rcj | infinity, bdmurray? ^ | 00:26 |
---|---|---|
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.542.4] | 04:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.25] | 04:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.47] | 04:21 | |
marcustomlinson | hi sil2100, if you have any free cycles to today, please could you have a look at my libreoffice SRUs for xenial and bionic? | 06:49 |
sil2100 | marcustomlinson: hey! Sure thing | 07:03 |
marcustomlinson | sil2100: thanks! | 07:03 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9 (disco-proposed/main) [9-20190402-1ubuntu1 => 9.1.0-2ubuntu2~19.04] (core) (sync) | 07:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9-cross (disco-proposed/main) [4ubuntu4 => 4ubuntu4.1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 07:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9-cross-ports (disco-proposed/universe) [3ubuntu4 => 3ubuntu4.1] (no packageset) (sync) | 07:16 | |
mwhudson | sil2100: could you also look at releasing containerd/docker.io/runc for bionic and cosmic? :) | 08:34 |
sil2100 | mwhudson: doing it just now | 08:38 |
sil2100 | docker.io got copied, but then I'm getting timeouts all the time ;/ So will take a moment | 08:39 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu7.3] | 08:44 | |
* Laney forgot about the proposed-migration config mangling that happens in b1 | 09:01 | |
Laney | was getting angry that my changes kept being reverted | 09:01 |
sil2100 | Laney: as for the SRU regression messaging, thinking about it now I might want to add one thing before we switch it from dry-run to a normal one | 09:17 |
sil2100 | Laney: since I guess we want to only do this for stable series | 09:17 |
sil2100 | I'll prep something for that today | 09:18 |
Laney | sil2100: you mean to the text? | 09:28 |
Laney | https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/bionic/2019-05-23/09:14:21.log btw ;-) | 09:28 |
Laney | (hopefully fixed) | 09:28 |
sil2100 | Laney: I mean not commenting on bugs from the current development release, since that makes no sense there | 09:29 |
sil2100 | Ouchie | 09:29 |
Laney | sil2100: oh yeah, that's handled in britney1, just turning the config on for the right releases only | 09:31 |
Laney | like we do for the email policy already | 09:31 |
Laney | sil2100: ok https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/disco/2019-05-23/09:52:22.log | 10:02 |
Laney | now why didn't it try to send for libseccomp? | 10:02 |
sil2100 | Laney: let me try investigating that - most important thing is that it's not exploding anymore ;p | 10:04 |
sil2100 | Laney: I'll look at that so that you don't have to waste any time | 10:05 |
Laney | thanks ♥ | 10:07 |
sil2100 | Laney: thanks for shepherding it to production! | 10:15 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1] (kernel) | 11:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1] (kernel) | 11:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1] (kernel) | 11:04 | |
Laney | sil2100: the state file doesn't seem to be working either, it's emailing every run | 11:06 |
Laney | oh yes save_progress() bails out in that case | 11:09 |
Laney | hmm not sure about this .new logic on a second look; what's it trying to protect against? | 11:14 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (bionic-proposed/universe) [20190315-0ubuntu1~18.04.0 => 20190521-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 12:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (disco-proposed/main) [20190315-0ubuntu1~19.04.0 => 20190521-0ubuntu1~19.04.0] (core, ubuntu-cloud) | 12:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (cosmic-proposed/main) [20190315-0ubuntu1~18.10.0 => 20190521-0ubuntu1~18.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 12:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20190315-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 20190521-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 12:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: finalrd (bionic-proposed/primary) [3~ubuntu18.04.0] | 13:02 | |
rbalint | xnox, ^ \o/ | 13:25 |
rbalint | sil2100, could you please accept the gce-compute-image-packages packages? | 13:26 |
xnox | rbalint: heh. thanks. but like NEW queue in stable releases is typically ignored, so i expect for like bionic to go EOESM before it gets accepted. | 13:27 |
rbalint | xnox, it is quite important to fix shutdown i can't believe it won't be accepted quickly | 13:33 |
sil2100 | rbalint: I'll try | 14:02 |
sil2100 | marcustomlinson: regarding libreoffice - for bionic I don't see libreoffice-l10n, is it not needed? | 14:10 |
marcustomlinson | sil2100: not needed no | 14:10 |
sil2100 | marcustomlinson: ACK | 14:11 |
sil2100 | Laney: yeah, I see some more unneeded leftover code I need to prune ;/ Will push fixes after my SRU shift | 14:12 |
Laney | sil2100: ok :-) | 14:14 |
Laney | I've stopped looking at it anyway so I'll not be pointing anything else out right now | 14:14 |
Laney | :P | 14:14 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-good1.0 (bionic-security/main) [1.14.1-1ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1 => 1.14.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync) | 14:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-good1.0 [sync] (bionic-security) [1.14.0-1ubuntu1] | 14:23 | |
Laney | what | 14:26 |
sil2100 | Laney: shhh, you didn't see anything o/ | 14:48 |
sil2100 | Laney: but seriously, I had to promote one of it's binaries to main, but we only had gst-plugins-good1.0 in bionic release and -updates | 14:49 |
sil2100 | Laney: didn't want to cause a mismatch for only promoting the one in -updates, so I bin-copied release to security and promoted the binary in both pockets to main | 14:50 |
sil2100 | (since the release pocket is immutable) | 14:50 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.6] | 14:51 | |
Laney | for that libreoffice upload right? | 14:51 |
sil2100 | Yeah | 14:52 |
sil2100 | The source is already in main, but the needed binary was not | 14:52 |
Laney | I guess if that SRU is heading for -security it makes sense | 14:53 |
sil2100 | Laney: it's not going there actually, but my thinking here is: if I only promoted the -updates one and security would want to release a libreoffice security update, we might forget that the binary is not in main for -security and get a mismatch then | 14:55 |
sil2100 | So I preferred to promote in all the pockets, since sooner or later a new libreoffice in -security might appear | 14:56 |
sil2100 | Possibly unneeded, but oh well | 14:56 |
Laney | 🕺 | 14:59 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:5.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu1~xenial7] | 14:59 | |
