| mup | PR snapcraft#2550 closed: storeapi: move from details (v1) to info (v2) <Created by sergiusens> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2550> | 01:54 |
|---|---|---|
| mvo | I need a review for the 2.39 PRs | 07:04 |
| pedronis | mvo: I double-checked quickly and approved the backports | 07:22 |
| pedronis | and hi | 07:22 |
| mvo | pedronis: thanks! and good morning :) | 07:25 |
| mup | PR snapd#6814 closed: overlord/corecfg: make expiration of automatic snapshots configurable (4/4) - 2.39 <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6814> | 07:28 |
| mup | PR snapd#6815 closed: snapstate: auto-install snapd when needed (2.39) <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6815> | 07:28 |
| mup | PR snapd#6818 closed: snapshotstate: disable automatic snapshots on core for now <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6818> | 08:11 |
| mvo | pedronis: good news, all PRs for 2.39 are in, there is a travis failure right now that I'm looking at though, not sure if its a fluke or not | 08:31 |
| pedronis | ok | 08:31 |
| mvo | pedronis: do you think 6810 can go in with just one review? its mostly shuffling things around so it seems that is ok(?) | 08:51 |
| pedronis | mvo: I suppose so, a bit your call, it would be good if somebody outside of us was aware of the change | 09:02 |
| mvo | pedronis: yeah, that pushes it to monday but thats ok I think | 09:03 |
| pedronis | I probably will have 3 more PRs today, getting quite close to the core of rereg, and also to your code/PRs | 09:04 |
| mvo | pedronis: great | 09:04 |
| mvo | pedronis: my afternoon will be full of meetings | 09:05 |
| mvo | pedronis: but I hope to spent the morning in a productive way | 09:05 |
| * mvo looks at one build failure in sbuild though | 09:05 | |
| pedronis | yea, I'll try also do some reviewing but yes, most of the meetings I'm also there | 09:06 |
| * mvo nods | 09:06 | |
| pedronis | mvo: it would also be good to land your Remodel PRs because I probably need to touch that code a bit as well soon | 09:10 |
| pedronis | but probably Monday at this point | 09:10 |
| mvo | pedronis: yeah, they need reviews | 09:13 |
| pedronis | mvo: also, for next week but I was reminded that we need undo tests for remodeling and that's there a bug related to queueCommand (using service commands from configure hooks) that affects seeding but will also affects more annyoingly remodel | 09:14 |
| mvo | pedronis: hrm, that sounds annoying | 09:20 |
| pedronis | mvo: slightly rare, but yes annoying, still need to think out to fix it | 09:21 |
| mup | PR snapd#6819 opened: osutil: fix TestReadBuildGo test in sbuild <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6819> | 09:22 |
| pedronis | mvo: the issue is that as it is queueCommand puts stuff after mark-seeded, and now set-model | 09:22 |
| pedronis | which relates to lanes and undo and how we use them or not | 09:23 |
| pedronis | as well | 09:23 |
| pedronis | bit of a tangle | 09:23 |
| mup | PR snapd#6820 opened: snap-confine: improve error when running on a not /home homedir <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6820> | 09:28 |
| pedronis | mvo: let me know when you have the new changelog for 2.39 since pre1 | 09:33 |
| mup | PR snapd#6821 opened: many: make which store to use contextual <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6821> | 09:37 |
| mvo | pedronis: mailed it to you | 09:39 |
| pedronis | thx, opening one more PR and then will look at it | 09:40 |
| mvo | pedronis: ok, I prepare the release but will wait for you with this then | 09:42 |
| mvo | pedronis: test building in the ppa now to ensure we have no build failures in sbuild | 09:42 |
| pedronis | mvo: looks as expected but aren't we missing the PR by maciej about runuser and selinux and snapshots? | 09:46 |
| pedronis | mvo: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6748 | 09:48 |
| mup | PR #6748: data/selinux: tweak the policy for runuser and s-c, interpret audit entries <SELinux> <Created by bboozzoo> <Merged by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6748> | 09:48 |
| pedronis | or is the changelong missing some bits | 09:49 |
| pedronis | it was tagged 2.39 | 09:50 |
| pedronis | mvo: mmh, same question about #6802 | 09:54 |
| pedronis | mvo: did we forget some backports? | 09:54 |
| mup | PR #6802: overlord/ifacestate: update static attributes of "content" interface <⚠ Critical> <Created by stolowski> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6802> | 09:54 |
| mvo | pedronis: let me double check | 09:57 |
| mvo | pedronis: 6802 is in (unless I miss something), b2c4893 is there in 2.39 | 09:58 |
