[04:03] I'm cranking arm64/i386/amd64 up to full blast, given the remaining queue contents don't look like they should be i/o bound [04:04] and I'll check in again before I turn in for the night [17:48] woohoo, all queues seem empty [17:48] * autopkgtest queues [18:34] yep! now I move on to trying to figure out why the heck busybox ftbfs on s390x in Ubuntu but not Debian :P [18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (disco-backports/universe) [189-1 => 192-1~ubuntu19.04.1] (no packageset) [18:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (cosmic-backports/universe) [189-1~ubuntu18.10.1 => 192-1~ubuntu18.10.1] (no packageset) [18:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (cosmic-backports) [192-1~ubuntu18.10.1] [18:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (disco-backports) [192-1~ubuntu19.04.1] [18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (bionic-backports/universe) [189-1~ubuntu18.04.1 => 192-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset) [18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (bionic-backports) [192-1~ubuntu18.04.1] [19:48] did a email ever get sent saying eoan was open? I can't see one anywhere in a place I would expect [20:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9-cross [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [4ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop) [20:22] vorlon, well we are higher gcc abi level than debian.... zEC12 (us) vs z196 (debian) [21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9-cross-ports [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [3ubuntu5] (no packageset) [22:02] acheronuk: don't think so. It was never really closed (opening was super quick), though, but yes, it would probably be a good idea. === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414