[00:26] <rcj> infinity, bdmurray? ^
[04:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.542.4]
[04:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.25]
[04:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.47]
[06:49] <marcustomlinson> hi sil2100, if you have any free cycles to today, please could you have a look at my libreoffice SRUs for xenial and bionic?
[07:03] <sil2100> marcustomlinson: hey! Sure thing
[07:03] <marcustomlinson> sil2100: thanks!
[07:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9 (disco-proposed/main) [9-20190402-1ubuntu1 => 9.1.0-2ubuntu2~19.04] (core) (sync)
[07:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9-cross (disco-proposed/main) [4ubuntu4 => 4ubuntu4.1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9-cross-ports (disco-proposed/universe) [3ubuntu4 => 3ubuntu4.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:34] <mwhudson> sil2100: could you also look at releasing containerd/docker.io/runc for bionic and cosmic? :)
[08:38] <sil2100> mwhudson: doing it just now
[08:39] <sil2100> docker.io got copied, but then I'm getting timeouts all the time ;/ So will take a moment
[08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu7.3]
[09:01]  * Laney forgot about the proposed-migration config mangling that happens in b1
[09:01] <Laney> was getting angry that my changes kept being reverted
[09:17] <sil2100> Laney: as for the SRU regression messaging, thinking about it now I might want to add one thing before we switch it from dry-run to a normal one
[09:17] <sil2100> Laney: since I guess we want to only do this for stable series
[09:18] <sil2100> I'll prep something for that today
[09:28] <Laney> sil2100: you mean to the text?
[09:28] <Laney> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/bionic/2019-05-23/09:14:21.log btw ;-)
[09:28] <Laney> (hopefully fixed)
[09:29] <sil2100> Laney: I mean not commenting on bugs from the current development release, since that makes no sense there
[09:29] <sil2100> Ouchie
[09:31] <Laney> sil2100: oh yeah, that's handled in britney1, just turning the config on for the right releases only
[09:31] <Laney> like we do for the email policy already
[10:02] <Laney> sil2100: ok https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/disco/2019-05-23/09:52:22.log
[10:02] <Laney> now why didn't it try to send for libseccomp?
[10:04] <sil2100> Laney: let me try investigating that - most important thing is that it's not exploding anymore ;p
[10:05] <sil2100> Laney: I'll look at that so that you don't have to waste any time
[10:07] <Laney> thanks ♥
[10:15] <sil2100> Laney: thanks for shepherding it to production!
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1] (kernel)
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1] (kernel)
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1] (kernel)
[11:06] <Laney> sil2100: the state file doesn't seem to be working either, it's emailing every run
[11:09] <Laney> oh yes save_progress() bails out in that case
[11:14] <Laney> hmm not sure about this .new logic on a second look; what's it trying to protect against?
[12:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (bionic-proposed/universe) [20190315-0ubuntu1~18.04.0 => 20190521-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[12:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (disco-proposed/main) [20190315-0ubuntu1~19.04.0 => 20190521-0ubuntu1~19.04.0] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[12:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (cosmic-proposed/main) [20190315-0ubuntu1~18.10.0 => 20190521-0ubuntu1~18.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[12:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20190315-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 20190521-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: finalrd (bionic-proposed/primary) [3~ubuntu18.04.0]
[13:25] <rbalint> xnox, ^ \o/
[13:26] <rbalint> sil2100, could you please accept the gce-compute-image-packages packages?
[13:27] <xnox> rbalint:  heh. thanks. but like NEW queue in stable releases is typically ignored, so i expect for like bionic to go EOESM before it gets accepted.
[13:33] <rbalint> xnox, it is quite important to fix shutdown i can't believe it won't be accepted quickly
[14:02] <sil2100> rbalint: I'll try
[14:10] <sil2100> marcustomlinson: regarding libreoffice - for bionic I don't see libreoffice-l10n, is it not needed?
[14:10] <marcustomlinson> sil2100: not needed no
[14:11] <sil2100> marcustomlinson: ACK
[14:12] <sil2100> Laney: yeah, I see some more unneeded leftover code I need to prune ;/ Will push fixes after my SRU shift
[14:14] <Laney> sil2100: ok :-)
[14:14] <Laney> I've stopped looking at it anyway so I'll not be pointing anything else out right now
[14:14] <Laney> :P
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-good1.0 (bionic-security/main) [1.14.1-1ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1 => 1.14.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-good1.0 [sync] (bionic-security) [1.14.0-1ubuntu1]
[14:26] <Laney> what
[14:48] <sil2100> Laney: shhh, you didn't see anything o/
[14:49] <sil2100> Laney: but seriously, I had to promote one of it's binaries to main, but we only had gst-plugins-good1.0 in bionic release and -updates
[14:50] <sil2100> Laney: didn't want to cause a mismatch for only promoting the one in -updates, so I bin-copied release to security and promoted the binary in both pockets to main
[14:50] <sil2100> (since the release pocket is immutable)
[14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.6]
[14:51] <Laney> for that libreoffice upload right?
