=== pavlushka is now known as Guest54570 === pavlushka_ is now known as pavlushka === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand [14:59] o/ [15:02] o/ [15:02] from what I can see no applicant today. [15:03] Yeah, we just have the 2 carried-over action items to touch-base on [15:04] yeah do we start a meeting anyway ? [15:04] My action for APAC is waiting on the original APAC requester [15:04] hm, we usually wait for quorum when starting the meeting, but that's only relevant for when voting is required [15:05] tsimonq2 doesn't seem to be around for his action item as well [15:05] So I guess we'll be carrying them over [15:05] All the other action items are done, so yay [15:05] I'm around, but alas, with no completed action item :( [15:06] ok, I guess we are done then ? ;) [15:06] tsimonq2: no worries! Hope you'll find some time for that - remember, it's enough if you just have some base we can all chip in on [15:06] I'd say we're done, but let's stick around here in case anyone comes with some DMB-related request [15:07] I like treating DMB meetings as 'time when we're available for the community' [15:07] (I mean, we're available always, but here we're specifically for that ;p) [15:07] sil2100, make sense [15:16] sil2100 slashd tsimonq2 or any other dmb member, my application is sched for next mtg; if you have any requests for info for me to gather before the mtg, please let me know at your convenience (or now, if you have something now) [15:18] ddstreet, I won't be able to attend next meeting on May 20th, on my side I worked enough with you to have my opinion about your work. I'll make sure the dmb get my vote pre-next mtg. [15:18] so my absence won't be a blocker for you [15:23] slashd thnx [15:24] Here's my recommendation : [15:24] - set yourself as patch pilot for 1 or 2 days [15:24] it's low traffic really low [15:24] - http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/ [15:24] fix something FTBFS [15:24] again it's up to you, but I think it might help [15:24] more 'upload' won't satisfy them I'm afraid [15:25] there must be something in the list that is not super time consuming if you want to have a look [15:26] just as a heads up SOMETIME before the end of the month (next week or two) I intend to file my application for Core Dev. If you need any requests for info you need from me, let me know now or after I post the item to the agenda. (just wanted to give a heads up about it) [15:26] aaaa. sorry, I thought I was on, but my connection was dead [15:27] (work schedule is chaotic evil with interrupting my ability to get the application filed :P) [15:28] ddstreet, try to expand your work outside more 'upload' only if possible, show that you can also handle other coredev task basically. [15:28] teward: ok o/ [15:35] sil2100, cyphermox, tsimonq2 : did we establish a list of thing we would like ddstreet to do before he re-apply for coredev (beside more upload) I know tsimonq2 is working on a document but meanwhile can we help ddstreet to reach its objective ? [15:38] slashd: set yourself as patch pilot for 1 or 2 days> That seems to me to be a bit of a catch 22. [15:39] Of course, recommendations can be made about what to do, and triage can be done, but a lot of it is, well, sponsoring. [15:39] not that I know. the story for applications is pretty much "do work", where that's ftbfs fixes, etc. [15:39] Since we're at that point in the cycle, I would also recommend merges from Debian. [15:39] cyphermox: +1 [15:40] tsimonq2, ddstreet did a few merge already from what I can remember [15:40] As was said before, we're not looking for a set amount of uploads. We're looking to see that you have demonstrated skill in a wide variety of tasks. [15:40] slashd: Ah, got it. [15:40] tsimonq2, right this is why i put focus on not only more uploads, ddstreet already showed his skill in the upload area imho [15:41] tsimonq2, remember ddstreet is already a sponsor in stable release, so he can help as patch pilot for stable release at least. [15:42] is that something that would carry any weight at all in my coredev application? sponsoring to sru releases? [15:42] i was under the impression it would not [15:42] slashd: Ohh, got it. [15:42] tsimonq2, ack [15:42] ddstreet: Yes and no. [15:43] well that's not ambiguous xD [15:43] You should have devel uploads to supplement your SRUs, but I would say that if you can demonstrate your skill that way, that's fine. [15:43] Sorry ;) [15:48] tsimonq2, I think he did a decent amount of devel upload in disco, and will continue in eoan : https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu-sponsorships.cgi?render=html&sponsor=&sponsor_search=name&sponsoree=Dan+Streetman&sponsoree_search=name I don't think devel upload is an issue for ddstreet [15:48] we can have a wider discussion next mtg, but my goal is more that provide reasonnable goal for him to succeed [15:49] s/that/to ^ [15:49] ok [15:52] this is why I have suggested patch pilot, and FTBFS situation, (he already did merge (for vlan) iirc and decent amount of devel uploads imho). [16:03] ddstreet, so bottom line ddstreet continue to do what you are doing, and if you can show us other things such as FTBFS it won't hurt your next application I guess, that's what I can think of and seem to come out from the discussion so far, as you already did other proposal (merge, devel uploads, ...) hope it helps a little bit to prepare you for next mtg [16:03] slashd thnx === jamespage_ is now known as jamespage