| LocutusOfBorg | hello please reject hy from queue, needs some more fixes... | 08:07 |
|---|---|---|
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected php7.0 [source] (xenial-proposed) [7.0.33-0ubuntu0.16.04.3] | 11:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-settings-daemon [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.18.2-0ubuntu3.2] | 11:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected udisks2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.1.7-1ubuntu2] | 11:59 | |
| slashd | sil2100, o/ by curiosity did you notice the following : http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/resource-agents/bionic/armhf it showing 'code 14' instead of passed or fails | 12:10 |
| slashd | ddstreet, ^ | 12:10 |
| ddstreet | yeah it's a real failure, halves is working on fixing it in lp #1828258 | 12:11 |
| ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1828258 in resource-agents (Ubuntu Eoan) "ldirectord systemd service fails if no /var/lock/subsys dir" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1828258 | 12:11 |
| ddstreet | i think 'code 14' means it couldn't install all test deps | 12:11 |
| slashd | ddstreet, thanks | 12:12 |
| halves | slashd ddstreet currently waiting on upstream for the ldirectord one https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/1328 | 12:12 |
| gitbot | ClusterLabs issue (Pull request) 1328 in resource-agents "ldirectord: Remove /var/lock from systemd unit" [Open] | 12:12 |
| acheronuk | 14 erroneous package and at least one test skipped | 12:13 |
| * acheronuk just learned something ^ | 12:13 | |
| slashd | 14 erroneous package and at least one test skipped | 12:16 |
| slashd | right ^ | 12:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted resolvconf [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.78ubuntu7] | 12:22 | |
| vorlon | how are the ubuntu and ubuntu-mate bionic dailies oversized by exactly the same amount >_< | 12:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted metaphlan2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.7.5-1ubuntu1] | 13:21 | |
| rbasak | Could an SRU team member please review lexicon in Bionic and Cosmic? I can't do it as I sponsored. | 13:22 |
| vorlon | rbasak: my rule of thumb is that if I didn't modify the package as part of sponsorship, I can wear both hats | 13:30 |
| rbasak | vorlon: I'm reluctant to do that. I sponsored for a non-uploader, and I don't think I want to be the only barrier to introducing a mistake (as the sponsoree supposedly isn't qualified; otherwise they'd be an uploader) | 13:32 |
| vorlon | right, I disagree, but I can't force you to self-review ;) | 13:32 |
| Laney | desktop-icons incoming with a wrong version, please reject it :| | 14:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons (disco-proposed/main) [19.01.1-1 => 19.01.3-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons (disco-proposed/main) [19.01.1-1 => 19.01.3-1~ubuntu19.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:20 | |
| Laney | second one there is better | 14:21 |
| Laney | also, retrying all arm64 failures | 14:21 |
| Laney | one of the clouds is having a bad day and I've taken it out of rotation | 14:21 |
| Laney | done | 14:22 |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: sorry for the lack of response yesterday, I got pulled away. Cloud-init follows an SRU exception @ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CloudinitUpdates where we only provide a single SRU process bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1828637, We have an exception do to extensive CI plus manual cloud-testing during verification | 15:51 |
| ubot5` | Ubuntu bug 1828637 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (18.5-45 to 19.1.1) Xenial, Bionic, Cosmic, Disco" [Undecided,In progress] | 15:51 |
| blackboxsw | so none of the other 'bugs' related to that SRU will carry SRU templates anymore | 15:52 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: then don't reference them in Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed | 15:52 |
| blackboxsw | we additionally still perform some level of manual verification on those bugs, which we track over in https://github.com/cloud-init/ubuntu-sru/tree/master/20190514 | 15:53 |
| * blackboxsw checks, I maybe botched the sru proposal. | 15:53 | |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed is created from the LP: # entries in the debian/changelog file. | 15:53 |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: ubuntu/xenial, bionic, cosmic debian/changelog only carries two bugs LP: #1828641 and LP: #1828637..... | 15:55 |
| ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1828641 in cloud-init "Xenial, Bionic, Cosmic revert ubuntu-advantage-tools config module changes from tip" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1828641 | 15:55 |
| ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1828637 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (18.5-45 to 19.1.1) Xenial, Bionic, Cosmic, Disco" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1828637 | 15:55 |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: ahh the disco proposal is broken... our publishing scripts didn't recognize it as a 'release/sru' distro series | 15:56 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: The disco one has a whole bunch - https://launchpadlibrarian.net/423221370/cloud-init_18.5-62-g6322c2dd-0ubuntu1_19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.1.diff.gz | 15:56 |
| blackboxsw | thanks for catching that, I'll fix that and re-push disco | 15:56 |
| blackboxsw | xenial/bionic/cosmic should be sane disco I'll fix now | 15:56 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: ah yeah, cosmic looks good. I just didn't pass GO after seeing disco | 15:57 |
| blackboxsw | thanks again bdmurray | 15:57 |
| blackboxsw | makes sense to me | 15:57 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: Okay, I'll reject disco and feel free to ping me when its ready for rereview | 15:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (disco-proposed) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.1] | 15:59 | |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: do I need to also change the version on disco from 19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.1 to 19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.2 so I can re-upload with fixed changelog. or can I re-use 19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.1 now that it's rejected | 15:59 |
| blackboxsw | since it never officially got into -proposed | 15:59 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: You can reuse it since it never appeared in the archive but you'll need to upload with dput -f | 16:00 |
