| dja | hi all - does anyone know where the official upstream of sbsigntool lives now? | 01:40 |
|---|---|---|
| dja | is it jejb's kernel.org repo, or does the official one live at Canonical still? | 01:41 |
| sarnold | heh, the url in debian/copyright looks dead .. this looks like the new name for the old thing https://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/jk/sbsigntool/ -- looks like it's six years idle | 01:43 |
| dja | yes, it's jk's old tool but it's still useful (the secure boot stuff hasn't changed much, and it was current when cyphermox wrote https://blog.ubuntu.com/2017/08/11/how-to-sign-things-for-secure-boot in 2017) | 01:44 |
| cyphermox | dja: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/sbsigntools.git/ | 01:50 |
| cyphermox | (it does need an update, more specifically a merge from Debian; I will take care of that) | 01:51 |
| dja | cyphermox: cool. There's an issue in at least cosmic where sbverify ignores -v despite having code to process it, it needs the getopt line to include lowercase v as well as uppercase V | 02:02 |
| dja | I can send a patch to james for master | 02:02 |
| dja | ah looks like master already has it | 02:04 |
| dja | cyphermox: master got the fix I wanted in 2014 so hopefully a sync with debian should catch it | 02:17 |
| dja | thanks :) | 02:17 |
| === MarkMaglana_ is now known as MarkMaglana | ||
| LocutusOfBorg | mwhudson, maybe we can make 1.11 migrate and then transition again? | 06:41 |
| LocutusOfBorg | didrocks, ubuntu-report is having a sad day with new default golang... I don't think I understood the testsuite failure.... | 06:53 |
| didrocks | LocutusOfBorg: ah, interesting, I guess autopkgtests rdepends? | 07:16 |
| didrocks | LocutusOfBorg: funny, because with the upstream google compiler, I'm using 1.11 (and not 1.12) for months… | 07:17 |
| didrocks | I bet it's a question of 1.11 with modules and it tries to fetch the upstream repo instead of the vendor/ directory | 07:18 |
| didrocks | and no git installed, so… | 07:18 |
| didrocks | the question is really why gccgo 1.11 ignores the vendor/ directory | 07:19 |
| didrocks | (upstream compiler doesn't) | 07:19 |
| didrocks | that's in mwhudson's hand IMHO | 07:19 |
| LocutusOfBorg | didrocks, interesting I found mostly the same, after installing a lot of golang packages | 07:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | didrocks, interesting I found mostly the same, after installing a lot of golang packages | 07:49 |
| mwhudson | uh what | 07:51 |
| xnox | mwhudson, didrocks, does any of https://github.com/golang/go/issues/29670 make sense? | 07:52 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I mean, I installed stuff like: golang-github-spf13-pflag-dev and so on | 07:52 |
| xnox | you shall have PWD in GOPATH? | 07:52 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and it still tries to fetch them... | 07:52 |
| LocutusOfBorg | even 1.12 seems to fail... | 07:52 |
| xnox | didrocks, i wonder if 'cd /tmp' at the end of debian/tests/setup would fix everything..... | 07:53 |
| mwhudson | oh well | 07:54 |
| didrocks | xnox: need to test it. I don't have 1.11.4 here (upstream 1.12.*) | 07:56 |
| xnox | didrocks, yeah, i'm doing... | 07:56 |
| didrocks | thx | 07:56 |
| xnox | didrocks, also I wonder if the autopkgtest can be reduced to: | 07:56 |
| xnox | Test-Command: /bin/true | 07:56 |
| xnox | Restrictions: requires-build | 07:57 |
| xnox | or whatever it was to ask autopkgtest to rebuild the package | 07:57 |
| didrocks | yeah, basically the idea is to rebuild + run the package tests | 07:57 |
| mwhudson | or GO111MODULE=off | 07:57 |
| mwhudson | "Outside GOPATH while inside a file tree with a go.mod — defaults to modules behavior" | 07:57 |
| xnox | cause that restriction would get you rw build-tree without needing to copy src tree. | 07:58 |
| didrocks | mwhudson: how is this related? in both behavior they should look at the vendor/ directory | 07:58 |
| xnox | and like one should use AUTOPKGTMP not /tmp | 07:58 |
| didrocks | so unsure if autopkgtests doesn't include it | 07:58 |
| mwhudson | "By default, go commands like go build ignore the vendor directory when in module mode." | 07:58 |
