/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/05/09/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-8 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)00:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-8 [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)01:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-8 [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)03:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-8 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)05:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-8 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1]06:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-8 [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1]06:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-8 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1]06:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-8 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1]06:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-8 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1]06:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-8 [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1]06:16
cpaelzersil2100: hi, this is a ping in regard to your SRU duty today; due to a silly error generating the .changes for 1823836 that was rejected yesterday08:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rdma-core (disco-proposed/main) [22.1-1 => 22.1-1ubuntu0.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)08:13
cpaelzersil2100: but that one already waited quite a while and should be small and simple08:13
cpaelzerbdmurray: pointed out that something was odd08:13
cpaelzerI found the .changes had too long history (probably my flaw by accident when running buildpackage)08:13
cpaelzerbut since IBM is waiting on that one I wanted to ask if you could take a look at rdma-core in disco's queue when you are on SRU duty today08:14
cpaelzerto not have it waiting for some time again08:14
cpaelzerand bdmurray, thanks for the hint and sorry for the mistake08:14
cpaelzerall I can think of is fetching a buildpackage command with ctrl+R and not dropping a -v option08:15
cpaelzer:-/08:15
sil2100cpaelzer: sure o/08:19
cpaelzerthank you08:20
marcustomlinsonhey doko, re: the openjdk backporting, the breaks versions for libreoffice are 1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.6 and 1:5.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu1~xenial708:37
marcustomlinsonI think I gave you some incorrect versions before, sorry08:37
LocutusOfBorgmissing build on arm64: hmmer (from 3.1b2+dfsg-5ubuntu1)09:12
LocutusOfBorgcan any AA remove such binaries? they have been removed in debian already... probably also prokka needs to have them removed (not in testing, so nobody cared in Debian)09:12
LocutusOfBorg[12:12:51] <LocutusOfBorg> can any AA remove circlator on non-amd64? missing build on arm64: circlator (from 1.5.5-2) debian did the same a while ago09:13
LocutusOfBorg[12:13:55] <LocutusOfBorg> same for htslib on i386 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=92833309:13
LocutusOfBorg[12:13:56] <ubot5`> Debian bug 928333 in ftp.debian.org "RM: htslib [i386 hurd-i386 kfreebsd-i386] -- ANAIS; ROM; *i386 no longer supported upstream" [Normal,Open]09:13
LocutusOfBorg[12:14:46] <LocutusOfBorg> ^^ this probably means that nanopolish bio-eagle python-cyvcf2 python3-cyvcf2 reapr have to go on i386 too?09:13
ubot5`Debian bug 928333 in ftp.debian.org "RM: htslib [i386 hurd-i386 kfreebsd-i386] -- ANAIS; ROM; *i386 no longer supported upstream" [Normal,Open]09:13
LocutusOfBorgalso ^^09:13
ginggsLocutusOfBorg: for hmmer LP: #182829209:31
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1828292 in hmmer (Ubuntu) "Please remove old binaries (arm*, powerpc, ppc64el and s390x)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182829209:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:6.1.5-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 => 1:6.1.6-0ubuntu0.18.10.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)11:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice-l10n (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:6.1.5-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 => 1:6.1.6-0ubuntu0.18.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop)11:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rdma-core [source] (disco-proposed) [22.1-1ubuntu0.1]11:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice-l10n [source] (disco-proposed) [1:6.2.3-0ubuntu0.19.04.1]11:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (disco-proposed) [1:6.2.3-0ubuntu0.19.04.1]11:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bash [source] (disco-proposed) [5.0-3ubuntu1.1]12:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gedit [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.2-0ubuntu0.18.10.3]12:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-good1.0 (cosmic-updates/main) [1.14.4-1ubuntu1 => 1.14.4-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync)12:36