| blackboxsw | excellent thanks, just fixed disco | 16:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lexicon [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.7.0-1ubuntu0.1] | 16:18 | |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: I haven't seen arges in a while . is he still SRU publishing vanguard on wednesdays? per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Publishing | 16:23 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: I haven't seen him in a while either | 16:24 |
| blackboxsw | or should we generally try rbasak on wednesdays | 16:24 |
| blackboxsw | and/or update the table in the wiki? | 16:25 |
| * blackboxsw isn't sure how that SRU vanguard process is sorted | 16:25 | |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: The SRU team should probably check in with him. | 16:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (bionic-proposed/main) [0.96.24.32.8 => 0.96.24.32.9] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 16:55 | |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: what did "just fixed disco" mean? I don't see it in the queue. | 17:10 |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: /me checks if the upload got rejected due to lints etc..... | 17:11 |
| blackboxsw | I uploaded a new disco release afaict....verifying | 17:11 |
| blackboxsw | hrm. .. looked ok from my cli .... https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/2j2bxQVwyK/ will re-attempt (I also see nothing in the queue) | 17:13 |
| blackboxsw | hrm Package has already been uploaded to ubuntu on upload.ubuntu.com | 17:16 |
| blackboxsw | ok removing the stock upload file that blocked me | 17:18 |
| blackboxsw | from the first upload | 17:18 |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: I manually dput the package again after removing the corresponding cloud-init_19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.1_source.ubuntu.upload. My dput CLI claims it successfully uploaded packages. Yet I don't see cloud-init in any state in the New or Unapproved queues @ https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/disco/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=cloud-init. Is it possible that my reusing the same version string as is | 17:28 |
| blackboxsw | currently 'Rejected' upload causes a hiccup here? | 17:28 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: can I see you source.changes file? | 17:30 |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/disco/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=cloud-init | 17:31 |
| blackboxsw | oops | 17:31 |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/qcqDRtgtZz/ | 17:31 |
| bdmurray | That looks sane to me. | 17:33 |
| bdmurray | Have you gotten an email about the upload? | 17:33 |
| blackboxsw | ahh just did, I hadn't earlier | 17:33 |
| blackboxsw | Files specified in DSC are broken or missing, skipping package unpack verification. | 17:34 |
| blackboxsw | ok | 17:34 |
| blackboxsw | File cloud-init_19.1-1-gbaa47854.orig.tar.gz already exists in Primary Archive for Ubuntu, but uploaded version has different contents. See more information about this error in https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/UploadErrors. | 17:34 |
| blackboxsw | ok I've referenced an invalid orig tar. | 17:34 |
| blackboxsw | will really fix it. I had a cached file locally that was referenced incorrectly. | 17:34 |
| blackboxsw | once sorted and in the queue properly I'll ping or I can table this for next SRU vanguard tomorrow if preferred. | 17:35 |
| bdmurray | I'm here all day. | 17:35 |
| blackboxsw | heh, excellent | 17:36 |
| blackboxsw | ok bdmurray, let's try this song again. unapproved queue shows the upload for disco now v | 17:48 |
| blackboxsw | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/disco/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=cloud-init | 17:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (disco-proposed/main) [18.5-62-g6322c2dd-0ubuntu1 => 19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.1] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud) | 17:48 | |
| blackboxsw | thx queuebot | 17:48 |
| blackboxsw | :) | 17:49 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.32 => 1:18.04.33] (core) | 17:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (disco-proposed) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.1] | 18:03 | |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: Hey there again. Can you explain the plan regarding bug 1828641 a bit more to me? It seems to me like there is going to be a cloud-init upload, then an u-a upload, then another cloud-init upload. Is that right? | 18:18 |
| ubot5` | bug 1828641 in cloud-init "Xenial, Bionic, Cosmic revert ubuntu-advantage-tools config module changes from tip" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1828641 | 18:18 |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: correct, there is active development that my squad owns that will ultimately result in an SRU of ubuntu-advantage-tools 19.1 or later into Trusty, Xenial, Bionic, and Disco... It will ultimately change the ubuntu-advantage-tools CLI to match what cloud-init tip(Disco and Eoan) currently supports in the ubuntu_advantage.py cloud-config module | 18:20 |
| blackboxsw | likely we will need to SRU ubuntu-advantage-tools 19.1 into cosmic too, so we don't carry different versions of the ubuntu-advantage-tools CLI around | 18:20 |
| blackboxsw | so when ubuntu-advantage-tools 19.1 SRUs, we'll drop the debian/patch from cloud-init for each series | 18:21 |
| blackboxsw | so basically we'll have to tightly couple the cloud-init (xenial/bionic/cosmic) and ubuntu-advantage-tools 19.1 SRU | 18:23 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: there isn't a way to make cloud-init handle either ubuntu-advantage? | 18:25 |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: there is not a away because the 'old' ubuntu-advantage-tools (v <= 18) expects a user to have specific tokens for the related support services (livepatch, esm, fips) in order to enable services. The new ubuntu-advantage-tools is able to obtain those tokens credentials from the backend service and doesn't require the use of those tokens on the commandline. The cloud-init team decided that because | 18:32 |
| blackboxsw | ubuntu-advantage-tools was breaking cli compatibility and because ua-tools decided explicitly to not to support an upgrade path from old ua-tools to new ua-tools that cloud-init would not try to support both old and new. The expectation is that for specific ubuntu-advantage-tools customer with support agreements, there will be some hand-holding to migrate supported users from old version to new version of | 18:32 |
| blackboxsw | ubuntu-advantage-tools. | 18:32 |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: .... well there is a 'way' for cloud-init to support both syntaxes in the ubuntu-advantage cloud-config, since the config directive keys are different in cloud-init. cloud-init *could* carry the burden of supporting both, but it was suggested that it wasn't worth it for this use case | 18:34 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: its up you y'all since you'll be doing the extra upload of cloud-init. | 18:35 |
