[04:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-konsorten-go-windows-terminal-sequences [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.2-1]
[04:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dogtag-pki [source] (eoan-proposed) [10.6.10-0ubuntu1]
[04:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dogtag-pki [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [10.6.10-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dogtag-pki [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [10.6.10-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dogtag-pki [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [10.6.10-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dogtag-pki [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [10.6.10-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dogtag-pki [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [10.6.10-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dogtag-pki [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [10.6.10-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dogtag-pki [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [10.6.10-0ubuntu1]
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dogtag-pki [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [10.6.10-0ubuntu1]
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dogtag-pki [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [10.6.10-0ubuntu1]
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dogtag-pki [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [10.6.10-0ubuntu1]
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dogtag-pki [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [10.6.10-0ubuntu1]
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dogtag-pki [i386] (eoan-proposed) [10.6.10-0ubuntu1]
[09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (disco-proposed/main) [1.8.0 => 1.8.1] (core)
[10:22] <cpaelzer> Hi, current eoan component mismatch on rdma-core is already covered by MIR https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rdma-core/+bug/1732892 - I outlined in an update (comment #27) what is needed and why it should be ok
[10:22] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1732892 in rdma-core (Ubuntu) "[MIR] 18.04 rdma-core as replacement for older ibverbs code" [Undecided,Fix released]
[10:23] <cpaelzer> let me know if there is anything preventing that from being promoted ^^
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-apt [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.7.1]
[10:59] <LocutusOfBorg> ahasenack, I did some paperwork for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kronosnet/+bug/1811139
[10:59] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1811139 in kronosnet (Ubuntu) "[MIR] kronosnet" [Undecided,New]
[10:59] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm doing the corosync/pacemaker merge in bileto
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-apt [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.4]
[11:08] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, good morning, I really would like to land this ticket soon https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3712/+packages
[11:08] <LocutusOfBorg> I did a lot of work in the last few days on that
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-apt (xenial-proposed/main) [1.1.0~beta1ubuntu0.16.04.3 => 1.1.0~beta1ubuntu0.16.04.4] (core)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-apt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.0~beta1ubuntu0.16.04.4]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-apt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.0~beta1ubuntu0.16.04.4]
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openjdk-lts [source] (disco-proposed) [11.0.3+7-2ubuntu1]
[11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-glance-store [source] (disco-proposed) [0.28.0-0ubuntu1.1]
[12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (disco-proposed) [3.32.1-2ubuntu1~19.04.1]
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (disco-proposed) [3.32.1-1ubuntu1~19.04.1]
[12:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vte2.91 [source] (disco-proposed) [0.56.2-1ubuntu1~19.04.1]
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1044.48] (kernel)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1044.48]
[13:31] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm librte-pmd-mlx4-18.11/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: rdma-core
[13:31] <LocutusOfBorg> what?
[13:32] <LocutusOfBorg> this is funny :p src:rdma-core is in main, and binary:rdma-core is in universe... can we please have it propmoted?
[13:53] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: done
[13:54] <LocutusOfBorg> coreycb, I'm doing sbd/pacemaker/dlm/crmsh updates/merges in bileto https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3712
[13:55] <LocutusOfBorg> can you help trying them and see if everything works as expected? thanks!
[13:55] <LocutusOfBorg> I really would like to end that bd-uninstallability nightmare
[13:55]  * LocutusOfBorg thanks cjwatson :)
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups [source] (disco-proposed) [2.2.10-4ubuntu1]
[14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.8-5ubuntu1.3]
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.7-1ubuntu2.5]
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.1.3-4ubuntu0.8]
[14:11] <ahasenack> LocutusOfBorg: ok, thanks! Do you have a personal interest in corosync/pacemaker, or are you just annoyed that it's stuck in migration for so long?
[14:11] <ahasenack> we planned to tackle the ha stack this cycle, bring it up to date
[14:19] <LocutusOfBorg> the latter :D
[14:19] <LocutusOfBorg> ahasenack, I was worried about the CVE fixes needing a rebase, I was doing it manually and then I found them on git master
[14:19] <LocutusOfBorg> so it became trivial
[14:19] <LocutusOfBorg> I also don't want a CVE fix being in -proposed pocket
[14:19] <LocutusOfBorg> and causing autopkgtest regressions (after it landed)
[14:20] <LocutusOfBorg> and yes, I'm tired of stuff not migrating :p
[14:20] <ahasenack> which cve?
[14:21] <LocutusOfBorg> CVE-2018-16877 CVE-2018-16878 CVE-2019-3885
[14:21] <LocutusOfBorg> they seems to be clearly making sbd sad on i386 https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/sbd/eoan/i386
[14:21] <LocutusOfBorg> but I can't figure out why
[14:22] <LocutusOfBorg> I can land the bileto and see what happens with autopkgtestsuites if you want
[14:23] <LocutusOfBorg> [   54.481868] Buffer I/O error on dev dm-0, logical block 0, async page read
[14:23] <LocutusOfBorg> [  155.517792] sysrq: SysRq : Resetting
[14:23] <LocutusOfBorg> killing an autopkgtest machine with a CVE fix is not something I like! I'm not sure why security team let it go in -security pocket with such regression...