| mvo | pedronis: but the selinux is missing, thanks for this one | 09:58 |
| pedronis | mvo: it's interesting that 6802 is not in the changelog | 10:00 |
| pedronis | are we dropping some stuff? | 10:00 |
| pedronis | but yes, I see it in the branch | 10:00 |
| mvo | pedronis: maybe a bug in the script, let me debug | 10:00 |
| mup | PR snapd#6822 opened: overlord/devicestate: introduce registrationContext <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6822> | 10:05 |
| mvo | pedronis: found the issue, the commit is malformated, we usually have pattern: "cmd,snapd: what changed" | 10:09 |
| mvo | pedronis: this one is missing that | 10:09 |
| mvo | pedronis: I will add it manually and think a bit more about if the script should warn about those | 10:10 |
| pedronis | mvo: the PR looked right https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6802 so it was are intefact of merging or the backport | 10:10 |
| mup | PR #6802: overlord/ifacestate: update static attributes of "content" interface <⚠ Critical> <Created by stolowski> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6802> | 10:11 |
| mvo | pedronis: oh, indeed | 10:11 |
| niemeyer | cmatsuoka: Review is in.. just a couple of last points | 10:11 |
| mvo | pedronis: I updated the changelog manually now and once travis is green I will upload and push to beta | 10:30 |
| mup | PR snapd#6823 opened: [RFC] packaging: build empty package on powerpc <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6823> | 11:04 |
| mvo | pedronis: we *may* want 6823 for 2.39, I will try to get opinions from foundations | 11:10 |
| mvo | pedronis: it will mostly make their processes easier as all arches will have packages | 11:10 |
| * mvo gets lunch first | 11:10 | |
| pedronis | mvo: happy to do what they prefer there | 11:11 |
| mvo | pedronis: yeah, I had the impression this is good for them but its a hack so I want to confirm first | 11:11 |
| cmatsuoka | niemeyer: thanks! | 11:21 |
| pedronis | mvo: I did a bit of reviewing | 11:44 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#2542 closed: meta: Validate common ID against appstream metadata <Created by cmatsuoka> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2542> | 11:53 |
| === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
| petan | how can I reset release number back to ^ ? | 12:46 |
| petan | I changed candidate and beta in past to certain number, I don't want that anymore, I want them to fall back to release number as they do by default | 12:47 |
| petan | but no idea how to reset it back to original state | 12:47 |
| pedronis | petan: maybe you mean "snapcraft close candidate beta", after that they will follow stable | 12:52 |
| pedronis | sorry "snapcraft close <snap-name>..." | 12:53 |
| === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
| mup | PR snapd#6824 opened: release: 2.39 <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6824> | 13:52 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#2551 opened: project: read local plugins from build-aux <Created by cmatsuoka> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2551> | 13:59 |
| * cachio afk | 14:09 | |
| mvo | kenvandine: beta has the fix now (version is still 2.39~rc1 but will become 2.39 in some minutes) | 14:28 |
| kenvandine | mvo: thanks | 14:29 |
| mvo | cachio: core 2.39 is in the beta channel now | 14:37 |
| cachio | mvo, starting validation | 15:01 |
| cachio | thanks | 15:01 |
| mvo | cachio: thank you! | 15:06 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#2552 opened: release: 3.4.1 <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2552> | 15:11 |
| clobrano | hi! I have some problems installing snapcraft for development after upgrade to 19.04, specifically installing python-apt I got a huge error message https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/tjQM3HJrrg/ | 15:13 |
| clobrano | I meant, installing snapcraft dependencies | 15:13 |
| kenvandine | mvo: confirmed it seems to fix the issue, thanks! | 15:23 |
| sergiusens | clobrano: you need to develop inside a 16.04 environment, easiest way is to "lxc launch ubuntu:16.04" and setup in there | 15:27 |
| sergiusens | you would be using the incorrect python version if not | 15:27 |
| mvo | kenvandine: \o/ | 15:39 |
| mvo | kenvandine: thanks for double checking | 15:39 |
| nemosupremo | Hi, I'm trying to understand the process of building ubuntu-core images. Some of the software I need on the image can't be packaged into a snap, as well as I want to copy some configuration files directly on the device itself. Is there a way I can run a shell script before the image is created? | 15:41 |
