[01:54] <mup> PR snapcraft#2550 closed: storeapi: move from details (v1) to info (v2) <Created by sergiusens> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2550>
[07:04] <mvo> I need a review for the 2.39 PRs
[07:22] <pedronis> mvo: I double-checked quickly and approved the backports
[07:22] <pedronis> and hi
[07:25] <mvo> pedronis: thanks! and good morning :)
[07:28] <mup> PR snapd#6814 closed: overlord/corecfg: make expiration of automatic snapshots configurable (4/4) - 2.39 <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6814>
[07:28] <mup> PR snapd#6815 closed: snapstate: auto-install snapd when needed (2.39) <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6815>
[08:11] <mup> PR snapd#6818 closed: snapshotstate: disable automatic snapshots on core for now <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6818>
[08:31] <mvo> pedronis: good news, all PRs for 2.39 are in, there is a travis failure right now that I'm looking at though, not sure if its a fluke or not
[08:31] <pedronis> ok
[08:51] <mvo> pedronis: do you think 6810 can go in with just one review? its mostly shuffling things around so it seems that is ok(?)
[09:02] <pedronis> mvo: I suppose so, a bit your call, it would be good if somebody outside of us was aware of the change
[09:03] <mvo> pedronis: yeah, that pushes it to monday but thats ok I think
[09:04] <pedronis> I probably will have 3 more PRs today, getting quite close to the core of rereg, and also to your code/PRs
[09:04] <mvo> pedronis: great
[09:05] <mvo> pedronis: my afternoon will be full of meetings
[09:05] <mvo> pedronis: but I hope to spent the morning in a productive way
[09:05]  * mvo looks at one build failure in sbuild though
[09:06] <pedronis> yea, I'll try also do some reviewing but yes, most of the meetings I'm also there
[09:06]  * mvo nods
[09:10] <pedronis> mvo: it would also be good to land your Remodel PRs because I probably need to touch that code a bit as well soon
[09:10] <pedronis> but probably Monday at this point
[09:13] <mvo> pedronis: yeah, they need reviews
[09:14] <pedronis> mvo: also, for next week but I was reminded that we need undo tests for remodeling and that's there a bug related to queueCommand (using service commands from configure hooks) that affects seeding but will also affects more annyoingly remodel
[09:20] <mvo> pedronis: hrm, that sounds annoying
[09:21] <pedronis> mvo: slightly rare, but yes annoying, still need to think out to fix it
[09:22] <mup> PR snapd#6819 opened: osutil: fix TestReadBuildGo test in sbuild <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6819>
[09:22] <pedronis> mvo: the issue is that as it is queueCommand puts stuff after mark-seeded, and now set-model
[09:23] <pedronis> which relates to lanes and undo and how we use them or not
[09:23] <pedronis> as well
[09:23] <pedronis> bit of a tangle
[09:28] <mup> PR snapd#6820 opened: snap-confine: improve error when running on a not /home homedir <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6820>
[09:33] <pedronis> mvo: let me know when you have the new changelog for 2.39 since pre1
[09:37] <mup> PR snapd#6821 opened: many: make which store to use contextual  <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6821>
[09:39] <mvo> pedronis: mailed it to you
[09:40] <pedronis> thx, opening one more PR and then will look at it
[09:42] <mvo> pedronis: ok, I prepare the release but will wait for you with this then
[09:42] <mvo> pedronis: test building in the ppa now to ensure we have no build failures in sbuild
[09:46] <pedronis> mvo: looks as expected but aren't we missing the PR by maciej about runuser and selinux and snapshots?
[09:48] <pedronis> mvo: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6748
[09:48] <mup> PR #6748: data/selinux: tweak the policy for runuser and s-c, interpret audit entries <SELinux> <Created by bboozzoo> <Merged by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6748>
[09:49] <pedronis> or is the changelong missing some bits
[09:50] <pedronis> it was tagged 2.39
[09:54] <pedronis> mvo: mmh, same question about #6802
[09:54] <pedronis> mvo: did we forget some backports?