tsimonq2vorlon: indicator-notifications> Yeah, it's with my MATE hat on (we switched to Evolution from Thunderbird) and they don't work with Ayatana (yet).12:40
tsimonq2vorlon: indicator-notifications b-d> That is pretty incredible. :P12:40
LocutusOfBorgginggs, I opened bugs for the others...13:01
LocutusOfBorgsil2100, I admit I can't figure out your gst-plugins-good1.0 (cosmic-updates/main) [1.14.4-1ubuntu1 => 1.14.4-1ubuntu1]...13:02
ginggsLocutusOfBorg: i think subscribe ubuntu-archive rather than assign ubuntu-release13:04
LocutusOfBorglol13:07
LocutusOfBorgI only made one mistake out of 3 :D13:08
sil2100LocutusOfBorg: ;)13:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-good1.0 [sync] (cosmic-updates) [1.14.4-1ubuntu1]13:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mariadb-10.1 [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:10.1.38-0ubuntu0.18.10.2]13:50
LocutusOfBorgsil2100, why are you copying from release to updates? forgive my curiosity13:54
apwLocutusOfBorg, to make it mutable14:02
LocutusOfBorgmmm I don't get what you mean, but nevermind, I think its something I won't ever have to do14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mdadm [source] (cosmic-proposed) [4.1~rc1-4ubuntu1.1]14:26
sil2100LocutusOfBorg: I wanted to promote one of its binaries to main, but the package was only available in the release pocket - which is immutable14:26
LocutusOfBorgoh....... thanks! this makes sense! so you promote also on stable?14:28
LocutusOfBorgso you wanted to promote... gstreamer1.0-qt5 ?14:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mdadm [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.1~rc1-3~ubuntu18.04.2]14:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice-l10n [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:6.1.6-0ubuntu0.18.10.1]15:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:6.1.6-0ubuntu0.18.10.1]15:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libxmlb (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.1.8-1~ubuntu18.04.1]15:23
dokomarcustomlinson: committed16:24
marcustomlinson👍16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.10.3 => 0.97-0ubuntu1~18.10.1] (core)16:43
vorlontsimonq2: are you going to reupload without one of the libindicator* b-d then, or are you simply agreeing it's incredible? ;)17:17
tsimonq2vorlon: I mean, I was agreeing that it's incredible, but I can certainly reupload. ;)17:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (bionic-proposed/main) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.04.4 => 0.97-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (core)18:49
infinitytsimonq2: Why would anyone switch *to* Evolution?18:51
infinitytsimonq2: (And don't say anything about Thunderbird's supposed lack of support, they've been waving that flag every six months for over a decade and, yet, it seems to keep getting supported)18:52
tsimonq2infinity: That would be a question for Wimpress.18:53
tsimonq2infinity: (I personally use Thunderbird.)18:54
infinityI mean, I personally use mutt, but of all the GUI clients, Tbird seems to suck the least at actually doing email things (it's what I have my Dad use, for instance)18:54
tsimonq2I agree.18:55
Wimpressinfinity Many reasons, nothing to do with upstream support.18:55
WimpressBasically, superior desktop integration. Superior Gmail and Exchange integration.18:55
tsimonq2To be fair to Wimpress, Evolution isn't that bad. It's my second option personally. :)18:56
infinitygmail integration seems like an odd non-starter to me.  I integrate with gmail via a web browser.18:56
infinityThe Exchange thing, I could maybe give you, if I'd had any reason to use an Exchange server in the last two decades.18:57
WimpressNotifications and such regarding calendar events and tasks.18:57
infinityAnyhow, your flavour, you do you.18:57
WimpressYep, am doing 🙂18:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-good1.0 (cosmic-security/main) [1.14.4-1ubuntu1 => 1.14.4-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync)19:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-good1.0 [sync] (cosmic-security) [1.14.4-1ubuntu1]19:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rtl8812au (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu8 => 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu8.1] (no packageset)19:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.9-0ubuntu2 => 1.2.5-1ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-core)19:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libclc [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1]19:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: fwupd-signed (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.2~ubuntu18.04.1]19:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (cosmic-proposed/main) [3:14.0.2-0ubuntu2 => 3:14.0.2-0ubuntu4] (openstack, ubuntu-server)19:43
tsimonq2vorlon: indicator-notifications> Looking into it more, libindicator-dev is so that indicators with GTK 2 applications can work, and libindicator3-dev is so that indicators with GTK 3 applications can work.19:49
