluesabre: thanks o/
[09:32] <luna> Ubuntu 19.04 Release party at TG LAN in Norway later tonight
[10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lighttpd (disco-proposed/universe) [1.4.53-3ubuntu1 => 1.4.53-4ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:28] <LocutusOfBorg> CVE fixes ^^
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base i386 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[11:38] <Laney> tsimonq2: might want to fix that lubuntu link in the release notes?
[11:41] <tsimonq2> Laney: I assumed sil2100  would have done it. :P
[11:41] <tsimonq2> I'll look.
[11:42] <sil2100> No no no, I was only whipping about doing that
[11:43] <tsimonq2> heh
[11:46] <infinity> tsimonq2: Mark yourself ready too. :P
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi3 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi2 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi3 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gedit [source] (disco-proposed) [3.32.0-3]
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Disco Final] has been marked as ready
[12:17] <tsimonq2> infinity: .
[12:17] <tsimonq2> I'll play with the wiki when I'm *not* on my phone. :P
[12:31] <tsimonq2> Oh, nice. The wiki doesn't like me today.
[12:32] <tsimonq2> The link is literally s/cosmic/disco/ with nothing else changed. Can someone please JFDI?
[12:32] <tsimonq2> Laney, sil2100: ^
[12:36] <Wimpress> tsimonq2: Are your RM for Lubuntu this release?
[12:38] <acheronuk> tsimonq2: the wiki hates everyone today
[12:40] <Laney> tsimonq2: ok, someone will need to make it not 404 then
[12:42] <tsimonq2> Wimpress: I am by default, wxl had to fill in last cycle because I was deathly ill.
[12:42] <tsimonq2> Laney: It'll stop 404ing when the ISOs come out. :P
[12:42] <tsimonq2> Wimpress: (If I'm not around, wxl is my backup, and then it falls back to the Lubuntu Council.)
[12:44] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: s/today/always/ :P
[12:45] <tsimonq2> Oh, I actually see ISOs.
[13:13] <acheronuk> tsimonq2: https://www.ubuntu.com/ says 19.04 is out. going to wait for the email still?
[13:14] <acheronuk> and instantly I sees infinity's email :)
[13:17] <cjwatson> Well done
[13:18] <ginggs> happy 19.04 everyone!
[13:18] <tsimonq2> \o/
[13:18] <tsimonq2> /o/ \o\ /o/ \o\ /o/ \o\ /o/ \o\ /o/ \o\
[13:18] <tsimonq2> Congrats everyone!
[13:18] <rbalint> \o/
[13:21] <handsome_feng> \\\\0///
[13:24] <gaughen> congrats all!
[13:40] <mdeslaur> congrats!
[13:40] <Eickmeyer> Congrats all!
[13:46] <Ukikie> infinity: Congrats.
[13:48] <sil2100> tsimonq2: I'm either on some unreliable network or the link to https://lubuntu.me/disco-released doesn't work ;)
[13:49] <sil2100> tsimonq2: the announcement is out, I guess it's *time*
[13:49] <LocutusOfBorg> do we have a codename for EE???
[13:49]  * LocutusOfBorg is joking, just to be clear
[13:49] <LocutusOfBorg> congrats everybody!
[13:49] <cyphermox> LocutusOfBorg: Edgy Eft :)
[13:50] <LocutusOfBorg> LOL
[13:50] <LocutusOfBorg> for some seconds I took it seriously
[13:50] <cyphermox> dead serious, only 13 years ago
[13:53] <mdeslaur> Edgy Eft II
[13:54] <LocutusOfBorg> http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~stefanor/ubuntu-activity/
[13:54] <LocutusOfBorg> for the first time, non canonical contributions are at the first place?
[13:55] <Ukikie> LocutusOfBorg: One might notice https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/Eoan-changes and https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/eoan
[13:55] <infinity> Looks like that's been a trend for a couple of years.  I blame people who take over the job of autosync after we freeze and stop syncing. :P
[13:56] <infinity> But also, Canonical contribution has obviously dropped off a bit since we dropped Unity.