| mwhudson | if you're in a directory that's not in GOPATH and there is a go.mod file -> module mode | 07:58 |
| didrocks | mwhudson: where is that coming from? That was the first intent, but then, it got amended for distros like us | 07:59 |
| didrocks | when I discussed with Russ Cox | 07:59 |
| mwhudson | https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/Modules#when-do-i-get-old-behavior-vs-new-module-based-behavior | 07:59 |
| mwhudson | i should say that i'm not very aware of modules | 07:59 |
| mwhudson | but the behaviour in the autopkgtest is consistent with that wiki page | 08:00 |
| didrocks | I'm using modules for some months already :) | 08:00 |
| xnox | 'cd /tmp' fixes everything | 08:00 |
| xnox | let me try the GO111MODULE=off | 08:00 |
| didrocks | ok, so it's just that we are not in the correct directory | 08:00 |
| didrocks | I wonder if -mod=vendor hasn't been added in 1.12, not 1.11 | 08:01 |
| didrocks | I'll add that for future references, at least with gccgo as I only use a vendor directory for the ubuntu package (not when doing upstream dev) | 08:02 |
| mwhudson | didrocks: why are you using gccgo!? | 08:02 |
| xnox | didrocks, mwhudson - 'export GO111MODULE=off' in debian/tests/setup also works | 08:03 |
| xnox | i can upload fixup with either 'cd' or 'export' or both.... any preference? | 08:03 |
| didrocks | mwhudson: isn't what the distro is using? Not upstream go compiiler? | 08:04 |
| mwhudson | didrocks: if you want to figure out how go modules should interact with packaging and implement that in debain ... >:) | 08:04 |
| mwhudson | didrocks: no! | 08:04 |
| didrocks | xnox: I would like to try GOFLAGS | 08:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | me too | 08:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | :) | 08:04 |
| xnox | didrocks, what do you want me to try in GOFLAGS? | 08:04 |
| didrocks | xnox: GOFLAGS=-mod=vendor | 08:04 |
| xnox | so... export GOFLAGS=-mod=vendor ? | 08:05 |
| didrocks | mwhudson: ah, I really thought that, good news | 08:05 |
| didrocks | yep | 08:05 |
| didrocks | xnox: it should pick the vendor/ directory in that case | 08:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | goflags works too... | 08:05 |
| xnox | didrocks, we have always used golang-go on all arches it was available on, and only fellback to gccgo on arches that didn't. but golango is now available on all arches. | 08:05 |
| didrocks | mwhudson: if I have official time allocated for figuring out go modules support in debian, I would love to :) | 08:06 |
| mwhudson | didrocks: go build -mod=vendor is supported in 1.11 it seems | 08:06 |
| didrocks | xnox: ah, that's where my misinterpretation was for | 08:06 |
| mwhudson | didrocks: what kind of whisky does will like? :) | 08:07 |
| didrocks | mwhudson: ask him, he may answer that he prefers beers anyway :p | 08:07 |
| xnox | didrocks, GOFLAGS works too. so which of the three to upload? | 08:08 |
| * xnox doesn't like the version number in that GO111MODULE=off variable, as if, it's per-version-specific var | 08:09 | |
| mwhudson | i think the idea is that it indicates the version it became valid in | 08:10 |
| didrocks | xnox: please use GOFLAGS and submit it in ubuntu-report upstream :) | 08:10 |
| mwhudson | you're not going to have to say GO112MODULE=off with go 1.12 | 08:10 |
| * mwhudson afk for a while | 08:10 | |
| xnox | i see that didrocks 2019 edition, does not like to prefix releases with 'v' =) | 08:13 |
| xnox | https://github.com/xnox/ubuntu-report/releases | 08:13 |
| didrocks | xnox: arg, nicely spotted! I blame debcommit -r :) | 08:13 |
| * didrocks adds a second tag | 08:13 | |
| * xnox ponders if i should be uploading or not | 08:14 | |
| xnox | https://github.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-report/pull/27 | 08:14 |
| xnox | please upload? | 08:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | btw xnox you might want to add all the three and decomment only the GOFLAGS one, so in case in future something breaks again... we have fallbacks | 08:14 |
| didrocks | xnox: feel free to upload :) | 08:14 |
| xnox | didrocks, ack, pushed tag to my repo. no idea if github merges tags or not. | 08:15 |
