[01:50] <RAOF> stgraber: Have you seen the cosmic lxd SRU autopkgtest failure: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-cosmic/cosmic/amd64/a/autopkgtest/20190430_220636_4b3fc@/log.gz
[01:51] <RAOF> stgraber: That looks like a real failure?
[02:15] <stgraber> RAOF: unlikely, we've seen that one fail before, IIRC it's dependent on system load as the test may be a bit racy
[02:16] <stgraber> RAOF: when you ask LXD to restart a container all it does is deliver a signal to PID 1 in the container. If init hasn't had time to setup its signal handler or another signal races with it, this may cause the init system to just ignore it
[02:16] <RAOF> Oh, lovely :(
[02:17] <RAOF> It's pretty reliably failing here: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/autopkgtest/cosmic/amd64
[02:20] <stgraber> odd, I wonder what that test actually does, might be that it's not allowing any time for the init system to be done booting or could be that systemd is crashing for some reason
[02:21] <stgraber> in any case, it can't be cause by this LXD SRU as 1) it was happening before and 2) the LXD sru doesn't actually change what LXD version you get on your system
[02:33] <Logan> vorlon: yeah, I did notice that. Unfortunately, I'm not sure how to work around that issue with the proxy in autopkgtest for mtail. Did you have any ideas?
[03:47] <RAOF> stgraber: Wait, what? How can the lxd sru not change what LXD version you get on your system? Surely that's the entire point of the SRU?
[03:54] <stgraber> RAOF: no it's not
[03:54] <stgraber> RAOF: lxd is snap only
[03:54] <stgraber> RAOF: the deb installs the latest snap
[03:55] <RAOF> Oh, right.
[03:55] <RAOF> Yeah, I forgot that transition.
[03:55] <RAOF> So, um, what does the SRU do?
[03:55] <stgraber> RAOF: the change in this SRU is about changing the logic which moves you from deb to snap so it doesn't fail on WSL
[03:55] <stgraber> as WSL doesn't have systemd or snapd things weren't working so well for those doing a bionic -> cosmic dist upgrade
[04:00] <RAOF> Aha
[04:32] <vorlon> Logan: I don't know if there's a way to override the environment for autopkgtest-pkg-go, but I would look there
[07:40] <LocutusOfBorg> mwhudson, I subscribed release team to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-1.10/+bug/1827180
[07:40] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1827180 in golang-1.10 (Ubuntu) "Remove golang-1.10 from EOAN" [Undecided,New]
[07:45] <LocutusOfBorg> mwhudson, please change the default, my two no-change rebuilds have missed the default change
[07:49] <LocutusOfBorg> I can do it, I have already the merge ready to go
[07:54] <LocutusOfBorg> I created a bileto to test https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3710
=== Wryhder is now known as Lucas_Gray
[09:58] <apw> has anyone reported grub seeming to be unable to drive the display under efi on a lenovo; starting 'recently'
[10:51] <mwhudson> LocutusOfBorg: i'm happy for you to upload the merge
[10:51] <mwhudson> LocutusOfBorg: or maybe i'll finally get around to it tomorrow
[12:10] <rbasak> rbalint: thank you for working on bug 520546. I keep hitting the lock screen and then realised I'm hitting that bug :)
[12:10] <ubottu> bug 520546 in kbd (Ubuntu Eoan) "Alt+KEY incorrectly behaves like Ctrl+Alt+KEY, and/or unwanted VT switch from Alt+Left/Right" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/520546
[12:10] <rbasak> (because Alt-Left in Firefox since they got rid of Backspace)
=== Wryhder is now known as Lucas_Gray
[20:56] <LocutusOfBorg> mwhudson, I did it :) and published the bileto ticket
[20:56] <LocutusOfBorg> I need some promotion now...
[21:20] <mwhudson> LocutusOfBorg: oh heh i was going to update golang to 1.12 but well
[22:21] <Logan> vorlon: thanks! I'll look into that.
[22:29] <Eickmeyer> Anybody wanna throw-on a MOTU hat and look at bug 1827288? This would be my third sponsored package.
[22:29] <ubottu> bug 1827288 in Ubuntu Studio "[Needs Packaging] LSP-Plugins for Eoan" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1827288