[15:00] o/ [15:01] \o [15:01] o/ [15:04] * vorlon waves [15:04] \o\ [15:04] #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team [15:04] Meeting started Thu May 9 15:04:46 2019 UTC. The chair is gaughen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. [15:04] Available commands: action commands idea info link nick === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team Meeting | Current topic: [15:04] o\ [15:05] o> [15:05] |o| [15:05] #topic Lightning rounds === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team Meeting | Current topic: Lightning rounds [15:05] order - infinity doko juliank cyphermox xnox waveform bdmurray tdaitx vorlon rbalint mwhudson sil2100 [15:05] ~o~ [15:06] infinity isn't on the channel [15:06] me I guess [15:06] juliank: your turn [15:06] doko is at a srpint [15:06] juliank, it's you [15:06] * booked DebConf travel [15:06] * python-apt SRUs with locking fixes (LP: #1826870) [15:06] Launchpad bug 1826870 in python-apt (Ubuntu Cosmic) "cache.commit() doesn't release the archives lock" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1826870 [15:06] * Various work on getting APT 1.9 ready to upload (ABI/API break), not done yet - first break, some more to come throughout the cycle, as we're working towards APT 2.0 and improve extensibility. [15:06] * apt SRUS to fix LP: #1820886 and LP: #1821640 [15:06] Launchpad bug 1820886 in apt (Ubuntu Cosmic) "Potential inconsistency due to system halt/reboot being allowed when package installation in progress" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1820886 [15:06] * merged wpa 2.8 from experimental; dropped android-headers build-dep [15:06] Launchpad bug 1821640 in apt (Ubuntu Cosmic) "Missing pattern for linux-image-unsigned keeps autoremovable kernels on the system" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1821640 [15:06] * added more gnome 2 stuff to removal bug [15:07] (LP: #1825972) [15:07] Launchpad bug 1825972 in libgnome-keyring (Ubuntu) "Remove gnome 2 stack + linsmith from eoan" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1825972 [15:07] (done) [15:07] cyphermox: [15:07] fixing bringing up interfaces without an assigned IP in netplan (bug LP: #1763608) [15:07] Launchpad bug 1763608 in netplan "Netplan ignores Interfaces without IP Addresses" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1763608 [15:07] netplan.io 0.97 release + SRUs [15:07] more debugging of HTTP Boot for MAAS [15:07] fielding questions from Till on NM VPN DNS bug 1754671 [15:07] bug 1754671 in network-manager (Ubuntu Bionic) "Full-tunnel VPN DNS leakage regression" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1754671 [15:07] updated sbuild-launchpad-chroot to work on eoan [15:07] partner work [15:07] tracking/verifications for in-flight SRUs [15:07] reviewed subiquity PRs [15:07] whitepaper / spec review responses [15:07] (done) [15:07] xnox: [15:07] * uploaded s390-tools cherrypicks from master for secureboot [15:07] * uploaded bash PATH SRU updates into all the releases [15:07] * uploaded upstream test fix for golang-github-prometheus-client-golang [15:07] * uploaded/working on perl stack regressions w.r.t. SSL_MODE_AUTO_RETRY [15:07] * uploaded transition to uncouple icu & boost-regex transitions [15:07] * subiquity code reviews [15:07] + srus waiting to be accepted into -proposed: [15:07] - xenial bash [15:07] - bionic bash, s390-tools, ruby2.5 [15:07] - cosmic s390-tools, python-tornado4 (NEW) [15:07] Done [15:08] * Short week (bank holiday Monday) [15:08] * Working on consolidating raspi2 and raspi3 classic images (armhf working, arm64 being tricky) [15:08] * Attempted to shuffle cloud-init's startup order to avoid partition renaming (this doesn't work) [15:08] * Attempted to shuffle fstab earlier in systemd's boot sequence (this is a bad idea!) [15:08] * So, back to partition renaming - investigated upgrade procedure for /boot partition renaming [15:08] * Digging into ubuntu-image issue building armhf images on arm64 [15:08] * Investigating wifi issues on core for cec [15:08] (done) [15:08] tdaitx, hello [15:08] disabled accepting crash reports from Ubuntu 14.04 in the Error Tracker [15:08] wrote test case for upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04 w/ ESM enabled [15:08] SRU verification of bug 1824862 [15:08] bug 1824862 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Trusty) "Enable upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04 while keeping ESM