[14:52] <sil2100> Yeah
[14:52] <sil2100> The source is already in main, but the needed binary was not
[14:53] <Laney> I guess if that SRU is heading for -security it makes sense
[14:55] <sil2100> Laney: it's not going there actually, but my thinking here is: if I only promoted the -updates one and security would want to release a libreoffice security update, we might forget that the binary is not in main for -security and get a mismatch then
[14:56] <sil2100> So I preferred to promote in all the pockets, since sooner or later a new libreoffice in -security might appear
[14:56] <sil2100> Possibly unneeded, but oh well
[14:59] <Laney> 🕺
[14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:5.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu1~xenial7]
[14:59] <Laney> sil2100: I can understand the reasoning actually, since the tooling there isn't very good it'd be easy to miss next time
[15:12] <marcustomlinson> sil2100: thank you!
[16:27] <Eickmeyer> xnox: I'm working on figuring out how we differ from xubuntu in regards to bug 1830201. Can you shed some light on this?
[16:27] <ubot5> bug 1830201 in ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu) "ubiquity-frontend-gtk and ubiquity-frontend-gtk-panel split" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1830201
[16:28] <Eickmeyer> We = Ubuntu Studio
[16:36] <xnox> Eickmeyer:  well, maybe you don't. the code that was done in ubiquity is this one:
[16:37] <xnox> Eickmeyer:  https://git.launchpad.net/ubiquity/commit/?id=40ed9a796bc4c06d4409944d4b22766dc2d4790b
[16:37] <Eickmeyer> xnox: I've been inspecting our default panel layouts and have discovered some differences, but I don't know if it's related.
[16:38] <xnox> Eickmeyer:  so that bit says, that during maybe-ubiquity or only-ubiquity do not launch panel app if
[16:38] <xnox> xfwm4 is the wm_cmd
[16:38] <xnox> and studio i guess uese xfwm4 for ubuntu-dm
[16:38] <xnox> and thus i guess you don't use panel app
[16:38] <xnox> subsequently that panel is empty if there are no indicators available.
[16:39] <xnox> which xubuntu unseeded.
[16:39] <Eickmeyer> Correct. We use Xfce as the desktop, therefore this shouldn't apply to us at all. We're more closely related to Xubuntu in this respect.
[16:39] <xnox> they still seed something-something-app-indicator such that any weird 3rd party things can publish into panel, just nothing by default in neither live or ubiquity-dm
[16:39] <Eickmeyer> Studio has used Xfce since 12.04.
[16:39] <xnox> ack
[16:39] <xnox> so i guess studio is out, but let me check seeds, one sec.
[16:39] <Eickmeyer> k
[16:40] <xnox> $ grep indicator */* 2>/dev/null | grep -e xubuntu -e studio
[16:40] <xnox> ubuntustudio/desktop: * (indicator-messages)
[16:40] <xnox> ubuntustudio/desktop-core: * (xfce4-indicator-plugin)
[16:40] <xnox> ubuntustudio/desktop-core: * (indicator-application)
[16:40] <xnox> ubuntustudio/desktop-core: * (indicator-sound)
[16:41] <xnox> xubuntu/core: * (xfce4-indicator-plugin)
[16:41] <xnox> xubuntu/desktop: * (indicator-messages)
[16:41] <xnox> so slight difference of studio recommending -mesages and -sound which xubuntu i guess dropped
[16:41] <xnox> Eickmeyer:  maybe you want to trace that, and see if you'd like to also drop that.
[16:41] <xnox> Eickmeyer:  but at least there is no action on your part needed for the panel seed then.
[16:42] <Eickmeyer> xnox: ack. I'll invalidate the bug for us, and we just decided that it's best to work on this now rather than during the 20.04 cycle irt -application and -sound.
[16:43] <xnox> sorry -sound & -application
[16:43] <xnox> cool!
[16:43] <Eickmeyer> Thanks!
[16:43] <xnox> Eickmeyer:  note canonical no longer uses, nor maintains indicator-* stack. It would be nice to remove them from the archive, but we can't as it's still seeded in flavours.
[16:44] <Eickmeyer> xnox: ack, as soon as we get the panel layout synced with Xubuntu we can likely drop the indicator-* stack.
[17:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: monero [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.14.0.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1033.35]
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1]
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1]
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-16.17~18.04.1]
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: monero [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.14.0.2-1] (no packageset)
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.4.8+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.4.8+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.4.8+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.4.8+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[19:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: monero [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.14.0.2-1] (no packageset)
[20:08] <rcj> Can I get an SRU member to review livecd-rootfs in the upload queue for disco?
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted monero [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [0.14.0.2-1]
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [i386] (eoan-proposed) [3.4.8+dfsg-1]
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [3.4.8+dfsg-1]
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [3.4.8+dfsg-1]
[20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted monero [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.14.0.2-1]
[20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [3.4.8+dfsg-1]
[20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted monero [i386] (eoan-proposed) [0.14.0.2-1]
[20:27] <vorlon> rcj: wasn't disco going to get another fix to magic-proxy?
[20:29] <rcj> vorlon: Oh yeah, I thought it was in there.  Okay, so I need an upload of https://code.launchpad.net/~rcj/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/367729
[20:29] <rcj> drat
[20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (disco-proposed/main) [2.578.2 => 2.578.4] (desktop-core)
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (disco-proposed) [2.578.3]
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (disco-proposed) [2.578.4]
[21:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubiquity [i386] (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.2] (core)
[21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubiquity [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.2] (core)
[21:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubiquity [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.2] (core)
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubiquity [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.2] (core)
[21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubiquity [armhf] (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.2] (core)
[21:43] <rcj> vorlon: Thank you
[22:02] <vorlon> rcj: n/p