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lshw [source] (xenial-proposed) [02.17-1.1ubuntu3.6]
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-bluetooth [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-2ubuntu0.2]
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (disco-proposed) [1.8.1]
[14:57] <bdmurray> sil2100: Could you have a look at my u-r-u upload in D's SRU queue?
[15:02] <sil2100> bdmurray: ok o/
[15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted scite [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.0-1ubuntu0.1]
[15:14] <sil2100> bdmurray: I assume the DistUpgrade.cfg.bionic thingy has been sanity-checked? I mean, I don't know the format of that, but the [KernelRemoval] Version=4.2.0 makes me wonder
[15:14] <sil2100> bdmurray: but on the other hand, I don't know what that means or does - but is that correct?
[15:15] <sil2100> bdmurray: DistUpgrade.cfg.xenial had Version=4.4.0
[15:15] <sil2100> bdmurray: so through analogy, I'd expect it to be 4.15.0, but maybe that's completely unrelated?
[15:16] <bdmurray> sil2100: hrm, I'll have a look at what section really does
[15:56] <sil2100> bdmurray: give me a poke once you find out
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpptest [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpptest [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpptest [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpptest [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpptest [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpptest [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[16:56] <sil2100> bdmurray: any luck with the KernelRemoval section?
[16:57] <sil2100> bdmurray: asking since I'll be going EOD soon
[16:58] <bdmurray> sil2100: if you look at DistUpgrade.cfg it hasn't been updated either. I'm testing an upgrade now to see if that's really needed.
[16:59] <bdmurray> sil2100: so you could let it through and maybe it'll get superseded.
[17:03] <sil2100> bdmurray: ACK o/ So probably it's unrelated to anything
[17:03] <sil2100> As long as you have it on your radar, it's all good
[17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (disco-proposed) [1:19.04.16.3]
[17:04] <bdmurray> sil2100: I do now, thanks for noticing / reminding me.
[17:09] <sil2100> yw! Approved
[17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resolvconf (xenial-proposed/main) [1.78ubuntu6 => 1.78ubuntu7] (core)
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.525.21 => 2.525.22] (desktop-core)
[18:13] <bdmurray> vorlon: bug 1824862 has been verified if you think it warrants a speedy delivery to -updates
[18:13] <ubot5`> bug 1824862 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Trusty) "Enable upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04 while keeping ESM enabled" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1824862
[18:18] <vorlon> bdmurray: lgtm, releasing, thanks
[18:21] <Eickmeyer> Still looking for someone to put on a MOTU hat to sponsor this guy: bug 1827288
[18:21] <ubot5`> bug 1827288 in Ubuntu Studio "[Needs Packaging] LSP-Plugins for Eoan" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1827288
[19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1006.7] (no packageset)
[20:16] <vorlon> tjaalton: well, new dogtag-pki accepted through NEW, but fails autopkgtests
[20:21] <infinity> And Release Schedule is up at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/EoanErmine/ReleaseSchedule
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpptest [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.0-2]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpptest [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.0-2]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpptest [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.0-2]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpptest [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.0-2]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpptest [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.0-2]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpptest [i386] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.0-2]
[20:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (bionic-proposed/main) [0.37ubuntu0.4 => 0.37ubuntu0.5] (core)
[20:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (xenial-proposed/main) [0.28ubuntu0.11 => 0.28ubuntu0.12] (core)
[20:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (trusty-proposed/main) [0.18ubuntu0.12 => 0.18ubuntu0.13] (core)
[20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.38ubuntu0.3 => 0.38ubuntu0.4] (core)
[20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (disco-proposed/main) [0.39ubuntu2 => 0.39ubuntu2.1] (core)
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.18ubuntu0.13]
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.28ubuntu0.12]
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.37ubuntu0.5]
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (disco-proposed) [0.39ubuntu2.1]
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libsmbios [source] (trusty-backports) [2.4.0-1~ubuntu14.04.1]
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.38ubuntu0.4]
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected dianara [source] (trusty-backports) [1.3.6-1~ubuntu14.04.1]
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ibmpmlinux [source] (trusty-proposed) [3.2.2-0ubuntu1]
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected navicli [source] (trusty-proposed) [7.33.2.0.51-0ubuntu0.14.04.1]
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libjwt [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.6.1-1]
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected snapd-glib [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.12-0ubuntu1~14.04]
[20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1006.7]
[21:05] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: why is lsp-plugins anative package?
[21:12] <tjaalton> vorlon: weird, works fine on my eoan machines.. I'll have a look tomorrow
[21:14] <tjaalton> ah, the TPS subsystem.. freeipa uses only CA & KRA
[21:52] <tsimonq2> infinity: Wiki index done: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/EoanErmine
[21:52] <tsimonq2> Ermine, cool.
