[04:42] <obiwahn> sarnold: At the moment a build takes about 3 minutes I think deboostrap is a bit much? If creating a package turns out to be too hard I can just create the binaries and copy them. But I will continue later today.
[08:29] <oSoMoN> doko, good morning! you mentioned a while back that the libreoffice java vendor patches will need to be backported to stable releases, does that include xenial?
[08:31] <oSoMoN> tdaitx, you might have the answer to that question? ^
[09:06] <Laney> sahid: it's the worker-lxd.conf
[09:23] <sahid> Laney: thanks I just updated the merge request
[11:02] <doko> oSoMoN: no, backed that out from the backports. so you can backport them, and once they are, I can apply those to the openjdk backport as well
[11:20] <marcustomlinson> hey doko, I'll be doing the backporting. I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. Xenial is backed out of the backports? So we're only concerned with Bionic for this?
[11:41] <oSoMoN> doko, yeah, the question was rather: will you be backporting openjdk to xenial too, or only bionic?
[12:06] <doko> oSoMoN, marcustomlinson: there probably are PPA builds, nothing in the distro. but if you backport this change, I can enable it even for the ppa builds
[12:06] <doko> and I'm waiting with the bionic backport until you have fixed that
[12:07] <marcustomlinson> alright, I'm in the process of SRU'ing both xenial and bionic so I might as well include it in both
[12:07] <doko> ok, just let me know about the versions, and I'll add appropriate breaks
[12:14] <marcustomlinson> doko: it'll be 1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.5, and 1:5.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu1~xenial7
[13:46] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, hello, can you please do some merges with your name on it? e.g. python-pyvmomi should be syncd, right? there is something that is build-depending on stuff that needs merging...
[13:48] <tsimonq2> @pilot in
[13:48] <tsimonq2> ohai :)
[13:49] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg, ack.
[13:49] <LocutusOfBorg> lovely thanks! I see for some of them you are TIL because of "no change rebuild", I presume you might not care, right?
[13:50]  * LocutusOfBorg did a generic question, not a specific one, related to everybody that has a merge
[13:50] <tsimonq2> seb128: Bug 1821410 might interest you as a "polish then upload" bug.
[13:50] <LocutusOfBorg> I think no-change rebuilds should not be listed by DOM, only the last "meaningful upload" should be considered
[13:51] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: Please remember to unsubscribe sponsors when you sponsor packages :) bug 1824560 is one I just looked at
[13:52] <seb128> tsimonq2, thank, it would be nice to have, I'm unsure I've the slot to work on non default components atm so if someone can beat me into sponsoring please do
[13:52] <LocutusOfBorg> tsimonq2, do I have privileges to do that?
[13:52] <tsimonq2> seb128: Sounds good, just needs the SRU bug template.
[13:53] <LocutusOfBorg> yes I have them
[13:53] <LocutusOfBorg> ack then
[13:53] <tsimonq2> cool :)
[13:53] <seb128> tsimonq2, it's a bit of a shame that you unsubscribed sponsors, it pretty much garantee that we are going to forget about it if the contributor doesn't do the paperwork/subscribe the team back
[13:54] <tsimonq2> seb128: Yeah, like you said on the ML, ideally we'd have a separate page for it. ;?
[13:54] <tsimonq2> *:/
[13:55] <tsimonq2> Now that we have a public log though, I'll make a note to follow up on this bug once that is implemented.
[13:55] <seb128> tsimonq2, that would be one way, the other would be to do as well did until now and keep sponsors subscribed
[13:55] <seb128> it makes some "noise" on the list but I think it's better to have noise than loose contributions
[13:56] <tsimonq2> I'm certainly not opposed to it.
[14:00] <LocutusOfBorg> sponsored LP #1821130
[14:06] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: ack
[14:06] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: If you're working on sponsoring as well, perhaps you should @pilot in ;)
[14:08] <tsimonq2> oSoMoN: Hi, did you plan on driving bug 1827451?
[14:08] <tsimonq2> Otherwise, that's the queue :)
[14:09] <oSoMoN> tsimonq2, I'm handing over maintenance of libreoffice to marcustomlinson, he will drive it
[14:10] <tsimonq2> Sounds good, thanks!
[14:10] <LocutusOfBorg> tsimonq2, I don't want to pilot in, I just did three of them :)
[14:10] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: ;D
[14:10] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't have a slot
[14:12] <tsimonq2> ok
[14:14] <tsimonq2> @pilot out
[14:14] <tsimonq2> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2019-May/040678.html
[15:11] <seb128> doko, bug #1827499 unsure how important the issue is but since the description mentions some memory corruption it might be worth checking that it's not potentially a security issue
[15:12] <seb128> (it's fixed in 5.0/disco but not bionic)
[22:23] <vorlon> jbicha: did you see my ping before questioning the utility of gparted's delta?