[00:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-8 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[01:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-8 [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[03:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-8 [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[05:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-8 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-8 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1]
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-8 [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1]
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-8 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1]
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-8 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1]
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-8 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1]
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-8 [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1:8-3~ubuntu18.04.1]
[08:13] <cpaelzer> sil2100: hi, this is a ping in regard to your SRU duty today; due to a silly error generating the .changes for 1823836 that was rejected yesterday
[08:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rdma-core (disco-proposed/main) [22.1-1 => 22.1-1ubuntu0.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[08:13] <cpaelzer> sil2100: but that one already waited quite a while and should be small and simple
[08:13] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: pointed out that something was odd
[08:13] <cpaelzer> I found the .changes had too long history (probably my flaw by accident when running buildpackage)
[08:14] <cpaelzer> but since IBM is waiting on that one I wanted to ask if you could take a look at rdma-core in disco's queue when you are on SRU duty today
[08:14] <cpaelzer> to not have it waiting for some time again
[08:14] <cpaelzer> and bdmurray, thanks for the hint and sorry for the mistake
[08:15] <cpaelzer> all I can think of is fetching a buildpackage command with ctrl+R and not dropping a -v option
[08:15] <cpaelzer> :-/
[08:19] <sil2100> cpaelzer: sure o/
[08:20] <cpaelzer> thank you
[08:37] <marcustomlinson> hey doko, re: the openjdk backporting, the breaks versions for libreoffice are 1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.6 and 1:5.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu1~xenial7
[08:37] <marcustomlinson> I think I gave you some incorrect versions before, sorry
[09:12] <LocutusOfBorg> missing build on arm64: hmmer (from 3.1b2+dfsg-5ubuntu1)
[09:12] <LocutusOfBorg> can any AA remove such binaries? they have been removed in debian already... probably also prokka needs to have them removed (not in testing, so nobody cared in Debian)
[09:13] <LocutusOfBorg> [12:12:51] <LocutusOfBorg> can any AA remove circlator on non-amd64? missing build on arm64: circlator (from 1.5.5-2) debian did the same a while ago
[09:13] <LocutusOfBorg> [12:13:55] <LocutusOfBorg> same for htslib on i386 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=928333
[09:13] <LocutusOfBorg> [12:13:56] <ubot5`> Debian bug 928333 in ftp.debian.org "RM: htslib [i386 hurd-i386 kfreebsd-i386] -- ANAIS; ROM; *i386 no longer supported upstream" [Normal,Open]
[09:13] <LocutusOfBorg> [12:14:46] <LocutusOfBorg> ^^ this probably means that nanopolish bio-eagle python-cyvcf2 python3-cyvcf2 reapr have to go on i386 too?
[09:13] <ubot5`> Debian bug 928333 in ftp.debian.org "RM: htslib [i386 hurd-i386 kfreebsd-i386] -- ANAIS; ROM; *i386 no longer supported upstream" [Normal,Open]
[09:13] <LocutusOfBorg> also ^^
[09:31] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: for hmmer LP: #1828292
[09:31] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1828292 in hmmer (Ubuntu) "Please remove old binaries (arm*, powerpc, ppc64el and s390x)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1828292
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:6.1.5-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 => 1:6.1.6-0ubuntu0.18.10.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice-l10n (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:6.1.5-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 => 1:6.1.6-0ubuntu0.18.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rdma-core [source] (disco-proposed) [22.1-1ubuntu0.1]
[11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice-l10n [source] (disco-proposed) [1:6.2.3-0ubuntu0.19.04.1]
[11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (disco-proposed) [1:6.2.3-0ubuntu0.19.04.1]
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bash [source] (disco-proposed) [5.0-3ubuntu1.1]
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gedit [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.2-0ubuntu0.18.10.3]
[12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-good1.0 (cosmic-updates/main) [1.14.4-1ubuntu1 => 1.14.4-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[12:40] <tsimonq2> vorlon: indicator-notifications> Yeah, it's with my MATE hat on (we switched to Evolution from Thunderbird) and they don't work with Ayatana (yet).
[12:40] <tsimonq2> vorlon: indicator-notifications b-d> That is pretty incredible. :P
[13:01] <LocutusOfBorg> ginggs, I opened bugs for the others...