tsimonq2vorlon: Is introducing a new GTK 2 build dependency the problem, or are ambiguous-looking package names ambiguous-looking?19:49
vorlontsimonq2: indicators with gtk2 applications> such as?19:56
vorlonI think gtk2 should be considered dead and not to be used for any new packages19:56
vorloneven openjdk might migrate off of gtk2 this year19:56
vorlon;)19:56
tsimonq2vorlon: Sounds good, fixing.19:58
tdaitxvorlon: tsimonq2: so openjdk-lts (openjdk-11) used to depend on gtk3, we rolled that back for all releases during the transition to bionic when we noticed that openjdk support for gtk3 is substandard compared to gtk219:59
tdaitxupstream knows there are problems and will _eventually_ fix those19:59
tdaitxwidgets look worse on gtk3, there are padding issues, etc...19:59
vorlontdaitx: I know, I remember you covering this a bit ago, I'm half trolling :)19:59
vorlon(and also somebody asked about it Tuesday I think :)20:00
* tsimonq2 wonders if libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev is GTK 2 or GTK 3...20:00
tdaitxyeah, I know, I'm responding to the other half ;-)20:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: indicator-notifications (eoan-proposed/primary) [0.3.3-0ubuntu1]20:02
tsimonq2vorlon: ^20:02
vorlonta20:02
vorlonwell if openjdk can't make the gtk3 stuff work correctly maybe we'll just switch to Xaw20:03
cjwatsontsimonq2: Neither or both; it's a lower layer.  Both libgtk2.0-dev and libgtk3-dev depend on libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev20:03
tsimonq2cjwatson: Yeah, I guessed so. Thanks though.20:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gupnp [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0-1]20:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gupnp [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0-1]20:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gupnp [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0-1]20:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gupnp [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0-1]20:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gupnp [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0-1]20:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gupnp [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0-1]20:04
tsimonq2cccccchekeltkibeivtgebnerjidibttciijrbvdfjee20:05
tsimonq2...?20:05
tsimonq2Oh, right, my Yubikey. >_>20:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (bionic-proposed) [19.0.2-1ubuntu1~18.04.1]20:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected indicator-notifications [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.3.3-0ubuntu1]20:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bash [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.4.18-2ubuntu1.1]20:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bash [source] (xenial-proposed) [4.3-14ubuntu1.3]20:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (disco-proposed/main) [0.96-0ubuntu4.1 => 0.97-0ubuntu1~19.04.1] (core)21:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (disco-proposed) [0.97-0ubuntu1~19.04.1]21:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.97-0ubuntu1~18.10.1]21:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.97-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]22:03
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/m/mira/eoan/ppc64el fwiw that's not how you do a release-pocket-only test of a package that has a newer version in -proposed; due to limitations in the implementation you need to use a different source package name as the trigger (one that is present only in release && !proposed)22:26
vorlonxnox: ^^ I've triggered a fresh autopkgtest run that will actually test the binaries in release22:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (xenial-proposed/universe) [18.09.5-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 18.09.5-0ubuntu1~16.04.2] (no packageset)22:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (bionic-proposed/universe) [18.09.5-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 18.09.5-0ubuntu1~18.04.2] (no packageset)23:02
mwhudsonvorlon: any chance you could look at these docker.io upload? I forgot to version the dependency on containerd :(23:03
mwhudsonthere's a cosmic one on the way too23:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (cosmic-proposed/universe) [18.09.5-0ubuntu1~18.10.1 => 18.09.5-0ubuntu1~18.10.2] (no packageset)23:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (cosmic-proposed) [18.09.5-0ubuntu1~18.10.2]23:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.09.5-0ubuntu1~18.04.2]23:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (xenial-proposed) [18.09.5-0ubuntu1~16.04.2]23:16
mwhudsonvorlon: thank you23:17
vorlonmwhudson: n/p23:17
mwhudsonvorlon, bdmurray: any chance of an early release for livecd-rootfs for disco and cosmic?23:43

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!