[06:40] <vorlon> Laney: seems there's a spike in autopkgtest runner testbed failures on arm64
[06:40] <vorlon> juliank: ^^
[07:02] <juliank> vorlon: ack
[07:06] <juliank> I see a lot of logs ending at login prompt
[07:07] <juliank> which confuses me as I'd hope to get some errors
[07:07] <Laney> network failed to come up?
[07:08] <Laney> none of the overnight failure emails mentioned arm64, so workers seem to be recovering
[07:08] <Laney> could be one compute node is wonky
[07:08] <juliank> Ah yes
[07:08] <juliank> Failed to sart: Waiting for network to be configured
[07:09] <juliank> Also, why it thinks it saw a kernel panic, I don't know, seems like some regex is a bit wrong
[07:09] <juliank> Laney: Latest failure was 3 mins ago
[07:09] <Laney> it's not failing *workers* though, so seems like the retries are working
[07:10] <Laney> you get 3 tries before they fall over
[07:10] <juliank> yes
[07:10] <juliank> only tmpfail
[07:11] <Laney> is there an instance ID in there somewhere?
[07:11] <Laney> IS might be able to grep logs to see if it's related to the compute node
[07:49] <cpaelzer> I yesterday added dpdk-doc in the seeds to an Extra-Exclude
[07:49] <cpaelzer> and I see it is gone from https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.eoan/all
[07:49] <cpaelzer> while formerly it had the usual line there for auto-includes like "... Rescued from dpdk"
[07:49] <cpaelzer> But in a eoan container it still is listed to be in main
[07:50] <cpaelzer> I wondere if there is just time until this is effective, or if I miss another action that has to be taken
[07:56] <vorlon> cpaelzer: "listed in main" is a manual processing of component-mismatches by the archive admins
[07:56] <vorlon> cpaelzer: i.e. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches
[07:56] <vorlon> cpaelzer: but why do you specifically want to demote these docs?
[07:58] <vorlon> cpaelzer: this doesn't appear to have been required based on dependencies.  Reading https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1814060/comments/9 doesn't seem like a good reason to me to demote the docs just because the examples might be poor
[07:58] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1814060 in dpdk (Ubuntu) "Disco: Please remove old version 17.11 binaries that are left" [Undecided,Fix released]
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.12]
[08:00] <cpaelzer> vorlon: yes it is not dependencies, you think having those examples declared to be supported while not being particularly great or reliable is not an issue
[08:01] <cpaelzer> I really think that puts too much expectations on them wich they might not hold
[08:02] <vorlon> cpaelzer: I don't think code examples in docs are ever "supported" and I have never had a bug report from someone who assumed they were
[08:02] <vorlon> I think you're trying to hold this package to a much different standard than the rest of the docs packages in main
[08:02] <cpaelzer> I was cleaning up dpdk depedencies in general, mostly focussed on the binaries - many of the awkward/experimental ones are now in universe which is great. cleaning up dpdk-doc was just a tail end cleanup
[08:03] <cpaelzer> but your experience on these cases clearly beats mine, so I'm ok following you
[08:03] <cpaelzer> I'll remove the Extra-exclude then
[08:03] <cpaelzer> I may quote you on the bug so that anyone coming by later (including myself) remembers then
[08:03] <cpaelzer> thanks vorlon
[08:04] <vorlon> that's fine, quote away :)
[08:11] <cpaelzer> vorlon: to complete my mindset on this, that "standard" we hold these packages to only applies to -doc and not to all packages that deliver an uncompiled source - so a -dev that wants to be in main would still have to be "better" right?
[08:12] <vorlon> cpaelzer: well, -dev in main we would certainly expect to be usable for compilation :)
[08:13] <cpaelzer> hehe, that even the examples in said -doc might have been :-)
[08:14] <cpaelzer> vorlon: I hope you can enjoy the sprint (location) - not further distracting you for now
[08:14] <vorlon> :)
[08:39] <mwhudson> hmm anyone around to release livecd-rootfs?
[08:46] <tkamppeter> bdmurray, RAOF, hi
[08:47] <tkamppeter>  bdmurray, RAOF, on the Bionic modemmanager SRU for bug 1819615 the autopkg tests have passed now, so it should be ready for -updates.