[13:02] <LocutusOfBorg> sil2100, I admit I can't figure out your gst-plugins-good1.0 (cosmic-updates/main) [1.14.4-1ubuntu1 => 1.14.4-1ubuntu1]...
[13:04] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: i think subscribe ubuntu-archive rather than assign ubuntu-release
[13:07] <LocutusOfBorg> lol
[13:08] <LocutusOfBorg> I only made one mistake out of 3 :D
[13:35] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: ;)
[13:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-good1.0 [sync] (cosmic-updates) [1.14.4-1ubuntu1]
[13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mariadb-10.1 [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:10.1.38-0ubuntu0.18.10.2]
[13:54] <LocutusOfBorg> sil2100, why are you copying from release to updates? forgive my curiosity
[14:02] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, to make it mutable
[14:25] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm I don't get what you mean, but nevermind, I think its something I won't ever have to do
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mdadm [source] (cosmic-proposed) [4.1~rc1-4ubuntu1.1]
[14:26] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: I wanted to promote one of its binaries to main, but the package was only available in the release pocket - which is immutable
[14:28] <LocutusOfBorg> oh....... thanks! this makes sense! so you promote also on stable?
[14:28] <LocutusOfBorg> so you wanted to promote... gstreamer1.0-qt5 ?
[14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mdadm [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.1~rc1-3~ubuntu18.04.2]
[15:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice-l10n [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:6.1.6-0ubuntu0.18.10.1]
[15:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:6.1.6-0ubuntu0.18.10.1]
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libxmlb (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.1.8-1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[16:24] <doko> marcustomlinson: committed
[16:25] <marcustomlinson> 👍
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.10.3 => 0.97-0ubuntu1~18.10.1] (core)
[17:17] <vorlon> tsimonq2: are you going to reupload without one of the libindicator* b-d then, or are you simply agreeing it's incredible? ;)
[17:25] <tsimonq2> vorlon: I mean, I was agreeing that it's incredible, but I can certainly reupload. ;)
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (bionic-proposed/main) [0.96-0ubuntu0.18.04.4 => 0.97-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (core)
[18:51] <infinity> tsimonq2: Why would anyone switch *to* Evolution?
[18:52] <infinity> tsimonq2: (And don't say anything about Thunderbird's supposed lack of support, they've been waving that flag every six months for over a decade and, yet, it seems to keep getting supported)
[18:53] <tsimonq2> infinity: That would be a question for Wimpress.
[18:54] <tsimonq2> infinity: (I personally use Thunderbird.)
[18:54] <infinity> I mean, I personally use mutt, but of all the GUI clients, Tbird seems to suck the least at actually doing email things (it's what I have my Dad use, for instance)
[18:55] <tsimonq2> I agree.
[18:55] <Wimpress> infinity Many reasons, nothing to do with upstream support.
[18:55] <Wimpress> Basically, superior desktop integration. Superior Gmail and Exchange integration.
[18:56] <tsimonq2> To be fair to Wimpress, Evolution isn't that bad. It's my second option personally. :)
[18:56] <infinity> gmail integration seems like an odd non-starter to me.  I integrate with gmail via a web browser.
[18:57] <infinity> The Exchange thing, I could maybe give you, if I'd had any reason to use an Exchange server in the last two decades.
[18:57] <Wimpress> Notifications and such regarding calendar events and tasks.
[18:57] <infinity> Anyhow, your flavour, you do you.
[18:57] <Wimpress> Yep, am doing 🙂
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-good1.0 (cosmic-security/main) [1.14.4-1ubuntu1 => 1.14.4-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-good1.0 [sync] (cosmic-security) [1.14.4-1ubuntu1]
[19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rtl8812au (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu8 => 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu8.1] (no packageset)
[19:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.9-0ubuntu2 => 1.2.5-1ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-core)
[19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libclc [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: fwupd-signed (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.2~ubuntu18.04.1]
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (cosmic-proposed/main) [3:14.0.2-0ubuntu2 => 3:14.0.2-0ubuntu4] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[19:49] <tsimonq2> vorlon: indicator-notifications> Looking into it more, libindicator-dev is so that indicators with GTK 2 applications can work, and libindicator3-dev is so that indicators with GTK 3 applications can work.
