LocutusOfBorghello please reject hy from queue, needs some more fixes...08:07
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected php7.0 [source] (xenial-proposed) [7.0.33-0ubuntu0.16.04.3]11:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-settings-daemon [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.18.2-0ubuntu3.2]11:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected udisks2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.1.7-1ubuntu2]11:59
slashdsil2100, o/ by curiosity did you notice the following : http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/resource-agents/bionic/armhf it showing 'code 14' instead of passed or fails12:10
slashdddstreet, ^12:10
ddstreetyeah it's a real failure, halves is working on fixing it in lp #182825812:11
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1828258 in resource-agents (Ubuntu Eoan) "ldirectord systemd service fails if no /var/lock/subsys dir" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182825812:11
ddstreeti think 'code 14' means it couldn't install all test deps12:11
slashdddstreet, thanks12:12
halvesslashd ddstreet currently waiting on upstream for the ldirectord one https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/132812:12
gitbotClusterLabs issue (Pull request) 1328 in resource-agents "ldirectord: Remove /var/lock from systemd unit" [Open]12:12
acheronuk14 erroneous package and at least one test skipped12:13
* acheronuk just learned something ^12:13
slashd     14   erroneous package and at least one test skipped12:16
slashdright ^12:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted resolvconf [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.78ubuntu7]12:22
vorlonhow are the ubuntu and ubuntu-mate bionic dailies oversized by exactly the same amount >_<12:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted metaphlan2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.7.5-1ubuntu1]13:21
rbasakCould an SRU team member please review lexicon in Bionic and Cosmic? I can't do it as I sponsored.13:22
vorlonrbasak: my rule of thumb is that if I didn't modify the package as part of sponsorship, I can wear both hats13:30
rbasakvorlon: I'm reluctant to do that. I sponsored for a non-uploader, and I don't think I want to be the only barrier to introducing a mistake (as the sponsoree supposedly isn't qualified; otherwise they'd be an uploader)13:32
vorlonright, I disagree, but I can't force you to self-review ;)13:32
Laneydesktop-icons incoming with a wrong version, please reject it :|14:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons (disco-proposed/main) [19.01.1-1 => 19.01.3-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)14:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons (disco-proposed/main) [19.01.1-1 => 19.01.3-1~ubuntu19.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)14:20
Laneysecond one there is better14:21
Laneyalso, retrying all arm64 failures14:21
Laneyone of the clouds is having a bad day and I've taken it out of rotation14:21
blackboxswbdmurray: sorry for the lack of response yesterday, I got pulled away.   Cloud-init follows an SRU exception @ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CloudinitUpdates  where we only provide a single SRU process bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1828637, We have an exception do to extensive CI plus manual cloud-testing during verification15:51
ubot5`Ubuntu bug 1828637 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (18.5-45 to 19.1.1) Xenial, Bionic, Cosmic, Disco" [Undecided,In progress]15:51
blackboxswso none of the other 'bugs' related to that SRU will carry SRU templates anymore15:52
bdmurrayblackboxsw: then don't reference them in Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed15:52
blackboxswwe additionally still perform some level of manual verification on those bugs, which we track over in https://github.com/cloud-init/ubuntu-sru/tree/master/2019051415:53
* blackboxsw checks, I maybe botched the sru proposal.15:53
bdmurrayblackboxsw: Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed is created from the LP: # entries in the debian/changelog file.15:53
blackboxswbdmurray: ubuntu/xenial, bionic, cosmic  debian/changelog only carries two bugs LP: #1828641 and LP: #1828637.....15:55
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1828641 in cloud-init "Xenial, Bionic, Cosmic revert ubuntu-advantage-tools config module changes from tip" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182864115:55
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1828637 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (18.5-45 to 19.1.1) Xenial, Bionic, Cosmic, Disco" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182863715:55
blackboxswbdmurray: ahh the disco proposal is broken... our publishing scripts didn't recognize it as a 'release/sru' distro series15:56
bdmurrayblackboxsw: The disco one has a whole bunch - https://launchpadlibrarian.net/423221370/cloud-init_18.5-62-g6322c2dd-0ubuntu1_19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.1.diff.gz15:56
blackboxswthanks for catching that, I'll fix that and re-push disco15:56
blackboxswxenial/bionic/cosmic should be sane disco I'll fix now15:56
bdmurrayblackboxsw: ah yeah, cosmic looks good. I just didn't pass GO after seeing disco15:57
blackboxswthanks again bdmurray15:57
blackboxswmakes sense to me15:57
bdmurrayblackboxsw: Okay, I'll reject disco and feel free to ping me when its ready for rereview15:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (disco-proposed) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.1]15:59
blackboxswbdmurray: do I need to also change the version on disco from 19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.1 to 19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.2 so I can re-upload with fixed changelog. or can I re-use 19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.1 now that it's rejected15:59
blackboxswsince it never officially got into -proposed15:59
bdmurrayblackboxsw: You can reuse it since it never appeared in the archive but you'll need to upload with dput -f16:00
blackboxswexcellent thanks, just fixed disco16:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lexicon [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.7.0-1ubuntu0.1]16:18
