[11:56] <sil2100> oSoMoN: hey! Could LP: #1822839 be SRUified? It's included in the changelog of the libreoffice SRU
[11:56] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1822839 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic) "LibreOffice doesn't detect JVM because of unexpected java.vendor property value" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1822839
[12:03] <oSoMoN> sil2100, yes, of course! marcustomlinson, can you update the description of the bug to make it SRU-compliant ?
=== jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand
[12:07] <marcustomlinson> sil2100, oSoMoN: sure, bank holiday today though, will do tomorrow
[12:17] <sil2100> marcustomlinson, oSoMoN: thanks guys o/
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab
[14:26] <Eickmeyer> Does anybody know if there is a reason that exfat-fuse isn't included by default? The question came up in #ubuntustudio-devel as to if we should include it in the future.
[14:30] <cjwatson> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exfat-utils/+bug/1649537
[14:30] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1649537 in fuse-exfat (Ubuntu) "[MIR] exfat-utils and fuse-exfat" [Undecided,Won't fix]
[14:40] <Eickmeyer> cjwatson: Thanks!
[18:01] <tsimonq2> rbasak, bdmurray: What's the SRU team stance on flavors SRUing their metapackage to add a dependency?
[18:01] <tsimonq2> Does that follow the same process and such?
[18:03] <bdmurray> yes
[18:03] <tsimonq2> Sounds good, thanks.
[18:20] <Eickmeyer> Still looking for someone to put on their MOTU hat to sponsor this guy: #1827288
[18:20] <Eickmeyer> bug 1827288
[18:20] <ubottu> bug 1827288 in Ubuntu Studio "[Needs Packaging] LSP-Plugins for Eoan" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1827288
=== led_dark_2 is now known as led_dark_1
=== joedborg_ is now known as joedborg
=== jamespage_ is now known as jamespage
=== michagogo_ is now known as michagogo
=== gusnan_ is now known as gusnan