[19:49] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Is introducing a new GTK 2 build dependency the problem, or are ambiguous-looking package names ambiguous-looking?
[19:56] <vorlon> tsimonq2: indicators with gtk2 applications> such as?
[19:56] <vorlon> I think gtk2 should be considered dead and not to be used for any new packages
[19:56] <vorlon> even openjdk might migrate off of gtk2 this year
[19:56] <vorlon> ;)
[19:58] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Sounds good, fixing.
[19:59] <tdaitx> vorlon: tsimonq2: so openjdk-lts (openjdk-11) used to depend on gtk3, we rolled that back for all releases during the transition to bionic when we noticed that openjdk support for gtk3 is substandard compared to gtk2
[19:59] <tdaitx> upstream knows there are problems and will _eventually_ fix those
[19:59] <tdaitx> widgets look worse on gtk3, there are padding issues, etc...
[19:59] <vorlon> tdaitx: I know, I remember you covering this a bit ago, I'm half trolling :)
[20:00] <vorlon> (and also somebody asked about it Tuesday I think :)
[20:00]  * tsimonq2 wonders if libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev is GTK 2 or GTK 3...
[20:00] <tdaitx> yeah, I know, I'm responding to the other half ;-)
[20:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: indicator-notifications (eoan-proposed/primary) [0.3.3-0ubuntu1]
[20:02] <tsimonq2> vorlon: ^
[20:02] <vorlon> ta
[20:03] <vorlon> well if openjdk can't make the gtk3 stuff work correctly maybe we'll just switch to Xaw
[20:03] <cjwatson> tsimonq2: Neither or both; it's a lower layer.  Both libgtk2.0-dev and libgtk3-dev depend on libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev
[20:04] <tsimonq2> cjwatson: Yeah, I guessed so. Thanks though.
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gupnp [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gupnp [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gupnp [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gupnp [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gupnp [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gupnp [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[20:05] <tsimonq2> cccccchekeltkibeivtgebnerjidibttciijrbvdfjee
[20:05] <tsimonq2> ...?
[20:05] <tsimonq2> Oh, right, my Yubikey. >_>
[20:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (bionic-proposed) [19.0.2-1ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected indicator-notifications [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.3.3-0ubuntu1]
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bash [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.4.18-2ubuntu1.1]
[20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bash [source] (xenial-proposed) [4.3-14ubuntu1.3]
[21:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (disco-proposed/main) [0.96-0ubuntu4.1 => 0.97-0ubuntu1~19.04.1] (core)
[21:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (disco-proposed) [0.97-0ubuntu1~19.04.1]
[21:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.97-0ubuntu1~18.10.1]
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.97-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[22:26] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/m/mira/eoan/ppc64el fwiw that's not how you do a release-pocket-only test of a package that has a newer version in -proposed; due to limitations in the implementation you need to use a different source package name as the trigger (one that is present only in release && !proposed)
[22:27] <vorlon> xnox: ^^ I've triggered a fresh autopkgtest run that will actually test the binaries in release
[22:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (xenial-proposed/universe) [18.09.5-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 18.09.5-0ubuntu1~16.04.2] (no packageset)
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (bionic-proposed/universe) [18.09.5-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 18.09.5-0ubuntu1~18.04.2] (no packageset)
[23:03] <mwhudson> vorlon: any chance you could look at these docker.io upload? I forgot to version the dependency on containerd :(
[23:03] <mwhudson> there's a cosmic one on the way too
[23:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (cosmic-proposed/universe) [18.09.5-0ubuntu1~18.10.1 => 18.09.5-0ubuntu1~18.10.2] (no packageset)
[23:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (cosmic-proposed) [18.09.5-0ubuntu1~18.10.2]
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.09.5-0ubuntu1~18.04.2]
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (xenial-proposed) [18.09.5-0ubuntu1~16.04.2]
[23:17] <mwhudson> vorlon: thank you
[23:17] <vorlon> mwhudson: n/p
[23:43] <mwhudson> vorlon, bdmurray: any chance of an early release for livecd-rootfs for disco and cosmic?