[06:15] Kubuntu iso build failed with: [06:15] The following packages have unmet dependencies: [06:15] libio-socket-ssl-perl : Depends: libnet-ssleay-perl (>= 1.84-1ubuntu0.1) but 1.84-1build1 is to be installed [06:23] that is bionic ^^ [06:28] xnox: ^ [06:29] from the control file: Depends: libnet-ssleay-perl (>= 1.84-1ubuntu0.1), [06:39] sil2100: morning. FYI, xubuntu and kubuntu daily isos for bionic are failing today due to the libio-socket-ssl-perl SRU in bionic proposed having broken deps in its control file [06:47] acheronuk: ah, this one, I poked vorlon and xnox about it yesterday already, since it was basically causing FTBFS for another SRU I was driving [06:48] I hoped it would have been resolved somehow by today [06:48] ok. as long as is on someone's radar, then good [07:00] acheronuk: ok, I actually see an upload that Steve didn't review yesterday, missing piece of the SRU puzzle [07:02] sil2100: makes sense. I looked or something like that. maybe I looked in the wrong queue! [07:03] acheronuk: I totally missed it yesterday as well, since the upload was a bit old [07:03] So it was hidden in the older entries [07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libnet-ssleay-perl [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.84-1ubuntu0.1] [07:08] sil2100: yeah, just found this from last night https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/05/30/%23ubuntu-release.html#t14:58 [07:08] fort some reason my BNC backlog did not give me that :/ [07:08] * acheronuk kicks the KDE bnc [07:16] acheronuk: too bad Steve didn't include that analysis in the SRU bug [07:17] grrrr [07:18] xnox, vorlon: since I accepted the SRU that was in the queue, and seeing that I didn't have all the IRC-chat context, I'm now wondering if that was the right thing to do? [07:21] xnox, vorlon: when reviewing the package I just assumed, as per regression potential, that the behavioral change of read()/write() has been decided and accepted, but I see it is not quite [07:22] xnox, vorlon: maybe I did accept this package prematurely, but having a partial SRU and bionic-proposed broken was also not great [07:22] So it was either this or removing the SRU from the -proposed pocket [07:24] Just follow up with another upload to if this needs to be changed [10:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (disco-proposed) [1.1.1b-1ubuntu2.1] [11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (bionic-proposed/main) [2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.2 => 2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.3] (desktop-core, xorg) [12:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.16.1-1ubuntu1.2 => 1.16.1-1ubuntu1.3] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) === coreycb_ is now known as coreycb === davecore_ is now known as davecore === JamieBennett_ is now known as JamieBennett === jamespage_ is now known as jamespage === nottrobin_ is now known as nottrobin [12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (xenial-proposed/main) [1.13.4-1ubuntu1.14 => 1.13.4-1ubuntu1.15] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (disco-proposed) [240-6ubuntu5.1] [13:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (cosmic-proposed) [239-7ubuntu10.14] [13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.22] [14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtwebengine-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.5+dfsg-0ubuntu2 => 5.9.8+dfsg-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [16:35] AAs: Ubuntu Studio now has two packages needing review: lsp-plugins, and ubuntustudio-look has a new binary called ubuntustudio-wallpapers-disco that is just moving the disco wallpapers to a new package in prep for new wallpapers on the way. [21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glusterfs (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.13.2-1build1 => 3.13.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)