enabled" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1824862 [15:08] reported bug re u-r-u and upgrading from 18.04 to 19.04 (LP: #1827635) [15:08] uploaded u-r-u for Eoan, disco SRU for LP: #1827635 [15:08] updated meta-release-development for Eoan [15:08] uploaded u-r-u again with Ermine info also update m-r-d [15:08] Launchpad bug 1827635 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Disco) "dist-upgrader tarball needs updating to support upgrades from bionic to disco" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1827635 [15:09] tested / merged vorlon's MoM changes, updated MoM on the server [15:09] reported u-r-u bug LP: #1827951 re snap refreshing [15:09] reported u-r-u bug LP: #1828072 about updating and SRU'ing it [15:09] Launchpad bug 1827951 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Disco) "snaps not refreshed when upgrading from bionic or cosmic to disco" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1827951 [15:09] Launchpad bug 1828072 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Disco) "KernelRemoval section is out of date" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1828072 [15:09] uploaded SRUs of u-r-u to B, C, D releases [15:09] reported u-r-u bug LP: #1828100 regarding long term fix for it [15:09] Launchpad bug 1828100 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "KernelRemoval section of DistUpgrade.cfg shouldn't require manual updating" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1828100 [15:09] tdaitx: [15:10] * sil2100 pokes tdaitx [15:10] vorlon: [15:11] * local tests with jck 11 using lxc [15:11] * fixed & tested tomcat8's LP: #1827090, missing upload [15:11] * fixed & tested netbeans' LP: #1825604 [15:11] * working on netbeans' LP: #1828427, cleaning up conflicts from upstream patch [15:11] Launchpad bug 1827090 in tomcat8 (Ubuntu) ""-1" instead of "8005" in tomcat8-instance-create" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1827090 [15:11] Launchpad bug 1825604 in netbeans (Ubuntu) "Netbeans 10 requires openjdk-11" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1825604 [15:11] Launchpad bug 1828427 in netbeans (Ubuntu) "Netbeans fails to create a java project with NoSuchMethodError" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1828427 [15:11] assuming he's done, since he's having irc problems and won't see if I ask him :) [15:11] * short week, was out yesterday [15:11] * merges [15:11] * improved the filtering of d-i components out of the merge-o-matic stats for Foundations [15:12] * NEW processing [15:12] * SRU reviews [15:12] * boot speed: analyzing remaining pain points across different substrates and kernels [15:12] * prep for Lyon next week [15:12] * out tomorrow, swap for Lyon travel [15:12] (done) [15:12] rbalint is out sick I think? [15:12] rbalint is out sick [15:12] sil2100: [15:12] - Last week: long weekend due to national holidays [15:12] - SRU reviews and releases [15:12] - Some kernel reviews, trying out new code-paths for ESM [15:12] - Rewriting the publish_info pieces for ubuntu-cdimage (now merged) [15:12] - Setting up an SRU team meeting [15:12] - DMB meeting (short one) [15:12] - Hacking bileto to not re-set PPA dependencies periodically [15:12] - Preparing no-change security-only rebuilds of the toolchain updates for cosmic and bionic [15:12] * Blocked until next week as one additional fix might be pulled in [15:12] - All-hands meeting [15:12] - Writing up an explaination of the steps needed to add new images for supported devices [15:12] - Reviewing final raspi-amazing spec [15:12] - Starting the release process of ubuntu-image 1.7 [15:12] (done) [15:14] #topic Release incoming bugs === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team Meeting | Current topic: Release incoming bugs [15:14] #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-dd-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs [15:14] gaughen: which release are we on? [15:14] ee! [15:15] bdmurray, I'm following the instructios [15:15] #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ee-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs [15:15] #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ee-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs [15:15] * cyphermox updates the 'structions [15:15] cyphermox, thank you [15:15] do we need a checklist item in the NewReleaseCycleProcess to update the link? [15:15] you guys don't review your stable series incoming bugs? ;) [15:15] the high one, bug 1825021, is carded [15:15] bug 