| bdmurray | anyway it'll be important to get the debian/control changes right for the next uploads | 18:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (cosmic-proposed) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~18.10.1] | 18:40 | |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: for this case during the SRU of ubuntu-advantage-tools 19.1 (new) SRU. I'm wondering how best to express the minimum version requirement of an optional package dependency...... maybe Conflicts: ubuntu-advantage-tools < 19? | 18:40 |
| blackboxsw | the conflicts would be in cloud-init's debian/control. | 18:42 |
| blackboxsw | we'll make sure we call that out in our SRU process for next release. | 18:53 |
| Eickmeyer | vorlon: Where did we land on lsp-plugins? Would it help if I created a separate package (named something like, liblsp) that contained only the shared object that gets installed into /usr/lib? I understand your reluctance, but there's many other packages that install items directly to that directory. | 19:04 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: Your bionic changelog references u-a 19.1 and xenial. I'm willing to overlook it but thought I should mention it. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/423714836/cloud-init_18.5-45-g3554ffe8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1_19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~18.04.1.diff.gz | 19:05 |
| blackboxsw | bah +1. can repush if that's easier (then we don't have to worry about cleanup or referencing the wrong distro in a changelog | 19:07 |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: ok for me to rebuild-push and get that up in 10 mins? | 19:07 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: sure | 19:07 |
| blackboxsw | s/xenial/bionic in the changelog | 19:07 |
| blackboxsw | ok | 19:07 |
| blackboxsw | working it | 19:07 |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: will you be rejecting bioinic queue? | 19:08 |
| blackboxsw | so I can reuse the same changelog ver | 19:09 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: You can still reuse it but yes | 19:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] | 19:13 | |
| blackboxsw | thanks bdmurray new dput is up for bionic | 19:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [18.5-45-g3554ffe8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) | 19:16 | |
| blackboxsw | thank you sire | 19:16 |
| blackboxsw | *sir | 19:16 |
| * infinity prefers sire. | 19:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] | 19:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] | 19:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.27.1-6ubuntu3.7] | 20:40 | |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer: a separate liblsp package definitely does not help. As far as I'm concerned, the path lookup code needs to be cleaned up, and the file which is not a shared library (because it has no soname) needs to be moved into a subdirectory | 22:56 |
| Eickmeyer | vorlon: I can't clean up the code, I lack the know-how. What if it was in a subdirectory and then a symbollic link was created in the /usr/lib directory? | 22:59 |
| vorlon | no | 22:59 |
| vorlon | /usr/lib needs to be kept clean | 22:59 |
| Eickmeyer | Then why are there other non-shared libraries there? | 23:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dhcpoptinj [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblopsub [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1] (no packageset) | 23:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: emacs-neotree [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-diffobj [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dhcpoptinj [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dhcpoptinj [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblopsub [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-fontbitstreamvera [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.1.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dhcpoptinj [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-rhdf5 [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.26.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblopsub [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1] (no packageset) | 23:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblopsub [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-rhdf5 [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.26.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-diffobj [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-diffobj [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-ggthemes [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [4.1.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-rhdf5 [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.26.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-diffobj [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-venndiagram [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.6.20-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-apcluster [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.4.7-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-fontliberation [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.1.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dhcpoptinj [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-apcluster [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.4.7-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-apcluster [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.4.7-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dhcpoptinj [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-apcluster [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.4.7-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblopsub [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-rhdf5 [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.26.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-diffobj [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-rhdf5 [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.26.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-diffobj [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| Eickmeyer | vorlon: Filed an issue on Github, hopefully it'll get somewhere: https://github.com/sadko4u/lsp-plugins/issues/49 | 23:13 |
| gitbot | sadko4u issue 49 in lsp-plugins "lsp-plugins-jack-core-1.1.9.so installs to /usr/lib" [Open] | 23:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblopsub [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-apcluster [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.4.7-1] (no packageset) | 23:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-apcluster [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.4.7-1] (no packageset) | 23:15 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!