blackboxswbdmurray: I haven't seen arges in a while . is he still SRU publishing vanguard on wednesdays? per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Publishing16:23
bdmurrayblackboxsw: I haven't seen him in a while either16:24
blackboxswor should we generally try rbasak on wednesdays16:24
blackboxswand/or update the table in the wiki?16:25
* blackboxsw isn't sure how that SRU vanguard process is sorted16:25
bdmurrayblackboxsw: The SRU team should probably check in with him.16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (bionic-proposed/main) [ =>] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)16:55
bdmurrayblackboxsw: what did "just fixed disco" mean? I don't see it in the queue.17:10
blackboxswbdmurray: /me checks  if the upload got rejected due to lints etc.....17:11
blackboxswI uploaded a new disco release afaict....verifying17:11
blackboxswhrm. .. looked ok from my cli .... https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/2j2bxQVwyK/  will re-attempt (I also see nothing in the queue)17:13
blackboxswhrm Package has already been uploaded to ubuntu on upload.ubuntu.com17:16
blackboxswok removing the stock upload file that blocked me17:18
blackboxswfrom the first upload17:18
blackboxswbdmurray: I manually dput the package again after removing the corresponding cloud-init_19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.1_source.ubuntu.upload. My dput CLI claims it successfully uploaded packages.  Yet I don't see cloud-init in any state in the New or Unapproved queues @ https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/disco/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=cloud-init.   Is it possible that my reusing the same version string as is17:28
blackboxswcurrently 'Rejected' upload causes a hiccup here?17:28
bdmurrayblackboxsw: can I see you source.changes file?17:30
blackboxswbdmurray: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/disco/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=cloud-init17:31
blackboxswbdmurray: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/qcqDRtgtZz/17:31
bdmurrayThat looks sane to me.17:33
bdmurrayHave you gotten an email about the upload?17:33
blackboxswahh just did, I hadn't earlier17:33
blackboxswFiles specified in DSC are broken or missing, skipping package unpack verification.17:34
blackboxswFile cloud-init_19.1-1-gbaa47854.orig.tar.gz already exists in Primary Archive for Ubuntu, but uploaded version has different contents. See more information about this error in https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/UploadErrors.17:34
blackboxswok I've referenced an invalid orig tar.17:34
blackboxswwill really fix it. I had a cached file locally that was referenced incorrectly.17:34
blackboxswonce sorted and in the queue properly I'll ping or I can table this for next SRU vanguard tomorrow if preferred.17:35
bdmurrayI'm here all day.17:35
blackboxswheh, excellent17:36
blackboxswok bdmurray, let's try this song again. unapproved queue shows the upload for disco now v17:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (disco-proposed/main) [18.5-62-g6322c2dd-0ubuntu1 => 19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.1] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)17:48
blackboxswthx queuebot17:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.32 => 1:18.04.33] (core)17:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (disco-proposed) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.1]18:03
bdmurrayblackboxsw: Hey there again. Can you explain the plan regarding bug 1828641 a bit more to me? It seems to me like there is going to be a cloud-init upload, then an u-a upload, then another cloud-init upload. Is that right?18:18
ubot5`bug 1828641 in cloud-init "Xenial, Bionic, Cosmic revert ubuntu-advantage-tools config module changes from tip" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182864118:18
blackboxswbdmurray: correct, there is active development that my squad owns that will ultimately result in an SRU of ubuntu-advantage-tools 19.1 or later into Trusty, Xenial, Bionic, and Disco... It will ultimately change the ubuntu-advantage-tools CLI to match what cloud-init tip(Disco and Eoan) currently supports in the ubuntu_advantage.py cloud-config module18:20
blackboxswlikely we will need to SRU ubuntu-advantage-tools 19.1 into cosmic too, so we don't carry different versions of the ubuntu-advantage-tools CLI around18:20
blackboxswso when ubuntu-advantage-tools 19.1 SRUs, we'll drop the debian/patch from cloud-init for each series18:21
blackboxswso basically we'll have to tightly couple  the cloud-init (xenial/bionic/cosmic) and ubuntu-advantage-tools 19.1 SRU18:23
bdmurrayblackboxsw: there isn't a way to make cloud-init handle either ubuntu-advantage?18:25
blackboxswbdmurray: there is not a away because the 'old' ubuntu-advantage-tools (v <= 18) expects a user to have specific tokens for the related support services (livepatch, esm, fips) in order to enable services. The new ubuntu-advantage-tools  is able to obtain those tokens credentials from the backend service and doesn't require the use of those tokens on the commandline. The cloud-init team decided that because18:32
blackboxswubuntu-advantage-tools was breaking cli compatibility and because ua-tools decided explicitly to not to support an upgrade path from old ua-tools to new ua-tools that cloud-init would not try to support both old and new. The expectation is that for specific ubuntu-advantage-tools customer with support agreements, there will be some hand-holding to migrate supported users from old version to new version of18:32
blackboxswbdmurray: .... well there is a 'way' for cloud-init to support both syntaxes in the ubuntu-advantage cloud-config, since the config directive keys are different in cloud-init. cloud-init *could* carry the burden of supporting both, but it was suggested that it wasn't worth it for this use case18:34
bdmurrayblackboxsw: its up you y'all since you'll be doing the extra upload of cloud-init.18:35
bdmurrayanyway it'll be important to get the debian/control changes right for the next uploads18:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (cosmic-proposed) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~18.10.1]18:40
