/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/05/23/#ubuntu-release.txt

rcjinfinity, bdmurray? ^00:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.542.4]04:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.25]04:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.47]04:21
marcustomlinsonhi sil2100, if you have any free cycles to today, please could you have a look at my libreoffice SRUs for xenial and bionic?06:49
sil2100marcustomlinson: hey! Sure thing07:03
marcustomlinsonsil2100: thanks!07:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9 (disco-proposed/main) [9-20190402-1ubuntu1 => 9.1.0-2ubuntu2~19.04] (core) (sync)07:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9-cross (disco-proposed/main) [4ubuntu4 => 4ubuntu4.1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)07:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9-cross-ports (disco-proposed/universe) [3ubuntu4 => 3ubuntu4.1] (no packageset) (sync)07:16
mwhudsonsil2100: could you also look at releasing containerd/docker.io/runc for bionic and cosmic? :)08:34
sil2100mwhudson: doing it just now08:38
sil2100docker.io got copied, but then I'm getting timeouts all the time ;/ So will take a moment08:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu7.3]08:44
* Laney forgot about the proposed-migration config mangling that happens in b109:01
Laneywas getting angry that my changes kept being reverted09:01
sil2100Laney: as for the SRU regression messaging, thinking about it now I might want to add one thing before we switch it from dry-run to a normal one09:17
sil2100Laney: since I guess we want to only do this for stable series09:17
sil2100I'll prep something for that today09:18
Laneysil2100: you mean to the text?09:28
Laneyhttps://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/bionic/2019-05-23/09:14:21.log btw ;-)09:28
Laney(hopefully fixed)09:28
sil2100Laney: I mean not commenting on bugs from the current development release, since that makes no sense there09:29
sil2100Ouchie09:29
Laneysil2100: oh yeah, that's handled in britney1, just turning the config on for the right releases only09:31
Laneylike we do for the email policy already09:31
Laneysil2100: ok https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/disco/2019-05-23/09:52:22.log10:02
Laneynow why didn't it try to send for libseccomp?10:02
sil2100Laney: let me try investigating that - most important thing is that it's not exploding anymore ;p10:04
sil2100Laney: I'll look at that so that you don't have to waste any time10:05
Laneythanks ♥10:07
sil2100Laney: thanks for shepherding it to production!10:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1] (kernel)11:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1] (kernel)11:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1] (kernel)11:04
Laneysil2100: the state file doesn't seem to be working either, it's emailing every run11:06
Laneyoh yes save_progress() bails out in that case11:09
Laneyhmm not sure about this .new logic on a second look; what's it trying to protect against?11:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (bionic-proposed/universe) [20190315-0ubuntu1~18.04.0 => 20190521-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)12:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (disco-proposed/main) [20190315-0ubuntu1~19.04.0 => 20190521-0ubuntu1~19.04.0] (core, ubuntu-cloud)12:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (cosmic-proposed/main) [20190315-0ubuntu1~18.10.0 => 20190521-0ubuntu1~18.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud)12:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20190315-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 20190521-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)12:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: finalrd (bionic-proposed/primary) [3~ubuntu18.04.0]13:02
rbalintxnox, ^ \o/13:25
rbalintsil2100, could you please accept the gce-compute-image-packages packages?13:26
xnoxrbalint:  heh. thanks. but like NEW queue in stable releases is typically ignored, so i expect for like bionic to go EOESM before it gets accepted.13:27
rbalintxnox, it is quite important to fix shutdown i can't believe it won't be accepted quickly13:33
sil2100rbalint: I'll try14:02
sil2100marcustomlinson: regarding libreoffice - for bionic I don't see libreoffice-l10n, is it not needed?14:10
marcustomlinsonsil2100: not needed no14:10
sil2100marcustomlinson: ACK14:11
sil2100Laney: yeah, I see some more unneeded leftover code I need to prune ;/ Will push fixes after my SRU shift14:12
Laneysil2100: ok :-)14:14
LaneyI've stopped looking at it anyway so I'll not be pointing anything else out right now14:14
Laney:P14:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-good1.0 (bionic-security/main) [1.14.1-1ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1 => 1.14.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync)14:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-good1.0 [sync] (bionic-security) [1.14.0-1ubuntu1]14:23
Laneywhat14:26
sil2100Laney: shhh, you didn't see anything o/14:48
sil2100Laney: but seriously, I had to promote one of it's binaries to main, but we only had gst-plugins-good1.0 in bionic release and -updates14:49
sil2100Laney: didn't want to cause a mismatch for only promoting the one in -updates, so I bin-copied release to security and promoted the binary in both pockets to main14:50
sil2100(since the release pocket is immutable)14:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.6]14:51
Laneyfor that libreoffice upload right?14:51
sil2100Yeah14:52
sil2100The source is already in main, but the needed binary was not14:52
LaneyI guess if that SRU is heading for -security it makes sense14:53
sil2100Laney: it's not going there actually, but my thinking here is: if I only promoted the -updates one and security would want to release a libreoffice security update, we might forget that the binary is not in main for -security and get a mismatch then14:55
sil2100So I preferred to promote in all the pockets, since sooner or later a new libreoffice in -security might appear14:56
sil2100Possibly unneeded, but oh well14:56