1825021 in apt (Ubuntu) "apt's dpkgpm.cc WriteApportReport function should gather more data" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1825021 [15:16] seb128: Is there one you are particularly concerned about? [15:16] seb128: I think they should be carried over, probably. [15:16] bdmurray, no, just feels like a weak point to not review the series where most the users are [15:16] ie. script the change of tags [15:16] * vorlon checks where that card is and if it's close enough to the front to ever realistically be worked [15:16] cyphermox, well, things might be fixed in e but not b [15:16] I haven't had a chance to review them as I've been fixing other bugs [15:16] anyway, don't let me derail your meeting [15:16] seb128: sure, and then they get in a different list [15:16] probably not a discussion for here/now [15:17] cyphermox, we do review all the rls-nn-incoming weekly for desktop (bb cc dd ee atm) [15:17] seb128: if something is broken (incoming) in the previous devel release, it probably is still unfixed in the new devel release [15:17] yeah, it's 1825021 is close enough to the top to consider it committed [15:17] What to do on that though? [15:18] ie. actively culling thigns that are to be fixed, and whatever people really don't care about and won't fix, would be nice. [15:18] rather than forever keeping bugs unfixed in a "incoming" or "tracking" list [15:18] PATH is now replaced by APT in disco, so tracking it there probably makes no sense [15:18] cool [15:19] juliank: I thought when we last talked about it we said it needed testing. [15:19] yeah, well, before I realized it was disco+, and thought it was in cosmic too [15:20] So regardless the original bug is about getting more info and maybe there should be a second one about u-r-u setting the path [15:20] bdmurray: do we need to triage any of the ones on rls-ee-incoming that are importance: undecided? [15:21] (where valid triage might be "remove tag because someone nominated it but couldn't be bothered to set importance"?) [15:22] vorlon: before we get there could we talk about bug 1821415 [15:22] bug 1821415 in policykit-1 (Ubuntu) "pkexec fails in a non-graphical environment" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1821415 [15:25] bdmurray: what's the impact of this bug if you run apport as root? [15:26] I would expect most users who run apport on servers to just invoke it as root [15:26] vorlon: there should be no impact [15:26] so maybe it is low impact overall? [15:26] what about xorg and no X? [15:26] as in desktop user is trying to report a problem with their X server not starting? [15:26] yeah [15:26] couldn't they also run as root? [15:27] but maybe they wouldn't know to [15:27] that is true [15:27] do we generate a useful error message in the UI when the client fails to collect due to lack of privs? [15:27] polkit-agent-helper-1: error response to PolicyKit daemon: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.PolicyKit1.Error.Failed: No session for cookie [15:27] ==== AUTHENTICATION FAILED === [15:27] Error executing command as another user: Not authorized [15:27] i wouldn't call that useful [15:28] bdmurray: but it at least doesn't silently submit an incomplete report [15:28] Its also worth considering that I'm the one who reported the bug so maybe no one else is bothered by it [15:29] so I think it warrants opening a task on apport, but is still probably not a high priority to fix [15:29] okay, thanks for helping prioritize it [15:30] so the unprioritized ones [15:30] LP: #1727472 [15:30] Launchpad bug 1727472 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "[RFE] Automatically update the Ubuntu version string in ubuntu-release-upgrader" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1727472 [15:31] so boring [15:31] certainly seems a worthwhile fix [15:32] should be trivial too [15:32] so target it? and what importance? [15:32] yeah I wouldn't make it 'high', but I think we should take it [15:33] importance: medium? [15:33] works for me [15:33] and carded [15:33] LP: #1796193 [15:33] Launchpad bug 1796193 in apt (Ubuntu) "unattended do-release-upgrade asks about /etc/cron.daily/apt-compat" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1796193 [15:34] I don't think that's an apt bug, maybe it's a dpkg one? [15:35] is it reproducible? do we know what removed it? [15:35] well, I guess the user removed the file [15:35] I'm checking files right now [15:36] juliank: it's plarson doing automated upgrade testing [15:36] so