[00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected dmarc-cat [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.9.2-1ubuntu1] [00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected dmarc-cat [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [0.9.2-1ubuntu1] [00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected dmarc-cat [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [0.9.2-1ubuntu1] [00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected dmarc-cat [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [0.9.2-1ubuntu1] [00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected dmarc-cat [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [0.9.2-1ubuntu1] [00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected dmarc-cat [i386] (eoan-proposed) [0.9.2-1ubuntu1] [00:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hy [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.16.0-0ubuntu1] [00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubiquity [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.2] [00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubiquity [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.2] [00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubiquity [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.2] [00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubiquity [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.2] [00:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubiquity [i386] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.2] [05:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-webgestaltr [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-1] (no packageset) [05:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-webgestaltr [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-1] (no packageset) [05:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-webgestaltr [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-1] (no packageset) [05:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-webgestaltr [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-1] (no packageset) [05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-webgestaltr [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-1] (no packageset) [05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-webgestaltr [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-1] (no packageset) === icey_ is now known as icey [08:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9 [sync] (disco-proposed) [9.1.0-2ubuntu2~19.04] [08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9-cross [sync] (disco-proposed) [4ubuntu4.1] [08:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9-cross-ports [sync] (disco-proposed) [3ubuntu4.1] [09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaru-theme (disco-proposed/main) [19.04.2 => 19.04.3] (desktop-core) [09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yaru-theme [source] (disco-proposed) [19.04.3] [09:49] any AA can please remove hy 0.16.0-0ubuntu1 from eoan-proposed? I want to do some testing with the old version before updating... never built [09:50] I don't know why but today the old version seems building [09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (bionic-proposed/main) [3.192.1.6 => 3.192.1.7] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [10:00] vorlon: do you want to handle fwupd* et al on bionic queue/NEW? fwupd is still on unapproved for some reason, while libxmlb and fwupd-signed are already on NEW.. [10:01] tjaalton, there is no "some reason/while" here, those 2 are packages that don't exist today in bionic so uploading them hit sourceNEW and not unapproved [10:02] seb128: oh, source NEW? [10:02] even more reason for an AA to review them in tandem [10:03] tjaalton, yes, the first one is a new library that is needed by the new fwupd version [10:03] right [10:03] I don't expect that to be an easy SRU, maybe best for vorlon to review :) [10:04] right, I'll do the easier ones then :) === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer [10:11] apw, please kick hy out from eoan... [10:12] I want to replace with a copy from cosmic [10:12] and then do a no-change rebuild [10:12] and fix failures with single patches on top of 0.12 because the new version requires lots of other library updates [10:20] xnox: why is openssl targeted for 'disco-updates' instead of proposed? the sru tooling doesn't see the diff so it's harder to review [10:24] worse than that, that means that when you accept it it'll go straight to -updates [10:24] (AIUI) [10:30] sigh [10:31] reject it :> [10:31] done [10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openssl [source] (disco-updates) [1.1.1b-1ubuntu2.1] [10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dkms [source] (disco-proposed) [2.6.1-4ubuntu2.1] [10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dkms [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.3-3ubuntu11.1] [10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dkms [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3-3ubuntu9.3] [10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dkms [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.2.0.3-2ubuntu11.7] [11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.192.1.7] === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch [12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1007.7] (core, kernel) === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g === waveform_ is now known as waveform [14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected software-properties [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.96.24.32.9] [14:20] Laney: ok, I finally had a moment to sit down on the britney SRU regression thingy - fixed a few things regarding state record and read, but in besides that it seems to be working correctly [14:20] Laney: for instance yeah, it doesn't send a message for libseccomp for bionic because that upload has no launchpad bugs in its .changes [14:20] Laney: for bionic at least it seems that for all the others it did the 'right thing' [14:21] sil2100: oh! thanks, I didn't consider that possibliity :-O [15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (bionic-proposed/main) [0.96.24.32.8 => 0.96.24.32.9] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [15:13] vorlon: Looks like bos02 randomly healed itself... going to turn it back on [15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.96.24.32.9] [15:24] Laney: heh ok [15:25] such reliable [16:09] any AA please remove hy from eoan, and let me copy the previous binary from cosmic [16:09] vorlon, ^^ :D [16:09] pleeeeeeease [16:09] (rationale above) [16:09] mm [16:09] the new release can't build... [16:09] and the old one seems to build fine now [16:10] I spent three days trying to make the new one work, but requires lots of more changes, in other python libs [16:10] better stick with cosmic and cherry-pick fixes [16:10] removed [16:10] or let debian do it :D [16:10] <3 [16:10] but why was it uploaded to eoan if it wasn't buildable? [16:11] mistake, it was directed to ppa! [16:11] I asked to not accept few times, and I gave up... [16:11] anyway, ./copy-package --from=ubuntu --from-suite=cosmic hy --to=ubuntu --to-suite=eoan-proposed -b [16:11] correct? [16:11] * LocutusOfBorg tries and goes catching a train [16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: hy (eoan-proposed/primary) [0.12.1-2] [16:12] LocutusOfBorg: syntactically correct, but I'm not happy to accept a binary sync from cosmic to eoan of a package that was dropped in disco [16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected hy [sync] (eoan-proposed) [0.12.1-2] [16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-webgestaltr [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.4.0-1] [16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-webgestaltr [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [0.4.0-1] [16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-webgestaltr [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [0.4.0-1] [16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-webgestaltr [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [0.4.0-1] [16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-webgestaltr [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [0.4.0-1] [16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-webgestaltr [i386] (eoan-proposed) [0.4.0-1] [16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1007.7] [16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1039.44] (kernel) [16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1039.44] [16:27] ok, so better now? [16:27] I or should I upload a build1 version? [16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: hy (eoan-proposed/primary) [0.12.1-2] [16:28] I uploaded both :D [16:41] LocutusOfBorg: I don't mean that you should sync it from a different release, I mean that I'm not accepting a forward-sync of a package that was dropped in disco. sourceful upload. [16:42] LocutusOfBorg: and I only see your sync, not your build1 upload [16:42] (I did write that in the reject comment before, which I guess you didn't see before re-syncing) [16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected hy [sync] (eoan-proposed) [0.12.1-2] [17:00] vorlon, I think I did it now, the build1 was "ENONET" interrupted [17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: hy (eoan-proposed/primary) [0.12.1-2build1] [17:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hy [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.12.1-2build1] [17:03] and no, sorry I didn't receive the reject email, even now [17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hy [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.12.1-2build1] (no packageset) [17:06] strange that it built without touching it... meh [17:07] I suppose autopkgtests will be sad [17:11] vorlon, please accept it? :) [17:12] so I can start my weekend having fixed itk4 poppler elastix lintian hy and deken from proposed :D [17:12] acorn is ongoing upstream work [17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hy [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.12.1-2build1] [17:18] sil2100, Laney: note that the libseccomp is there for wider testing before the security team publishes a USN. it isn't a normal SRU [17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deken [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-1] (no packageset) [20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-hibinit-agent (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu4~18.04.0 => 1.0.0-0ubuntu4~18.04.1] (no packageset) [20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-hibinit-agent (disco-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu4 => 1.0.0-0ubuntu4.19.04.0] (no packageset) [20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-hibinit-agent (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu4~18.10.0 => 1.0.0-0ubuntu4~18.10.1] (no packageset) [20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-hibinit-agent (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu4~16.04.0 => 1.0.0-0ubuntu4~16.04.1] (no packageset) [20:28] tjaalton, vorlon could you please accept those packages? ^ [20:28] the diff is tiny :-) [20:34] rbalint: I don't understand why the test case involves a long-running process. is that to prove that the instance resumed, as opposed to something else (auto-killed by the hypervisor due to networking not coming up?) [20:35] haha I feel we should really take a closer look at the interaction between this hook, and the hook in lizardfs-chunkserver [20:36] vorlon yes, just to prove that the instance is resumed [20:37] ok [20:37] i just use screen top [20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ec2-hibinit-agent [source] (disco-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu4.19.04.0] [20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ec2-hibinit-agent [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu4~18.10.1] [20:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ec2-hibinit-agent [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu4~18.04.1] [23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected geary [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.12.4-4~ubuntu0.18.04.1]