[08:47] <ubot5`> bug 1819615 in OEM Priority Project "For additional hardware support, modemmanager needs to be upgraded to 1.10 on Bionic" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1819615
[09:04] <vorlon> mwhudson: done
[09:10] <mwhudson> vorlon: yay
[09:10] <mwhudson> vorlon: thanks
[09:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (disco-proposed/main) [1.6+19.04ubuntu1 => 1.7+19.04ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (bionic-proposed/main) [1.6+18.04ubuntu1 => 1.7+18.04ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (xenial-proposed/main) [1.6+16.04ubuntu1 => 1.7+16.04ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.6+18.10ubuntu1 => 1.7+18.10ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[12:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (bionic-proposed/partner) [1:20190409.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 1:20190514.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[12:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (disco-proposed/partner) [1:20190409.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:20190514.1-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] (no packageset)
[12:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (cosmic-proposed/partner) [1:20190409.1-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 => 1:20190514.1-0ubuntu0.18.10.1] (no packageset)
[12:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20190409.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20190514.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset)
[12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (disco-proposed) [1:20190514.1-0ubuntu0.19.04.1]
[12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:20190514.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:20190514.1-0ubuntu0.18.10.1]
[12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20190514.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[12:45] <vorlon> seb128: so you closed your block-proposed bug again?  Do you want to reopen it and redemote, so that we can clean up the NBS old library versions? :)
[12:49] <seb128> bah, let me fix that. I expected that the old binaries would have stopped being available when the new version migrated and such those demoted packages would have stayed in eoan-proposed without the blocking bug
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: biosdevname (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-0ubuntu10 => 0.4.1-0ubuntu10.1] (no packageset)
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: biosdevname (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-0ubuntu9 => 0.4.1-0ubuntu9.1] (no packageset)
[13:42] <LocutusOfBorg> rmadison -u ubuntu libllvm8
[13:42] <LocutusOfBorg>  libllvm8 | 1:8~svn342638-1     | cosmic-proposed/universe | i386, s390x
[13:42] <LocutusOfBorg> what does this mean? the cosmic proposed archive cleanup and copy to disco failed for that library?
[13:42]  * LocutusOfBorg is happy that llvm-toolchain-snapshot is now gone for good
[14:33] <ddstreet> bdmurray apw can you push out debootstrap for cosmic for lp #1825250?  it will fix pbuilder autopkgtest regressions for my upload of debconf
[14:33] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1825250 in resource-agents (Debian) "ethmonitor does not list interfaces without assigned IP address" [Unknown,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1825250
[14:34] <ddstreet> sorry wrong bug, i meant lp #1825994 is the bug for debootstrap
[14:34] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1825994 in debootstrap (Ubuntu Cosmic) "Add Ubuntu Eoan as a known release" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1825994
[14:41] <bdmurray> ddstreet: Have you looked at the lxc ppc64el autopkgtest regression?
[14:41] <ddstreet> bdmurray yes, the test is flaky; i'm re-running it now
[14:41] <ddstreet> but i'll add a comment indicating that the test is flaky
[14:41] <bdmurray> ddstreet: great, thanks
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (cosmic-proposed/main) [18.5-45-g3554ffe8-0ubuntu1~18.10.1 => 19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~18.10.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [18.5-45-g3554ffe8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [18.5-45-g3554ffe8-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (disco-proposed) [1:19.04.16.5]
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:18.10.11.8]
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-50.54] (core, kernel)
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1018.18~18.04.1] (kernel)
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-50.54] (core, kernel)
[18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1011.12~18.04.1] (kernel)
[18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1032.34] (kernel)
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-15.16~18.04.1] (kernel)
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1032.34] (no packageset)
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-20.21~18.04.1] (kernel)
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-15.16~18.04.1] (kernel)
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1038.43] (kernel)
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-20.21~18.04.1] (kernel)
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-15.16~18.04.1] (kernel)
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1013.15] (kernel)
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1007.8] (no packageset)
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1011.12] (kernel)
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1018.18] (kernel)
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[18:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1006.6] (core, kernel)
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-15.16] (core, kernel)
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-15.16] (core, kernel)
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1006.6] (core, kernel)
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-15.16] (core, kernel)
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-148.174] (core, kernel)
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1045.49] (kernel)
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-50.54~16.04.1] (kernel)
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1032.34~16.04.1] (kernel)
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-50.54~16.04.1] (kernel)
[18:22] <cascardo> bdmurray: is there anything pending for cosmic and bionic SRUs of initramfs-tools ?