it is unlikely to be the result of user action [15:36] The files certainly are different in xenial and bionic [15:36] I guess there are two questions here [15:36] 1) what removed this conffile [15:37] 2) what should the handling of conffiles be when using the noninteractive frontend [15:37] crash burn and die [15:37] because we do in general consider there to be no sane default for conffile prompts [15:37] unattended-upgrades has some code to handle some conffile stuff, maybe it did something here? idk [15:37] so I tend to agree with xnox, that the current behavior for 2) is not a bug in the package manager [15:37] I gather that something used to happen with conffiles when using the noninteractive frontend [15:37] juliank: unattended-upgrades handling is to hold back those packages [15:37] which is not sensible for a release upgrade [15:38] Now it also detects unmodified moved conffiles or stuff [15:39] I'm trying to run an upgrade in xenial, but I don't get any [15:39] bdmurray: so I think we should initially treat this as a matter of figuring out why there are modified conffiles and addressing that [15:39] So what is the next step with this bug? [15:39] ask the submitter for a reproducer [15:39] Try to reproduce it [15:39] Okay, I remember seeing one with mlocate recently [15:40] bdmurray: will you follow up with the submitter then? [15:40] vorlon: yeah and I'll ping david ames again [15:40] LP: #1818564 [15:40] Launchpad bug 1818564 in apport (Ubuntu) "directory permission sanity checks" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1818564 [15:41] is interesting [15:42] I wouldn't commit to it [15:42] but I'll card it :) [15:42] so leave it incoming? [15:42] bdmurray: I'll take it out of incoming but card it [15:43] LP: #1825000 [15:43] Launchpad bug 1825000 in apt (Ubuntu) "Add ability for mirrors to distinguish interactive and non-interactive apt runs" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1825000 [15:44] ok no fair juliank triaging these during the meeting and invalidating the report ;) [15:45] so this is wishlist, I guess we can move on [15:45] heh, yeah [15:45] also the next one [15:45] LP: #1828100 [15:45] Launchpad bug 1828100 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "KernelRemoval section of DistUpgrade.cfg shouldn't require manual updating" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1828100 [15:45] bdmurray has been talking about this one [15:45] that's something rbalint probably wants to have a look at [15:45] that looks like a good one for us to take [15:46] so that we can finally put the nail in the coffin of stale kernels on /boot [15:46] so I'll take it in for eoan [15:47] +1 on that [15:47] Yeah that bug is about the long term fix [15:48] so I think that's the bottom of the queue [15:49] #topic Team proposed-migration report [15:49] #link http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team Meeting | Current topic: Team proposed-migration report [15:49] lintian [15:49] upstream failure [15:49] lintian [15:49] vorlon, anything we should do? [15:49] Debian broke their own autopkgtests, we can wait for them to fix it [15:49] k [15:49] done [15:49] NEXT [15:49] the other one, libnet-ssleay-perl, is xnox breaking apache [15:49] yes [15:49] ;) [15:50] #topic AOB === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team Meeting | Current topic: AOB [15:50] and i don't know why, cause it was all green [15:50] anything? [15:50] beuller? [15:50] bueller? [15:50] yes [15:50] ooooh [15:50] seb128 has a point; [15:50] should we start to review bb, cc, dd as well as $newcycle [15:50] ? [15:50] cc is dead to me =) [15:51] should we at least do one review of cc/dd at the transition [15:51] but monitor bb [15:52] we / somebody could subscribe to the -incoming bug tag [15:52] perhaps next week we should review what's in the queue for those, so we can assess how much value there is in doing so [15:52] I already have bb in the script since there *are* point-releases [15:52] that'S tricky [15:52] maybe we should do it every first meeting in the month? [15:53] or every second week? [15:57] looks like we need to work through the backlog out of band [15:58] and then try to add reviewing these into the meeting agenda [15:58] #endmeeting === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice [15:58] Meeting ended Thu May 9 15:58:51 2019 UTC. [15:58] Minutes: http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2019/ubuntu-meeting.2019-05-09-15.04.moin.txt [15:59] thanks!