[04:24] hmm. If libixion source was in main in disco, why did component-mismatches not want libixion-dev to be promoted via Extra-Includes? [08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.5ubuntu3.18.10.4] [08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected unattended-upgrades [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.11] [09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1010.11~18.04.1] (kernel) [09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1031.33~16.04.1] (kernel) [09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.11] [09:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected unattended-upgrades [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.3] [09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-1010.11~18.04.1] [09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1031.33~16.04.1] [10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.3] [10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator (disco-proposed/main) [28-1 => 29-1~ubuntu19.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) [10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1] [10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [s390x] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [i386] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [arm64] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wiringpi [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.50-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1] [10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1] [10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1] [10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1] [10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1] [10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wiringpi [i386] (eoan-proposed) [2.50-0ubuntu1] [10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lexicon (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-2 => 2.2.1-2ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) [10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lexicon (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.7.0-1 => 2.7.0-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) [10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1005.6] (no packageset) [11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1005.6] === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer [12:38] sil2100: do you mind copying a new canary image (the eoan one), please? [12:38] also, any news on publishing it on the official cdimage server? [12:43] didrocks: sure! As for that: not yet, Steve was sick last week and off yesterday, so ugh, a bit unlucky - but I'll know more later today ;) [12:44] Actually, let me send an e-mail and CC you in it [12:48] sil2100: thanks! [12:49] didrocks: in the meantime: http://people.canonical.com/~platform/ubuntu-canary/20190430/ [12:49] sil2100: perfect :) [13:09] nobody is doing SRU today? [13:09] I have a bad bug that deletes files waiting for SRU approval... [13:10] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blender/+bug/1826180 [13:10] Ubuntu bug 1826180 in blender (Ubuntu Disco) "[SRU] blender: erases photoshop files" [Critical,In progress] [13:10] causing serious data loss... [13:23] LocutusOfBorg: today is bdmurray's and ROAF's day [13:23] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Publishing [13:23] LocutusOfBorg, the SRU schedule on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates states it's bdmurray's day, maybe try pinging him [13:23] he's probably only starting his day [13:25] thanks, I was not sure if that page was up-to-date... nice to know [14:17] LocutusOfBorg: I feel like the test case should say something about being careful when testing this. ;-) [14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blender [source] (disco-proposed) [2.79.b+dfsg0-6ubuntu1.19.04.1] [14:21] lol :D [14:22] bdmurray, can please accept also on bionic and cosmic? [14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blender [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.79.b+dfsg0-4ubuntu1.18.10.1] [14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blender [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.79.b+dfsg0-1ubuntu1.18.04.1] [14:28] thanks [14:29] sil2100 bdmurray my upload for mariadb-10.1 on cosmic needs another patch for arm64; i marked lp #1824335 verification-failed, and i have a new upload to fix it; would you prefer i add a new changelog entry on top of what's in -proposed, or replace the changelog entry with a new one (and drop the previous changelog entry) [14:29] Launchpad bug 1824335 in mariadb-10.1 (Ubuntu Cosmic) "autopkgtest always fails with "I can't find mariadb-test"" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1824335 [14:30] e.g., add onto -proposed changelog entry https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/jPWR857PfV/ [14:30] or replace -proposed changelog entry https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/ZQY5ftfWCG/ [14:30] adding on seems more appropriate to me, but whichever way you prefer is fine with me [14:31] ddstreet: am I reading this right "This update is a port of the package from Bionic"? [14:31] bdmurray yep [14:32] ddstreet: the arm64 changes go hand in hand with the port correct? [14:33] yes, the arm change was already made in cosmic, but never got out of -proposed [14:33] in fact there were never any cosmic-updates (or cosmic-security) releases for the pkg at all [14:33] which is why the version in bionic is so far ahead of cosmic [14:36] My point is if it can be considered part of the whole then https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/ZQY5ftfWCG/ makes sense to me [14:36] ok sounds good - i'll upload that shortly. thnx [14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mariadb-10.1 (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:10.1.38-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 => 1:10.1.38-0ubuntu0.18.10.2] (no packageset) [14:57] ddstreet: "never got out of proposed"? [14:57] ddstreet: cosmic has the arm64 fixes in the release pocket. [14:57] ddstreet: If your SRU had been based on cosmic packaging, you'd have gotten the arm64 stuff for free. :P [14:58] ^^ +1, I'm the person who found that delta dropped in the SRU :) [14:59] * LocutusOfBorg didn't find the delta dropped, but introduced the delta, to be honest [14:59] infinity lol [15:00] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/377757545/mariadb-10.1_1%3A10.1.29-6build2_1%3A10.1.29-6ubuntu2.diff.gz [15:00] That's the version in cosmic-release. [15:00] Which looks a lot like the upload you just made. [15:00] Just sayin'. [15:00] infinity yeah i know, it was dropped and re-added twice more in cosmic-proposed xD [15:00] did you check the cosmic-proposed history? [15:00] ;-) [15:01] ddstreet: Sure, but the cosmic-proposed history isn't relevant. You said the fixes "never made it out of proposed" which is clearly untrue. [15:01] It's there in the release pocket. [15:02] yep [16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.66.21 => 1.66.22] (core) [16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (disco-proposed/main) [0.96-0ubuntu4 => 0.96-0ubuntu4.1] (core) [16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.10.2 => 0.96-0ubuntu0.18.10.3] (core) [16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (bionic-proposed/main) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.04.3 => 0.96-0ubuntu0.18.04.4] (core) [16:38] bdmurray: could you please review grub2-signed in xenial-proposed and the netplan.io SRUs I just uploaded for D,C, and B? [16:51] cyphermox: added to the list [17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8.9] [17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (disco-proposed/main) [1:6.2.2-0ubuntu2 => 1:6.2.3-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) [17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (disco-proposed) [2.578.1] [17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice-l10n (disco-proposed/main) [1:6.2.2-0ubuntu2 => 1:6.2.3-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.542.2] [17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.21] [17:49] Quick question: anyone happen to know why meta-release{,-lts} lists Precise and Trusty as supported? [17:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.66.22] [17:55] ^ infinity: extended support? [17:58] infinity, cjwatson: ugh does someone understand what's going on with component-mismatches? first it wanted to promote a bunch of Extra-Includes: -dev and -doc packages that should've already been referenced in disco; now it wants me to demote libmdds-doc, which obviously matches the pattern '*-doc'... [17:58] likewise, it wanting to keep only libxapian30 from xapian-core, and not xapian-doc or libxapian-dev [18:06] michagogo: ESM. [18:06] vorlon: Genuinely no idea. I noticed it wanting me to promote a package with no rdeps but itself that we'd demoted in disco, but then I was gone for most of the week and stopped caring. [18:07] Bit more than I have time to go into at the moment, sorry :( [18:08] vorlon: Ahh, yes. doxygen. Which I see you (or someone) promoted. I could find no reason WHY it was promoting. [18:09] vorlon: And the reasons given by c-m was that doxygen was an rdep of doxygen-doc and doxygen-doc was extra-included from doxygen. ie: it was promoting itself somehow. Which is madness. [18:13] vorlon: In fact, nacl looks to be in a similar situation right now. [18:15] vorlon: nacl has no rdeps on the archive, isn't mentioned in any seeds, but c-m wants to promote it to rescue libnacl-dev for nacl. Something's going very weird here. [18:18] Oh, hrm, maybe the nacl thing is actually sane, if we assume built-using should trigger promotions (libssh is statically linked against nacl), but then it also should have been in main in disco, as the versions haven't changed. [18:18] So, WTF either way. [18:44] yeah, built-using is meant to result in promotions, just the reporting on this is scant [18:45] vorlon: Which still begs the question of why c-m treated nacl differntly in disco and eoan, despite libssh being in main (and the same version) in both. [18:45] So, there's a lot of "whee" here. [18:46] yes [19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibm-java80 (xenial-proposed/partner) [8.0.5.30-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.5.35-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:13.1.4-0ubuntu4.4] [20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (disco-proposed) [0.96-0ubuntu4.1] [20:58] could someone please review grub2 amd64 and arm64 binaries in the xenial unapproved queue? [20:59] (the usual Secure Boot singing stuff) [20:59] signing too. [21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.10.3] [21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.22] [21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.22] [21:30] thanks! [21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.04.4] [22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.208.17] [22:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.45] [22:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pastebinit [source] (disco-proposed) [1.5-2.2~ubuntu0.19.04.1] [22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted knockd [source] (disco-proposed) [0.7-1ubuntu2.1] [22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted knockd [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.7-1ubuntu1.18.10.2] [23:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted knockd [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7-1ubuntu1.18.04.2]