| didrocks | xnox: I guess for safety I'll pull/push | 08:16 |
| didrocks | once CI pass :p | 08:16 |
| xnox | didrocks, i think it's a trap | 08:16 |
| didrocks | heh | 08:16 |
| xnox | didrocks, "feel free to upload" and like no..... | 08:16 |
| xnox | 376 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 201177 deletions(-) | 08:16 |
| didrocks | hum | 08:17 |
| xnox | is my diffstat when i try to make an upload | 08:17 |
| didrocks | what? | 08:17 |
| didrocks | ah I know | 08:17 |
| didrocks | you need to go mod vendor | 08:17 |
| xnox | well, vendor tree is not in git?! or i failed to init them? | 08:17 |
| didrocks | to generate that vendor/ dir | 08:17 |
| didrocks | yeah, it's not in git | 08:17 |
| xnox | yeah, not doing that =) | 08:17 |
| didrocks | because you have go.mod and go.lock which defines the content | 08:17 |
| didrocks | so you have the exact same content | 08:17 |
| didrocks | I can upload anyway if you are scared :p | 08:17 |
| didrocks | let me sponsor you :p | 08:18 |
| didrocks | the day we have module support in debian/ubuntu, this go mod vendor can cease to exists | 08:18 |
| xnox | willcooke is not in the channel, but i am offering a whiskey tasting out of my own reserves to make ^ happen. | 08:19 |
| didrocks | heh | 08:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | travis is happy! | 08:21 |
| didrocks | changelog | 6 ++++++ | 08:22 |
| didrocks | tests/setup | 1 + | 08:22 |
| didrocks | looks better ;) | 08:22 |
| didrocks | sponsored with love :) | 08:23 |
| didrocks | thanks xnox, mwhudson, LocutusOfBorg | 08:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks you all! | 08:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I hope we can move forward with golang-1.12 now :) | 08:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm stealing golang-1.11 merge :D | 08:24 |
| didrocks | same :) | 08:24 |
| didrocks | I have even some dreams of 1.13 released in early August and us picking it up | 08:25 |
| LocutusOfBorg | or mwhudson you want to do it? | 08:25 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the changelog is not listing all the delta, I'm unsure if it is wanted or not... | 08:25 |
| xnox | i did not expect the day to start with go; it was meant to start with perl! | 08:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | you mean perl 5.28.2? :) /me hides | 08:43 |
| xnox | nah, just some modules | 08:46 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yep I know, I see the proposed page :) | 08:49 |
| xnox | Laney, our armhf autopkgtests appear to lack internets | 08:58 |
| xnox | Err:50 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu eoan/main armhf pinentry-curses armhf 1.1.0-2 | 08:58 |
| xnox | Unable to connect to ftpmaster.internal:http: | 08:58 |
| Laney | retry | 08:58 |
| Laney | it happens sometimes, nobody has ever been able to figure it out | 08:59 |
| Laney | never ever happens when you access them manually, that would be too easy | 08:59 |
| xnox | hahaha | 09:01 |
| xnox | yeah the other package now passed. lolz | 09:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, since the introduction of systemd-resolve, from time to time, I get some DNS resolving failure | 09:03 |
| dupondje | Was just about to ask something about golang-1.12 :) And I see history is full of golang talk :) | 09:03 |
| Laney | same thing | 09:03 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and when I type: "systemd-resolve --status" to figure it out, my laptop auto-heals | 09:03 |
| Laney | oh | 09:03 |
| Laney | not on tests | 09:03 |
| Laney | don't ask me about that stuff :-) | 09:03 |
| dupondje | Are there plans to get 1.12.4 into disco? | 09:03 |
| LocutusOfBorg | dupondje, like the one already in eoan? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-1.12 | 09:04 |
| dupondje | LocutusOfBorg: yep | 09:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | just backport it into your ppa :) | 09:04 |