Laney🕺14:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:5.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu1~xenial7]14:59
Laneysil2100: I can understand the reasoning actually, since the tooling there isn't very good it'd be easy to miss next time14:59
marcustomlinsonsil2100: thank you!15:12
Eickmeyerxnox: I'm working on figuring out how we differ from xubuntu in regards to bug 1830201. Can you shed some light on this?16:27
ubot5bug 1830201 in ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu) "ubiquity-frontend-gtk and ubiquity-frontend-gtk-panel split" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/183020116:27
EickmeyerWe = Ubuntu Studio16:28
xnoxEickmeyer:  well, maybe you don't. the code that was done in ubiquity is this one:16:36
xnoxEickmeyer:  https://git.launchpad.net/ubiquity/commit/?id=40ed9a796bc4c06d4409944d4b22766dc2d4790b16:37
Eickmeyerxnox: I've been inspecting our default panel layouts and have discovered some differences, but I don't know if it's related.16:37
xnoxEickmeyer:  so that bit says, that during maybe-ubiquity or only-ubiquity do not launch panel app if16:38
xnoxxfwm4 is the wm_cmd16:38
xnoxand studio i guess uese xfwm4 for ubuntu-dm16:38
xnoxand thus i guess you don't use panel app16:38
xnoxsubsequently that panel is empty if there are no indicators available.16:38
xnoxwhich xubuntu unseeded.16:39
EickmeyerCorrect. We use Xfce as the desktop, therefore this shouldn't apply to us at all. We're more closely related to Xubuntu in this respect.16:39
xnoxthey still seed something-something-app-indicator such that any weird 3rd party things can publish into panel, just nothing by default in neither live or ubiquity-dm16:39
EickmeyerStudio has used Xfce since 12.04.16:39
xnoxack16:39
xnoxso i guess studio is out, but let me check seeds, one sec.16:39
Eickmeyerk16:39
xnox$ grep indicator */* 2>/dev/null | grep -e xubuntu -e studio16:40
xnoxubuntustudio/desktop: * (indicator-messages)16:40
xnoxubuntustudio/desktop-core: * (xfce4-indicator-plugin)16:40
xnoxubuntustudio/desktop-core: * (indicator-application)16:40
xnoxubuntustudio/desktop-core: * (indicator-sound)16:40
xnoxxubuntu/core: * (xfce4-indicator-plugin)16:41
xnoxxubuntu/desktop: * (indicator-messages)16:41
xnoxso slight difference of studio recommending -mesages and -sound which xubuntu i guess dropped16:41
xnoxEickmeyer:  maybe you want to trace that, and see if you'd like to also drop that.16:41
xnoxEickmeyer:  but at least there is no action on your part needed for the panel seed then.16:41
Eickmeyerxnox: ack. I'll invalidate the bug for us, and we just decided that it's best to work on this now rather than during the 20.04 cycle irt -application and -sound.16:42
xnoxsorry -sound & -application16:43
xnoxcool!16:43
EickmeyerThanks!16:43
xnoxEickmeyer:  note canonical no longer uses, nor maintains indicator-* stack. It would be nice to remove them from the archive, but we can't as it's still seeded in flavours.16:43
Eickmeyerxnox: ack, as soon as we get the panel layout synced with Xubuntu we can likely drop the indicator-* stack.16:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: monero [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.14.0.2-1] (no packageset)17:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1033.35]17:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1]17:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1]17:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1]17:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: monero [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.14.0.2-1] (no packageset)18:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.4.8+dfsg-1] (no packageset)18:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.4.8+dfsg-1] (no packageset)18:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.4.8+dfsg-1] (no packageset)18:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.4.8+dfsg-1] (no packageset)18:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: monero [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.14.0.2-1] (no packageset)19:05
rcjCan I get an SRU member to review livecd-rootfs in the upload queue for disco?20:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted monero [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [0.14.0.2-1]20:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [i386] (eoan-proposed) [3.4.8+dfsg-1]20:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [3.4.8+dfsg-1]20:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [3.4.8+dfsg-1]20:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted monero [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.14.0.2-1]20:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [3.4.8+dfsg-1]20:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted monero [i386] (eoan-proposed) [0.14.0.2-1]20:10
vorlonrcj: wasn't disco going to get another fix to magic-proxy?20:27
rcjvorlon: Oh yeah, I thought it was in there.  Okay, so I need an upload of https://code.launchpad.net/~rcj/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/36772920:29
rcjdrat20:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (disco-proposed/main) [2.578.2 => 2.578.4] (desktop-core)20:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (disco-proposed) [2.578.3]20:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (disco-proposed) [2.578.4]20:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubiquity [i386] (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.2] (core)21:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubiquity [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.2] (core)21:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubiquity [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.2] (core)21:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubiquity [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.2] (core)21:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubiquity [armhf] (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.2] (core)21:34
rcjvorlon: Thank you21:43
vorlonrcj: n/p22:02

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!