[09:54] <mup> PR #6802: overlord/ifacestate: update static attributes of "content" interface <⚠ Critical> <Created by stolowski> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6802>
[09:57] <mvo> pedronis: let me double check
[09:58] <mvo> pedronis: 6802 is in (unless I miss something), b2c4893 is there in 2.39
[09:58] <mvo> pedronis: but the selinux is missing, thanks for this one
[10:00] <pedronis> mvo: it's interesting that 6802 is not in the changelog
[10:00] <pedronis> are we dropping some stuff?
[10:00] <pedronis> but yes, I see it in the branch
[10:00] <mvo> pedronis: maybe a bug in the script, let me debug
[10:05] <mup> PR snapd#6822 opened: overlord/devicestate: introduce registrationContext <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6822>
[10:09] <mvo> pedronis: found the issue, the commit is malformated, we usually have pattern: "cmd,snapd: what changed"
[10:09] <mvo> pedronis: this one is missing that
[10:10] <mvo> pedronis: I will add it manually and think a bit more about if the script should warn about those
[10:10] <pedronis> mvo: the PR looked right https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6802 so it was are intefact of merging or the backport
[10:11] <mup> PR #6802: overlord/ifacestate: update static attributes of "content" interface <⚠ Critical> <Created by stolowski> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6802>
[10:11] <mvo> pedronis: oh, indeed
[10:11] <niemeyer> cmatsuoka: Review is in.. just a couple of last points
[10:30] <mvo> pedronis: I updated the changelog manually now and once travis is green I will upload and push to beta
[11:04] <mup> PR snapd#6823 opened: [RFC] packaging: build empty package on powerpc <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6823>
[11:10] <mvo> pedronis: we *may* want 6823 for 2.39, I will try to get opinions from foundations
[11:10] <mvo> pedronis: it will mostly make their processes easier as all arches will have packages
[11:10]  * mvo gets lunch first
[11:11] <pedronis> mvo: happy to do what they prefer there
[11:11] <mvo> pedronis: yeah, I had the impression this is good for them but its a hack so I want to confirm first
[11:21] <cmatsuoka> niemeyer: thanks!
[11:44] <pedronis> mvo: I did a bit of reviewing
[11:53] <mup> PR snapcraft#2542 closed: meta: Validate common ID against appstream metadata <Created by cmatsuoka> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2542>
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch
[12:46] <petan> how can I reset release number back to ^ ?
[12:47] <petan> I changed candidate and beta in past to certain number, I don't want that anymore, I want them to fall back to release number as they do by default
[12:47] <petan> but no idea how to reset it back to original state
[12:52] <pedronis> petan: maybe you mean  "snapcraft close candidate beta",  after that they will follow stable
[12:53] <pedronis> sorry "snapcraft close <snap-name>..."
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab
[13:52] <mup> PR snapd#6824 opened: release: 2.39 <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6824>
[13:59] <mup> PR snapcraft#2551 opened: project: read local plugins from build-aux <Created by cmatsuoka> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2551>
[14:09]  * cachio afk
[14:28] <mvo> kenvandine: beta has the fix now (version is still 2.39~rc1 but will become 2.39 in some minutes)
[14:29] <kenvandine> mvo: thanks
[14:37] <mvo> cachio: core 2.39 is in the beta channel now
[15:01] <cachio> mvo, starting validation
[15:01] <cachio> thanks
[15:06] <mvo> cachio: thank you!
[15:11] <mup> PR snapcraft#2552 opened: release: 3.4.1 <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2552>
[15:13] <clobrano> hi! I have some problems installing snapcraft for development after upgrade to 19.04, specifically installing python-apt I got a huge error message https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/tjQM3HJrrg/
[15:13] <clobrano> I meant, installing snapcraft dependencies
[15:23] <kenvandine> mvo: confirmed it seems to fix the issue, thanks!
[15:27] <sergiusens> clobrano: you need to develop inside a 16.04 environment, easiest way is to "lxc launch ubuntu:16.04" and setup in there
[15:27] <sergiusens> you would be using the incorrect python version if not
[15:39] <mvo> kenvandine: \o/
[15:39] <mvo> kenvandine: thanks for double checking
[15:41] <nemosupremo> Hi, I'm trying to understand the process of building ubuntu-core images. Some of the software I need on the image can't be packaged into a snap, as well as I want to copy some configuration files directly on the device itself. Is there a way I can run a shell script before the image is created?