| dupondje | its bugfix only release, so might be usefull to backport it to disco no? | 09:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm to scared to SRU something I don't understand completely | 09:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | dupondje, golang is a black hole for me | 09:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so... I don't know implications wrt archive sanity of stuff built with the previous version | 09:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | as well as ABI issues while looking at the diff | 09:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and disco will be EOL soon, like in some months or so, loong before I can learn that language | 09:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, the question was actually: can we put some hook to launch systemd-resolve --status when failures happen? or a cronjob saving it? or: are you using that as dns daemon or not? | 09:06 |
| Laney | seriously? | 09:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I don't know if you are using systemd to resolve or not... | 09:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I presume you have some DNS server in your lan to translate ftpmaster.internal into a private ip, right? | 09:08 |
| Laney | yes it's using systemd-resolved, but adding a hack like that is not really appropriate | 09:09 |
| Laney | if there's a bug then it should be fixed... | 09:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, I'm not asking to add in the archive... I'm asking to add it in some machine to reproduce and log the issue to debug it | 09:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | or try to see if stop using it helps... | 09:10 |
| Laney | and if you're experiencing the bug, then woohoo! we have someone who can debug | 09:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | that would be *too* easy | 09:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | :) | 09:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | is it possible to install a custom systemd version on some armhf runners with debug code? or isolate some machines from the net and use them for testing purposes? | 09:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | that systemd-resolve bug is something I'm trying to understand why/when happens since a lot, and it is happening on my machine | 09:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | hopefully it is the same, and I presume it happens when I switch network, sometimes I'm connected on the same network via eth and wifi, when I disconnect wifi looks like the routing tables are not updated until I do some arp on the network (hopefully this is what systemd-resolve does) | 09:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I know having many connections on the same lan is not correct, this is something I forget to do (switching off wifi) | 09:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | xnox, do you have systemd merge plans? | 09:18 |
| xnox | yes, i will merge systemd | 09:19 |
| * LocutusOfBorg wornders if something on new systemd will make armhf workers more happy | 09:19 | |
| mwhudson | LocutusOfBorg: sure go ahead with 1.12 | 09:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mwhudson, the changes in gbp.conf are useful or not? | 10:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://patches.ubuntu.com/g/golang-1.12/golang-1.12_1.12.4-1ubuntu1.patch | 10:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | also, the "find -delete *.syso" is not listed in changelog | 10:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I think you should commit them on debian git repo... | 10:14 |
| * LocutusOfBorg golang uploaded | 10:14 | |
| === tinoco_ is now known as tinoco | ||
| === lfaraone_ is now known as lfaraone | ||
| mwhudson | LocutusOfBorg: uhh i merged golang-1.12 already | 10:25 |
| mwhudson | didn't i? | 10:25 |
| mwhudson | LocutusOfBorg: i thought you were talking about moving the default onto 1.12 ... | 10:27 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yep you did I made a mistake, I now uploaded 1.11 merged | 10:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I leave 1.11 default migrate (hopefully on next britney run) and then leave to you the default switch to 1.12 | 10:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | my biggers concern is to kick 1.10 out | 10:29 |
| mwhudson | LocutusOfBorg: the changes in gbp.conf are useful | 10:39 |
| mwhudson | <LocutusOfBorg> also, the "find -delete *.syso" is not listed in changelog | 10:39 |