[13:56] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, actually if you see the number of packages, haskell is probably to blame ;)
[13:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kpatch (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-0ubuntu1 => 0.5.0-0ubuntu1.1] (no packageset)
[13:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xtables-addons (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0-0.1ubuntu1 => 3.0-0.1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[13:56] <Odd_Bloke> Edgy Eft II: Electric Eoogaloo
[13:57] <luna> http://releases.ubuntu.com/19.04/ubuntu-19.04-desktop-amd64.iso.torrent 0 day Ubuntu Linux warez
[13:57] <LocutusOfBorg> but I think half of my effort is "syncing packages after pushing the delta to debian" and hopefully with gcc9 we will loose all our "wl-asneeded"
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> is the archive open yet for eoan? :p
[13:58]  * LocutusOfBorg wants to be the first to ask
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> seriously, good job release team! its time to celebrate and party!
[14:10]  * juliank moved up from 16th to 15th place
[14:11] <juliank> this ubuntu-activity thing is fun
[14:12] <juliank> but like a lot of the apt stuff I do is just synced
[14:12] <juliank> :)
[14:14] <infinity> juliank: Yeah, it doesn't record autosyncs, but if you beat the bot and sync yourself, it'll pick that up. :P
[14:15] <infinity> At the end of the day, though, it's really just a way to see who does the most transitions.
[14:15] <juliank> I mostly upload things so they are synced when I wake up the next day
[14:15] <juliank> :)
[14:15] <infinity> (And the Canonical/Community split is always an interesting non-metric)
[14:15] <tsimonq2> sil2100: I would do it if I didn't have school to attend to. I'll publish during my lunch in a little more than two hours.
[14:16] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, I think we should remove the "buildN" uploads, we would have better results
[14:16]  * infinity shrugs.
[14:16] <LocutusOfBorg> (even if no change rebuilds with delta have "ubuntu" suffix)
[14:17] <infinity> I don't think accuracy of results are really a goal.  Plus, "accuracy" changes depending on what you think it's meant to be measuring.
[14:22] <tsimonq2> What is Eoan? Is it a misspelling of Eon?
[14:23] <infinity> https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/eoan
[14:24] <LocutusOfBorg> what would happen if I propose to do only one release each year? do you have statistics of installation of LTS VS non-LTS releases?
[14:24] <LocutusOfBorg> I think it might be time to relax a bit :D
[14:25] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Releasing less often means longer freezes and bug-hunting periods.
[14:25] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Releasing more often (or continuously, as some want) means never getting new features, because there's no time to fix bugs.
[14:25] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: 6mo feels like a sweet spot for a large OS-sized project.
[14:26] <tsimonq2> infinity: Weird, a physical Merrium-Webster dictionary didn't have itm
[14:26] <tsimonq2> *it.
[14:26] <infinity> tsimonq2: Maybe Merriam would have, but your cheap knock-off Merrium didn't?
[14:27] <tsimonq2> I don't know, it was a very large dictionary.
[14:27] <tsimonq2> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[14:27] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, OTOH, who cares about installing something that will be thrown away in less than 9mo?
[14:27] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Lots of people.
[14:27] <tsimonq2> Anyway, as usual, once we have the noun, dibs on the wiki.
[14:27] <LocutusOfBorg> ok, that was my request, do you have statistics?
[14:28] <infinity> Not handy.
[14:28] <LocutusOfBorg> ok :)
[14:28] <infinity> Popularity definitely skews more toward LTS these days, but that's mostly due to cloud.
[14:28] <LocutusOfBorg> it would be nice to compare LTS and non-LTS, to see how many are following the 6months releases
[14:28] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, that is my point, almost every people I know, are using LTS because of 5 years support
[14:29] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: I heard LTS:non-LTS was 10:1. Don't quote me on that.
[14:29] <LocutusOfBorg> with hwe LTS gained also new features
[14:29] <infinity> tsimonq2: Stats like that count each cloud instance as an install, though, which is likely not a fair metric.
[14:29] <tsimonq2> Fairn
[14:29] <tsimonq2> *Fair.
[14:29] <tsimonq2> (Typing on mobile.)
[14:30] <tsimonq2> I do agree with infinity though.
[14:30] <LocutusOfBorg> but do you agree that the sum of "new features" each release decreased in the last 10 years?
[14:30] <LocutusOfBorg> I mean, ok I was probably a younger student 10 years ago, and students have lots of time to format the laptop
[14:31] <infinity> I'm not sure I agree with that, no.
[14:31] <infinity> We get a ton of churn.
[14:31] <LocutusOfBorg> but meh, "updated kernel updated glib, updated gnome updated foobar", but nothing really heartbreaking
[14:31] <infinity> And it's more each year.
