[04:24] <vorlon> hmm.  If libixion source was in main in disco, why did component-mismatches not want libixion-dev to be promoted via Extra-Includes?
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.5ubuntu3.18.10.4]
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected unattended-upgrades [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.11]
[09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1010.11~18.04.1] (kernel)
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1031.33~16.04.1] (kernel)
[09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.11]
[09:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected unattended-upgrades [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.3]
[09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-1010.11~18.04.1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1031.33~16.04.1]
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.3]
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator (disco-proposed/main) [28-1 => 29-1~ubuntu19.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1]
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [s390x] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [i386] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [arm64] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1]
[10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1]
[10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1]
[10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1]
[10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1]
[10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [i386] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1]
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lexicon (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-2 => 2.2.1-2ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lexicon (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.7.0-1 => 2.7.0-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1005.6] (no packageset)
[11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1005.6]
[12:38] <didrocks> sil2100: do you mind copying a new canary image (the eoan one), please?
[12:38] <didrocks> also, any news on publishing it on the official cdimage server?
[12:43] <sil2100> didrocks: sure! As for that: not yet, Steve was sick last week and off yesterday, so ugh, a bit unlucky - but I'll know more later today ;)
[12:44] <sil2100> Actually, let me send an e-mail and CC you in it
[12:48] <didrocks> sil2100: thanks!
[12:49] <sil2100> didrocks: in the meantime: http://people.canonical.com/~platform/ubuntu-canary/20190430/
[12:49] <didrocks> sil2100: perfect :)
[13:09] <LocutusOfBorg> nobody is doing SRU today?
[13:09] <LocutusOfBorg> I have a bad bug that deletes files waiting for SRU approval...
[13:10] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blender/+bug/1826180
[13:10] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1826180 in blender (Ubuntu Disco) "[SRU] blender: erases photoshop files" [Critical,In progress]
[13:10] <LocutusOfBorg> causing serious data loss...
[13:23] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: today is bdmurray's and ROAF's day
[13:23] <sil2100> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Publishing
[13:23] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, the SRU schedule on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates states it's bdmurray's day, maybe try pinging him
[13:23] <seb128> he's probably only starting his day
[13:25] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks, I was not sure if that page was up-to-date... nice to know
[14:17] <bdmurray> LocutusOfBorg: I feel like the test case should say something about being careful when testing this. ;-)
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blender [source] (disco-proposed) [2.79.b+dfsg0-6ubuntu1.19.04.1]
[14:21] <LocutusOfBorg> lol :D
[14:22] <LocutusOfBorg> bdmurray, can please accept also on bionic and cosmic?
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blender [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.79.b+dfsg0-4ubuntu1.18.10.1]
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blender [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.79.b+dfsg0-1ubuntu1.18.04.1]
[14:28] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[14:29] <ddstreet> sil2100 bdmurray my upload for mariadb-10.1 on cosmic needs another patch for arm64; i marked lp #1824335 verification-failed, and i have a new upload to fix it; would you prefer i add a new changelog entry on top of what's in -proposed, or replace the changelog entry with a new one (and drop the previous changelog entry)
[14:29] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1824335 in mariadb-10.1 (Ubuntu Cosmic) "autopkgtest always fails with "I can't find mariadb-test"" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1824335
[14:30] <ddstreet> e.g., add onto -proposed changelog entry https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/jPWR857PfV/
[14:30] <ddstreet> or replace -proposed changelog entry https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/ZQY5ftfWCG/
[14:30] <ddstreet> adding on seems more appropriate to me, but whichever way you prefer is fine with me
[14:31] <bdmurray> ddstreet: am I reading this right "This update is a port of the package from Bionic"?
[14:31] <ddstreet> bdmurray yep
[14:32] <bdmurray> ddstreet: the arm64 changes go hand in hand with the port correct?
[14:33] <ddstreet> yes, the arm change was already made in cosmic, but never got out of -proposed
[14:33] <ddstreet> in fact there were never any cosmic-updates (or cosmic-security) releases for the pkg at all
[14:33] <ddstreet> which is why the version in bionic is so far ahead of cosmic
[14:36] <bdmurray> My point is if it can be considered part of the whole then https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/ZQY5ftfWCG/ makes sense to me
[14:36] <ddstreet> ok sounds good - i'll upload that shortly.  thnx
[14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mariadb-10.1 (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:10.1.38-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 => 1:10.1.38-0ubuntu0.18.10.2] (no packageset)
[14:57] <infinity> ddstreet: "never got out of proposed"?
[14:57] <infinity> ddstreet: cosmic has the arm64 fixes in the release pocket.
[14:57] <infinity> ddstreet: If your SRU had been based on cosmic packaging, you'd have gotten the arm64 stuff for free. :P
[14:58] <LocutusOfBorg> ^^ +1, I'm the person who found that delta dropped in the SRU :)
[14:59]  * LocutusOfBorg didn't find the delta dropped, but introduced the delta, to be honest
[14:59] <ddstreet> infinity lol
[15:00] <infinity> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/377757545/mariadb-10.1_1%3A10.1.29-6build2_1%3A10.1.29-6ubuntu2.diff.gz
[15:00] <infinity> That's the version in cosmic-release.