[21:54] <tsimonq2> infinity: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/eoan needs moar Ermine.
[21:54] <wxl> definitely not an eagle
[21:54] <tsimonq2> I was really hoping for Electric Eagle. Oh well.
[21:55] <wxl> thank god for that
[21:55] <tsimonq2> XD
[23:10] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: I'm working on your email. Is there a reason why lsp-plugins should not be a native package?
[23:10] <Eickmeyer> er, working on your comment in the bug report.
[23:10] <Eickmeyer> Really, the only thing that is confusing me now is the difference between native/non-native and when each is appropriate.
[23:10] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: native is never appropriate unless it is a package authored as part of the distribution
[23:11] <vorlon> if there is an upstream, you want non-native
[23:12] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: So, in this case, since the github repo (they don't use sourceforge anymore) is the upstream, this means I need to use non-native versioning (1.1.9-0ubuntu1)?
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: go-qrcode [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.0~git20190110.dc11ecd-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: go-qrcode [s390x] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.0~git20190110.dc11ecd-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-koofr-go-httpclient [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.0~git20180104.0378617-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-partykit [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.2-3-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-partykit [s390x] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.2-3-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-psychotools [s390x] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.5-0-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-jmespath [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-socksify [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.7.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-strptime [s390x] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.2.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: go-qrcode [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.0~git20190110.dc11ecd-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-renekroon-ttlcache [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.4.0+git20190429.e7780e9-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-psychotools [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.5-0-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-opentracing [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-heroku-rollrus [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.0~git20190402.fde2a6b-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: yes, and you should use the upstream tarball
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-aws-eventstream [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-partykit [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.2-3-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-strptime [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.2.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:12] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: (where available)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: go-qrcode [arm64] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.0~git20190110.dc11ecd-1] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: go-qrcode [i386] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.0~git20190110.dc11ecd-1] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-partykit [i386] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.2-3-1] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-psychotools [arm64] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.5-0-1] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-psychotools [i386] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.5-0-1] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-serverengine [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-strptime [arm64] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.2.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: go-qrcode [armhf] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.0~git20190110.dc11ecd-1] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-psychotools [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.5-0-1] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-parallel-tests [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [2.28.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-partykit [arm64] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.2-3-1] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-strptime [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.2.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-psychotools [armhf] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.5-0-1] (no packageset)
[23:13] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: This is all the upstream tarball, as you can see. There's an upstream branch with the exact contents of the tarball and a pristine-tar branch with the tar.
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted go-qrcode [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [0.0~git20190110.dc11ecd-1]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-psychotools [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [0.5-0-1]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-partykit [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.2-3-1]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-strptime [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [0.2.3-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted go-qrcode [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [0.0~git20190110.dc11ecd-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-psychotools [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.5-0-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-psychotools [i386] (eoan-proposed) [0.5-0-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-serverengine [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [2.1.0-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-partykit [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.2-3-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-parallel-tests [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [2.28.0-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-psychotools [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [0.5-0-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-strptime [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.2.3-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted go-qrcode [i386] (eoan-proposed) [0.0~git20190110.dc11ecd-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-heroku-rollrus [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.0~git20190402.fde2a6b-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-renekroon-ttlcache [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.4.0+git20190429.e7780e9-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-partykit [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.2-3-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-socksify [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.7.1-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted go-qrcode [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [0.0~git20190110.dc11ecd-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-partykit [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.2-3-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-koofr-go-httpclient [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.0~git20180104.0378617-1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-aws-eventstream [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.3-1]
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted go-qrcode [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.0~git20190110.dc11ecd-1]
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-psychotools [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [0.5-0-1]
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-jmespath [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.4.0-1]
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-strptime [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [0.2.3-1]
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-partykit [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [1.2-3-1]
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-opentracing [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.5.0-1]
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-psychotools [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [0.5-0-1]
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted go-qrcode [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [0.0~git20190110.dc11ecd-1]
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-strptime [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [0.2.3-1]
[23:42] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Here's a log from a failed auto test: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/421931673/buildlog_ubuntu-eoan-amd64.lsp-plugins_1.1.9-0~201905021445~ubuntu19.10.1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[23:53] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: that doesn't look to me like tests that need to be run manually, given that the test is failing to compile
[23:53] <vorlon> it looks to me like upstream bugs that should be fixed
[23:54] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Then why, if I compile it manually or overridden, does it work?
[23:54] <Eickmeyer> Oh, upstream bug.
[23:54] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: In that case, is it okay to leave that overridden?
[23:54] <vorlon> how are you compiling it manually that it works?
[23:55] <vorlon> I would not be happy sponsoring upload of a new package whose upstream test suite fails to build
[23:57] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Per the instructions on https://github.com/sadko4u/lsp-plugins. That works. Building the deb works.
[23:57] <Eickmeyer> The installed binaries work and are well tested.