[14:31] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't think I got what you said
[14:32] <Eickmeyer> Ubutnu Studio's update was huge. Our 25th release, and it was pretty feature-full.
[14:32] <LocutusOfBorg> what is "churn?" :) -ENONATIVESPEAKER
[14:32] <infinity> If by "new feature" you mean "holy crap, it suspends and resumes without crashing", sure, we get less of that, but that's because once you solve a problem like that, it's done.
[14:32] <infinity> So, we're a bit more "boring" by virtue of the fact that we suck less.
[14:32] <LocutusOfBorg> that is a fair point, but I mean like "hey we switched from gnome2 to gnome3" or something similar
[14:33] <ginggs> was that a feature?
[14:33] <LocutusOfBorg> :D
[14:33] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: "churn", constant movement of stuff.  Lots of changes.  More thousands of lines of code change per year now than 4 years ago or 8.
[14:33] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, of course code changes are big! but is end user experiencing something different at the end?
[14:33] <tsimonq2> Instead of changing the release cycle, I would argue in 2019 you don't need 3 mo ths to upgrade if you're on the non-LTS anyway.
[14:33] <tsimonq2> *months
[14:34] <LocutusOfBorg> I mean, my bionic is stable, I never had to think wrt moving to cosmic or disco
[14:34] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: End user experience doesn't define our workload.
[14:34] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe end user installation might define it a little bit, if we discover nobody is installing non-LTS because of $reasons...
[14:34] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: The bottom line is that lots of changed code means lots of work keeping it integrated.  The longer you allow unfettered churn, the longer you have to stop to fix it all.
[14:35] <LocutusOfBorg> but less releases means also less SRUs
[14:35] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Our freezes are much less painful than Debian's, and it's not because we're somehow more awesom, it's because we're dealing with smaller chunks of destabilisation.
[14:35] <LocutusOfBorg> actually just to point my little experience, I discovered today I fixed a java11 issue in virtualbox in bionic, and I completely forgot about cosmic
[14:36] <LocutusOfBorg> because 1) I wasn't aware of java11 going in cosmic 2) nobody pointed it out, so I forgot about it
[14:38] <LocutusOfBorg> my guess is that I'm not the only one who in terms of fixing stable bugs has a tendency to consider only LTS and LTS-1 instead of everything else
[14:38] <cjwatson> You're not, but I think that's OK - we don't have to fix everything
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 6787 entries have been added or removed
[14:38] <LocutusOfBorg> (not something I do on purpose!)
[14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gedit (disco-updates/main) [3.32.0-3 => 3.32.0-3] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gedit [sync] (disco-updates) [3.32.0-3]
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (eoan-proposed/main) [0.39ubuntu1 => 0.39ubuntu2] (core)
[14:48] <LocutusOfBorg> oh.... so you are already ready for eoan? surprising
[14:49] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: No.
[14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.39ubuntu2]
[14:49] <LocutusOfBorg> of course you aren't yet, but the work started quickly on that cicle
[14:50] <LocutusOfBorg> *cycle
[14:50] <Laney> It can start once we get the name, which happened in time this cycle.
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (eoan-proposed/main) [0.39ubuntu1 => 0.39ubuntu2] (core)
[15:11] <teward> *hands the Release Team beers*
[15:12]  * Eickmeyer sends teward a quad-shot venti latte
[15:12]  * teward absorbs through osmosis
[15:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (trusty-proposed/main) [0.18ubuntu0.11 => 0.18ubuntu0.12] (core)
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (bionic-proposed/main) [0.37ubuntu0.3 => 0.37ubuntu0.4] (core)
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (disco-proposed/main) [0.39ubuntu1 => 0.39ubuntu2] (core)
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.38ubuntu0.2 => 0.38ubuntu0.3] (core)
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (xenial-proposed/main) [0.28ubuntu0.10 => 0.28ubuntu0.11] (core)
[15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (disco-proposed) [0.39ubuntu2]
[15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.38ubuntu0.3]
[15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.37ubuntu0.4]
[15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.28ubuntu0.11]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.18ubuntu0.12]
[15:28] <tsimonq2> Nice, Eanimals are cool. Is that Australian? :P
[15:29] <sil2100> I don't know, I'm not very knowledgable in animals! Especially e-animals
[15:30] <sil2100> Electronic-animals
[15:30] <sil2100> hm
[15:30] <sil2100> Bionic animals?
