vorlon | hmm. If libixion source was in main in disco, why did component-mismatches not want libixion-dev to be promoted via Extra-Includes? | 04:24 |
---|---|---|
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.5ubuntu3.18.10.4] | 08:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected unattended-upgrades [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.11] | 08:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1010.11~18.04.1] (kernel) | 09:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1031.33~16.04.1] (kernel) | 09:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.11] | 09:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected unattended-upgrades [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.3] | 09:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-1010.11~18.04.1] | 09:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1031.33~16.04.1] | 09:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.3] | 10:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator (disco-proposed/main) [28-1 => 29-1~ubuntu19.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 10:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1] | 10:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [s390x] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [i386] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [arm64] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:24 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1] | 10:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1] | 10:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1] | 10:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1] | 10:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1] | 10:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [i386] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1] | 10:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lexicon (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-2 => 2.2.1-2ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 10:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lexicon (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.7.0-1 => 2.7.0-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 10:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1005.6] (no packageset) | 10:59 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1005.6] | 11:00 | |
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
didrocks | sil2100: do you mind copying a new canary image (the eoan one), please? | 12:38 |
didrocks | also, any news on publishing it on the official cdimage server? | 12:38 |
sil2100 | didrocks: sure! As for that: not yet, Steve was sick last week and off yesterday, so ugh, a bit unlucky - but I'll know more later today ;) | 12:43 |
sil2100 | Actually, let me send an e-mail and CC you in it | 12:44 |
didrocks | sil2100: thanks! | 12:48 |
sil2100 | didrocks: in the meantime: http://people.canonical.com/~platform/ubuntu-canary/20190430/ | 12:49 |
didrocks | sil2100: perfect :) | 12:49 |
LocutusOfBorg | nobody is doing SRU today? | 13:09 |
LocutusOfBorg | I have a bad bug that deletes files waiting for SRU approval... | 13:09 |
LocutusOfBorg | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blender/+bug/1826180 | 13:10 |
ubot5` | Ubuntu bug 1826180 in blender (Ubuntu Disco) "[SRU] blender: erases photoshop files" [Critical,In progress] | 13:10 |
LocutusOfBorg | causing serious data loss... | 13:10 |
sil2100 | LocutusOfBorg: today is bdmurray's and ROAF's day | 13:23 |
sil2100 | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Publishing | 13:23 |
seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, the SRU schedule on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates states it's bdmurray's day, maybe try pinging him | 13:23 |
seb128 | he's probably only starting his day | 13:23 |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks, I was not sure if that page was up-to-date... nice to know | 13:25 |
bdmurray | LocutusOfBorg: I feel like the test case should say something about being careful when testing this. ;-) | 14:17 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blender [source] (disco-proposed) [2.79.b+dfsg0-6ubuntu1.19.04.1] | 14:19 | |
LocutusOfBorg | lol :D | 14:21 |
LocutusOfBorg | bdmurray, can please accept also on bionic and cosmic? | 14:22 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blender [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.79.b+dfsg0-4ubuntu1.18.10.1] | 14:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blender [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.79.b+dfsg0-1ubuntu1.18.04.1] | 14:24 | |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks | 14:28 |
ddstreet | sil2100 bdmurray my upload for mariadb-10.1 on cosmic needs another patch for arm64; i marked lp #1824335 verification-failed, and i have a new upload to fix it; would you prefer i add a new changelog entry on top of what's in -proposed, or replace the changelog entry with a new one (and drop the previous changelog entry) | 14:29 |
ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1824335 in mariadb-10.1 (Ubuntu Cosmic) "autopkgtest always fails with "I can't find mariadb-test"" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1824335 | 14:29 |
ddstreet | e.g., add onto -proposed changelog entry https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/jPWR857PfV/ | 14:30 |
ddstreet | or replace -proposed changelog entry https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/ZQY5ftfWCG/ | 14:30 |
ddstreet | adding on seems more appropriate to me, but whichever way you prefer is fine with me | 14:30 |
bdmurray | ddstreet: am I reading this right "This update is a port of the package from Bionic"? | 14:31 |
ddstreet | bdmurray yep | 14:31 |
bdmurray | ddstreet: the arm64 changes go hand in hand with the port correct? | 14:32 |
ddstreet | yes, the arm change was already made in cosmic, but never got out of -proposed | 14:33 |
ddstreet | in fact there were never any cosmic-updates (or cosmic-security) releases for the pkg at all | 14:33 |
ddstreet | which is why the version in bionic is so far ahead of cosmic | 14:33 |
bdmurray | My point is if it can be considered part of the whole then https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/ZQY5ftfWCG/ makes sense to me | 14:36 |
ddstreet | ok sounds good - i'll upload that shortly. thnx | 14:36 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mariadb-10.1 (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:10.1.38-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 => 1:10.1.38-0ubuntu0.18.10.2] (no packageset) | 14:40 | |