Laney | sil2100: I can understand the reasoning actually, since the tooling there isn't very good it'd be easy to miss next time | 14:59 |
marcustomlinson | sil2100: thank you! | 15:12 |
Eickmeyer | xnox: I'm working on figuring out how we differ from xubuntu in regards to bug 1830201. Can you shed some light on this? | 16:27 |
ubot5 | bug 1830201 in ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu) "ubiquity-frontend-gtk and ubiquity-frontend-gtk-panel split" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1830201 | 16:27 |
Eickmeyer | We = Ubuntu Studio | 16:28 |
xnox | Eickmeyer: well, maybe you don't. the code that was done in ubiquity is this one: | 16:36 |
xnox | Eickmeyer: https://git.launchpad.net/ubiquity/commit/?id=40ed9a796bc4c06d4409944d4b22766dc2d4790b | 16:37 |
Eickmeyer | xnox: I've been inspecting our default panel layouts and have discovered some differences, but I don't know if it's related. | 16:37 |
xnox | Eickmeyer: so that bit says, that during maybe-ubiquity or only-ubiquity do not launch panel app if | 16:38 |
xnox | xfwm4 is the wm_cmd | 16:38 |
xnox | and studio i guess uese xfwm4 for ubuntu-dm | 16:38 |
xnox | and thus i guess you don't use panel app | 16:38 |
xnox | subsequently that panel is empty if there are no indicators available. | 16:38 |
xnox | which xubuntu unseeded. | 16:39 |
Eickmeyer | Correct. We use Xfce as the desktop, therefore this shouldn't apply to us at all. We're more closely related to Xubuntu in this respect. | 16:39 |
xnox | they still seed something-something-app-indicator such that any weird 3rd party things can publish into panel, just nothing by default in neither live or ubiquity-dm | 16:39 |
Eickmeyer | Studio has used Xfce since 12.04. | 16:39 |
xnox | ack | 16:39 |
xnox | so i guess studio is out, but let me check seeds, one sec. | 16:39 |
Eickmeyer | k | 16:39 |
xnox | $ grep indicator */* 2>/dev/null | grep -e xubuntu -e studio | 16:40 |
xnox | ubuntustudio/desktop: * (indicator-messages) | 16:40 |
xnox | ubuntustudio/desktop-core: * (xfce4-indicator-plugin) | 16:40 |
xnox | ubuntustudio/desktop-core: * (indicator-application) | 16:40 |
xnox | ubuntustudio/desktop-core: * (indicator-sound) | 16:40 |
xnox | xubuntu/core: * (xfce4-indicator-plugin) | 16:41 |
xnox | xubuntu/desktop: * (indicator-messages) | 16:41 |
xnox | so slight difference of studio recommending -mesages and -sound which xubuntu i guess dropped | 16:41 |
xnox | Eickmeyer: maybe you want to trace that, and see if you'd like to also drop that. | 16:41 |
xnox | Eickmeyer: but at least there is no action on your part needed for the panel seed then. | 16:41 |
Eickmeyer | xnox: ack. I'll invalidate the bug for us, and we just decided that it's best to work on this now rather than during the 20.04 cycle irt -application and -sound. | 16:42 |
xnox | sorry -sound & -application | 16:43 |
xnox | cool! | 16:43 |
Eickmeyer | Thanks! | 16:43 |
xnox | Eickmeyer: note canonical no longer uses, nor maintains indicator-* stack. It would be nice to remove them from the archive, but we can't as it's still seeded in flavours. | 16:43 |
Eickmeyer | xnox: ack, as soon as we get the panel layout synced with Xubuntu we can likely drop the indicator-* stack. | 16:44 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: monero [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.14.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 17:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1033.35] | 17:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1] | 17:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1] | 17:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1] | 17:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: monero [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.14.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 18:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.4.8+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 18:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.4.8+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 18:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.4.8+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 18:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.4.8+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 18:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: monero [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.14.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 19:05 | |
rcj | Can I get an SRU member to review livecd-rootfs in the upload queue for disco? | 20:08 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted monero [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [0.14.0.2-1] | 20:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [i386] (eoan-proposed) [3.4.8+dfsg-1] | 20:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [3.4.8+dfsg-1] | 20:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [3.4.8+dfsg-1] | 20:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted monero [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.14.0.2-1] | 20:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [3.4.8+dfsg-1] | 20:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted monero [i386] (eoan-proposed) [0.14.0.2-1] | 20:10 | |
vorlon | rcj: wasn't disco going to get another fix to magic-proxy? | 20:27 |
rcj | vorlon: Oh yeah, I thought it was in there. Okay, so I need an upload of https://code.launchpad.net/~rcj/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/367729 | 20:29 |
rcj | drat | 20:29 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (disco-proposed/main) [2.578.2 => 2.578.4] (desktop-core) | 20:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (disco-proposed) [2.578.3] | 20:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (disco-proposed) [2.578.4] | 20:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubiquity [i386] (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.2] (core) | 21:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubiquity [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.2] (core) | 21:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubiquity [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.2] (core) | 21:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubiquity [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.2] (core) | 21:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubiquity [armhf] (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.2] (core) | 21:34 | |
rcj | vorlon: Thank you | 21:43 |
vorlon | rcj: n/p | 22:02 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!