| mwhudson | sure it is, that's what "Do not distribute un-built from source race detector runtime files" is about | 10:40 |
| mwhudson | i should probably get that change into debian but my inertia for ITP-ing golang-race-detector-runtime seems to be basically infinite | 10:40 |
| mwhudson | LocutusOfBorg: i do the merges from debian via git not mom btw | 10:44 |
| * mwhudson zzz | 10:44 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | mwhudson, do you need a debian sponsor? | 10:46 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I couldn't find the ubuntu branch on debian git, but I might be wrong, and I hope the delta will go away... | 10:47 |
| Wafficus | hi there can anyome help me modify the Ubuntu ISO Tester to solely automate the testing of Lubuntu isos? | 11:47 |
| Wafficus | https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server-iso-testing-dev/ubuntu-server-iso-testing/trunk/view/head:/docs/README.dev | 11:48 |
| Wafficus | if anyone can point me to the specific spot of the docs on how to use altermate isos id appreciate it | 11:48 |
| Wafficus | my email is SBanya@outlook.com if you can help me | 11:49 |
| Wafficus | thanks | 11:49 |
| === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
| === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
| === stgraber_ is now known as stgraber | ||
| sahid | Laney: hello, in autopktest, what is related to the armhf worker? i have difficulty to find that | 14:08 |
| sahid | in my idea that was the arm64 workers but it seems that i'm worng | 14:08 |
| sahid | coreycb: ^ you might have an idea | 14:13 |
| acheronuk | mwhudson: hi. now eoan exists here, https://partner-images.canonical.com/core/eoan/current/ , is there a change of eoan docker images soon? | 14:29 |
| acheronuk | *chance of | 14:29 |
| coreycb | sahid: i'm not sure that i understand the question | 15:17 |
| sahid | coreycb: it's related to this merge request https://code.launchpad.net/~sahid-ferdjaoui/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/366696 | 15:21 |
| obiwahn | hi guys i would like to build a newer binutils for 16.4 so it can be used in travis | 15:39 |
| obiwahn | it would be cool if here is somebody who can provide me with a template and who answers a few questions as they araise | 15:40 |
| doko | oSoMoN: the fonts update was needed because the new version was required in the security pocket | 15:41 |
| oSoMoN | doko, ack, that's what I understood from talking to t_daitx, but the cosmic task in the bug report was irrelevant, right? | 15:42 |
| doko | I assume so | 15:42 |
| coreycb | sahid: ah i see, you've updated the arm64 conf and there's no obvious armhf conf? | 15:46 |
| sahid | coreycb: yep | 15:48 |
| sahid | i was expecting Laney to give me a hint | 15:49 |
| === sarnold_ is now known as sarnold | ||
| rbasak | obiwahn: are you speaking as Travis upstream, or a Travis user? You should just ask your questions - nobody is going to put themselves on the hook for answering if they don't know what the questions are. | 16:49 |
| obiwahn | How do I get the 18.04 biutils sources on 16.04? | 16:59 |
| obiwahn | i know there ist apt-get source | 16:59 |
| obiwahn | Is there a cross release mechanism to get the sources? | 17:00 |
| sarnold | obiwahn: copy the /etc/apt/sources.list to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/bionic.list -- replace all the 'xenial' with 'bionic', then apt-get update && apt-get source binutils/bionic | 17:02 |
| rbasak | obiwahn: the cross release mechanism Ubuntu developers use is "pull-lp-source binutils bionic". pull-lp-source is in the ubuntu-dev-tools package. | 17:29 |
| JohnGavr | hello there | 17:34 |
| JohnGavr | I am coming here with a question about the new kernel | 17:34 |
| JohnGavr | When i stop a video or a music in any client, i hear a bip on the external audio speakers. In other kernels don't do that. | 17:35 |
| obiwahn | thank you - i am just setting up a vm and look how far i get | 17:49 |
| JohnGavr | obiwahn, are you talking to me? | 18:02 |
| Eickmeyer | !support | JohnGavr | 18:02 |
| ubottu | JohnGavr: The official ubuntu support channel is #ubuntu. Please be aware that this channel is for development only. | 18:02 |