[15:30] <tsimonq2> XD
[15:42] <vorlon> congrats, all!
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.39ubuntu2]
[16:42] <acheronuk> infinity: perhaps an impossible things to estimate, but do you have an ETA on updating the metadata to turn do-release-upgrades on?
[16:43] <acheronuk> if not, then fine :)
[16:55] <infinity> bdmurray: ^
[16:55] <bdmurray> infinity: Do you want me to give an estimage? ;-)
[16:55] <infinity> bdmurray: Sure. :)
[16:56] <infinity> bdmurray: Or if you're not aware of any upgrade showstoppers, do the thing.
[16:56]  * infinity needs to lie down for a bit to let these drugs clear his sinuses.
[16:56] <bdmurray> infinity: I'm not aware of any because either nobody tests or its perfect
[17:02] <bdmurray> acheronuk: real soon now maybe an hour at most
[17:02] <acheronuk> bdmurray: I know in recent times it has been a few days. if we look like going sooner, I won't complain
[17:03] <acheronuk> bdmurray: people have been asking, and all I have been able to do is cite past examples
[17:05] <bdmurray> acheronuk: what release did we wait days? I'm not remembering one immediately
[17:13] <acheronuk> bdmurray: I don't recall. the memory is insistent on the fact, but could be mistaken I guess
[17:13] <acheronuk> something like release on Thurs but meta not updated until Monday
[17:14] <acheronuk> honesly, I don't care if that memory or normal procedure is wrong. :)
[17:14] <bdmurray> well if you are repeating it and its wrong...
[17:15] <acheronuk> I did say it could be hrs to a few days, depending...
[17:18] <acheronuk> point being that as said, only done if it seems no showstoppers. which I can only hedge bets on
[17:18] <bdmurray> okay for bionic we did wait a couple of days
[17:19] <bdmurray> https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/meta-release/ubuntu/revision/208#meta-release
[17:19] <acheronuk> fair enough
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (trusty-proposed/main) [10ubuntu0.14.04.2 => 10ubuntu0.14.04.3] (no packageset)
[19:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity [sync] (bionic-proposed) [7.5.0+18.04.20190304-0ubuntu1]
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity [sync] (xenial-proposed) [7.4.5+16.04.20190312-0ubuntu1]
[19:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (trusty-proposed) [10ubuntu0.14.04.3]
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (trusty-proposed/main) [10ubuntu0.14.04.2 => 10ubuntu0.14.04.3] (no packageset)
[20:03] <ahasenack> vorlon: ^
[20:13] <valorie> Thank you release team!
[20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (trusty-proposed) [10ubuntu0.14.04.3]
[20:15] <tsimonq2> infinity, vorlon: Can I please get your AA hat opinion? https://github.com/lxqt/libfm-qt/issues/370#issuecomment-484671222
[20:15] <gitbot> lxqt issue 370 in libfm-qt "Licensing question" [Closed]
[20:17] <vorlon> tsimonq2: can you phrase that in the form of a question rather than a link to a nondescript comment in a github issue? :)
[20:18] <tsimonq2> vorlon: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=927380 two files were released with the wrong license.
[20:18] <ubot5`> Debian bug 927380 in release.debian.org "unblock: libfm-qt/0.14.1-5" [Normal,Open]
[20:18] <vorlon> that's still not a question
[20:18] <tsimonq2> What is the appropriate action here?
[20:19] <vorlon> merge the new version when Ergonomic opens?
[20:19] <tsimonq2> Patch the source, or call it good since upstream explicitly patched it?
[20:19] <tsimonq2> For Disco.
[20:19] <vorlon> there are plenty of upstream license statements in source tarballs that are incorrect
[20:20] <tsimonq2> That's the answer then, thanks!
[20:20] <vorlon> we don't need to do extra work to make the upstream license statements match reality :)
[20:20] <tsimonq2> Makes sense, just confirming :)
[20:21] <vorlon> and AIUI the upstream fix was to correct the license statement to LGPL, in which case debian/copyright happened to already be accuarte
[20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dde-qt-dbus-factory (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-2 => 1.1.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected dde-qt-dbus-factory [source] (disco-proposed) [1.1.0-2ubuntu1]
[20:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dkms [source] (disco-proposed) [2.6.1-4ubuntu2]
[21:10] <tsimonq2> Ahh, got it