[15:00] <infinity> Which looks a lot like the upload you just made.
[15:00] <infinity> Just sayin'.
[15:00] <ddstreet> infinity yeah i know, it was dropped and re-added twice more in cosmic-proposed xD
[15:00] <ddstreet> did you check the cosmic-proposed history?
[15:00] <ddstreet> ;-)
[15:01] <infinity> ddstreet: Sure, but the cosmic-proposed history isn't relevant.  You said the fixes "never made it out of proposed" which is clearly untrue.
[15:01] <infinity> It's there in the release pocket.
[15:02] <ddstreet> yep
[16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.66.21 => 1.66.22] (core)
[16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (disco-proposed/main) [0.96-0ubuntu4 => 0.96-0ubuntu4.1] (core)
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.10.2 => 0.96-0ubuntu0.18.10.3] (core)
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (bionic-proposed/main) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.04.3 => 0.96-0ubuntu0.18.04.4] (core)
[16:38] <cyphermox> bdmurray: could you please review grub2-signed in xenial-proposed and the netplan.io SRUs I just uploaded for D,C, and B?
[16:51] <bdmurray> cyphermox: added to the list
[17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8.9]
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (disco-proposed/main) [1:6.2.2-0ubuntu2 => 1:6.2.3-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (disco-proposed) [2.578.1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice-l10n (disco-proposed/main) [1:6.2.2-0ubuntu2 => 1:6.2.3-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.542.2]
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.21]
[17:49] <michagogo> Quick question: anyone happen to know why meta-release{,-lts} lists Precise and Trusty as supported?
[17:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.66.22]
[17:55] <acheronuk> ^ infinity: extended support?
[17:58] <vorlon> infinity, cjwatson: ugh does someone understand what's going on with component-mismatches?  first it wanted to promote a bunch of Extra-Includes: -dev and -doc packages that should've already been referenced in disco; now it wants me to demote libmdds-doc, which obviously matches the pattern '*-doc'...
[17:58] <vorlon> likewise, it wanting to keep only libxapian30 from xapian-core, and not xapian-doc or libxapian-dev
[18:06] <infinity> michagogo: ESM.
[18:06] <infinity> vorlon: Genuinely no idea.  I noticed it wanting me to promote a package with no rdeps but itself that we'd demoted in disco, but then I was gone for most of the week and stopped caring.
[18:07] <cjwatson> Bit more than I have time to go into at the moment, sorry :(
[18:08] <infinity> vorlon: Ahh, yes.  doxygen.  Which I see you (or someone) promoted.  I could find no reason WHY it was promoting.
[18:09] <infinity> vorlon: And the reasons given by c-m was that doxygen was an rdep of doxygen-doc and doxygen-doc was extra-included from doxygen.  ie: it was promoting itself somehow.  Which is madness.
[18:13] <infinity> vorlon: In fact, nacl looks to be in a similar situation right now.
[18:15] <infinity> vorlon: nacl has no rdeps on the archive, isn't mentioned in any seeds, but c-m wants to promote it to rescue libnacl-dev for nacl.  Something's going very weird here.
[18:18] <infinity> Oh, hrm, maybe the nacl thing is actually sane, if we assume built-using should trigger promotions (libssh is statically linked against nacl), but then it also should have been in main in disco, as the versions haven't changed.
[18:18] <infinity> So, WTF either way.
[18:44] <vorlon> yeah, built-using is meant to result in promotions, just the reporting on this is scant
[18:45] <infinity> vorlon: Which still begs the question of why c-m treated nacl differntly in disco and eoan, despite libssh being in main (and the same version) in both.
[18:45] <infinity> So, there's a lot of "whee" here.
[18:46] <vorlon> yes
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibm-java80 (xenial-proposed/partner) [8.0.5.30-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.5.35-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:13.1.4-0ubuntu4.4]
[20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (disco-proposed) [0.96-0ubuntu4.1]
[20:58] <cyphermox> could someone please review grub2 amd64 and arm64 binaries in the xenial unapproved queue?
[20:59] <cyphermox> (the usual Secure Boot singing stuff)
[20:59] <cyphermox> signing too.
[21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.10.3]
[21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.22]
[21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.22]
[21:30] <cyphermox> thanks!
[21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.04.4]
[22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.208.17]
[22:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.45]
[22:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pastebinit [source] (disco-proposed) [1.5-2.2~ubuntu0.19.04.1]
[22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted knockd [source] (disco-proposed) [0.7-1ubuntu2.1]
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted knockd [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.7-1ubuntu1.18.10.2]
[23:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted knockd [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7-1ubuntu1.18.04.2]