| obiwahn | rbasak: I have unsatisfied build deps for binutils. I can proably build it with any other older gcc but what must I do to change the dependencies? Is it ok just to lower the versions in the control file? | 18:21 |
| obiwahn | i think i just try to change files in the binutils dir and build the content with dpkg-buildpackage. | 18:22 |
| obiwahn | oh gosh dpkg-gencontrol|vendor has it to be that complicated:P | 18:37 |
| cjwatson | You shouldn't normally use dpkg-gencontrol manually | 18:37 |
| cjwatson | Changing debian/control is usually all you need to do to change build-deps, unless debian/control is generated from other files in debian/ (which is fairly rare but some packages do it - in that case poke through the rules files under debian/ to find what the actual source file is and change that) | 18:38 |
| obiwahn | cjwatson: What are the correct steps to change the dependencies when creating a backport? | 18:39 |
| cjwatson | Depends wildly | 18:39 |
| cjwatson | I mean most backports don't need to change build-dependencies | 18:39 |
| cjwatson | In the cases that do it's utterly specific to the problem at hand | 18:39 |
| cjwatson | But for general advice on changing build-deps, see my previous remark | 18:39 |
| sarnold | obiwahn: hmm. I wonder, if you actually want bionic on travis's xenial systems, maybe using debootstrap would get you to your desired end result more quickly | 18:43 |
| ddstreet | xnox i see systemd in eoan is still failing boot-smoke due to lp #1825997 do you want me to prep a debdiff for you to include in your next upload or are you already working on it | 19:11 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1825997 in systemd (Ubuntu Eoan) "boot-smoke fails due to running jobs" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1825997 | 19:11 |
| ddstreet | i have a patch ready to fix it, then i think storage is the only failing test left, right? | 19:11 |
| ddstreet | xnox mp for u: https://code.launchpad.net/~ddstreet/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/366857 | 19:20 |
| ddstreet | enjoy | 19:20 |
| pipegeek | hi, folks! was wondering: how does GNOME Software determine which packages to make visible and which ones to hide from search results? | 19:39 |
| obiwahn | Is there a command to install everything that is in a control file. Something like apt-get build-dep but for control files instead of packages | 19:39 |
| pipegeek | and in particular, would it be reasonable to open a feature request bug against the network-manager-.*-gnome packages (or against gnome-software depending on how that works) to request that they be made visible through that interface? | 19:40 |
| pipegeek | those seem like reasonable things for nontechnical end-users to want to be able to install (e.g. "L2TP VPN Support for Gnome") | 19:40 |
| pipegeek | without having to open a terminal to do it | 19:40 |
| pipegeek | never mind! I just realized I can't read | 19:50 |
| pipegeek | it's already there, it's just not listed as a separate package. | 19:50 |
| pipegeek | sorry for the noise :) | 19:51 |
| mwhudson | acheronuk: in short, yes | 21:25 |
| mwhudson | LocutusOfBorg: no, i maintain all this crap in debian too | 21:25 |
| mwhudson | LocutusOfBorg: the ubuntu branches are only in my launchpad git repo, not debian | 21:25 |
| mwhudson | LocutusOfBorg: so it's perfectly reasonable for you not to have found them, now that I remember that fact :) | 21:26 |
| Unit193 | mwhudson: ...If you get bored, could I entice you to look at gocryptfs? (Sorry I'm bugging about this one yet again..) | 21:51 |
| mwhudson | Unit193: uhh as in why is it still in proposed? | 21:58 |
| mwhudson | looks like it depends on the new golang-golang-x-sys | 22:00 |
| mwhudson | golang-go4 maybe needs new grpc? | 22:01 |
| mwhudson | this stuff is all such a mess | 22:01 |
| Unit193 | That's kind of why I asked you, since you seem to be an expert. It got stuck in disco because x-sys needed a retry on arm64 (so I ended up backporting both to a PPA) | 22:02 |
| mwhudson | hmm clearly i need to stop appearing like an expert :) | 22:06 |
| Unit193 | Too late. | 22:06 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!