| Saviq | hi all, something wrong with buildd's snap store uploads? https://code.launchpad.net/~saviq/+snap/subsurface-stable | 11:52 |
|---|---|---|
| Saviq | I've retried these a couple times now and the upload continues to fail | 11:52 |
| cjwatson | Saviq: -> #snapstore | 12:00 |
| cjwatson | folks have been investigating something similar this morning | 12:01 |
| cjwatson | (internal channel) | 12:01 |
| cjwatson | AFAIK it's not an LP problem | 12:01 |
| Saviq | ack | 12:01 |
| === epod is now known as luk3yx | ||
| === coreycb_ is now known as coreycb | ||
| === tintou_ is now known as tintou | ||
| === nottrobin_ is now known as nottrobin | ||
| === igitoor_ is now known as igitoor | ||
| ricotz | cjwatson, hi :), would you have a moment for https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/681165 | 16:20 |
| Eickmeyer | This might be a stupid question, but I have a package that I have updated (I have PPU rights to this one) and it's been "pending publication" for a few days. Any idea what's going on? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-look | 16:22 |
| Eickmeyer | "pending publication" in Proposed, might I add. | 16:22 |
| teward | Eickmeyer: NEW queue | 16:25 |
| teward | NEW binaries. | 16:25 |
| Eickmeyer | teward: That shouldn't be in the NEW queue, it's not new. | 16:25 |
| teward | Eickmeyer: you have a new binary | 16:26 |
| teward | ubuntustudio-wallpapers-disco_0.61_all.deb (7.0 MiB) NEW | 16:26 |
| teward | Eickmeyer: the SOURCE package isn't new | 16:26 |
| teward | but it produces a NEW binary | 16:26 |
| teward | that needs AA acceptance | 16:26 |
| teward | go to the queue at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/eoan/+queue, set it to "new", exapdn ubuntustudio-look | 16:26 |
| teward | see the red "NEW" next to that package. | 16:26 |
| teward | NEW queue affects *new binary packages* as well as new source packages previouisly not introduced | 16:27 |
| teward | so you need AAs to look at it | 16:27 |
| Eickmeyer | Oh, I see. | 16:27 |
| teward | Eickmeyer: prime example was my recent 'nginx' upload which added the third party geoip2 module. The new binary produced containing the dynamic module for that needed AA approval/review before it was published or made available in proposed. | 16:28 |
| teward | any new source **OR** produced binary needs AA review typically, AIUI | 16:28 |
| Eickmeyer | Okay, that makes sense. | 16:29 |
| Eickmeyer | Seems to be a slow process. Do we not have enough AAs? | 16:29 |
| teward | AAs have a lot of work ;) | 16:30 |
| Eickmeyer | Well, yes, but I have had a package that has been sitting in there for weeks. | 16:30 |
| Eickmeyer | (as you and I previously discussed) | 16:30 |
| teward | Eickmeyer: that's a discussion for elsewhere. | 16:30 |
| cjwatson | ricotz: done | 16:30 |
| Eickmeyer | Indeed. | 16:30 |
| teward | you can always ask an AA to look at it in #ubuntu-release though | 16:31 |
| teward | except vorlon who is always too busy :p | 16:31 |
| ricotz | cjwatson, thank you | 16:31 |
| gQuigs | this https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 report bug always seems to Oops | 17:24 |
| cjwatson | It's end of week, please file a bug about it or it will be forgotten | 17:25 |
| gQuigs | cjwatson: rgr | 17:25 |
| cjwatson | I expect it has something to do with it not actually being a package in Ubuntu though | 17:25 |
| cjwatson | Are you sure you didn't typo the name? | 17:25 |
| gQuigs | cjwatson: it's only in PPAs at the moment, correct | 17:26 |
| cjwatson | It shouldn't OOPS, but we are unlikely to make it actually do anything. | 17:26 |
| cjwatson | PPAs don't support bugs | 17:26 |
| cjwatson | So any fix would just be to say no gracefully rather than to OOPS | 17:26 |
| gQuigs | so Report bug shouldn't even be an option, alright :) | 17:26 |
| gQuigs | relevant LP bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/179873 | 18:12 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 179873 in Launchpad itself "Can't report bugs on packages installed from a PPA" [High,Triaged] | 18:12 |
| cjwatson | gQuigs: That indeed documents the fact that this feature is not present; the OOPS is a separate issue though | 18:22 |
| cjwatson | gQuigs: But it's https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1635118 | 18:23 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1635118 in Launchpad itself "Submitting bug for non-existent distro source package triggers OOPS on submission, should not allow you to start" [Critical,Triaged] | 18:23 |
| gQuigs | thanks, your bug search foo is better then mine :) | 18:24 |
| cjwatson | Coupled with vague memory ... | 18:24 |
| === gQuigs is now known as bryanquigley | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!