infinity | ddstreet: "never got out of proposed"? | 14:57 |
infinity | ddstreet: cosmic has the arm64 fixes in the release pocket. | 14:57 |
infinity | ddstreet: If your SRU had been based on cosmic packaging, you'd have gotten the arm64 stuff for free. :P | 14:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | ^^ +1, I'm the person who found that delta dropped in the SRU :) | 14:58 |
* LocutusOfBorg didn't find the delta dropped, but introduced the delta, to be honest | 14:59 | |
ddstreet | infinity lol | 14:59 |
infinity | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/377757545/mariadb-10.1_1%3A10.1.29-6build2_1%3A10.1.29-6ubuntu2.diff.gz | 15:00 |
infinity | That's the version in cosmic-release. | 15:00 |
infinity | Which looks a lot like the upload you just made. | 15:00 |
infinity | Just sayin'. | 15:00 |
ddstreet | infinity yeah i know, it was dropped and re-added twice more in cosmic-proposed xD | 15:00 |
ddstreet | did you check the cosmic-proposed history? | 15:00 |
ddstreet | ;-) | 15:00 |
infinity | ddstreet: Sure, but the cosmic-proposed history isn't relevant. You said the fixes "never made it out of proposed" which is clearly untrue. | 15:01 |
infinity | It's there in the release pocket. | 15:01 |
ddstreet | yep | 15:02 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.66.21 => 1.66.22] (core) | 16:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (disco-proposed/main) [0.96-0ubuntu4 => 0.96-0ubuntu4.1] (core) | 16:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.10.2 => 0.96-0ubuntu0.18.10.3] (core) | 16:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (bionic-proposed/main) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.04.3 => 0.96-0ubuntu0.18.04.4] (core) | 16:38 | |
cyphermox | bdmurray: could you please review grub2-signed in xenial-proposed and the netplan.io SRUs I just uploaded for D,C, and B? | 16:38 |
bdmurray | cyphermox: added to the list | 16:51 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8.9] | 17:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (disco-proposed/main) [1:6.2.2-0ubuntu2 => 1:6.2.3-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 17:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (disco-proposed) [2.578.1] | 17:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice-l10n (disco-proposed/main) [1:6.2.2-0ubuntu2 => 1:6.2.3-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 17:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.542.2] | 17:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.21] | 17:29 | |
michagogo | Quick question: anyone happen to know why meta-release{,-lts} lists Precise and Trusty as supported? | 17:49 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.66.22] | 17:51 | |
acheronuk | ^ infinity: extended support? | 17:55 |
vorlon | infinity, cjwatson: ugh does someone understand what's going on with component-mismatches? first it wanted to promote a bunch of Extra-Includes: -dev and -doc packages that should've already been referenced in disco; now it wants me to demote libmdds-doc, which obviously matches the pattern '*-doc'... | 17:58 |
vorlon | likewise, it wanting to keep only libxapian30 from xapian-core, and not xapian-doc or libxapian-dev | 17:58 |
infinity | michagogo: ESM. | 18:06 |
infinity | vorlon: Genuinely no idea. I noticed it wanting me to promote a package with no rdeps but itself that we'd demoted in disco, but then I was gone for most of the week and stopped caring. | 18:06 |
cjwatson | Bit more than I have time to go into at the moment, sorry :( | 18:07 |
infinity | vorlon: Ahh, yes. doxygen. Which I see you (or someone) promoted. I could find no reason WHY it was promoting. | 18:08 |
infinity | vorlon: And the reasons given by c-m was that doxygen was an rdep of doxygen-doc and doxygen-doc was extra-included from doxygen. ie: it was promoting itself somehow. Which is madness. | 18:09 |
infinity | vorlon: In fact, nacl looks to be in a similar situation right now. | 18:13 |
infinity | vorlon: nacl has no rdeps on the archive, isn't mentioned in any seeds, but c-m wants to promote it to rescue libnacl-dev for nacl. Something's going very weird here. | 18:15 |
infinity | Oh, hrm, maybe the nacl thing is actually sane, if we assume built-using should trigger promotions (libssh is statically linked against nacl), but then it also should have been in main in disco, as the versions haven't changed. | 18:18 |
infinity | So, WTF either way. | 18:18 |
vorlon | yeah, built-using is meant to result in promotions, just the reporting on this is scant | 18:44 |
infinity | vorlon: Which still begs the question of why c-m treated nacl differntly in disco and eoan, despite libssh being in main (and the same version) in both. | 18:45 |
infinity | So, there's a lot of "whee" here. | 18:45 |
vorlon | yes | 18:46 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibm-java80 (xenial-proposed/partner) [8.0.5.30-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.5.35-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 19:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:13.1.4-0ubuntu4.4] | 20:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (disco-proposed) [0.96-0ubuntu4.1] | 20:51 | |
cyphermox | could someone please review grub2 amd64 and arm64 binaries in the xenial unapproved queue? | 20:58 |
cyphermox | (the usual Secure Boot singing stuff) | 20:59 |
cyphermox | signing too. | 20:59 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.10.3] | 21:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.22] | 21:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.22] | 21:14 | |
cyphermox | thanks! | 21:30 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.04.4] | 21:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.208.17] | 22:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.45] | 22:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pastebinit [source] (disco-proposed) [1.5-2.2~ubuntu0.19.04.1] | 22:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted knockd [source] (disco-proposed) [0.7-1ubuntu2.1] | 22:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted knockd [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.7-1ubuntu1.18.10.2] | 22:59 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted knockd [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7-1ubuntu1.18.04.2] | 23:01 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!