blackboxswbdmurray: for this case during the SRU of ubuntu-advantage-tools 19.1 (new) SRU. I'm wondering how best to express the minimum version requirement of an optional package dependency...... maybe Conflicts: ubuntu-advantage-tools < 19?18:40
blackboxswthe conflicts would be in cloud-init's debian/control.18:42
blackboxswwe'll make sure we call that out in our SRU process for next release.18:53
Eickmeyervorlon: Where did we land on lsp-plugins? Would it help if I created a separate package (named something like, liblsp) that contained only the shared object that gets installed into /usr/lib? I understand your reluctance, but there's many other packages that install items directly to that directory.19:04
bdmurrayblackboxsw: Your bionic changelog references u-a 19.1 and xenial. I'm willing to overlook it but thought I should mention it. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/423714836/cloud-init_18.5-45-g3554ffe8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1_19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~18.04.1.diff.gz19:05
blackboxswbah +1. can repush if that's easier (then we don't have to worry about cleanup or referencing the wrong distro in a changelog19:07
blackboxswbdmurray: ok for me to rebuild-push and get that up in 10 mins?19:07
bdmurrayblackboxsw: sure19:07
blackboxsws/xenial/bionic in the changelog19:07
blackboxswworking it19:07
blackboxswbdmurray: will you be rejecting bioinic queue?19:08
blackboxswso I can reuse the same changelog ver19:09
bdmurrayblackboxsw: You can still reuse it but yes19:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]19:13
blackboxswthanks bdmurray new dput is up for bionic19:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [18.5-45-g3554ffe8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)19:16
blackboxswthank you sire19:16
* infinity prefers sire.19:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]19:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]19:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.27.1-6ubuntu3.7]20:40
vorlonEickmeyer: a separate liblsp package definitely does not help.  As far as I'm concerned, the path lookup code needs to be cleaned up, and the file which is not a shared library (because it has no soname) needs to be moved into a subdirectory22:56
Eickmeyervorlon: I can't clean up the code, I lack the know-how. What if it was in a subdirectory and then a symbollic link was created in the /usr/lib directory?22:59
vorlon /usr/lib needs to be kept clean22:59
EickmeyerThen why are there other non-shared libraries there?23:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dhcpoptinj [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset)23:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblopsub [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset)23:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1] (no packageset)23:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: emacs-neotree [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset)23:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-diffobj [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)23:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dhcpoptinj [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dhcpoptinj [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblopsub [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-fontbitstreamvera [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.1.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dhcpoptinj [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-rhdf5 [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.26.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblopsub [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblopsub [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-rhdf5 [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.26.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-diffobj [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-diffobj [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-ggthemes [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [4.1.1-1] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-rhdf5 [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.26.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-diffobj [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-venndiagram [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.6.20-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-apcluster [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.4.7-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-fontliberation [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.1.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dhcpoptinj [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-apcluster [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.4.7-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-apcluster [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.4.7-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dhcpoptinj [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-apcluster [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.4.7-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblopsub [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-rhdf5 [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.26.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-diffobj [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-rhdf5 [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.26.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: umis [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-diffobj [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)23:12
Eickmeyervorlon: Filed an issue on Github, hopefully it'll get somewhere: https://github.com/sadko4u/lsp-plugins/issues/4923:13
gitbotsadko4u issue 49 in lsp-plugins "lsp-plugins-jack-core-1.1.9.so installs to /usr/lib" [Open]23:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblopsub [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset)23:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-apcluster [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.4.7-1] (no packageset)23:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-apcluster [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.4.7-1] (no packageset)23:15

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!