| cachio | mvo, changelog was not generated here https://people.canonical.com/~mvo/core-changes/html/beta/ | 15:45 |
| mvo | cachio: looking | 15:48 |
| mvo | cachio: should be good now | 15:56 |
| cachio | mvo, thanks | 15:57 |
| clobrano | sergiusens: oh, I missed this important info :D, thanks! | 16:04 |
| jdstrand | niemeyer: hey, fyi https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6681#issuecomment-489150666 | 16:06 |
| mup | PR #6681: many: support system-users for 'daemon' user <Complex> <Created by jdstrand> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6681> | 16:06 |
| jdstrand | joeubuntu: fyi, mvo changed ^ that to be in 2.40, not 2.39, so it is officially out for sprint | 16:08 |
| jdstrand | mvo: since you did that, there is no rush in getting libseccomp 2.4.1 in core/core18 or snapd | 16:09 |
| joeubuntu | thanks for the heads up jdstrand | 16:10 |
| jdstrand | testing is so far good with 2.4.1, we'll likely have it in a security update sometime after the sprint | 16:10 |
| jdstrand | at which point, the core, core18 and snapd snaps will just have it | 16:10 |
| mvo | jdstrand: yeah, sorry, this one was a tough call | 16:13 |
| jdstrand | mvo: np. that feature was plaugued with difficulty. I'm surprised we are as far along as we are :) | 16:14 |
| jdstrand | mvo: so many steps back before we could be where we are today | 16:14 |
| joeubuntu | mvo jdstrand I'd rather do it right then rush it and introduce an error. | 16:15 |
| wis | ogra, is there a way for core to connect a different wifi network other than the console-conf(igured) one on first boot? | 16:24 |
| wis | I am following the docs.ubuntu.com/core/en/stacks/network/network-manager/docs/configure-wifi-connections | 16:24 |
| wis | nmcli r wifi on is not listing the WiFi network i'm connected to | 16:25 |
| wis | `nmcli d wifi list` * I meant to paste ^ | 16:27 |
| tooijar | Do 'prepare' and 'install' properties work as described here https://docs.snapcraft.io/snapcraft-parts-metadata | 17:05 |
| tooijar | I'm getting "Additional properties are not allowed" | 17:05 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#2553 opened: ci: use --destructive-mode to build snap in travis <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2553> | 17:36 |
| mup | PR snapd#6641 closed: snap-gdb-shim: switch to the SUDO_UID when available <Created by mvo5> <Closed by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6641> | 18:46 |
| mup | PR snapd#6825 opened: cmd: rework `snap run --gdb` to work as user <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6825> | 18:52 |
| mup | PR snapd#6826 opened: tests: enable tests on centos 7 again <Created by sergiocazzolato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6826> | 18:55 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#2554 opened: release: 3.4.1 <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2554> | 19:06 |
| om26er | Hi! Are there instructions somewhere on how to build a snap on Travis ? | 19:20 |
| om26er | I found these instruction https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/deployment/snaps/ but they seem to be for deploy only | 19:21 |
| tooijar | To answer my own question, for anyone who might be curious..."prepare" and "install" do NOT work as described at https://docs.snapcraft.io/snapcraft-parts-metadata | 19:29 |
| tooijar | They are deprecated https://docs.snapcraft.io/t/deprecation-notices/8396 | 19:30 |
| tooijar | I submitted a request for docs update https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/snapcraft-parts-metadata/8336/6 | 19:30 |
| AlexPortable | Can someone help me creating a wine snap? | 20:19 |
| AlexPortable | https://github.com/mmtrt/wine-platform | 20:19 |
| AlexPortable | I currently found this, but how do I merge my wine installation with this snap? | 20:19 |
| AlexPortable | and how can i set a weekly refresh for my snaps? | 20:45 |
| mup | PR snapd#6827 opened: tests: fix "Placeholer" is a misspelling of "Placeholder" issue <Created by sergiocazzolato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6827> | 21:00 |
| zyga | AlexPortable: hey, please come back on Monday for more help but you can probably find examples on the forum. Look for snap set core refresh.schedule please. | 21:29 |
| AlexPortable | what is the difference between system refresh.timer and core refresh.schedule ? | 21:35 |
| === tomreyn_ is now known as tomreyn | ||
| luke-jr | How do I get snapcraft installed without a 4.4 kernel? | 23:27 |
| luke-jr | ugh, and it wants root too? | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!