[04:03] <vorlon> I'm cranking arm64/i386/amd64 up to full blast, given the remaining queue contents don't look like they should be i/o bound
[04:04] <vorlon> and I'll check in again before I turn in for the night
[17:48] <juliank> woohoo, all queues seem empty
[17:48] <juliank> * autopkgtest queues
[18:34] <vorlon> yep! now I move on to trying to figure out why the heck busybox ftbfs on s390x in Ubuntu but not Debian :P
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (disco-backports/universe) [189-1 => 192-1~ubuntu19.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (cosmic-backports/universe) [189-1~ubuntu18.10.1 => 192-1~ubuntu18.10.1] (no packageset)
[18:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (cosmic-backports) [192-1~ubuntu18.10.1]
[18:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (disco-backports) [192-1~ubuntu19.04.1]
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (bionic-backports/universe) [189-1~ubuntu18.04.1 => 192-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (bionic-backports) [192-1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[19:48] <acheronuk> did a email ever get sent saying eoan was open? I can't see one anywhere in a place I would expect
[20:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9-cross [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [4ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop)
[20:22] <xnox> vorlon, well we are higher gcc abi level than debian.... zEC12 (us) vs z196 (debian)
[21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9-cross-ports [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [3ubuntu5] (no packageset)
[22:02] <juliank> acheronuk: don't think so. It was never really closed (opening was super quick), though, but yes, it would probably be a good idea.