[15:45] <cachio> mvo, changelog was not generated here https://people.canonical.com/~mvo/core-changes/html/beta/
[15:48] <mvo> cachio: looking
[15:56] <mvo> cachio: should be good now
[15:57] <cachio> mvo, thanks
[16:04] <clobrano> sergiusens: oh, I missed this important info :D, thanks!
[16:06] <jdstrand> niemeyer: hey, fyi https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6681#issuecomment-489150666
[16:06] <mup> PR #6681: many: support system-users for 'daemon' user <Complex> <Created by jdstrand> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6681>
[16:08] <jdstrand> joeubuntu: fyi, mvo changed ^ that to be in 2.40, not 2.39, so it is officially out for sprint
[16:09] <jdstrand> mvo: since you did that, there is no rush in getting libseccomp 2.4.1 in core/core18 or snapd
[16:10] <joeubuntu> thanks for the heads up jdstrand
[16:10] <jdstrand> testing is so far good with 2.4.1, we'll likely have it in a security update sometime after the sprint
[16:10] <jdstrand> at which point, the core, core18 and snapd snaps will just have it
[16:13] <mvo> jdstrand: yeah, sorry, this one was a tough call
[16:14] <jdstrand> mvo: np. that feature was plaugued with difficulty. I'm surprised we are as far along as we are :)
[16:14] <jdstrand> mvo: so many steps back before we could be where we are today
[16:15] <joeubuntu> mvo jdstrand I'd rather do it right then rush it and introduce an error.
[16:24] <wis> ogra, is there a way for core to connect a different wifi network other than the console-conf(igured) one on first boot?
[16:24] <wis> I am following the docs.ubuntu.com/core/en/stacks/network/network-manager/docs/configure-wifi-connections
[16:25] <wis> nmcli r wifi on is not listing the WiFi network i'm connected to
[16:27] <wis> `nmcli d wifi list` * I meant to paste ^
[17:05] <tooijar> Do 'prepare' and 'install' properties work as described here https://docs.snapcraft.io/snapcraft-parts-metadata
[17:05] <tooijar> I'm getting "Additional properties are not allowed"
[17:36] <mup> PR snapcraft#2553 opened: ci: use --destructive-mode to build snap in travis <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2553>
[18:46] <mup> PR snapd#6641 closed: snap-gdb-shim: switch to the SUDO_UID when available <Created by mvo5> <Closed by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6641>
[18:52] <mup> PR snapd#6825 opened: cmd: rework `snap run --gdb` to work as user <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6825>
[18:55] <mup> PR snapd#6826 opened: tests: enable tests on centos 7 again <Created by sergiocazzolato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6826>
[19:06] <mup> PR snapcraft#2554 opened: release: 3.4.1 <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2554>
[19:20] <om26er> Hi! Are there instructions somewhere on how to build a snap on Travis ?
[19:21] <om26er> I found these instruction https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/deployment/snaps/ but they seem to be for deploy only
[19:29] <tooijar> To answer my own question, for anyone who might be curious..."prepare" and "install" do NOT work as described at https://docs.snapcraft.io/snapcraft-parts-metadata
[19:30] <tooijar> They are deprecated https://docs.snapcraft.io/t/deprecation-notices/8396
[19:30] <tooijar> I submitted a request for docs update https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/snapcraft-parts-metadata/8336/6
[20:19] <AlexPortable> Can someone help me creating a wine snap?
[20:19] <AlexPortable> https://github.com/mmtrt/wine-platform
[20:19] <AlexPortable> I currently found this, but how do I merge my wine installation with this snap?
[20:45] <AlexPortable> and how can i set a weekly refresh for my snaps?
[21:00] <mup> PR snapd#6827 opened: tests: fix "Placeholer" is a misspelling of "Placeholder" issue <Created by sergiocazzolato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/6827>
[21:29] <zyga> AlexPortable: hey, please come back on Monday for more help but you can probably find examples on the forum. Look for snap set core refresh.schedule please.
[21:35] <AlexPortable> what is the difference between system refresh.timer and core refresh.schedule ?
=== tomreyn_ is now known as tomreyn
[23:27] <luke-jr> How do I get snapcraft installed without a 4.4 kernel?
[23:59] <luke-jr> ugh, and it wants root too?