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-50.54]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1013.15~16.04.1] (kernel)
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-50.54]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-1018.18~18.04.1]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-1011.12~18.04.1]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1032.34~16.04.1]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-50.54~16.04.1]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-148.174]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1045.49]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1013.15~16.04.1]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-50.54~16.04.1]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1032.34]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1032.34]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-15.16~18.04.1]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-15.16~18.04.1]
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-15.16~18.04.1]
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-20.21~18.04.1]
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-20.21~18.04.1]
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1038.43]
[18:27] <bdmurray> cascardo: I'm sorry I don't understand what you mean by "anything pending".
[18:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1007.8]
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1013.15]
[18:28] <cascardo> bdmurray: the upload has been in the queue for a while, I wanted to know if there is anything that has prevented it from being accepted into -proposed
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-20.21]
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-20.21]
[18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-1018.18]
[18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-1011.12]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-15.16]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-15.16]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-15.16]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1006.6]
[18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1006.6]
[18:31] <bdmurray> cascardo: I'm not aware of anything. Frequently around release team, end of April and October, the SRU review queues develop a backlog as the SRU team is also busy with the development release.
[18:31] <bdmurray> release time not release team
[18:32] <bdmurray> cascardo: If you'd like it reviewed quickly ping the SRU person on duty for the day, which I guess is me!
[18:35] <bdmurray> cascardo: Do you want me to review it today?
[18:38] <cascardo> bdmurray: sure, please!
[18:44] <bdmurray> sil2100: bug 1828827 is missing an Ubuntu package task.
[18:44] <ubot5`> bug 1828827 in Ubuntu Image "SRU 1.7 tracking bug" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1828827
[18:44] <bdmurray> sil2100: s/is/was/
[18:45] <bdmurray> Oh, no wait LP hates me.
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-image [source] (disco-proposed) [1.7+19.04ubuntu1]
[18:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: hy (eoan-proposed/primary) [0.16.0-0ubuntu1]
[18:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dmarc-cat [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.9.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dmarc-cat [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.9.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dmarc-cat [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.9.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dmarc-cat [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.9.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dmarc-cat [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.9.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dmarc-cat [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.9.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-170.220] (core, kernel)
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-148.174~14.04.1] (kernel)
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1045.49~14.04.1] (kernel)
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-170.220]
[19:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.15.0-1045.49~14.04.1]
[19:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-148.174~14.04.1]
[19:53] <LocutusOfBorg> please reject hy from queue, needs some more fixes...
[19:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-image [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.7+18.10ubuntu1]
[19:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-image [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7+18.04ubuntu1]
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-image [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.7+16.04ubuntu1]
[20:18] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: not sure if it's getting too close to EOD (or already passed ;) )  if there is a chance today to peek at cloud-init's queued SRU into xenial, bionic, cosmic and disco we have a couple of things in the queue for a 19.1.1 SRU.    https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1828637
[20:18] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1828637 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (18.5-45 to 19.1.1) Xenial, Bionic, Cosmic, Disco" [Undecided,In progress]
[20:19] <blackboxsw> otherwise I can pick it up tomorrow with the SRU-team vanguards
[20:19] <bdmurray> blackboxsw: I'm UTC -7 or so, so I've a bit to go.
[20:20]  * blackboxsw wasn't sure if you were @ home or @ sprint     for the above cloud-int SRU disco is straight forward.  The  xenial,bionic and cosmic SRU contains a single additional patch to revert changes in tip for cc_ubuntu_advantage.py because ubuntu-advantage-tools has not SRU'd yet for Xenial, Bionic or Cosmic.
[20:21] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: thanks for peeking if there is time
[21:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.131ubuntu15.2]
[21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.130ubuntu3.8]
[21:52] <bdmurray> blackboxsw: bug 1828479 has no ubuntu tasks which is awkward / more work for the SRU team
[21:52] <ubot5`> bug 1828479 in cloud-init "Release 19.1" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1828479
[21:53] <bdmurray> same with bug 1825596
[21:53] <ubot5`> bug 1825596 in cloud-init "Azure reboot with unformatted ephemeral drive won't mount reformatted volume" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1825596
[21:53] <bdmurray> and bug 1825253
[21:53] <ubot5`> bug 1825253 in cloud-init "Unit tests with filesystem-related mocks fail in SeLinuxGuard when run on RHEL or CentOS" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1825253
[21:53] <bdmurray> and bug 1645824
[21:53] <ubot5`> bug 1645824 in cloud-init "NoCloud source doesn't work on FreeBSD" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1645824
[21:54] <bdmurray> and a bunch of those are missing SRU bug template information
[21:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected horizon [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3:14.0.2-0ubuntu3]
[22:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3:14.0.2-0ubuntu4]
[22:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (bionic-proposed) [3:13.0.1-0ubuntu6]